Pulmonary circulation abnormalities in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome: dual-energy CT angiographic findings in 79 patients

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the frequency and pattern of pulmonary vascular abnormalities in the year following COVID-19.

Methods: The study population included 79 patients remaining symptomatic more than 6 months after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who had been evaluated with dual-energy CT angiography.

Results: Morphologic images showed CT features of (a) acute (2/79; 2.5%) and focal chronic (4/79; 5%) PE; and (b) residual post COVID-19 lung infiltration (67/79; 85%). Lung perfusion was abnormal in 69 patients (87.4%). Perfusion abnormalities included (a) perfusion defects of 3 types: patchy defects (n = 60; 76%); areas of non-systematized hypoperfusion (n = 27; 34.2%); and/or PE-type defects (n = 14; 17.7%) seen with (2/14) and without (12/14) endoluminal filling defects; and (b) areas of increased perfusion in 59 patients (74.9%), superimposed on ground-glass opacities (58/59) and vascular tree-in-bud (5/59). PFTs were available in 10 patients with normal perfusion and in 55 patients with abnormal perfusion. The mean values of functional variables did not differ between the two subgroups with a trend toward lower DLCO in patients with abnormal perfusion (74.8 ± 16.7% vs 85.0 ± 8.1).

Conclusion: Delayed follow-up showed CT features of acute and chronic PE but also two types of perfusion abnormalities suggestive of persistent hypercoagulability as well as unresolved/sequelae of microangiopathy.

Clinical relevance statement: Despite dramatic resolution of lung abnormalities seen during the acute phase of the disease, acute pulmonary embolism and alterations at the level of lung microcirculation can be identified in patients remaining symptomatic in the year following COVID-19.

Key points: • This study demonstrates newly developed proximal acute PE/thrombosis in the year following SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. • Dual-energy CT lung perfusion identified perfusion defects and areas of increased iodine uptake abnormalities, suggestive of unresolved damage to lung microcirculation. • This study suggests a complementarity between HRCT and spectral imaging for proper understanding of post COVID-19 lung sequelae.

Source: Mohamed I, de Broucker V, Duhamel A, Giordano J, Ego A, Fonne N, Chenivesse C, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M. Pulmonary circulation abnormalities in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome: dual-energy CT angiographic findings in 79 patients. Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr 25:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09618-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37145145; PMCID: PMC10129318. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129318/ (Full text)

Perceived Cognitive Deficits in Patients With Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 and Their Association With Post-COVID-19 Condition

Abstract:

Importance: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and in post-COVID-19 condition (PCC; colloquially known as long COVID), but the association between early presenting neuropsychiatric symptoms and PCC is unknown.

Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients with perceived cognitive deficits within the first 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the association of those deficits with PCC symptoms.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2020 to February 2021, with follow-up of 60 to 90 days. The cohort consisted of adults enrolled in the University of California, Los Angeles, SARS-CoV-2 Ambulatory Program who had a laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and were either hospitalized in a University of California, Los Angeles, hospital or one of 20 local health care facilities, or were outpatients referred by a primary care clinician. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2023.

Exposure: Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main outcomes and measures: Patients responded to surveys that included questions about perceived cognitive deficits modified from the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, Fifth Edition, (ie, trouble being organized, trouble concentrating, and forgetfulness) and symptoms of PCC at 30, 60, and 90 days after hospital discharge or initial laboratory-confirmed infection of SARS-CoV-2. Perceived cognitive deficits were scored on a scale from 0 to 4. Development of PCC was determined by patient self-report of persistent symptoms 60 or 90 days after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection or hospital discharge.

