Do diagnostic criteria for ME matter to patient experience with services and interventions? Key results from an online RDS survey targeting fatigue patients in Norway

Abstract:

Public health and welfare systems request documentation on approaches to diagnose, treat, and manage myalgic encephalomyelitis and assess disability-benefit conditions. Our objective is to document ME patients’ experiences with services/interventions and assess differences between those meeting different diagnostic criteria, importantly the impact of post-exertional malaise.

We surveyed 660 fatigue patients in Norway using respondent-driven sampling and applied validated DePaul University algorithms to estimate Canadian and Fukuda criteria proxies. Patients on average perceived most interventions as having low-to-negative health effects. Responses differed significantly between sub-groups for some key interventions. The PEM score was strongly associated with the experience of most interventions. Better designed and targeted interventions are needed to prevent harm to the patient group.

The PEM score appears to be a strong determinant and adequate tool for assessing patient tolerance for certain interventions. There is no known treatment for ME, and “do-no-harm” should be a guiding principle in all practice.

Source: Kielland A, Liu J, Jason LA. Do diagnostic criteria for ME matter to patient experience with services and interventions? Key results from an online RDS survey targeting fatigue patients in Norway. J Health Psychol. 2023 Apr 28:13591053231169191. doi: 10.1177/13591053231169191. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37114822. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13591053231169191 (Full text)

The prevalence of stigma in a UK community survey of people with lived experience of long COVID

Abstract:

Background: Stigma can be experienced as perceived or actual disqualification from social and institutional acceptance on the basis of one or more physical, health-related, behavioural, or other attributes deemed to be undesirable. Long COVID is a predominantly multisystem condition that occurs in people with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, often resulting in functional disability, which limits day-to-day activities. We aimed to quantify the burden of stigma experienced in a community-based sample of people with lived experience of long COVID.

Methods: Data from the follow-up of a long COVID longitudinal online survey was used. The survey was coproduced with people living with long COVID. 13 questions on stigma were included to develop a Long COVID Stigma Scale capturing three domains: enacted (overt experiences of discrimination due to long COVID), internalised (internalising negative associations with long COVID and accepting them as self-applicable), and anticipated (expectation of bias or poor treatment by others) stigma. Data were collected through a social media survey with convenience non-probability sampling.

Findings: 966 (47·9%) of 2016 participants from the UK completed the follow-up survey and 888 responded to the questions on stigma. The mean age of respondents was 48·3 years (SD 10·7), and 84·6% identified as female. Roughly half (n=460, 50·4%) reported having a formal, clinical, long COVID diagnosis, and of these, 440 responded to the questions on stigma. The prevalence of people experiencing overall stigma at least sometimes was 95·4% (n=847), prevalence of enacted stigma was 62·7% (n=557), internalised stigma was 86·4% (n=767), and anticipated stigma was 90·8% (n=806). Prevalence of stigma was higher in respondents with a formal diagnosis of long COVID (97·5%; n=429) than in those without (93·2%; n=413).

Interpretation: This study highlights widespread and multilayered stigmas experienced by people living with long COVID in the UK, which presents a serious public health concern. The broader literature on stigmatised health conditions consistently suggests that stigma drives people away from health services, contributes to psychological distress, and compromises long-term physical outcomes. The higher proportion experiencing stigma in those with clinical diagnosis of long COVID might be indicative of stigma within the health-care system. Findings from this study should be taken into consideration within clinical practice and health care, social care, employment, and education policies.

Source: Pantelic M, Ziauddeen N, Boyes M, O’Hara ME, Hastie C, Alwan NA. The prevalence of stigma in a UK community survey of people with lived experience of long COVID. Lancet. 2022 Nov;400 Suppl 1:S84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02294-2. Epub 2022 Nov 24. PMID: 36930033. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02294-2/fulltext

An international survey of experiences and attitudes towards pacing using a heart rate monitor for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is a complex, multi-system neurological condition. The defining feature of ME is post-exertional malaise (PEM) with over 30 symptoms triggered by physical, cognitive, emotional and social activity.

The cause of PEM is unclear but one area of research using cardio-pulmonary exercise tests show a reduced ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) with repeated tests leading to PEM.

Pacing with heart rate monitoring (HRM) provides feedback to maintain activity intensity below the VAT. There is only one piece of research investigating the use of HRM although a number of guidelines recommend it.

Objective: To identify the experiences and attitudes of people with ME towards HRM.

Methods: A 40 question online survey was devised and released on ME websites, Twitter and Facebook pages. People with ME read the information sheet and followed an online link to the survey. The survey was open for three weeks and all answers were anonymous.

