Category: Psychiatry/Psychology

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

Identifying the mental health burden in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients in Switzerland: A pilot study

Highlights:

  • First time study on mental health and well-being among ME/CFS patients in Switzerland.
  • High level (68.5%) of stigmatization reported due to ME/CFS.
  • Overall, ME/CFS led to a third of the patients and to half of the male patients to have suicidal thoughts.
  • ME/CFS led to secondary depression in 14.8% of the patients.
  • Lack of disease recognition and adequate patient support.

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating chronic disease of significant public health and clinical importance. It affects multiple systems in the body and has neuro-immunological characteristics. The disease is characterized by a prominent symptom called post-exertional malaise (PEM), as well as abnormalities in the immune-inflammatory pathways, mitochondrial dysfunctions and disturbances in neuroendocrine pathways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ME/CFS on the mental health and secondary psychosocial manifestations of patients, as well as their coping mechanisms.

Method: In 2021, a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Switzerland. A self-administered paper questionnaire survey was used to gather data from 169 individuals diagnosed with ME/CFS.

Results: The majority of the patients (90.5%) reported a lack of understanding of their disease, resulting in patients avoiding talking about the disease due to disbelief, trivialization and avoidance of negative reactions. They felt most supported by close family members (67.1%). Two thirds of the patients (68.5%) experienced stigmatization. ME/CFS had a negative impact on mental health in most patients (88.2%), leading to sadness (71%), hopelessness for relief (66.9%), suicidal thoughts (39.3%) and secondary depression (14.8%). Half of the male patients experienced at least one suicidal thought since clinical onset. Factors significantly associated with depression were the lack of cure, disabilities associated with ME/CFS, social isolation and the fact that life was not worth anymore with ME/CFS. The three main factors contributing to suicidal thoughts were (i) being told the disease was only psychosomatic (89.5%), (ii) being at the end of one’s strength (80.7%) and (iii) not feeling being understood by others (80.7%).

Conclusion: This study provided first time significant insights into the mental and psychological well-being of ME/CFS patients in Switzerland. The findings highlight the substantial experiences of stigmatization, secondary depression and suicidal thoughts compared to other chronic diseases, calling for an urgent need in Switzerland to improve ME/CFS patient’s medical, psychological and social support, in order to alleviate the severe mental health burden associated with this overlooked somatic disease.

Source: Rahel Susanne König, Daniel Henry Paris, Marc Sollberger, Rea Tschopp.  Identifying the mental health burden in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients in Switzerland: A pilot study, HELIYON (2024), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27031. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024030627 (Full text)

Confirmation of COVID-19 infection status and reporting of Long COVID symptoms in a population-based birth cohort: No evidence of a nocebo effect

Abstract:

Some patients with COVID-19 develop symptoms after the acute infection, known as ‘Long COVID’. We examined whether or not confirmation of COVID-19 infection status could act as a nocebo, using data from questionnaires distributed to the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort.
We examined associations between confirmation of COVID-19 infection status (confirmed by a positive test vs unconfirmed) and reporting of Long COVID symptoms. We explored the roles of sex and anxiety as potential moderators.
There was no clear evidence of a strong association between confirmation of COVID-19 infection status and the Long COVID composite score, physical or psychological symptoms or duration of symptoms. There was no clear evidence of moderation by sex or anxiety. We therefore found no evidence of a nocebo effect. Our data suggest that this psychological mechanism does not play a role in the medical symptomatology experienced by patients with Long COVID.
Source: 1.
Macleod-Hall CI, Munafò MR, Dyer ML. Confirmation of COVID-19 infection status and reporting of Long COVID symptoms in a population-based birth cohort: No evidence of a nocebo effect. Journal of Health Psychology. 2024;0(0). doi:10.1177/13591053241228711 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13591053241228711

Why the Psychosomatic View on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Inconsistent with Current Evidence and Harmful to Patients

Abstract:

Since 1969, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) has been classified as a neurological disease in the International Classification of Diseases by the World Health Organization. Although numerous studies over time have uncovered organic abnormalities in patients with ME/CFS, and the majority of researchers to date classify the disease as organic, many physicians still believe that ME/CFS is a psychosomatic illness.
In this article, we show how detrimental this belief is to the care and well-being of affected patients and, as a consequence, how important the education of physicians and the public is to stop misdiagnosis, mistreatment, and stigmatization on the grounds of incorrect psychosomatic attributions about the etiology and clinical course of ME/CFS.
Source: Thoma M, Froehlich L, Hattesohl DBR, Quante S, Jason LA, Scheibenbogen C. Why the Psychosomatic View on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Inconsistent with Current Evidence and Harmful to Patients. Medicina. 2024; 60(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010083 https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/1/83 (Full text)

Compelled loneliness and necessitated social isolation: “It’s like being on the other side of a mirror, just looking in”

Abstract:

This article develops the conceptualisation of loneliness by drawing on 42 accounts of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME). While illness experience is a central concern of the sociology of health and illness, experiences of loneliness alongside contested and chronic illness have received less attention. The analysis illustrates how loneliness can be an integral part of living with ME and offers two novel conceptual contributions – necessitated social isolation and compelled loneliness.

