Tag: long covid clinical trial

Low-dose naltrexone and NAD+ for the treatment of patients with persistent fatigue symptoms after COVID-19

Highlights:

  • A subset of patients experienced persistent fatigue symptoms after COVID-19.
  • Treatment with low-dose naltrexone (LDN) and NAD+ was well tolerated.
  • Treatment increased SF-36 quality of life scores.
  • Treatment also improved fatigue symptom scores.
  • A subset of patients were clinically responsive.

Abstract:

A subset of patients experiences persistent fatigue symptoms after COVID-19, and patients may develop long COVID, which is characterized by lasting systemic symptoms. No treatments for this condition have been validated and are urgently warranted.

In this pilot study, we assessed whether treatment with low-dose naltrexone (LDN, 4.5 mg/day) and supplementation with NAD + through iontophoresis patches could improve fatigue symptoms and quality of life in 36 patients with persistent moderate/severe fatigue after COVID-19.

We detected a significant increase from baseline in SF-36 survey scores after 12 weeks of treatment (mean total SF-36 score 36.5 [SD: 15.6] vs. 52.1 [24.8]; p < 0.0001), suggestive of improvement of quality of life. Furthermore, participants scored significantly lower on the Chalder fatigue scale after 12 weeks of treatment (baseline: 25.9 [4.6], 12 weeks: 17.4 [9.7]; p < 0.0001).

We found a subset of 52 % of patients to be responders after 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment was generally safe, with mild adverse events previously reported for LDN, which could be managed with dose adjustments. The iontophoresis patches were associated with mild, short-lived skin irritation in 25 % of patients.

Our data suggest treatment with LDN and NAD+ is safe and may be beneficial in a subset of patients with persistent fatigue after COVID-19. Larger randomized controlled trials will have to confirm our data and determine which patient subpopulations might benefit most from this strategy.

Source: Anar Isman, Andy Nyquist, Bailey Strecker, Girish Harinath, Virginia Lee, Xingyu Zhang, Sajad Zalzala. Low-dose naltrexone and NAD+ for the treatment of patients with persistent fatigue symptoms after COVID-19. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity – Health, Volume 36, 2024, 100733, ISSN 2666-3546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100733. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624000115 (Full text)

Herbal Medicines for Long COVID: A Phase 2 Pilot Clinical Study

Abstract:

Background: Infections of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) can cause long-term effects known as long COVID. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical study as well as the efficacy and safety of traditional East Asian herbal medicines in alleviating fatigue and cognitive dysfunction “brain fog” in patients with long COVID.

Methods: This prospective pilot study investigated the use of three types of herbal medicines, Bojungikki-tang (BIT), Kyungok-go (KOG), and Cheonwangbosim-dan (CBD), for a 12-week period as potential treatments for fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in patients with long COVID. Forty-five patients with long COVID were recruited, and one of three drugs was given based on the patient’s symptoms and pattern identification. The effect of herbal medications on fatigue and cognitive function outcomes was assessed over a 36-week period, with patient adherence closely monitored.

Results: After 12 weeks of herbal drug administration, fatigue symptoms improved significantly across all groups, with treatment success rates of 80%, 53.33%, and 46.67% in the BIT, KOG, and CBD groups, respectively. However, “brain fog” symptoms showed less improvement, with treatment success rates of 40%, 46.67%, and 13.33% in the BIT, KOG, and CBD groups, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild and unrelated to the medication. The study design was found to be feasible with high medication adherence.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial with three herbal medicines to treat long COVID symptoms like fatigue and “brain fog.”

Source:Kim, T.; Yoon, J.; Kim, S.; Kang, B.; Kang, J.W.; Kwon, S. Herbal Medicines for Long COVID: A Phase 2 Pilot Clinical Study. Preprints 2024, 2024011605. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.1605.v1 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202401.1605/v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Creatine supplementation combined with breathing exercises reduces respiratory discomfort and improves creatine status in patients with long-COVID

Abstract:

Eight long-COVID patients with moderate fatigue that had lasted for ≥3 months were recruited. All patients were allocated in a double-blind parallel-group design to receive either 4 g of creatine per day plus breathing exercises (study group) or breathing exercises only (control group) for 3 months.