Results: Of 1296 patients enrolled in the program, 766 (59.1%) (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [16.7] years; 399 men [52.1%]; 317 Hispanic/Latinx patients [41.4%]) completed the perceived cognitive deficit items at 30 days after hospital discharge or outpatient diagnosis. Of the 766 patients, 276 (36.1%) perceived a cognitive deficit, with 164 (21.4%) having a mean score of greater than 0 to 1.5 and 112 patients (14.6 %) having a mean score greater than 1.5. Prior cognitive difficulties (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.83) and diagnosis of depressive disorder (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23-1.86) were associated with report of a perceived cognitive deficit. Patients reporting perceived cognitive deficits in the first 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to report symptoms of PCC than those without perceived cognitive deficits (118 of 276 patients [42.8%] vs 105 of 490 patients [21.4%]; χ21, 38.9; P < .001). Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, perceived cognitive deficits in the first 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 were associated with PCC symptoms (patients with a cognitive deficit score of >0 to 1.5: OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.62-3.60; patients with cognitive deficit score >1.5: OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.86-4.75) compared to patients who reported no perceived cognitive deficits.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that patient-reported perceived cognitive deficits in the first 4 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection are associated with PCC symptoms and that there may be an affective component to PCC in some patients. The underlying reasons for PCC merit additional exploration.

Source: Turner GM, McMullan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Walker A, Jeyes F, Adler Y, Chong A, Buckland L, Stanton D, Davies EH, Haroon S, Calvert M. Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID. Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00429-2. PMID: 36997975; PMCID: PMC10061378. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061378/ (Full text)

Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID

Abstract:

Background: The high incidence of COVID-19 globally has led to a large prevalence of Long COVID but there is a lack of evidence-based treatments. There is a need to evaluate existing treatments for symptoms associated with Long COVID. However, there is first a need to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking randomised controlled trials of interventions for the condition. We aimed to co-produce a feasibility study of non-pharmacological interventions to support people with Long COVID.

Methods: A consensus workshop on research prioritisation was conducted with patients and other stakeholders. This was followed by the co-production of the feasibility trial with a group of patient partners, which included the design of the study, the selection of interventions, and the production of dissemination strategies.

Results: The consensus workshop was attended by 23 stakeholders, including six patients. The consensus from the workshop was to develop a clinical trial platform that focused on testing different pacing interventions and resources. For the co-production of the feasibility trial, patient partners selected three pacing resources to evaluate (video, mobile application, and book) and co-designed feasibility study processes, study materials and undertook usability testing of the digital trial platform.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this paper reports the principles and process used to co-produce a feasibility study of pacing interventions for Long COVID. Co-production was effective and influenced important aspects of the study.

Source: Turner GM, McMullan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Walker A, Jeyes F, Adler Y, Chong A, Buckland L, Stanton D, Davies EH, Haroon S, Calvert M. Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID. Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00429-2. PMID: 36997975; PMCID: PMC10061378. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061378/ (Full text)

Long Covid: conceptualizing the challenges for public health

Abstract:

Background: Long Covid has caused significant disruption to public services, economies and population health worldwide, but no single public health approach has proven effective in its management. This essay was the winning entry for the Faculty of Public Health’s Sir John Brotherston Prize 2022.

Methods: In this essay, I synthesize existing literature on public health policy in long Covid, and discuss the challenges and opportunities posed by long Covid for the public health profession. The utility of specialist clinics and community care, in the UK and internationally, is examined, as well as key outstanding issues relating to evidence generation, health inequality and defining long Covid. I then use this information to inform a simple conceptual model.

Results: The generated conceptual model integrates community- and population-level interventions; key areas of identified policy need at both levels include ensuring equitable access to long Covid care, developing screening programmes for high-risk populations, co-production of research and clinical services with patients, and using interventions to generate evidence.

Conclusions: Significant challenges remain in the management of long Covid from a public health policy perspective. Multidisciplinary community-level and population-level interventions should be employed with a view to achieving an equitable and scalable model of care.

Source: Prashar J. Long Covid: conceptualizing the challenges for public health. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 May 2:fdac153. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac153. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37132023. https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdac153/7147865 (Full text)

COVID-19, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”) and post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS, “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”): Similarities and differences

Abstract:

Worldwide there have been over 760 million confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, and over 13 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered as of April 2023, according to the World Health Organization. An infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can lead to an acute disease, i.e. COVID-19, but also to a post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”). Currently, the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines are increasingly being noted and studied.

