Tag: long covid disability

Repeated Hand Grip Strength is an Objective Marker for Disability and Severity of Key Symptoms in Post-COVID ME/CFS

Abstract:

Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS) refers to a diverse array of symptoms that persist beyond 3 months of the acute phase of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most frequent symptom is fatigue, which can manifest both mentally and physically. In this study, handgrip strength (HGS) parameters were determined as an objective measure of muscle fatigue and fatigability. HGS parameters were correlated with other frequent symptoms among 144 female PCS patients suffering from fatigue, exertional intolerance, and cognitive impairment.

Seventy-eight patients met the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC) for post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The severity of disability and key symptoms were evaluated utilizing self-reported questionnaires.

Notably, patients diagnosed with ME/CFS exhibited a higher overall severity of symptoms, including lower physical function (p < 0.001), a greater degree of disability (p < 0.001), more severe fatigue (p < 0.001), post-exertional malaise (p < 0.001), and autonomic dysfunction (p = 0.004). While HGS was similarly impaired in both PCS and ME/CFS patients, the associations between HGS and the severity of symptoms and disability revealed striking differences.

We observed significant correlations of HGS parameters with physical function across all patients, but with the key symptoms PEM, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction in ME/CFS patients only. This points to a common mechanism for these symptoms in the ME/CFS subtype, distinct from that in other types of PCS. Further HGS provides an objective marker of disease severity in ME/CFS.

Source: Anna Paffrath, Laura Kim, Claudia Kedor, Elisa Stein, Rebekka Rust, Helma Freitag, Uta Hoppmann, Leif G Hanitsch, Judith Bellmann-Strobl, Kirsten Wittke, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Franziska Sotzny. Repeated Hand Grip Strength is an Objective Marker for Disability and Severity of Key Symptoms in Post-COVID ME/CFS.
medRxiv 2024.01.25.24301776;  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.25.24301776v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Long COVID Disability Burden in US Adults: YLDs and NIH Funding Relative to Other Conditions

Abstract:

Background Long COVID (LC) is novel, debilitating and likely chronic. Yet, scant data exist about its disability burden to guide scientific research and public health planning. We estimated Long COVID’s non-fatal disease burden in US adults and its FY2024 actual: burden-commensurate research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) relative to other conditions, and biological sex.

Methods We present YLDs/100,000 for 70 NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDCs). Prevalence of disabling Long COVID was obtained from cross sectional surveys of representative samples of US adults, from September 2022 to August 2023. Disabling Long COVID was defined as incident symptoms persisting more than 3 months post-COVID, that significantly compromise daily activities. We calculated burden-commensurate funding for the top YLD conditions and for female vs. male dominant conditions.

Findings Disabling Long COVID was reported by 1.5% (n= 10,401) of n=757,580 respondents: Compared to the overall sample, those with disabling LC disproportionately identify as female (64.4% vs. 51.4%) and experiencing disability (80.8% vs. 52.9%) anxiety (57.5% vs. 23.8%) and depression (51.3% vs.18.5%). It ranked in the top 25% of YLDs at 320/100,000, between Alzheimer’s (279.4/100,000) and asthma (355.7/100,000) but received just 10% of its actual: YLD-commensurate funding. Only 5 conditions received less actual: burden: commensurate funding, including Myalgic Encephalitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (<1%), another post-viral, female-dominant condition.

Interpretation LC has debilitated 3.8 million (weighted frequency) US adults. Research funding for it, like other female dominant conditions, lags behind its disability burden.

Research in Context Evidence before this study – We analyzed Long-COVID’s (LC) non-fatal disease burden in the US–represented by YLD (years lived with disability= prevalence x disability weight) — and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research 2024 funding relative to other conditions. We searched PubMed through 11/28/2023 for Long COVID prevalence (US), and Long COVID disability and disease burden (not US-specific). The keywords “years lived with disability” + “COVID” yielded n= 38 articles (11/29/23); but most referenced “disability-adjusted life years” (DALYs) in other countries. Similarly, “disease burden” + Long COVID yielded 23 papers, but no US YLD data. See Supplement 1 for meta-analyses, systematic reviews and US studies of Long COVID prevalence and impact.