Creatine induced a significant increase in tissue total creatine levels for all 14 locations evaluated in the present study (P < 0.05), while its levels significantly dropped in the right frontal gray matter and left parietal mesial gray matter at follow-up in the control group (P < 0.05).

No change in time to exhaustion was demonstrated in the control group (P > 0.05), while the mean time to exhaustion was significantly improved for 54 s in the study group post-administration (P = 0.05).

These preliminary findings suggest that creatine is as an effective adjuvant therapeutic to breathing exercises for tackling the clinical features in long-COVID.

Source: Slankamenac, J; Ranisavljev, M; Todorovic, N; Ostojic, J; Stajer, V; Ostojic, SM. Creatine supplementation combined with breathing exercises reduces respiratory discomfort and improves creatine status in patients with long-COVID. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine ():, December 07, 2023. | DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_650_23  https://journals.lww.com/jopm/abstract/9000/creatine_supplementation_combined_with_breathing.99983.aspx (Full text available as PDF file)

Experimental drugs in randomized controlled trials for long-COVID: what’s in the pipeline? A systematic and critical review

Article highlights:

  • Presently, no standard treatment exists for long-COVID, a post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome, characterized by symptoms such as fatigue and brain fog lasting for 3 months or more after acute COVID-19.
  • Owing to increased funding, increasing numbers of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on drug treatments for long-COVID are being conducted. We systematically and critically reviewed these RCTs to pinpoint drugs with high potential for treating long-COVID.
  • Of the four completed RCTs identified, three examined long-COVID prevention, of which only metformin was deemed to exhibit high potential in preventing long-COVID when administered during acute COVID-19. Only one RCT investigated the potential efficacy of a drug (Treamid) in treating ongoing long-COVID, showing low to modest potential due to its inefficacy in improving the more meaningful outcomes of long-COVID.
  • Of the 22 ongoing RCTs identified, only rintatolimod and LYT-100 (deupirfenidone) were judged as possessing modest to high potential for treating long-COVID.
  • The fact that nearly all of the drug candidates did not seem to exhibit high potential in treating long-COVID is a testament to the ordeal of treating long-COVID.
  • Given that long-COVID is a multifaceted condition with multiple proposed subtypes, its treatment may need to be tailored to specific subtypes.

Abstract:

Introduction: Over three years have passed since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and yet the treatment for long-COVID, a post-COVID-19 syndrome, remains long overdue. Currently, there is no standardized treatment available for long-COVID, primarily due to the lack of funding for post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS). Nevertheless, the past few years have seen a renewed interest in long-COVID research, with billions of dollars allocated for this purpose. As a result, multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been funded in the quest to find an effective treatment for long-COVID.

Areas covered: This systematic review identified and evaluated the potential of current drug treatments for long-COVID, examining both completed and ongoing RCTs.

Expert opinion: We identified four completed and 22 ongoing RCTs, investigating 22 unique drugs. However, most drugs were deemed to not have high potential for treating long-COVID, according to three pre-specified domains, a testament to the ordeal of treating long-COVID. Given that long-COVID is highly multifaceted with several proposed subtypes, treatments likely need to be tailored accordingly. Currently, rintatolimod appears to have modest to high potential for treating the myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) subtype, LTY-100 and Treamid for pulmonary fibrosis subtype, and metformin for general long-COVID prevention.

Source: Yong SJ, Halim A, Halim M, Ming LC, Goh KW, Alfaresi M, AlShehail BM, Al Fares MA, Alissa M, Sulaiman T, Alsalem Z, Alwashmi ASS, Khamis F, Al Kaabi NA, Albayat H, Alsheheri A, Garout M, Alsalman J, Alfaraj AH, Alhajri M, Dhama K, Alburaiky LM, Alsanad AH, AlShurbaji AT, Rabaan AA. Experimental drugs in randomized controlled trials for long-COVID: what’s in the pipeline? A systematic and critical review. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2023 Aug 4:1-13. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2023.2242773. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37534972. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37534972/

Where are the long COVID trials?

