Category: Public Health

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence

Abstract:

In 2021, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced an evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a disabling long-term condition of unknown cause. The guideline provides clear support for people living with ME/CFS, their families and carers, and for clinicians. A recent opinion piece published in the journal suggested that there were anomalies in the processing and interpretation of the evidence when developing the guideline and proposed eight areas where these anomalies were thought to have occurred. We outline how these opinions are based on a misreading or misunderstanding of the guideline process or the guideline, which provides a balanced and reasoned approach to the diagnosis and management of this challenging condition.

Source: Barry PW, Kelley K, Tan T, et al. NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry Published Online First: 28 February 2024. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332731 https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/early/2024/02/28/jnnp-2023-332731 (Full text)

Inheriting discriminatory socio-political landscapes as ‘undeserving’ disabled people: The legacy of common health problems and the future for long COVID

Abstract:

The UK government’s recent announcement that the highly controversial Work Capability Assessment (WCA) will likely be abolished leaves questions of what precisely will emerge in its place. This commentary revisits a construct central to the attempted justification of the WCA, that of ‘common health problems’, which may well continue to leave a legacy in delineating purported ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ impairment, ill-health and related disability. After outlining the politically strategic application of this construct in social policy, concerns are raised for long Covid. In particular, the risk of long Covid following the trajectory of another post-infection diagnosis, myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome, is discussed.
Source: Hunt, J. (2024). Inheriting discriminatory  socio-political landscapes as ‘undeserving’ disabled people: The legacy of common health problems and the future for long COVID. Critical Social Policy, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183241229050 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02610183241229050 (Full text)

Unequal access to diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis in England

Abstract:

Background People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS; sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome) experience very poor health-related quality of life and only rarely recover. ME/CFS has no curative treatment and no single diagnostic test. Public health and policy decisions relevant to ME/CFS require knowledge of its prevalence and barriers to diagnosis. However, people with ME/CFS report lengthy diagnostic delays and widespread misunderstanding of their symptoms. Published prevalence estimates vary greatly by country, gender, age and ethnicity.

Methods Hospital Episode Statistics data is routinely collected by the NHS in England together with patient age, gender and ethnicity. This data, downloaded from the Feasibility Self-Service of NHS DigiTrials, was used to stratify individuals with the ICD-10 code that best reflects ME/CFS symptoms (G93.3; “Postviral fatigue syndrome”) according to their age, self-reported gender and ethnicity, General Practice and NHS England Integrated Care Board (ICB).

Results In all, 100,055 people in England had been diagnosed with ME/CFS (ICD-10:G93.3) between April 1 1989 and October 7 2023, 0.16% of all registered patients. Of these, 79,445 were females and 20,590 males, a female-to-male ratio of 3.88:1. Female relative to male prevalence peaked at about 6-to-1 in individuals’ fourth and fifth decades of life. Prevalence varied widely across the 42 ICBs: 0.086%-0.82% for females and 0.024%-0.21% for males. White individuals were approximately 5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with ME/CFS than others; black, Asian or Chinese ethnicities are associated with particularly low rates of ME/CFS diagnoses. This ethnicity bias is stronger than for other common diseases. Among active English GP practices, 176 (3%) had no registered ME/CFS patients. Eight ICBs (19%) each contained fewer than 8 other-than-white individuals with a G93.3 code despite their registers containing a total of 293,770 other-than-white patients.

Conclusion Those who are disproportionately undiagnosed with ME/CFS are other-than-white ethnic groups, older females (>60y), older males (>80y), and people living in areas of multiple deprivation. The lifetime prevalence of ME/CFS for English females and males may be as high as 0.92% and 0.25%, respectively, or approximately 390,000 UK individuals overall. This improved estimate of ME/CFS prevalence allows more accurate assessment of the socioeconomic and disease burden imposed by ME/CFS.

Source: Gemma L. Samms, Chris P. Ponting. Unequal access to diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis in England. medRxiv 2024.01.31.24302070; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302070 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.31.24302070v1.full-text (Full text)

Risk factors for experiencing Long-COVID symptoms: Insights from two nationally representative surveys

Abstract:

Background Long COVID (LC) is a complex and multisystemic condition marked by a diverse range of symptoms, yet its associated risk factors remain poorly defined.

Methods Leveraging data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), both representative of the United States population, this study aimed to identify demographic characteristics associated with LC. The sample was restricted to individuals aged 18 years and older who reported a positive COVID-19 test or doctor’s diagnosis. We performed a descriptive analysis comparing characteristics between participants with and without LC. Furthermore, we developed multivariate logistic regression models on demographic covariates that would have been valid at the time of the COVID-19 infection.

Results Among the 124,313 individuals in BRFSS and 10,131 in the NHIS reporting either a positive test or doctor’s diagnosis for COVID-19 (Table), 26,783 (21.5%) in BRFSS and 1,797 (17.1%) in NHIS reported LC. In the multivariate logistic regression model, we found middle age, female gender, Hispanic ethnicity, lack of a college degree, and residence in non-metropolitan areas associated with higher risk of LC. Notably, the initial severity of acute COVID-19 was strongly associated with LC risk. In contrast, significantly lower ORs were reported for Non-Hispanic Asian and Black Americans compared to Non-Hispanic White.