Here, we summarise the currently available indications and discuss our conclusions that (i) these side effects have specific similarities and differences to acute COVID-19 and PACS, that (ii) a new term should be used to refer to these side effects (post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome, PCVS, colloquially “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”), and that (iii) there is a need to distinguish between acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (ACVS) and post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PACVS) – in analogy to acute COVID-19 and PACS (“long COVID”). Moreover, we address mixed forms of disease caused by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination.

We explain why it is important for medical diagnosis, care and research to use the new terms (PCVS, ACVS and PACVS) in order to avoid confusion and misinterpretation of the underlying causes of disease and to enable optimal medical therapy. We do not recommend to use the term “Post-Vac-Syndrome” as it is imprecise. The article also serves to address the current problem of “medical gaslighting” in relation to PACS and PCVS by raising awareness among the medical professionals and supplying appropriate terminology for disease.

Source: Scholkmann F, May CA. COVID-19, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”) and post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS, “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”): Similarities and differences. Pathol Res Pract. 2023 May 3;246:154497. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154497. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37192595; PMCID: PMC10154064. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154064/ (Full text)

‘I’m still here, I’m alive and breathing’: The experience of Black Americans with long COVID

Abstract:

Aims and objectives: In this study, we aimed to characterize the impact of long COVID on quality of life and approaches to symptom management among Black American adults.

Background: As a novel condition, qualitative evidence concerning long COVID symptoms and their impact on quality of life can inform the refinement of diagnostic criteria and care plans. However, the underrepresentation of Black Americans in long COVID research is a barrier to achieving equitable care for all long COVID patients.

Design: We employed an interpretive description study design.

Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 15 Black American adults with long COVID. We analysed the anonymized transcripts from race-concordant, semi-structured interviews using an inductive, thematic analysis approach. We followed the SRQR reporting guidelines.

Results: We identified four themes: (1) The impact of long COVID symptoms on personal identity and pre-existing conditions; (2) Self-management strategies for long COVID symptoms; (3) Social determinants of health and symptom management; and (4) Effects on interpersonal relationships.

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the comprehensive ramifications of long COVID on the lives of Black American adults. Results also articulate how pre-existing conditions, social risk factors, distrust due to systemic racism, and the nature of interpersonal relationships can complicate symptom management.

Relevance to clinical practice: Care approaches that support access to and implementation of integrative therapies may be best suited to meet the needs of long COVID patients. Clinicians should also prioritize eliminating patient exposure to discrimination, implicit bias, and microaggressions. This is of particular concern for long COVID patients who have symptoms that are difficult to objectively quantify, such as pain and fatigue.

No patient or public contribution: While patient perspectives and experiences were the focus of this study, patients were not involved with the design or conduct of the study, data analysis or interpretation, or writing the manuscript.

Source: Bergmans RS, Chambers-Peeple K, Yu C, Xiao LZ, Wegryn-Jones R, Martin A, Dell’Imperio S, Aboul-Hassan D, Williams DA, Clauw DJ, DeJonckheere M. ‘I’m still here, I’m alive and breathing’: The experience of Black Americans with long COVID. J Clin Nurs. 2023 May 4. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16733. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37140186. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16733 (Full text)

Long-COVID and its Physical and Neurological Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review

Abstract:

This review was carried out with the objective to study patterns of neurological, psychological and other physical consequences of COVID-19 in the long term. The guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) had been followed; 22 articles, published during January 2020 to September 2021, were selected. Original research, review articles, editorial and viewpoints were included. Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed were searched through 2020 till 2021.

Data collection in selected studies was performed mainly through the online survey, telephone survey, use of medical records, and patient interviews. This systematic review contains the studies conducted in the American, Asian and European countries. The major outcomes identified were the neurological, psychological, and other long-term chronic manifestations of COVID‐19.

This review demonstrates that long-COVID has started to bring a huge wave of patients, the count of them being millions now, who can enter a phase of disability due to neurological damages if not treated during the early course of illness. Though more disabling than lethal, long-COVID patients with a neurological deficit is expected to overburden the healthcare system globally which is already been struggling to handle acute COVID-19 patients in this once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.