The news in early July, 2023, that STOP-PASC, a clinical trial at Stanford University, CA, USA, testing nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in patients with long COVID, is closing enrolment before the full study size has been reached, is disheartening. STOP-PASC is one of the few clinical trials studying a pharmacological intervention for long COVID and although the reason for termination hasn’t been confirmed yet, it adds to the dismal state of clinical research relative to the substantial burden of the condition.
ClinicalTrials.gov currently lists 386 trials under the search term Long COVID. However, only 94 of those studies are classed as interventional and are currently recruiting, and even more disturbing, only 12 trials are testing pharmacological interventions. The rest comprise follow-up of trials in acute infection, rehabilitation, food supplements, telehealth, psychological support, physiotherapy, acupuncture, light therapy, Chinese herbal medicine etc. While the list ranges from “nice to have additional support” to questionable alternative cures or even potentially harmful treatments, we are clearly lacking tested pharmacological interventions that treat the underlying pathophysiology.
There is a desperate need for long COVID treatments. Although estimates vary quite widely between populations and studies and depending on the definitions and methods used, 1 in 10 people experiences long COVID after infection. Lasting symptoms range from mild to disabling, with people unable to work or even bed-bound and unable to take care of basic personal needs. These individual tragedies have wide-ranging repercussions, leading to lost earnings, a shrinking workforce, and increased healthcare and social care costs. Again, estimates vary widely, but the impact is in the range of billions to trillions US dollars globally. Why do we only have 12 pharmacological interventional trials then?
Read the rest of this article HERE.
Source: Where are the long COVID trials? EDITORIAL, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, VOLUME 23, ISSUE 8, P879, AUGUST  Published:August, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00440-1 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00440-1/fulltext (Full text)

Autonomic Nervous System Affection Due to Post Covid Syndrome

Identification of the Effects of Post Covid Syndrome on the Autonomic Nervous System With Heart Rate Variability

Post-Covid syndrome is defined as symptoms that develop in addition to respiratory symptoms in individuals who have had Covid-19 infection for more than 12 weeks. Symptoms such as fatigue, headache, cognitive impairment, dyspnea, heart palpitations, heat intolerance, digestive system disorders, sleep disorders, dermal problems, orthostatic intolerance come to the fore in individuals with post-Covid syndrome. It has been tried to be revealed in some studies that Covid-19 infection affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the relationship between Post-Covid 19 syndrome and ANS dysfunction.
Heart rate variability (HRV) measurement method can be used to evaluate ANS activity. HRV is a non-invasive method and is a measure of the change in heart rate over a period of time. HRV is a scalar quantity that shows the time between two beats of the heart and defines the oscillations between the R-R intervals. In HRV measurements, time-dependent and frequency-dependent measurement results are obtained and from these measurements, time-dependent RMSSD (square root of the square of the difference of the R-R intervals) and frequency-dependent high-frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) measurement components are used in relation to the sympathetic nervous system (CNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PSS). HRV can be measured in short-term (5 minutes) in terms of measurement time.
The aim of this study is to clearly reveal the relationship between Post-Covid 19 syndrome and ANS dysfunction and to provide standardization related to HRV measurement method and sub-parameters.
Source: Ali Veysel Özden, M.D. Bahçeşehir University. Istanbul, Beşiktaş, Turkey, 34000. ICH GCP US Clinical Trials Registry, Clinical Trial NCT05502094 https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT05502094

Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID

Abstract:

Background: The high incidence of COVID-19 globally has led to a large prevalence of Long COVID but there is a lack of evidence-based treatments. There is a need to evaluate existing treatments for symptoms associated with Long COVID. However, there is first a need to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking randomised controlled trials of interventions for the condition. We aimed to co-produce a feasibility study of non-pharmacological interventions to support people with Long COVID.

Methods: A consensus workshop on research prioritisation was conducted with patients and other stakeholders. This was followed by the co-production of the feasibility trial with a group of patient partners, which included the design of the study, the selection of interventions, and the production of dissemination strategies.