Conclusions In the United States, there is marked variation in the risk of LC by demographic factors and initial infection severity. Further research is needed to understand the underlying cause of these observations.

Source: Yixuan Wu, Mitsuaki Sawano, Yilun Wu, Rishi M. Shah, Pamela Bishop, Akiko Iwasaki, Harlan M. Krumholz. Risk factors for experiencing Long-COVID symptoms: Insights from two nationally representative surveys. medRxiv 2024.01.12.24301170; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.12.24301170 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.12.24301170v1.full-text (Full text)

A systematic scoping review of how people with ME/CFS use the internet

Abstract:

Purpose: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) is a chronic neurological illness also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Key symptoms are extreme fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive problems and sleep disturbance. With reported higher levels of online activity for people with ME/CFS than other conditions, more knowledge of characteristics and experience of online use in everyday life is needed. This scoping review systematically identified, appraised and synthesised what is known on how people with ME/CFS use the internet.

Method: The following bibliographic databases were searched: Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Cinahl, AMED, and ASSIA, plus Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Scopus, and Google Scholar for grey literature. Two reviewers independently screened title-abstracts, and full text of studies against inclusion criteria. Remaining studies were quality-assessed using appropriate critical appraisal tools.

Results: Many people with ME/CFS go online daily to gain information and share experiences of their illness including difficulties with family, friends and doctors. Reciprocity of emotional and social support was found with a sense of in-group belonging and empowerment. Validation was sought online, and identity renegotiation took place. Some replacement of offline social support for online engagement was reported. Online lay expertise was seen to improve offline health professional relations but not replace them.

Conclusions: The internet is a valued source of support for people with ME/CFS in terms of sharing of experiences, legitimacy, empowerment, and integration into people’s everyday lives. The extent of interrelating of online and offline lives is not clear however and needs further investigation.

Source: Diane Shortland, Qulsom Fazil, Anna Lavis & Nutmeg Hallett (2024) A systematic scoping review of how people with ME/CFS use the internet, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2024.2303887  (Full text)

Long COVID Disability Burden in US Adults: YLDs and NIH Funding Relative to Other Conditions

Abstract:

Background Long COVID (LC) is novel, debilitating and likely chronic. Yet, scant data exist about its disability burden to guide scientific research and public health planning. We estimated Long COVID’s non-fatal disease burden in US adults and its FY2024 actual: burden-commensurate research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) relative to other conditions, and biological sex.

Methods We present YLDs/100,000 for 70 NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDCs). Prevalence of disabling Long COVID was obtained from cross sectional surveys of representative samples of US adults, from September 2022 to August 2023. Disabling Long COVID was defined as incident symptoms persisting more than 3 months post-COVID, that significantly compromise daily activities. We calculated burden-commensurate funding for the top YLD conditions and for female vs. male dominant conditions.

Findings Disabling Long COVID was reported by 1.5% (n= 10,401) of n=757,580 respondents: Compared to the overall sample, those with disabling LC disproportionately identify as female (64.4% vs. 51.4%) and experiencing disability (80.8% vs. 52.9%) anxiety (57.5% vs. 23.8%) and depression (51.3% vs.18.5%). It ranked in the top 25% of YLDs at 320/100,000, between Alzheimer’s (279.4/100,000) and asthma (355.7/100,000) but received just 10% of its actual: YLD-commensurate funding. Only 5 conditions received less actual: burden: commensurate funding, including Myalgic Encephalitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (<1%), another post-viral, female-dominant condition.

Interpretation LC has debilitated 3.8 million (weighted frequency) US adults. Research funding for it, like other female dominant conditions, lags behind its disability burden.

Research in Context Evidence before this study – We analyzed Long-COVID’s (LC) non-fatal disease burden in the US–represented by YLD (years lived with disability= prevalence x disability weight) — and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research 2024 funding relative to other conditions. We searched PubMed through 11/28/2023 for Long COVID prevalence (US), and Long COVID disability and disease burden (not US-specific). The keywords “years lived with disability” + “COVID” yielded n= 38 articles (11/29/23); but most referenced “disability-adjusted life years” (DALYs) in other countries. Similarly, “disease burden” + Long COVID yielded 23 papers, but no US YLD data. See Supplement 1 for meta-analyses, systematic reviews and US studies of Long COVID prevalence and impact.

We instead sourced YLD data from the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) /Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Long COVID Study Group. The HPS queries adults about Long COVID-related symptoms and their impact on daily activities. We applied the IHME/GBD’s estimated Long COVID disability weight of 0.21 and harmonized it with our LC case definition from the HPS data in consultation with IHME/GBD researchers. To harmonize IHME/GBD disability weights for non-LC diseases/conditions with the NIH’s terminology, we consulted with NIH staff. LC definition and measurement affects prevalence and burden estimates; our use of high-quality data sources and transparency in reporting how they were applied reduces the risk of biased assumptions.

