Tag: United Kingdom

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

Management of severe ME/CFS in children and young people in the UK: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit study

Abstract:

Objective: Severe myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) in children and young people (CYP) is a little-understood condition which significantly impacts education, development and quality of life. We used data from a population-wide surveillance study to explore the screening investigation, referral and management of suspected cases of paediatric severe ME/CFS.

Methods: A British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) study reported cases of CYP with suspected severe ME/CFS between February 2018 and February 2019. Paediatricians reporting cases to BPSU and allied healthcare professionals in two large specialist paediatric ME/CFS centres were invited to complete questionnaires for CYP meeting the surveillance case definition. The study focused primarily on CYP with confirmed severe ME/CFS and the extent to which their care met NICE (The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) recommendations but also considered separately those with probable or possible severe ME/CFS.

Results: This study includes a total of 92 CYP with suspected severe ME/CFS; 33 meeting criteria for severe ME/CFS and an additional 59 classified as probable or possible severe ME/CFS. For 16 possible cases, incomplete investigation to exclude alternative diagnoses prevented confirmation of a severe ME/CFS diagnosis. Only 21 of 33 (64%) confirmed severe ME/CFS cases had been referred to specialist services. The management provided varied considerably between patients and four received nothing at all. Of the management provided, the most frequent approaches were medication (67%), activity management (61%) and physiotherapy (61%). Domiciliary assessments and support, and social services referrals were received by 12% and 6% of confirmed severe cases. Similar proportions of management approaches were seen in probable/possible severe ME/CFS.

Conclusion: Full investigation is frequently incomplete in CYP with suspected severe ME/CFS and recommendations for referral and management are poorly implemented, in particular the needs of CYP who are unable to leave their home might be poorly met.

Source: Royston AP, Burge S, Idini I, Brigden A, Pike KC. Management of severe ME/CFS in children and young people in the UK: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Mar 7;8(1):e002436. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002436. PMID: 38453418. https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/8/1/e002436 (Full text)

‘The world was going through what we go through everyday’: The experiences of women with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) living with their partners during the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom

Abstract:

Objectives: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a long-term debilitating illness characterised by profound and persistent fatigue (JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 313, 2015, 1101). The current study aims to explore the experiences of women with ME/CFS living with their partners during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

Design: The study adopted a qualitative design comprising semi-structured interviews with participants. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis (TA).

Methods: Participants were women with ME/CFS (n = 21) recruited through ME/CFS support groups in the United Kingdom. All participants were in romantic relationships and lived with their partners.

Results: Data were organised into three themes: (1) lockdown disrupting routine, (2) reducing difference and (3) fear of getting COVID-19. People with ME/CFS found that lockdown disrupted their well-established routines. Although routines were disrupted by partners and increased working-from-home practices, participants found having partners at home helpful. People with ME/CFS believed that the changes induced by the pandemic reduced the differences between themselves and the outside world which, prior to lockdown, had felt prominent. They were fearful of getting COVID-19 as they believed this would make their ME/CFS worse. This meant that for people with ME/CFS, the lifting of the lockdown restrictions was an anxiety-provoking time, hence impacting symptoms. People with ME/CFS continued to adhere to government guidelines after national restrictions were eased.

Conclusions: This study outlines the experiences of women with ME/CFS during COVID-19, alongside the long-term impact this has had due to the changes that the pandemic imposed. These findings may have implications for those with long COVID.

Source: Sehmbi T, Wearden A, Peters S, Dienes K. ‘The world was going through what we go through everyday’: The experiences of women with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) living with their partners during the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom. Br J Health Psychol. 2024 Mar 6. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12717. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38448223. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12717 (Full text)

Inheriting discriminatory socio-political landscapes as ‘undeserving’ disabled people: The legacy of common health problems and the future for long COVID

Abstract:

The UK government’s recent announcement that the highly controversial Work Capability Assessment (WCA) will likely be abolished leaves questions of what precisely will emerge in its place. This commentary revisits a construct central to the attempted justification of the WCA, that of ‘common health problems’, which may well continue to leave a legacy in delineating purported ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ impairment, ill-health and related disability. After outlining the politically strategic application of this construct in social policy, concerns are raised for long Covid. In particular, the risk of long Covid following the trajectory of another post-infection diagnosis, myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome, is discussed.
Source: Hunt, J. (2024). Inheriting discriminatory  socio-political landscapes as ‘undeserving’ disabled people: The legacy of common health problems and the future for long COVID. Critical Social Policy, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183241229050 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02610183241229050 (Full text)

Unequal access to diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis in England

Abstract:

Background People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS; sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome) experience very poor health-related quality of life and only rarely recover. ME/CFS has no curative treatment and no single diagnostic test. Public health and policy decisions relevant to ME/CFS require knowledge of its prevalence and barriers to diagnosis. However, people with ME/CFS report lengthy diagnostic delays and widespread misunderstanding of their symptoms. Published prevalence estimates vary greatly by country, gender, age and ethnicity.