Necessitated social isolation concerns how ME symptoms can make social lives increasingly restricted. Compelled loneliness highlights how the combined experiences of both stigma and contested illness can lead to social withdrawal and rejection, which create a sense of loneliness. The article argues that loneliness and social isolation can be conceptually distinct yet recursive and overlapping.

With the worsening of ME, the participants experienced a cycle of loneliness, in which social isolation and loneliness reproduced each other. Three key themes draw attention to how loneliness is affected by the situational aspects of living with a chronic and contested illness: (1.) spatial and temporal restrictedness (2.) communicative alienation and (3.) discreditation. The article highlights how health challenges can impact on loneliness and how the stigma of contested illness exacerbates loneliness.

Source: Wotherspoon, N. (2023). Compelled loneliness and necessitated social isolation: “It’s like being on the other side of a mirror, just looking in”. Sociology of Health & Illness, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13732 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13732 (Full text)

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in people with long COVID, ME/CFS, and controls

Abstract:

Background: Prevalences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) have not previously been compared between individuals with long COVID and individuals with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), and healthy age-matched controls. For these reasons, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of PTSD and CPTSD in individuals with long COVID (n=21) and ME/CFS (n=20) and age-matched controls (n=20).

Methods: A case-case-control approach was employed, participants completed the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), a self-report measure of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) of PTSD and CPTSD consisting of 18 items. Scores were calculated for each PTSD and Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) symptom cluster and summed to produce PTSD and DSO scores. PTSD was diagnosed if the criteria for PTSD were met but not DSO, and CPTSD was diagnosed if the criteria for PTSD and DSO were met. Moreover, each cluster of PTSD and DSO were compared among individuals with long COVID, ME/CFS and healthy controls.

Results: Individuals with long COVID (PTSD= 5%, CPTSD= 33%) had more prevalence of PTSD and CPTSD than individuals with ME/CFS (PTSD= 0%, CPTSD= 20%) and healthy controls (PTSD= 0%, CPTSD= 0%). PTSD and CPTSD prevalence was greater in individuals with long COVID and ME/CFS than controls. Individuals with long COVID had greater values controls for all PTSD values. Moreover, individuals with long COVID had greater values than controls for all DSO values. Individuals with ME/CFS had greater values than controls for all DSO values. Both long COVID and ME/CFS groups differed in overall symptom scores compared to controls.

Conclusion: Findings of this study demonstrated that individuals with long COVID generally had more cases of PTSD and CPTSD than individuals with ME/CFS and healthy controls.

Source: Sanal-Hayes NEM, Hayes LD, Mclaughlin M, Berry ECJ, Sculthorpe NF. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in people with long COVID, ME/CFS, and controls. Am J Med. 2023 Dec 15:S0002-9343(23)00756-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.12.006. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38104642. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38104642/

Severe mental illness, race/ethnicity, multimorbidity and mortality following COVID-19 infection: nationally representative cohort study

Abstract:

Background: The association of COVID-19 with death in people with severe mental illness (SMI), and associations with multimorbidity and ethnicity, are unclear.

Aims: To determine all-cause mortality in people with SMI following COVID-19 infection, and assess whether excess mortality is affected by multimorbidity or ethnicity.

Method: This was a retrospective cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Database, from February 2020 to April 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of SMI on all-cause mortality during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: Among 7146 people with SMI (56% female), there was a higher prevalence of multimorbidity compared with the non-SMI control group (n = 653 024, 55% female). Following COVID-19 infection, the SMI group experienced a greater risk of death compared with controls (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.68). Black Caribbean/Black African people were more likely to die from COVID-19 compared with White people (aHR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.34), with similar associations in the SMI group and non-SMI group (P for interaction = 0.73). Following infection with COVID-19, for every additional multimorbidity condition, the aHR for death was 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.10) in the SMI stratum and 1.16 (95% CI 1.15-1.17) in the non-SMI stratum (P for interaction = 0.001).

Conclusions: Following COVID-19 infection, patients with SMI were at an elevated risk of death, further magnified by multimorbidity. Black Caribbean/Black African people had a higher risk of death from COVID-19 than White people, and this inequity was similar for the SMI group and the control group.

