Functional limitations in individuals with long COVID

Abstract:

Objectives: To examine the extent of long-term functional deficits experienced by individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Specific objectives were to: 1. describe changes in perceived global health, mobility, participation in daily activities, and employment status from pre-COVID-19 to ≥2 months following infection; and 2. evaluate factors associated with change in function.

Design: We conducted a telephone survey (at least 2 months post infection).

Setting: Population-based study of adults living at home.

Participants: Adult residents in Laval, Quebec, who were discharged home post-hospitalization for COVID-19.

Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants responded to a standard questionnaire (Covid-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Screen) regarding persistent symptoms and limitations in daily functioning. We calculated the prevalence of changes in perceived global health, mobility, personal care, participation in daily activities, and employment and evaluated associated factors using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Almost all participants (94%) were more fatigued and reported deterioration of their global health status (90%) at least three months after infection. The majority were more short of breath, and experienced pain and anxiety. The change in outcomes indicate a substantial reduction in those reporting ‘good’ health status, mobility, personal care, and daily activities, and less employment. Time since diagnosis was significantly associated with global health, mobility, and participation in daily activities.

Conclusion: This population-based study suggests that individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 infection have symptoms that impact daily functional activities many months after infection. It is imperative that the impact of infection is better understood so that those affected long-term can receive the needed services.

Source: Mazer B, Feldman DE. Functional limitations in individuals with long COVID. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 24:S0003-9993(23)00162-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.004. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36966957; PMCID: PMC10036292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036292/ (Full text)

Long COVID symptoms in a population-based sample of persons discharged home from hospital

Abstract:

Objectives: The impact of long COVID among persons hospitalized and discharged home is unknown. We aimed to (1) report the prevalence of long COVID in persons hospitalized for COVID-19 and discharged home; (2) estimate the prevalence of physical, sensory, and psychological/mental health impairments; and (3) explore associated factors.

Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of adult residents in Laval, Quebec, who were discharged home ≥ 2 months post-hospitalization for COVID-19. Participants responded to a standard questionnaire regarding persistent symptoms. We calculated the prevalence of long COVID and of persistent types of symptoms and evaluated associated factors using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: In our sample (n = 398), 70% reported physical symptoms, 58% psychological problems, and 16% sensory impairments. 31.5% reported being troubled by persistent symptoms (long COVID). Factors associated with long COVID were a greater number of symptoms (odds ratio (OR) = 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.69-2.28) and increased hospital stay (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06). Other factors associated with physical and psychological symptoms were female sex (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.27-3.71 and OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.25-3.39; respectively), higher education level (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.20-3.68 and OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.44-4.14; respectively), and obesity (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.15-3.34 and OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.05-2.77; respectively).

Conclusion: In this population-based study of persons hospitalized for COVID-19 and discharged home, nearly one third were troubled by symptoms for 2 months or more post-discharge. There was a high proportion with persistent physical and psychological/mental health symptoms. Further research will assess the specific needs of these patients to inform health policy makers on service requirements for these persons.

Source: Feldman DE, Boudrias MH, Mazer B. Long COVID symptoms in a population-based sample of persons discharged home from hospital. Can J Public Health. 2022 Sep 21:1–10. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00695-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36131218; PMCID: PMC9491248. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491248/ (Full text)

Psychiatric comorbidity in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome identified from the Georgia population

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) identified from the general population and a chronically ill group of people presenting with subsyndromic CFS-like illness (“insufficient symptoms or fatigue” (ISF)). Previous studies in CFS patients from primary and tertiary care clinics have found high rates of psychiatric disturbance, but this may reflect referral bias rather than true patterns of comorbidity with CFS.

METHODS: We used random digit dialing to identify unwell individuals. A detailed telephone interview identified those with CFS-like illness. These individuals participated in a 1-day clinical evaluation to confirm CFS or ISF status. We identified 113 cases of CFS and 264 persons with ISF. To identify current and lifetime psychiatric disorders, participants completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.