Methods Hospital Episode Statistics data is routinely collected by the NHS in England together with patient age, gender and ethnicity. This data, downloaded from the Feasibility Self-Service of NHS DigiTrials, was used to stratify individuals with the ICD-10 code that best reflects ME/CFS symptoms (G93.3; “Postviral fatigue syndrome”) according to their age, self-reported gender and ethnicity, General Practice and NHS England Integrated Care Board (ICB).

Results In all, 100,055 people in England had been diagnosed with ME/CFS (ICD-10:G93.3) between April 1 1989 and October 7 2023, 0.16% of all registered patients. Of these, 79,445 were females and 20,590 males, a female-to-male ratio of 3.88:1. Female relative to male prevalence peaked at about 6-to-1 in individuals’ fourth and fifth decades of life. Prevalence varied widely across the 42 ICBs: 0.086%-0.82% for females and 0.024%-0.21% for males. White individuals were approximately 5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with ME/CFS than others; black, Asian or Chinese ethnicities are associated with particularly low rates of ME/CFS diagnoses. This ethnicity bias is stronger than for other common diseases. Among active English GP practices, 176 (3%) had no registered ME/CFS patients. Eight ICBs (19%) each contained fewer than 8 other-than-white individuals with a G93.3 code despite their registers containing a total of 293,770 other-than-white patients.

Conclusion Those who are disproportionately undiagnosed with ME/CFS are other-than-white ethnic groups, older females (>60y), older males (>80y), and people living in areas of multiple deprivation. The lifetime prevalence of ME/CFS for English females and males may be as high as 0.92% and 0.25%, respectively, or approximately 390,000 UK individuals overall. This improved estimate of ME/CFS prevalence allows more accurate assessment of the socioeconomic and disease burden imposed by ME/CFS.

Source: Gemma L. Samms, Chris P. Ponting. Unequal access to diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis in England. medRxiv 2024.01.31.24302070; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302070 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302070v1.full-text (Full text)

Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey

Abstract:

Background: As a consequence of their occupation, doctors and other healthcare workers were at higher risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and more likely to experience severe disease compared to the general population. However, systematic information on post-acute COVID complications in doctors is very limited.

Aims: This study aimed to determine the symptoms, perceived determinants, health and occupational impact, and consequent needs relating to post-acute COVID complications in UK doctors.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to UK doctors self-identifying as having Long COVID or other post-acute COVID complications.

Results: Of 795 responses, 603 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of being a UK-based medical doctor experiencing one or more post-acute COVID complications. Twenty-eight per cent reported a lack of adequate Respiratory Protective Equipment at the time of contracting COVID-19. Eighteen per cent of eligible respondents reported that they had been unable to return to work since acquiring COVID.

Conclusions: Post-acute COVID (Long COVID) in UK doctors is a substantial burden for respondents to our questionnaire. The results indicated that insufficient respiratory protection could have contributed to occupational disease, with COVID-19 being contracted in the workplace, and resultant post-COVID complications. Although it may be too late to address the perceived determinants of inadequate protection for those already suffering with Long COVID, more investment is needed in rehabilitation and support of those afflicted.

Source: D Bland, R Evans, A Binesmael, S Wood, S P Qureshi, K Fearnley, A Small, W D Strain, R Agius, Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey, Occupational Medicine, 2023;, kqad120, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad120 https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqad120/7468904?redirectedFrom=fulltext

A National Evaluation of Outcomes in Long COVID Services using Digital PROM Data from the ELAROS Platform

Summary:

Key findings of this service evaluation study:
• Patient characteristics: A sample of 5,318 patients from 14 participating NHS LC sites were analysed. The sample had a female:male ratio of 2.1:1. The average age was 48.4 yrs, with 87% (of those whose ethnicity was recorded) of white ethnicity and 9% of Black or Asian ethnicity.
• Comorbidities: This sample of patients had a low prevalence of co-morbidities (7%) with a clear onset of new LC symptoms after their COVID-19 infection supporting the onset of a new condition in this cohort of previously healthy individuals.
• Duration of LC: The average duration of LC in this sample was 384 days (>12 months) at first assessment in an LC site, with symptoms still ongoing at presentation, with more than 90% of the sample being non-hospitalised patients.
• Digital platform: A total of 17,471 PROMs (C19-YRS and EQ-5D-5L) were completed by this sample of patients with at least 1,532 participants completing multiple assessments on the same PROM on the digital PROM platform. The completion of PROMs around the 3-month mark was low for both measures (11.7% for C19-YRS and 14.6% for EQ-5D-5L). The ones who completed PROMs both around the 3-month mark and the 6-month mark were 4.3% for C19-YRS and 5% for EQ-5D-5L. This limits the generalisability of the findings in this evaluation to all the LC population, but the findings remain valid for this cohort of individuals.
• New-onset disability: 3,395 patients who completed at least one C19-YRS questionnaire at first assessment showed significant new-onset symptom burden, functional disability, and deterioration of overall health since the COVID-19 infection.
• Comparison between LC and other chronic conditions: The cross-sectional EQ-5D-5L Index value of 3,438 patients suggests the burden and disability in LC are worse than that reported in the literature for Diabetes Mellitus, COPD, Heart Failure, and Multiple Sclerosis.
• 3-month follow-up: Among those who completed an initial C19-YRS assessment and another at 3 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in symptom burden, functional disability and overall health. Patients at 3 months however still had significant LC symptom
burden and disability compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status, i.e., their condition had improved, but they were far off from a complete recovery. Among those who completed EQ-5D- National Evaluation of Long COVID Service Outcomes using ELAROS Data (09 Oct 23) Page 3 of 31
5L, at first assessment and at 3 months, their EQ-5D-5L Index score did not show any statistically significant improvement, but the EQ-5D-5L VAS showed a statistically significant improvement.
• 6-month follow-up: Among those who completed measures at the first assessment, 3 months, and 6 months, C19-YRS and EQ-5D-5L VAS showed statistically significant improvement whereas EQ-5D-5L Index Value showed statistically significant deterioration. Patients at 6 months still had
significant LC symptom burden and disability compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status, i.e., their condition had improved but had not fully recovered. The follow-up changes in scores support the efficacy of interventions provided by LC services and suggest that continued specialist input is needed to manage these patients with persistent symptoms.
• C19-YRS (condition-specific measure) vs EQ-5D-5L (generic measure): The 3-month month follow-up changes in scores and responsiveness of PROMs highlight that C19-YRS is a more sensitive measure than EQ-5D-5L in this cohort of individuals with LC. This is in keeping with the literature recommending the use of condition-specific measures in addition to EQ-5D-5L.
• Vocational problems: 62% of this sample had their work role affected with them having to either be on sick leave, reduce hours, change roles, or quit roles. Only 21% were able to maintain their previous roles held prior to their COVID-19 infection. This is suggestive of considerable productivity loss and financial implications to the country.
• Fluctuating condition: In patients who completed multiple assessments, it was evident that LC is a fluctuant condition with no necessary linear trend of improvement or deterioration between the domains of symptom burden, functional disability, and overall health. This highlights the need to understand the triggers for the condition and invest in self-management and ongoing support from community healthcare services.
• Long-Term Condition: In most patients in this sample, LC has evidently become a Long-Term Condition (LTC) with fluctuations in their condition causing disability and significant deterioration of their overall health status seen even after 18 months of LC with no complete resolution or full recovery. There needs to be a national investment in managing this new LTC along with other LTCs.

Source: Dr Manoj Sivan, et al.  A National Evaluation of Outcomes in Long COVID Services using Digital PROM Data from the ELAROS Platform. National Evaluation of Long COVID Service Outcomes using ELAROS Data (09 Oct 23) https://locomotion.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2023/10/National-Evaluation-of-LC-Service-Outcomes-using-ELAROS-Data-09-10-23.pdf (Full text)

Invisibility and diagnosis stigma: disabling factors for female adults with myalgia encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a small-scale qualitative study in England

Abstract:

Purpose: Female adults diagnosed with myalgia encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) often are marginalised because their condition is not fully recognised by medical and health-care systems. The purpose of this small-scale study was to explore the lived experiences of adult females with ME/CFS in England in relation to contributing factors that impact their occupational participation.

Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews was used with nine female adult participants who were selected using a purposive sampling method. A Thematic Networks tool was used to analyse data.