Results: 488 people with ME completed the survey. Most participants were female, 35-50 years and with a reported illness of greater than 5 years. Over 100 types of HR monitor used. Over 30 benefits and over 30 negatives identified. HRM reduced severity of ME and severity and duration of PEM.

Conclusion: Although there are limitations, HRM has many benefits including helping PwME to understand and manage their PEM and support them to increase their activities, including work. There is a need for more research and education of healthcare professionals in the safe use of HRM.

Source: Clague-Baker N, Davenport TE, Madi M, Dickinson K, Leslie K, Bull M, Hilliard N. An international survey of experiences and attitudes towards pacing using a heart rate monitor for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Work. 2023 Mar 13. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220512. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36938766. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220512 (Full text)

Adults with ME/CFS report surprisingly high rates of youth symptoms: A qualitative analysis of patient blog commentary

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating chronic illness that impacts pediatric populations.

Objective: The current study aimed to better understand adult perceptions of their experiences leading up to their diagnosis of ME/CFS.

Method: Patients provided data regarding symptoms of ME/CFS they may have experienced during childhood through a popular community blog forum, with participants interacting via blog comments in real-time and across various geographical locations.

Results: Descriptive analyses indicated that roughly 43% of adult survey participants reported having developed ME/CFS prior to age 18. A standard content analysis of patient blog commentary revealed several themes, such as poor mental health, family pattern/history, healthy childhood preceding sick adulthood, feeling misunderstood, lack of clarity until adulthood, sharing of resources, poor school functioning, isolation/poor social supports, and coping mechanisms.

Conclusion: There are unique benefits and insights that can be used by investigators who collaborate with patient organizations as a means of better understanding ME/CFS illness severity, presentation, and lived experiences.

Source: Johnson M, Torres C, Watts-Rich H, Jason L. Adults with ME/CFS report surprisingly high rates of youth symptoms: A qualitative analysis of patient blog commentary. Work. 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220484. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911960. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220484 (Full text)

My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, debilitating health condition characterized by overwhelming fatigue and post-exertional malaise, or exacerbation of symptoms following physical, mental, or emotional exertion. ME/CFS often impacts every aspect of an individual’s life, and one’s new reality may be much different from the daily life experienced before the onset of the condition. Though the long-term effects of COVID-19 have brought increased attention to chronic fatigue and related disorders, ME/CFS is still vastly understudied and frequently misunderstood.

People with ME/CFS are often passed between various healthcare providers as evidence-based treatments remain scarce. These patients are sometimes sent to rehabilitation professionals, who often lack appropriate education and experience with this patient population. This article describes the experience of a young woman and physical therapist with ME/CFS following COVID-19 infection, as well as potential implications for rehabilitation professionals and those who care for those with this condition.

Source: Sirotiak Z. My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative. Work. 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220487. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911961. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220487 (Full text)

Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland

Abstract:

Objectives: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex chronic and debilitating multifactorial disease. Adequate patient care is challenged by poor knowledge among health care professionals and the historical misconception that the disease is psychological in nature. This study assessed the health-related challenges faced by patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland and examined whether they receive adequate health care.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire between June and September of 2021, among 169 patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland.

Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 38.8 years. Only one-third of ME/CFS affected children and youth were correctly diagnosed before their 18th birthday. The mean time from disease onset to diagnosis was 6.7 years, and patients had an average of 11.1 different appointments and 2.6 misdiagnoses. A poor diagnosis rate and insufficient disease knowledge among health professionals in Switzerland led 13.5% of the patients to travel abroad to seek a diagnosis. Most patients (90.5%) were told at least once that their symptoms were psychosomatic. Swiss patients expressed high dissatisfaction with the health system and indicated that physicians lacked knowledge regarding ME/CFS. Therapies prescribed by physicians or tried by patients, as well as their perceived efficacy, were described. Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) was perceived as harmful by patients, whereas pacing, complementary/alternative medicine, and dietary supplements and medications to alleviate symptoms were reported to be helpful to varying degrees.

Conclusion: This study highlights that poor disease knowledge among health care providers in Switzerland has led to high patient dissatisfaction, and delays in ME/CFS diagnoses and prescription of inappropriate therapies, thus adding to patient distress and disease burden.

Source: Tschopp R, König RS, Rejmer P, Paris DH. Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jan 4;18(4):876-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019. PMID: 36852237; PMCID: PMC9957780. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957780/ (Full text)

Living with “long COVID”: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence

Abstract:

Objectives: Long-term health consequences of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), also known as “long COVID,” has become a global health concern. In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize the qualitative evidence on lived experiences of people living with long COVID that may inform health policymaking and practice.