RESULTS: Sixty-four persons (57%) with CFS had at least one current psychiatric diagnosis, in contrast to 118 persons (45%) with ISF. One hundred one persons (89%) with CFS had at least one lifetime psychiatric diagnosis compared with 208 persons (79%) with ISF. Of note, only 11 persons (9.8%) with CFS and 25 persons (9.5%) with ISF reported having seen a mental healthcare specialist during the past 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that current and lifetime psychiatric disorders commonly accompany CFS in the general population. Most CFS cases with comorbid psychiatric conditions had not sought appropriate help during the past 6 months. These results demonstrate an urgent need to address psychiatric disorders in the clinical care of CFS cases.

Comment in: Criteria used to define chronic fatigue syndrome questioned. [Psychosom Med. 2010]

 

Source: Nater UM, Lin JM, Maloney EM, Jones JF, Tian H, Boneva RS, Raison CL, Reeves WC, Heim C. Psychiatric comorbidity in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome identified from the Georgia population. Psychosom Med. 2009 Jun;71(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31819ea179. Epub 2009 May 4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19414619

 

Individuals’ experience of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a condition of unknown aetiology that consists of symptoms such as fatigue, muscle and joint pain, gastric problems and a range of neurological disturbances. Due to the fact that these symptoms are complaints that most individuals will experience to a varying degree, it seems pertinent to investigate the processes by which those with CFS/ME conceptualise their symptoms and the experience of reaching a diagnosis.

Participants were recruited from local CFS/ME support groups. Eight semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and transcribed, and the verbatim transcriptions were analysed according to interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Six distinct themes were uncovered that illustrated the participants’ experience and perception of their symptoms. These included symptomatology and illness course, interference with daily and working life, frequency of symptoms, external information, diagnosis and treatment.

The findings were discussed in terms of internal and external cues related to symptom perception and the discovery that the possession of a diagnosis did not necessarily signify the end of the journey.

 

Source: Arroll MA, Senior V. Individuals’ experience of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychol Health. 2008;23(4):443-58. doi: 10.1080/14768320701246469. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160578

 

How common is chronic fatigue syndrome; how long is a piece of string?

Comment on: Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in metropolitan, urban, and rural Georgia. [Popul Health Metr. 2007]

One of the most difficult tasks in medicine is to accurately measure how common illnesses are. Why do we do it? Justifications include being able to plan health care and public health priorities, as well as highlighting specific diseases for extra funding for both health care and research. Yet the jobbing physician at the sharp edge of clinical practice cares little about the exact prevalence of a disease or illness, since this is all too obvious from the frequency of the problems presented by patients who come through the door.

You can read the rest of this comment here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904177/

 

Source: White PD. How common is chronic fatigue syndrome; how long is a piece of string? Popul Health Metr. 2007 Jun 8;5:6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904177/ (Full article)

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in metropolitan, urban, and rural Georgia

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating illness with no known cause or effective therapy. Population-based epidemiologic data on CFS prevalence are critical to put CFS in a realistic context for public health officials and others responsible for allocating resources.

METHODS: Based on a random-digit dialing survey we ascertained CFS cases and controls to estimate the prevalence of CFS in metropolitan, urban, and rural populations of Georgia. This report focuses on the 5,623 of 19,381 respondents ages 18 to 59 years old. Fatigued (2,438), randomly selected unwell not fatigued (1,429) and randomly selected well (1,756) respondents completed telephone questionnaires concerning fatigue, other symptoms, and medical history. Subsets of those identified by interview as having CFS-like illness (292), chronic unwellness which was not CFS-like (268 – randomly selected), and well subjects (223, matched to those with CFS-like illness on sex, race, and age) completed a clinical evaluation.