Source: Das-Munshi J, Bakolis I, Bécares L, Dyer J, Hotopf M, Ocloo J, Stewart R, Stuart R, Dregan A. Severe mental illness, race/ethnicity, multimorbidity and mortality following COVID-19 infection: nationally representative cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;223(5):518-525. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.112. PMID: 37876350; PMCID: PMC7615273. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615273/ (Full text)

A qualitative study to explore children’s experience of having long-Covid

There is currently uncertainty and limited research surrounding long-COVID in the paediatric population. Reports are conflicting regarding the prevalence, duration, and impact of long COVID on children. Despite the limited evidence, it is becoming increasingly apparent that numerous children are experiencing long-term physical and psychological effects of COVID19 many months after the initial infection. This thesis aimed to investigate the lived experience of children with long-COVID.
Part one of this portfolio presents a systematic review of the experiences of parents who provide care for a child with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The findings of the review indicate a paucity of research on parents’ experiences. However, it is apparent that caring for a child with ME/CFS is an all-encompassing, relentless undertaking, which can detrimentally impact parents’ well-being, everyday life, and relationships.
Given both ME/CFS and long-COVID are both post-viral illnesses, sharing similar symptoms, with low-level immune system activation. It may be conjectured that the existing knowledge on children with ME/CFS could benefit both children suffering from long-COVID and help inform parents on how best to care for their children.
Part two of this portfolio presents an empirical paper exploring the lived-experience of young people with long-COVID. Reflexive thematic analysis found three key themes, specifically, the perceived barriers to coping with long-COVID, ongoing associated emotional distress, and a desire for an integrated approach to long-COVID care.
Source: Carolyn Noorderhaven. A qualitative study to explore children’s experience of having long-Covid. Doctoral thesis: University of Surrey, School of Psychology. https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/doctoral/A-qualitative-study-to-explore-childrens/99813065702346?institution=44SUR_INST (Full text available as PDF file)

Re-visiting professional ethics in psychotherapy: Reflections on the use of talking therapies as a supportive adjunct for myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome and ‘medically unexplained symptoms’

Abstract:

Following years of debate over the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), public health bodies in the UK and beyond have determined that no psychotherapy is clinically proven for this patient group.

In the field of ME/CFS and the wider arena of ‘medically unexplained symptoms’ (MUS), patient survey data and qualitative research capturing patient experiences and psychotherapist attitudes suggest that therapeutic practice may sometimes fall short of required ethical standards. This raises questions about how psychotherapists can safely support, as opposed to treat, people with these debilitating conditions.

We consider four ethical principles that feature throughout psychotherapists’ codes of practice, those of respect, competence, responsibility, and integrity, and discuss examples of good and poor practice in this arena as evinced by recent empirical literature.

Following this, we offer a variety of suggestions to help strengthen ethical psychotherapy practice among patients with ME/CFS and other MUS. In terms of practitioner education, we recommend greater emphasis on humility and reflexive practice, exploration of personal as well professional ethics, and integration of patient expertise-by-experience, accompanied with latest evidence, into foundational and on-going training.

In terms of practice, we suggest consideration of formalized patient-focused feedback systems and greater transparency visà-vis patient access to clinical notes. Finally, we underline the importance of elevating patients from mere subjects to co-producers of psychotherapy research.

Source: Joanne Hunt, Charlotte Blease. Re-visiting professional ethics in psychotherapy: Reflections on the use of talking therapies as a supportive adjunct for myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome and ‘medically unexplained symptoms.’ OSF preprints. https://osf.io/2m9eb/ (Full text)

Interventions to support mental health in people with long COVID: a scoping review

Abstract:

Introduction: Long COVID (LC) is a multisystem disease with symptoms lasting weeks or months beyond the acute COVID-19 infection. Several manifestations are reported by people with LC, including effects on mental health, with varying degrees of psychological distress and disturbances to daily activities. Research conducted to identify effective interventions to support mental health among people with LC has been limited by the breadth and scope of studies.

Aim: This review aims to identify interventions being tested to support mental health of people with LC.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching five databases for articles published between January 2020 and early October 2022 to identify research evaluating interventions focused on improving mental health symptoms associated with LC. Results from all sources were checked for eligibility by two reviewers, and agreements were resolved by discussion. Gray literature and reference list of included studies and relevant reviews were scrutinised to identify any additional studies. Data extraction was conducted by one reviewer and checked by another reviewer for accuracy.

Results: Of the 940 studies identified, 17 were included, the design of which varied but included mainly case studies (n = 6) and clinical trials (n = 5). Several interventions were described, ranging from single interventions (e.g., pharmacologic) to more holistic, comprehensive suites of services (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic). Several mental health outcomes were measured, mostly anxiety and depression. All included studies were reported to be associated with improvements in participants’ mental health outcomes.

Conclusion: This scoping review identified studies reporting on a variety of interventions to support mental health among people with LC. Although positive changes were reported by all studies, some were case studies and thus their findings must be interpreted with caution. There is a need for more research to be conducted to identify the impact of interventions on mental health of people with LC.

Source: Al-Jabr H, Hawke LD, Thompson DR, Clifton A, Shenton M, Castle DJ, Ski CF. Interventions to support mental health in people with long COVID: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16079-8. PMID: 37340400; PMCID: PMC10280822. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280822/ (Full text)