Source: Abdul Mannan Baig, Sameera Rizvi, Shahla Pardhan, Joachim Gerlach, Tazeen Saeed Ali. Long-COVID and its Physical and Neurological Symptoms in Adults: A Systematic Review. Vol. 17 No. 04 (2023): Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. https://pjmhsonline.com/index.php/pjmhs/article/view/4549/4498 (Full text)

Long COVID: a review and proposed visualization of the complexity of long COVID

Abstract:

Post-Acute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus – 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, or Long COVID, is a prevailing second pandemic with nearly 100 million affected individuals globally and counting. We propose a visual description of the complexity of Long COVID and its pathogenesis that can be used by researchers, clinicians, and public health officials to guide the global effort toward an improved understanding of Long COVID and the eventual mechanism-based provision of care to afflicted patients. The proposed visualization or framework for Long COVID should be an evidence-based, dynamic, modular, and systems-level approach to the condition.

Furthermore, with further research such a framework could establish the strength of the relationships between pre-existing conditions (or risk factors), biological mechanisms, and resulting clinical phenotypes and outcomes of Long COVID. Notwithstanding the significant contribution that disparities in access to care and social determinants of health have on outcomes and disease course of long COVID, our model focuses primarily on biological mechanisms. Accordingly, the proposed visualization sets out to guide scientific, clinical, and public health efforts to better understand and abrogate the health burden imposed by long COVID.

Source: Perumal R, Shunmugam L, Naidoo K, Abdool Karim SS, Wilkins D, Garzino-Demo A, Brechot C, Parthasarathy S, Vahlne A, Nikolich JŽ. Long COVID: a review and proposed visualization of the complexity of long COVID. Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1117464. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1117464. PMID: 37153597; PMCID: PMC10157068. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157068/ (Full text)

Post-acute Sequelae of SARS Co-V2 and Chronic Fatigue/Myalgic Encephalitis Share Similar Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Exercise Limitation

Abstract:

Abstract available online: https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2023.207.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6470

Source: S. Jothi, G. Claessen, M. Insel, S. Kubba, E. Howden, S.-R. Carmona, F.P. Rischard. Post-acute Sequelae of SARS Co-V2 and Chronic Fatigue/Myalgic Encephalitis Share Similar Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Exercise Limitation. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2023.207.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6470

Intrinsic factors behind long-COVID: I. Prevalence of the extracellular vesicles

Abstract:

It can be argued that the severity of COVID-19 has decreased in many countries. This could be a result of the broad coverage of the population by vaccination campaigns, which often reached an almost compulsory status in many places. Furthermore, significant roles were played by the multiple mutations in the body of the virus, which led to the emergence of several new SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced infectivity but dramatically reduced pathogenicity.

However, the challenges associated with the development of various side effects and their persistence for long periods exceeding 20 months as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, or taking available vaccines against it, are spreading horizontally and vertically in number and repercussions. For example, the World Health Organization announced that there are more than 17 million registered cases of long-COVID (also known as post-COVID syndrome) in the European Union countries alone. Furthermore, by using the PubMed search engine, one can find that more than 10 000 articles have been published focusing exclusively on long-COVID.

In light of these enormous and ever-increasing numbers of cases and published articles, most of which are descriptive of the various long-COVID symptoms, the need to know the reasons behind this phenomenon raises several important questions. Is long-COVID caused by the continued presence of the virus or one/several of its components in the recovering individual body for long periods of time, which urges the body to respond in a way that leads to long-COVID development? Or are there some latent and limited reasons related to the recovering patients themselves? Or is it a sum of both?

Many observations support a positive answer to the first question, whereas others back the second question but typically without releasing a fundamental reason/signal behind it. Whatever the answer is, it seems that the real reasons behind this widespread phenomenon remain unclear. This report opens a series of articles, in which we will try to shed light on the underlying causes that could be behind the long-COVID phenomenon.

Source: El-Maradny YA, Rubio-Casillas A, Uversky VN, Redwan EM. Intrinsic factors behind long-COVID: I. Prevalence of the extracellular vesicles. J Cell Biochem. 2023 May;124(5):656-673. doi: 10.1002/jcb.30415. Epub 2023 May 1. PMID: 37126363. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37126363/