Findings: Four organising themes were identified: impairment-, person-, environment- and society-related factors. Two global themes, invisibility and diagnosis stigma, were identified as the overarching issues that female adults with ME/CFS face in occupational participation.

Originality/value: Many of the issues that contribute to lack of participation by this population are associated with environmental factors which are secondary to their illness.

Source: Khalafbeigi, M., Yazdani, F., Genis, F., Hess, K.Y. and Kirve, S. (2023), “Invisibility and diagnosis stigma: disabling factors for female adults with myalgia encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a small-scale qualitative study in England”, Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-08-2022-0032 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOT-08-2022-0032/full/html (Full text)

Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom

Abstract:

Objectives: To estimate the risk of Long COVID by socioeconomic deprivation and to further examine the inequality by sex and occupation.

Design: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey between 26 April 2020 and 31 January 2022. This is the largest nationally representative survey of COVID-19 in the UK with longitudinal data on occupation, COVID-19 exposure and Long COVID.

Setting: Community-based survey in the UK.

Participants: A total of 201,799 participants aged 16 to 64 years and with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Main outcome measures: The risk of Long COVID at least 4 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection by index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and the modifying effects of socioeconomic deprivation by sex and occupation.

Results: Nearly 10% (n = 19,315) of participants reported having Long COVID. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for a range of variables (demographic, co-morbidity and time), showed that participants in the most deprived decile had a higher risk of Long COVID (11.4% vs. 8.2%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34, 1.59) compared to the least deprived decile. Significantly higher inequalities (most vs. least deprived decile) in Long COVID existed in healthcare and patient-facing roles (aOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.44), in the education sector (aOR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.31, 2.16) and in women (aOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.40, 1.73) than men (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.51).

Conclusions: This study provides insights into the heterogeneous degree of inequality in Long COVID by deprivation, sex and occupation. These findings will help inform public health policies and interventions in incorporating a social justice and health inequality lens.

Source: Shabnam S, Razieh C, Dambha-Miller H, Yates T, Gillies C, Chudasama YV, Pareek M, Banerjee A, Kawachi I, Lacey B, Morris EJ, White M, Zaccardi F, Khunti K, Islam N. Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med. 2023 May 10:1410768231168377. doi: 10.1177/01410768231168377. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37164035. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01410768231168377 (Full text)

Employment outcomes of people with Long Covid symptoms: community-based cohort study

Abstract:

Background Evidence on the long-term employment consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection is lacking. We used data from a large, community-based sample in the UK to estimate associations between Long Covid and subsequent employment outcomes.

Methods This was an observational, longitudinal study using a pre-post design. We included UK COVID-19 Infection Survey participants who completed questionnaires on Long Covid from 3 February 2021 to 30 September 2022 when they were aged 16 to 64 years and not in full-time education. We used conditional logit modelling to explore the time-varying relationship between Long Covid status ≥12 weeks after a first test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (reference: pre-infection) and labour market inactivity (neither working nor looking for work) or workplace absence lasting ≥4 weeks.

Results Of 206,299 included participants (mean age 45 years, 54% female, 92% white), 15% were ever inactive in the labour market and 10% were ever long-term absent during follow-up. Compared with pre-infection, inactivity was higher in participants reporting Long Covid 30 to <40 weeks (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.45; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.81) or 40 to <52 weeks (1.34; 1.05 to 1.72) post-infection. Compared with pre-infection, reporting Long Covid was also associated with increased odds of long-term absence 18 to <24 weeks (1.40; 1.04 to 1.90) and 24 to <30 weeks (1.45; 1.03 to 2.04) post-infection, but not beyond 30 weeks. Combining with official statistics on Long Covid prevalence, our estimates translate to 27,000 (95% CI: 6,000 to 47,000) working-age adults in the UK being inactive because of their Long Covid symptoms in July 2022.

Conclusions Long Covid is likely to have contributed to reduced levels of participation in the UK labour market, though it is unlikely to be the sole driver. Further research is required to quantify the contribution of other factors, such as indirect health effects of the pandemic.

Source: Daniel Ayoubkhani, Francesco Zaccardi, Koen B. Pouwels, A. Sarah Walker, Donald Houston, Nisreen A. Alwan, Josh Martin, Kamlesh Khunti, Vahé Nafilyan. Employment outcomes of people with Long Covid symptoms: community-based cohort study.
medRxiv 2023.03.21.23287524; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.21.23287524 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.21.23287524v1.full-text (Full text)