We instead sourced YLD data from the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) /Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Long COVID Study Group. The HPS queries adults about Long COVID-related symptoms and their impact on daily activities. We applied the IHME/GBD’s estimated Long COVID disability weight of 0.21 and harmonized it with our LC case definition from the HPS data in consultation with IHME/GBD researchers. To harmonize IHME/GBD disability weights for non-LC diseases/conditions with the NIH’s terminology, we consulted with NIH staff. LC definition and measurement affects prevalence and burden estimates; our use of high-quality data sources and transparency in reporting how they were applied reduces the risk of biased assumptions.

Added value of this study- Long COVID is a chronic debilitating condition. While there is ample research on COVID’s acute illness and loss of life, there are no population-based data on its disability burden. We provide that data. To guide scientific research and public health planning, we report YLDs associated with disabling Long COVID (i.e., symptoms significantly limit activity), and; compare it to other conditions’ YLDs, NIH funding, and female-vs. male-dominance. It ranked in the top 25% of YLDs at 320/100,000, between Alzheimer’s (279.4/100,000) and asthma (355.7/100,000) but received just 10% of its YLD-commensurate funding. Only 5 conditions received less burden-commensurate funding; 3/5 were female-dominant, including Myalgic Encephalitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) at <1%, another post-viral condition that shares significant overlap with Long COVID. Overall, median funding/YLD was >= 5 times greater for male-vs. female-dominant conditions.

Implications of all the available evidence-Nearly 4 million US adults (weighted frequency) live with disabling Long COVID. They disproportionately identify as female and as having a disability, anxiety and depression. Yet NIH funding for diagnostic and treatment research for Long COVID hasn’t kept pace with its disability burden.

Source: Karen Bonuck, Qi Gao, Seth Congdon, Ryung Kim. Long COVID Disability Burden in US Adults: YLDs and NIH Funding Relative to Other Conditions. medRxiv 2024.01.09.24301057; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301057 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301057v1.full-text (Full text)

Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey

Abstract:

Background: As a consequence of their occupation, doctors and other healthcare workers were at higher risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and more likely to experience severe disease compared to the general population. However, systematic information on post-acute COVID complications in doctors is very limited.

Aims: This study aimed to determine the symptoms, perceived determinants, health and occupational impact, and consequent needs relating to post-acute COVID complications in UK doctors.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to UK doctors self-identifying as having Long COVID or other post-acute COVID complications.

Results: Of 795 responses, 603 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of being a UK-based medical doctor experiencing one or more post-acute COVID complications. Twenty-eight per cent reported a lack of adequate Respiratory Protective Equipment at the time of contracting COVID-19. Eighteen per cent of eligible respondents reported that they had been unable to return to work since acquiring COVID.

Conclusions: Post-acute COVID (Long COVID) in UK doctors is a substantial burden for respondents to our questionnaire. The results indicated that insufficient respiratory protection could have contributed to occupational disease, with COVID-19 being contracted in the workplace, and resultant post-COVID complications. Although it may be too late to address the perceived determinants of inadequate protection for those already suffering with Long COVID, more investment is needed in rehabilitation and support of those afflicted.

Source: D Bland, R Evans, A Binesmael, S Wood, S P Qureshi, K Fearnley, A Small, W D Strain, R Agius, Post-acute COVID-19 complications in UK doctors: results of a cross-sectional survey, Occupational Medicine, 2023;, kqad120, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad120 https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqad120/7468904?redirectedFrom=fulltext

“It was almost like it’s set up for people to fail” A qualitative analysis of experiences and unmet supportive needs of people with Long COVID

Abstract:

Background: Almost twenty percent of adults with COVID-19 develop Long COVID, leading to prolonged symptoms and disability. Understanding the supportive needs of people with Long COVID is vital to enacting effective models of care and policies.

Design/methods: This qualitative sub-study explored the experiences of people with Long COVID and their unmet needs. Participants enrolled in a larger study to evaluate the post-acute cardiovascular impacts of COVID-19 were invited to participate in subsequent in-depth interviews. Participants were enrolled purposively until saturation at 24 participants. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Participants focused on adaptations to life with Long COVID and their unmet needs in different life spheres. Three domains, 1) occupational and financial; 2) healthcare-related; and 3) social and emotional support, emerged as areas affecting quality of life. Although participants were motivated to return to work for financial and personal reasons, Long COVID symptoms often resulted in the inability to perform tasks required by their existing jobs, and unemployment. Those who maintained employment through employer accommodations still needed additional support. Participants encountered diagnostic challenges, challenges in accessing specialty appointments, insurance loopholes, high healthcare costs, and medical skepticism. Existing social networks provided support for completing daily tasks; however, those with Long COVID typically turned to others with similar lived experiences for emotional support. Participants found government support programs inadequate and difficult to access in all three domains.