Methods: We searched six major databases and additional sources and systematically retrieved relevant qualitative studies and conducted a meta-synthesis of key findings using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and reporting standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.

Results: We found 15 articles representing 12 studies out of 619 citations from different sources. These studies provided 133 findings that were categorized into 55 categories. All categories were aggregated to the following synthesized findings: living with complex physical health problems, psychosocial crises of long COVID, slow recovery and rehabilitation, digital resources and information management, changes in social support, and experiences with healthcare providers, services, and systems. Ten studies were from the UK, and others were from Denmark and Italy, which highlights a critical lack of evidence from other countries.

Conclusions: More representative research is needed to understand long COVID-related experiences from diverse communities and populations. The available evidence informs a high burden of biopsychosocial challenges among people with long COVID that would require multilevel interventions such as strengthening health and social policies and services, engaging patients and caregivers in making decisions and developing resources, and addressing health and socioeconomic disparities associated with long COVID through evidence-based practice.

Source: Hossain MM, Das J, Rahman F, Nesa F, Hossain P, Islam AMK, Tasnim S, Faizah F, Mazumder H, Purohit N, Ramirez G. Living with “long COVID”: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281884. PMID: 36795701; PMCID: PMC9934341. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934341/ (Full text)

Severe and Very Severe Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ME/CFS in Norway: Symptom Burden and Access to Care

Abstract:

There is a striking lack of systematic knowledge regarding the symptom burden, capacity for activities of daily living, and supportive measures for the most severely ill ME/CFS patients. The present study seeks to address this through a national, Internet-based survey targeting patients with severe and very severe ME/CFS and their carers.
Responses from 491 patients were included, with 444 having severe and 47 very severe ME/CFS with the classification based on the best estimate from patient responses. In addition, 95 respondents were reclassified from patients’ own classification to moderate and included for comparison. The onset was before 15 years of age for 45% in the very severe and 32% in the severe group. Disease duration was more than 15 years for 19% in the very severe and 27% in the severe group. Patient symptom burden was extensive. The most severely affected were totally bedridden, unable to talk, and experienced dramatic worsening of symptoms after minimal activity or sensory stimuli.
Care and assistance from healthcare and social services were often described as insufficient or inadequate, often worsening the symptom load and burden of care. A substantial lack of disease knowledge among healthcare providers in general was reported. Yet approximately 60% in the severe and very severe groups found services provided by occupational therapists and family doctors (general practitioners) helpful, while a smaller proportion experienced appropriate help from other health personnel groups. This indicates that help and support are highly needed and possible to provide. On the other hand, this must be approached carefully, as a substantial number of patients experienced deterioration from contact with healthcare personnel. Family carers described an extensive burden of care with often inadequate help from healthcare providers or municipal authorities.
Patient care by family members of very severe ME/CFS patients constituted more than 40 h a week for 71% of this patient group. The carers described a large negative impact on their work and financial situation, and on their mental wellbeing. We conclude that childhood onset was common, burden of disease was extensive, and support from responsible societal health and social support providers was commonly grossly inadequate.
Source: Sommerfelt K, Schei T, Angelsen A. Severe and Very Severe Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ME/CFS in Norway: Symptom Burden and Access to Care. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041487 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1487 (Full text)

As a doctor with long covid, I feel abandoned by the NHS

NHS workers with long covid should be given adequate sick pay and the support to work if they can

The covid-19 pandemic has thrown a spotlight on the treatment of NHS staff and their perceived value to their employers. As a recent episode of the BBC’s Panorama programme showed, many NHS staff now find themselves abandoned and in a precarious financial position after being infected with covid-19—most likely at work. The episode, “Forgotten Heroes of the Covid Front Line,” interviewed NHS staff struggling with the ongoing health effects of covid-19 infection, uncovering the stories of people who, despite being too sick to work, are facing reduced sick pay or losing their jobs. For some staff, this has already happened.

An estimated two million people in the UK have long covid,1 including many thousands of NHS workers, so why do we hear so little about it? As a doctor in the NHS who is one of those affected, I’m disappointed by the collective silence and the lack of protections and support mechanisms in place. NHS workers had to put their health and lives on the line when the virus broke out, with only a weekly clap to bolster them. Yet the public’s support hid underlying questions about the inadequacy of the personal protective equipment given to frontline workers in the UK and troubling attitudes to the risks we’d expose these people to.