Added value of this study- Long COVID is a chronic debilitating condition. While there is ample research on COVID’s acute illness and loss of life, there are no population-based data on its disability burden. We provide that data. To guide scientific research and public health planning, we report YLDs associated with disabling Long COVID (i.e., symptoms significantly limit activity), and; compare it to other conditions’ YLDs, NIH funding, and female-vs. male-dominance. It ranked in the top 25% of YLDs at 320/100,000, between Alzheimer’s (279.4/100,000) and asthma (355.7/100,000) but received just 10% of its YLD-commensurate funding. Only 5 conditions received less burden-commensurate funding; 3/5 were female-dominant, including Myalgic Encephalitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) at <1%, another post-viral condition that shares significant overlap with Long COVID. Overall, median funding/YLD was >= 5 times greater for male-vs. female-dominant conditions.

Implications of all the available evidence-Nearly 4 million US adults (weighted frequency) live with disabling Long COVID. They disproportionately identify as female and as having a disability, anxiety and depression. Yet NIH funding for diagnostic and treatment research for Long COVID hasn’t kept pace with its disability burden.

Source: Karen Bonuck, Qi Gao, Seth Congdon, Ryung Kim. Long COVID Disability Burden in US Adults: YLDs and NIH Funding Relative to Other Conditions. medRxiv 2024.01.09.24301057; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301057 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301057v1.full-text (Full text)

Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey

Abstract:

Background: As a consequence of their occupation, doctors and other healthcare workers were at higher risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and more likely to experience severe disease compared to the general population. However, systematic information on post-acute COVID complications in doctors is very limited.

Aims: This study aimed to determine the symptoms, perceived determinants, health and occupational impact, and consequent needs relating to post-acute COVID complications in UK doctors.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to UK doctors self-identifying as having Long COVID or other post-acute COVID complications.

Results: Of 795 responses, 603 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of being a UK-based medical doctor experiencing one or more post-acute COVID complications. Twenty-eight per cent reported a lack of adequate Respiratory Protective Equipment at the time of contracting COVID-19. Eighteen per cent of eligible respondents reported that they had been unable to return to work since acquiring COVID.

Conclusions: Post-acute COVID (Long COVID) in UK doctors is a substantial burden for respondents to our questionnaire. The results indicated that insufficient respiratory protection could have contributed to occupational disease, with COVID-19 being contracted in the workplace, and resultant post-COVID complications. Although it may be too late to address the perceived determinants of inadequate protection for those already suffering with Long COVID, more investment is needed in rehabilitation and support of those afflicted.

Source: D Bland, R Evans, A Binesmael, S Wood, S P Qureshi, K Fearnley, A Small, W D Strain, R Agius, Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey, Occupational Medicine, 2023;, kqad120, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad120 https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqad120/7468904?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adults: United States, 2021-2022

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, multisystem illness characterized by activity-limiting fatigue, worsening of symptoms after activity, and other symptoms (1). It affects all age, sex, and racial and ethnic groups and costs the U.S. economy about $18-$51 billion annually (2-5). This report describes the percentage of adults who had ME/CFS at the time of interview by selected demographic and geographic characteristics based on data from the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

Source: Vahratian A, Lin JS, Bertolli J, Unger ER. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adults: United States, 2021-2022. NCHS Data Brief. 2023 Dec;(488):1-8. PMID: 38085820. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs//data/databriefs/db488.pdf (Full text)

Severe mental illness, race/ethnicity, multimorbidity and mortality following COVID-19 infection: nationally representative cohort study

Abstract:

Background: The association of COVID-19 with death in people with severe mental illness (SMI), and associations with multimorbidity and ethnicity, are unclear.

Aims: To determine all-cause mortality in people with SMI following COVID-19 infection, and assess whether excess mortality is affected by multimorbidity or ethnicity.

Method: This was a retrospective cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Database, from February 2020 to April 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of SMI on all-cause mortality during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: Among 7146 people with SMI (56% female), there was a higher prevalence of multimorbidity compared with the non-SMI control group (n = 653 024, 55% female). Following COVID-19 infection, the SMI group experienced a greater risk of death compared with controls (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.68). Black Caribbean/Black African people were more likely to die from COVID-19 compared with White people (aHR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.34), with similar associations in the SMI group and non-SMI group (P for interaction = 0.73). Following infection with COVID-19, for every additional multimorbidity condition, the aHR for death was 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.10) in the SMI stratum and 1.16 (95% CI 1.15-1.17) in the non-SMI stratum (P for interaction = 0.001).

Conclusions: Following COVID-19 infection, patients with SMI were at an elevated risk of death, further magnified by multimorbidity. Black Caribbean/Black African people had a higher risk of death from COVID-19 than White people, and this inequity was similar for the SMI group and the control group.

Source: Das-Munshi J, Bakolis I, Bécares L, Dyer J, Hotopf M, Ocloo J, Stewart R, Stuart R, Dregan A. Severe mental illness, race/ethnicity, multimorbidity and mortality following COVID-19 infection: nationally representative cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;223(5):518-525. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.112. PMID: 37876350; PMCID: PMC7615273. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615273/ (Full text)