Discussion: We propose a five-pronged policy approach to support persons with Long COVID. These overarching recommendations are (1) improve public awareness of Long COVID; (2) improve clinical care quality and access; (3) implement additional school and workplace accommodations; (4) strengthen socioeconomic benefits and social services; and (5) improve research on Long COVID.

Source: McNabb, K.C., Bergman, A.J., Smith-Wright, R. et al. “It was almost like it’s set up for people to fail” A qualitative analysis of experiences and unmet supportive needs of people with Long COVID. BMC Public Health 23, 2131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17033-4 https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-17033-4 (Full text)

A National Evaluation of Outcomes in Long COVID Services using Digital PROM Data from the ELAROS Platform

Summary:

Key findings of this service evaluation study:
• Patient characteristics: A sample of 5,318 patients from 14 participating NHS LC sites were analysed. The sample had a female:male ratio of 2.1:1. The average age was 48.4 yrs, with 87% (of those whose ethnicity was recorded) of white ethnicity and 9% of Black or Asian ethnicity.
• Comorbidities: This sample of patients had a low prevalence of co-morbidities (7%) with a clear onset of new LC symptoms after their COVID-19 infection supporting the onset of a new condition in this cohort of previously healthy individuals.
• Duration of LC: The average duration of LC in this sample was 384 days (>12 months) at first assessment in an LC site, with symptoms still ongoing at presentation, with more than 90% of the sample being non-hospitalised patients.
• Digital platform: A total of 17,471 PROMs (C19-YRS and EQ-5D-5L) were completed by this sample of patients with at least 1,532 participants completing multiple assessments on the same PROM on the digital PROM platform. The completion of PROMs around the 3-month mark was low for both measures (11.7% for C19-YRS and 14.6% for EQ-5D-5L). The ones who completed PROMs both around the 3-month mark and the 6-month mark were 4.3% for C19-YRS and 5% for EQ-5D-5L. This limits the generalisability of the findings in this evaluation to all the LC population, but the findings remain valid for this cohort of individuals.
• New-onset disability: 3,395 patients who completed at least one C19-YRS questionnaire at first assessment showed significant new-onset symptom burden, functional disability, and deterioration of overall health since the COVID-19 infection.
• Comparison between LC and other chronic conditions: The cross-sectional EQ-5D-5L Index value of 3,438 patients suggests the burden and disability in LC are worse than that reported in the literature for Diabetes Mellitus, COPD, Heart Failure, and Multiple Sclerosis.
• 3-month follow-up: Among those who completed an initial C19-YRS assessment and another at 3 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in symptom burden, functional disability and overall health. Patients at 3 months however still had significant LC symptom
burden and disability compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status, i.e., their condition had improved, but they were far off from a complete recovery. Among those who completed EQ-5D- National Evaluation of Long COVID Service Outcomes using ELAROS Data (09 Oct 23) Page 3 of 31
5L, at first assessment and at 3 months, their EQ-5D-5L Index score did not show any statistically significant improvement, but the EQ-5D-5L VAS showed a statistically significant improvement.
• 6-month follow-up: Among those who completed measures at the first assessment, 3 months, and 6 months, C19-YRS and EQ-5D-5L VAS showed statistically significant improvement whereas EQ-5D-5L Index Value showed statistically significant deterioration. Patients at 6 months still had
significant LC symptom burden and disability compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status, i.e., their condition had improved but had not fully recovered. The follow-up changes in scores support the efficacy of interventions provided by LC services and suggest that continued specialist input is needed to manage these patients with persistent symptoms.
• C19-YRS (condition-specific measure) vs EQ-5D-5L (generic measure): The 3-month month follow-up changes in scores and responsiveness of PROMs highlight that C19-YRS is a more sensitive measure than EQ-5D-5L in this cohort of individuals with LC. This is in keeping with the literature recommending the use of condition-specific measures in addition to EQ-5D-5L.
• Vocational problems: 62% of this sample had their work role affected with them having to either be on sick leave, reduce hours, change roles, or quit roles. Only 21% were able to maintain their previous roles held prior to their COVID-19 infection. This is suggestive of considerable productivity loss and financial implications to the country.
• Fluctuating condition: In patients who completed multiple assessments, it was evident that LC is a fluctuant condition with no necessary linear trend of improvement or deterioration between the domains of symptom burden, functional disability, and overall health. This highlights the need to understand the triggers for the condition and invest in self-management and ongoing support from community healthcare services.
• Long-Term Condition: In most patients in this sample, LC has evidently become a Long-Term Condition (LTC) with fluctuations in their condition causing disability and significant deterioration of their overall health status seen even after 18 months of LC with no complete resolution or full recovery. There needs to be a national investment in managing this new LTC along with other LTCs.