UK guidance told healthcare workers that flimsy plastic aprons and masks we could see through were enough to protect us when clearly they weren’t. NHS staff had no choice but to continue working and caring for patients, so we carried on. I will never forget the fear in the eyes of those I cared for, and the dawning reality of the virus we were facing as cases continued to climb and more people were admitted to hospital.

I was relatively young, fit, and healthy when the pandemic began. I didn’t take any medications or have a pre-existing illness. I had nothing to worry about, I was told. But I was worried and wanted to protect my family. After coming home from a shift in the community covid hub, I’d strip off in the front porch, put my clothes straight in the washing machine, and shower. Of course, now that we understand more about the transmission of covid-19, I know why this wasn’t enough. Within a few weeks of working during the first wave of the pandemic, I was sick and stuck in bed, my oxygen levels dropping whenever I stood or walked.

Initially, I carried on working, struggling to manage a few hours here and there. One key feature of everyone I know with long covid is that we “pushed through” the initial stages of our illness, believing that we could get better by carrying on and ignoring our bodies. As a doctor, the system I worked in and the martyr complex instilled by medical culture enabled that view. In medicine, being ill, being human, and looking after ourselves is still too often seen as a kind of failure or weakness.

Being a doctor was how I defined my life, but eventually I was unable to carry on working. Now I’m in constant pain. I struggle to sit, walk, or play with my children. Like thousands of other people, I face the stark reality of being left behind—thrown away because I am now disabled.

The contrast in the way that healthcare workers have been treated is stark: from being lauded as heroes when needed by the system and government to being abandoned if they can now no longer work in the way they once did. Where is the leadership from the top, insisting that we care for those who were harmed by covid while working?

NHS workers—from doctors to porters, cleaners to nurses—have held the service together with their goodwill for years. But the personal costs of this are often too great. Even before the pandemic, I frequently neglected my needs or personal life for work. I miscarried at work, and continued with my clinic, not even giving myself time for a brief cry in the toilet. I missed a friend’s funeral because they were not a “first degree relative.” The covid-19 pandemic, and the swell of recognition it prompted for the value of healthcare workers, should have helped us reset these priorities and provide more support for staff. Yet this opportunity hasn’t been taken up by the government or NHS employers and is typified in the response to staff with long covid.

Like many people with long covid, I struggle living in a world where covid-19 has been declared “over” even though I still have not recovered my former health and more people are falling ill all the time. NHS staff, especially those with long covid or other covid-19 sequelae, should be protected from further infections and not have to fear for our lives going to work nearly three years on. Research has shown that FFP3 masks reduce the risk of covid-19 infection2: those who wish to wear them should be given them and supported.

Staff with long covid still have a lot to contribute to the NHS, which is beset by workforce shortages, but they need compassion and understanding. Many workers with long covid are desperately trying to return to work, but they must be met with flexibility and support. Instead of setting rigid time frames, NHS trusts should work with us to use our skills. This will mean making reasonable adjustments where they can, such as offering reduced duties, shorter hours, or the opportunity to work from home where possible.

The NHS has needed to challenge the organisational attitude of “work first, person second” for a long time. It can make a start by providing workers with long covid with adequate sick pay or compensation and the support to work if they are able to. Many of these people are ill because they were trying to save other people’s lives, without looking after their own. To neglect them now because they can no longer provide the same level of productivity is shameful.

Source: BMJ 2023;380:p337 https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p337 (Full text)

Evaluating the ability of patient reported outcome measures to represent the functional limitation of people living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Aim: To identify activities which people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) report are impacted by their condition, and evaluate the ability of measures of function used by National Health Service (NHS) ME/CFS Services to represent these experiences.

Method: 122 participants completed ME/CFS Service questionnaires reporting activities that they had reduced or stopped doing, as well as Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). These data were coded using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) using established linking rules. Matrices identified the agreement rate between the outcome measures and the participant-generated list. Activities which could not be coded against the ICF were grouped using content analysis.

Results: Responses from participants related to codes from nine subsections of the ICF. The PROMs used by the ME/CFS service had agreement rates between 58% and 62.5% with the participant-generated list. The content analysis identified a range of activities that were meaningful to participants that they could no longer do. These included holidays and day trips, accessing the community independently, and sustaining activity into the evening. These were not captured in either the ICF or the service’s outcome measures.

Conclusion: The list generated by participants referred to a wide range of activities, including some not captured by the ICF. Comparison against the outcome measures suggests that the measures used in many NHS ME/CFS services nationally capture patients’ experiences moderately well. However, there are activities that patients value that are not captured by these measures.

Source: Bethan Jones, Corin Bourne & Peter Gladwell. Evaluating the ability of patient reported outcome measures to represent the functional limitation of people living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2023.2175579 (Full text)