RESULTS: We estimated that 2.54% of persons 18 to 59 years of age suffered from CFS. There were no significant differences in prevalence of CFS between metropolitan, urban or rural populations or between white and black residents of the three regions. However, there were significant differences in female-to-male ratios of prevalence across the strata (metropolitan female: male 11.2 : 1, urban 1.7 : 1, rural 0.8 : 1).

CONCLUSION: We estimated that 2.54% of the Georgia population suffers from CFS, which is 6- to 10-fold higher than previous population-based estimates in other geographic areas. These differences may reflect broader screening criteria and differences in the application of the case definition. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that CFS prevalence may be higher in Georgia than other areas where it has been measured. Although the study did not identify differences in overall prevalence between metropolitan, urban, and rural Georgia populations, it did suggest the need for additional stratified analyses by geographic strata.

Comment in: How common is chronic fatigue syndrome; how long is a piece of string? [Popul Health Metr. 2007]

 

Source: Reeves WC, Jones JF, Maloney E, Heim C, Hoaglin DC, Boneva RS, Morrissey M, Devlin R. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in metropolitan, urban, and rural Georgia. Popul Health Metr. 2007 Jun 8;5:5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1904178/ (Full article)

 

Medication use by persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: results of a randomized telephone survey in Wichita, Kansas

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by profound fatigue, which substantially interferes with daily activities, and a characteristic symptom complex. Patients use a variety of prescribed and self-administered medications, vitamins, and supplements for relief of their symptoms. The objective of this study was to describe utilization of medications and supplements by persons with CFS and non-fatigued individuals representative of the general population of Wichita, Kansas.

METHODS: We used a random-digit dialing telephone survey to identify persons with CFS in the general population of Wichita, Kansas. Subjects who on the basis of telephone interview met the CFS case definition, and randomly selected non-fatigued controls, were invited for a clinic evaluation that included self-reported use of medications and supplements. Sex-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were estimated to measure the association between CFS and use of various drug categories.

RESULTS: We clinically evaluated and classified 90 subjects as CFS during the study and also collected clinical data on 63 who never described fatigue. Subjects with CFS reported using 316 different drugs compared to 157 reported by non-fatigued controls. CFS subjects were more likely to use any drug category than controls (p = 0.0009). Pain relievers and vitamins/supplements were the two most common agents listed by both groups. In addition CFS persons were more likely to use pain relievers, hormones, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, gastro-intestinal, and central nervous system medications (Sex-adjusted odds ratios range = 2.97 – 12.78).

CONCLUSION: Although the reasons for increased use of these agents were not elucidated, the data indicated the CFS patients’ need for symptom relief.

 

Source: Jones JF, Nisenbaum R, Reeves WC. Medication use by persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: results of a randomized telephone survey in Wichita, Kansas. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 2;1:74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC293479/ (Full article)

 

Estimating rates of chronic fatigue syndrome from a community-based sample: a pilot study

Abstract:

Most of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) epidemiological studies have relied on physicians who refer patients having at least six months of chronic fatigue and other symptoms. However, there are a number of potential problems when using this method to derive prevalence statistics.

For example, some individuals with CFS might not have the economic resources to access medical care. Other individuals with CFS might be reluctant to use medical personnel, particularly if they have encountered physicians skeptical of the authenticity of their illness. In addition, physicians that are skeptical of the existence of CFS might not identify cases.

In the present pilot study, a random community sample (N = 1,031) was interviewed by telephone in order to identify and comprehensively evaluate individuals with symptoms of CFS and those who self-report having CFS. Different definitions of CFS were employed, and higher rates (0.2%) of CFS were found than in previous studies. Methodological benefits in using more rigorous epidemiological methods when estimating CFS prevalence rates are discussed.

 

Source: Jason LA, Taylor R, Wagner L, Holden J, Ferrari JR, Plioplys AV, Plioplys S, Lipkin D, Papernik M. Estimating rates of chronic fatigue syndrome from a community-based sample: a pilot study. Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Aug;23(4):557-68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8546110