Source: Dr Manoj Sivan, et al.  A National Evaluation of Outcomes in Long COVID Services using Digital PROM Data from the ELAROS Platform. National Evaluation of Long COVID Service Outcomes using ELAROS Data (09 Oct 23) https://locomotion.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2023/10/National-Evaluation-of-LC-Service-Outcomes-using-ELAROS-Data-09-10-23.pdf (Full text)

Long-COVID and its Physical and Neurological Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review

Abstract:

This review was carried out with the objective to study patterns of neurological, psychological and other physical consequences of COVID-19 in the long term. The guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) had been followed; 22 articles, published during January 2020 to September 2021, were selected. Original research, review articles, editorial and viewpoints were included. Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed were searched through 2020 till 2021.

Data collection in selected studies was performed mainly through the online survey, telephone survey, use of medical records, and patient interviews. This systematic review contains the studies conducted in the American, Asian and European countries. The major outcomes identified were the neurological, psychological, and other long-term chronic manifestations of COVID‐19.

This review demonstrates that long-COVID has started to bring a huge wave of patients, the count of them being millions now, who can enter a phase of disability due to neurological damages if not treated during the early course of illness. Though more disabling than lethal, long-COVID patients with a neurological deficit is expected to overburden the healthcare system globally which is already been struggling to handle acute COVID-19 patients in this once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.

Source: Abdul Mannan Baig, Sameera Rizvi, Shahla Pardhan, Joachim Gerlach, Tazeen Saeed Ali. Long-COVID and its Physical and Neurological Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review. Vol. 17 No. 04 (2023): Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. https://pjmhsonline.com/index.php/pjmhs/article/view/4549/4498 (Full text)

Long COVID as a chronic illness: giving credibility to support students

Abstract:

The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to account for millions of short- and long-term conditions that can impact an individual’s cognition, breathing, and digestion. Specifically, Long COVID creates long-term health problems, diagnosable if COVID-19 symptoms present after an initial infection. Approximately 15% of U.S. adults with a prior positive COVID-19 diagnosis experience Long COVID symptoms. (See Roy H. Perlis, et al, Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults, 5 JAMA NETW OPEN 10 (October 27, 2022).) Long COVID is plaguing individuals’ ability to return to their typical functioning, including their ability to return to work. (See Katie Bach, New Data Shows Long Covid Is Keeping as Many as 4 Million People Out of Work, BROOKINGS INSTITUTE (August 24, 2022) (https://brook.gs/3xktTkC).)

Source: Aquino, K.C., Jarrow, J., Vance, L. and Rei-Skoff, A.E. (2023), Long COVID as a chronic illness: giving credibility to support students. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 28: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.31478

How do long COVID patients perceive their current life situation and occupational perspective? Results of a qualitative interview study in Germany

Abstract:

Introduction: Many people experience persistent or new-onset symptoms such as fatigue or cognitive problems after an acute infection with COVID-19. This phenomenon, known as long COVID, impacts physical and mental wellbeing, and may affect perceived quality of life and occupational perspectives likewise. The aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of how people with long COVID experience health-related restrictions in their daily life and their occupational situation, and to identify key challenges they face.

Methods: Guided qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 people with long COVID. The interviews were transcribed according to Dresing/Pehl and Kuckartz and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Afterward, a systematic comparison of the data and a reflection under consideration of lifeworld-theoretical approaches (Berger and Luckmann) were carried out.