Results: The consensus workshop was attended by 23 stakeholders, including six patients. The consensus from the workshop was to develop a clinical trial platform that focused on testing different pacing interventions and resources. For the co-production of the feasibility trial, patient partners selected three pacing resources to evaluate (video, mobile application, and book) and co-designed feasibility study processes, study materials and undertook usability testing of the digital trial platform.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this paper reports the principles and process used to co-produce a feasibility study of pacing interventions for Long COVID. Co-production was effective and influenced important aspects of the study.

Source: Turner GM, McMullan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Walker A, Jeyes F, Adler Y, Chong A, Buckland L, Stanton D, Davies EH, Haroon S, Calvert M. Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID. Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00429-2. PMID: 36997975; PMCID: PMC10061378. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061378/ (Full text)

Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-COVID fatigue: a randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study

Abstract:

Fatigue is one of the most frequent and disabling symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome. In this study, we aimed to assess the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on fatigue severity in a group of patients with post-COVID syndrome and chronic fatigue.

We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled study to evaluate the short-term effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (2 mA, 20 min/day) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The modified fatigue impact scale score was used as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included cognition (Stroop test), depressive symptoms (Beck depression inventory) and quality of life (EuroQol-5D).

Patients received eight sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and were evaluated at baseline, immediately after the last session, and one month later. Forty-seven patients were enrolled (23 in the active treatment group and 24 in the sham treatment group); the mean age was 45.66 ± 9.49 years, and 37 (78.72%) were women. The mean progression time since the acute infection was 20.68 ± 6.34 months.

Active transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with a statistically significant improvement in physical fatigue at the end of treatment and 1 month as compared with sham stimulation. No significant effect was detected for cognitive fatigue.

In terms of secondary outcomes, active transcranial direct current stimulation was associated with an improvement in depressive symptoms at the end of treatment. The treatment had no effects on the quality of life. All the adverse events reported were mild and transient, with no differences between the active stimulation and sham stimulation groups.

In conclusion, our results suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may improve physical fatigue. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and optimize stimulation protocols.

Source: Oliver-Mas S, Delgado-Alonso C, Delgado-Álvarez A, Díez-Cirarda M, Cuevas C, Fernández-Romero L, Matias-Guiu A, Valles-Salgado M, Gil-Martínez L, Gil-Moreno MJ, Yus M, Matias-Guiu J, Matias-Guiu JA. Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-COVID fatigue: a randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study. Brain Commun. 2023 Apr 10;5(2):fcad117. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad117. PMID: 37091591; PMCID: PMC10116605. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116605/ (Full text)

Efficacy and tolerability of an endogenous metabolic modulator (AXA1125) in fatigue-predominant long COVID: a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2a pilot study

Summary:

Background: ‘Long COVID’ describes persistent symptoms, commonly fatigue, lasting beyond 12 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Potential causes include reduced mitochondrial function and cellular bioenergetics. AXA1125 has previously increased β-oxidation and improved bioenergetics in preclinical models along with certain clinical conditions, and therefore may reduce fatigue associated with Long COVID. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AXA1125 in Long COVID.

Methods: Patients with fatigue dominant Long COVID were recruited in this single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2a pilot study completed in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an Interactive Response Technology to receive either AXA1125 or matching placebo in a clinical based setting. Each dose (33.9 g) of AXA1125 or placebo was administered orally in a liquid suspension twice daily for four weeks with a two week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to day 28 in the phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate following moderate exercise, assessed by 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). All patients were included in the intention to treat analysis. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05152849.

Findings: Between December 15th 2021, and May 23th 2022, 60 participants were screened and 41 participants were randomised and included in the final analysis. Changes in skeletal muscle phosphocreatine recovery time constant (τPCr) and 6-min walk test (6MWT) did not significantly differ between treatment (n = 21) and placebo group (n = 20). However, treatment with AXA1125 was associated with significantly reduced day 28 Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire [CFQ-11] fatigue score when compared with placebo (least squares mean difference [LSMD] −4.30, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) −7.14, −1.47; P = 0.0039). Eleven (52.4%, AXA1125) and four (20.0%, placebo) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events; none were serious, or led to treatment discontinuation.