Results: The interviews revealed that many participants have severe symptoms which strongly impair them in perform daily and work-related activities, and in their personal interests. Many interviewees already reach their stress limit during routine household activities or childcare. Of the 25 participants, 19 experienced limitations in pursuing leisure activities, and 10 of the 23 interviewees with jobs reported being on sick leave for several months. Several respondents who had vocational reintegration are still affected by ongoing symptoms that affect their work performance considerably. This leads to uncertainty, role conflicts, a decline in social contacts, and decreased incomes, which contribute to an impairment in their quality of life.

Conclusions: This study shows the huge need for specific support for people with long COVID in different areas of life. To prevent people with long COVID from finding themselves in social and economic precarity, decision-makers should develop strategies to systematically support them in their sustainable reintegration into the workforce. The focus should be on creating long COVID-sensitive workplaces, compensating for decreased incomes, and improving access to relief services such as vocational reintegration. We argue, that a shift of perspectives is necessary and that long COVID should be considered rather as a “social disease” with considerably impairments in the social life of those affected.

Trial registration: The study is registered in the German register for clinical trials (DRKS00026007).

Source: Schmachtenberg T, Müller F, Kranz J, Dragaqina A, Wegener G, Königs G, Roder S. How do long COVID patients perceive their current life situation and occupational perspective? Results of a qualitative interview study in Germany. Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1155193. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1155193. PMID: 36969629; PMCID: PMC10034079. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1155193/full (Full text)

Functional limitations in individuals with long COVID

Abstract:

Objectives: To examine the extent of long-term functional deficits experienced by individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Specific objectives were to: 1. describe changes in perceived global health, mobility, participation in daily activities, and employment status from pre-COVID-19 to ≥2 months following infection; and 2. evaluate factors associated with change in function.

Design: We conducted a telephone survey (at least 2 months post infection).

Setting: Population-based study of adults living at home.

Participants: Adult residents in Laval, Quebec, who were discharged home post-hospitalization for COVID-19.

Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants responded to a standard questionnaire (Covid-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Screen) regarding persistent symptoms and limitations in daily functioning. We calculated the prevalence of changes in perceived global health, mobility, personal care, participation in daily activities, and employment and evaluated associated factors using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Almost all participants (94%) were more fatigued and reported deterioration of their global health status (90%) at least three months after infection. The majority were more short of breath, and experienced pain and anxiety. The change in outcomes indicate a substantial reduction in those reporting ‘good’ health status, mobility, personal care, and daily activities, and less employment. Time since diagnosis was significantly associated with global health, mobility, and participation in daily activities.

Conclusion: This population-based study suggests that individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 infection have symptoms that impact daily functional activities many months after infection. It is imperative that the impact of infection is better understood so that those affected long-term can receive the needed services.

Source: Mazer B, Feldman DE. Functional limitations in individuals with long COVID. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 24:S0003-9993(23)00162-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.004. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36966957; PMCID: PMC10036292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036292/ (Full text)

The health impact of long COVID: a cross-sectional examination of health-related quality of life, disability, and health status among individuals with self-reported post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection at various points of recovery

Abstract:

Objective: The novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) has continued to present a significant burden to global public health efforts. The purpose of this study was to estimate the health-related quality of life, disability, and health status of individuals with self-reported long COVID at various lengths of recovery.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of individuals with self-reported long COVID. Participants were asked to complete the five-item EuroQOL EQ-5D-5L and EQ visual analog scale, the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and the 10-item Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health v1.2 short form. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to characterize the responses and differences across groups.

Results: Eighty-two participants from 13 countries completed the EQ-5D-5L, 73 completed the WHODAS 2.0 and 80 participants completed the PROMIS. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.51. The mean WHODAS score was 49.0. In the previous 30 days, participants reported their symptoms affected them for a mean of 24 days, they were totally unable to carry out usual activities for 15 days, and they cut back or reduced activities for 26 days. The mean PROMIS physical health and mental health scores were 10.7 and 8.6, respectively, corresponding to below-average health. No significant differences were detected across time or according to severity of acute infection.

Conclusions: Long COVID presents a significant chronic health burden to adults in the US and abroad. This health burden may persist for many months post-acute infection.

Source: Tak CR. The health impact of long COVID: a cross-sectional examination of health-related quality of life, disability, and health status among individuals with self-reported post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection at various points of recovery. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 21;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00572-0. PMID: 36943643; PMCID: PMC10029785. https://jpro.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41687-023-00572-0 (Full text)