Interpretation: Although treatment with AXA1125 did not improve the primary endpoint (τPCr-measure of mitochondrial respiration), when compared to placebo, there was a significant improvement in fatigue-based symptoms among patients living with Long COVID following a four week treatment period. Further multicentre studies are needed to validate our findings in a larger cohort of patients with fatigue-dominant Long COVID.

Source: Lucy E.M. Finnigan, Mark Philip Cassar, Margaret James Koziel, Joel Pradines, Hanan Lamlum, Karim Azer, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of an endogenous metabolic modulator (AXA1125) in fatigue-predominant long COVID: a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2a pilot study. The Lancet, Published: April 14, 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101946 (Full text)

Outpatient Treatment of COVID-19 and the Development of Long COVID Over 10 Months: A Multi-Center, Quadruple-Blind, Parallel Group Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute sequelae of COVID, termed “Long COVID”, is an emerging chronic illness potentially affecting ~10% of those with COVID-19. We sought to determine if outpatient treatment with metformin, ivermectin, or fluvoxamine could prevent Long COVID.

Methods: COVID-OUT (NCT04510194) was a decentralized, multi-site trial in the United States testing three medications (metformin, ivermectin, fluvoxamine) using a 2×3 parallel treatment factorial randomized assignment to efficiently share placebo controls. Participants, investigators, care providers, and outcomes assessors were masked to randomized treatment assignment. Inclusion criteria included: age 30 to 85 years with overweight or obesity, symptoms <7 days, enrolled within <=3 days of documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. Long COVID diagnosis from a medical provider was a pre-specified secondary outcome assessed by monthly surveys through 300 days after randomization and confirmed in medical records.

Findings: Of 1323 randomized trial participants, 1125 consented for long-term follow up, and 95.1% completed >9 months of follow up. The median age was 45 years (IQR, 37 to 54), and 56% were female (7% pregnant). The median BMI was 30 kg/m2 (IQR, 27 to 34). Overall, 8.4% reported a medical provider diagnosed them with Long COVID; cumulative incidence: 6.3% with metformin and 10.6% with matched placebo. The hazard ratio (HR) for metformin preventing Long COVID was 0.58 (95%CI, 0.38 to 0.88; P=0·009) versus placebo. The metformin effect was consistent across subgroups, including viral variants. When metformin was started within <4 days of symptom onset, the HR for Long COVID was 0.37 (95%CI, 0.15 to 0.95).  No statistical difference in Long COVID occurred in those randomized to either ivermectin (HR=0.99; 95%CI, 0.59 to 1.64) or fluvoxamine (HR=1.36; 95%CI, 0.78 to 2.34).

Interpretations: A 42% relative decrease and 4.3% absolute decrease in the Long COVID incidence occurred in participants who received early outpatient COVID-19 treatment with metformin compared to exact-matching placebo.

Source: Bramante, Carolyn and Buse, John B. and Liebovitz, David and Nicklas, Jacinda and Puskarich, Michael and Cohen, Kenneth R. and Belani, Hrishikesh and Anderson, Blake and Huling, Jared D. and Thompson, Jennifer and Pullen, Matthew and Wirtz, Esteban Lemus and Siegel, Lianne and Proper, Jennifer and Odde, David J. and Klatt, Nichole and Sherwood, Nancy E. and Lindberg, Sarah and Karger, Amy B. and Beckman, Kenneth B. and Erickson, Spencer and Fenno, Sarah and Hartman, Katrina and Rose, Michael and Mehta, Tanvi and Patel, Barkha and Griffiths, Gwendolyn and Bhat, Neeta and Murray, Thomas A. and Boulware, David R., Outpatient Treatment of COVID-19 and the Development of Long COVID Over 10 Months: A Multi-Center, Quadruple-Blind, Parallel Group Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4375620 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4375620