Tag: long Covid

COVID-19 Infection: Its Lingering Symptoms in Adults

Abstract:

Background: Recent studies showed that a significant percentage of people who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had lingering symptoms. Among patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, studies showed persistent symptoms both in patients hospitalized and in outpatient settings. In the studies done in the outpatient setting involving mild to moderate COVID-19 patients, there were significant variations regarding the exact percentage of people with lingering symptoms. Also, in the outpatient setting, not many studies were done on COVID-19 patients that assessed risk factors for having lingering symptoms. Given that a large percentage of people infected with COVID-19 infection do not get hospitalized, it is imperative that this lacuna be filled. We believe knowing the details of long-term symptoms of COVID-19 infection both from prevalence and predictors point of view, could allow the physicians, healthcare system and community to better prepare for managing and following these patients.

Materials and methods: Our study period was within 12 months after the first documented case of COVID-19 occurred in the State of Alabama. Our study population included patients who were diagnosed with a documented case of COVID-19 in this time period and were under the care of a single primary care provider at an ambulatory clinic. Among 80 patients who had documented COVID-19, three left the practice, two declined to participate in the study and three were deceased (two due to COVID-19 and one for other reasons). Therefore, the study population constituted 72 patients. A questionnaire was mailed to all 72 patients to see how many of them had symptoms three months and beyond of having COVID-19 infection. A chart review was conducted for the study participants to assess for “Comorbid conditions”, health conditions that were considered conclusively high risk for acute COVID-19 infection by US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Results: Fifty-three patients responded to the questionnaire; 27 patients (50.9%) reported lingering symptoms beyond three months of diagnosis with COVID-19 infection. The three most common symptoms reported were fatigue (56%), brain fog (48%), and shortness of breath (41%). The results also showed that women are more likely than men to have lingering symptoms. “Elderly” (≥65 years) patients were as likely as 18-64 years old patients to have lingering symptoms and the presence of one or more of the “Comorbid conditions” does not have any bearing on the occurrence of lingering symptoms.

Conclusion: Future studies should be done in a larger population to assess the findings that our study showed regarding “elderly” age and the presence of one or more “comorbid conditions” being independent variables of the occurrence of prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. We recommend studies be done assessing the prevalence and predictors for the long-term effects of the COVID-19 infection. This knowledge could help in preventing those long-term symptoms from occurring in the first place and also in preparing the patient, the physician and the community in managing the outcomes effectively.

Source: Yellumahanthi DK, Barnett B, Barnett S, Yellumahanthi S. COVID-19 Infection: Its Lingering Symptoms in Adults. Cureus. 2022 May 4;14(5):e24736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24736. PMID: 35677013; PMCID: PMC9166577. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166577/ (Full text)

Inflammation during early post-acute COVID-19 is associated with reduced exercise capacity and Long COVID symptoms after 1 year

Abstract:

Background: Mechanisms underlying persistent cardiopulmonary symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection (post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 “PASC” or “Long COVID”) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pathophysiology of cardiopulmonary PASC using multimodality cardiovascular imaging including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and ambulatory rhythm monitoring.

Methods: We performed CMR, CPET, and ambulatory rhythm monitoring among adults > 1 year after PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UCSF Long-Term Impact of Infection with Novel Coronavirus cohort (LIINC; NCT04362150 ) and correlated findings with previously measured biomarkers. We used logistic regression to estimate associations with PASC symptoms (dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations, and fatigue) adjusted for confounders and linear regression to estimate differences between those with and without symptoms adjusted for confounders.

Results: Out of 120 participants in the cohort, 46 participants (unselected for symptom status) had at least one advanced cardiac test performed at median 17 months following initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. Median age was 52 (IQR 42-61), 18 (39%) were female, and 6 (13%) were hospitalized for severe acute infection. On CMR (n=39), higher extracellular volume was associated with symptoms, but no evidence of late-gadolinium enhancement or differences in T1 or T2 mapping were demonstrated. We did not find arrhythmias on ambulatory monitoring. In contrast, on CPET (n=39), 13/23 (57%) with cardiopulmonary symptoms or fatigue had reduced exercise capacity (peak VO 2 <85% predicted) compared to 2/16 (13%) without symptoms (p=0.008). The adjusted difference in peak VO 2 was 5.9 ml/kg/min lower (-9.6 to -2.3; p=0.002) or -21% predicted (-35 to -7; p=0.006) among those with symptoms. Chronotropic incompetence was the primary abnormality among 9/15 (60%) with reduced peak VO 2 . Adjusted heart rate reserve <80% was associated with reduced exercise capacity (OR 15.6, 95%CI 1.30-187; p=0.03). Inflammatory markers (hsCRP, IL-6, TNF-α) and SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels measured early in PASC were negatively correlated with peak VO 2 more than 1 year later.

Conclusions: Cardiopulmonary symptoms and elevated inflammatory markers present early in PASC are associated with objectively reduced exercise capacity measured on cardiopulmonary exercise testing more than 1 year following COVID-19. Chronotropic incompetence may explain reduced exercise capacity among some individuals with PASC.

Clinical perspective: What is New? Elevated inflammatory markers in early post-acute COVID-19 are associated with reduced exercise capacity more than 1 year later. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise is associated with reduced exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary symptoms more than 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Findings on ambulatory rhythm monitoring point to perturbed autonomic function, while cardiac MRI findings argue against myocardial dysfunction and myocarditis.

Clinical implications: Cardiopulmonary testing to identify etiologies of persistent symptoms in post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 or “Long COVID” should be performed in a manner that allows for assessment of heart rate response to exercise. Therapeutic trials of anti-inflammatory and exercise strategies in PASC are urgently needed and should include assessment of symptoms and objective testing with cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Source: Durstenfeld MS, Peluso MJ, Kaveti P, Hill C, Li D, Sander E, Swaminathan S, Arechiga VM, Sun K, Ma Y, Zepeda V, Lu S, Goldberg SA, Hoh R, Chenna A, Yee BC, Winslow JW, Petropoulos CJ, Win S, Kelly JD, Glidden DV, Henrich TJ, Martin JN, Lee YJ, Aras MA, Long CS, Grandis DJ, Deeks SG, Hsue PY. Inflammation during early post-acute COVID-19 is associated with reduced exercise capacity and Long COVID symptoms after 1 year. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Jun 1:2022.05.17.22275235. doi: 10.1101/2022.05.17.22275235. PMID: 35677073; PMCID: PMC9176659. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176659/ (Full text)

Autonomic function testing in long-COVID syndrome patients with orthostatic intolerance

Abstract:

The association between dysautonomia and long-COVID syndrome has gained considerable interest. This study retrospectively characterized the findings of autonomic reflex screen (ARS) in long-COVID patients presenting with orthostatic intolerance (OI). Fourteen patients were identified. All patients had normal cardiovagal function and 2 patients had abnormal sudomotor function. The head-up tilt table (HUTT) was significantly abnormal in 3 patients showing postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). CASS ranged from 0 to 2. The most common clinical scenario was symptoms of orthostatic intolerance without demonstrable HUTT orthostatic tachycardia or orthostatic hypotension (OH) (n = 8, 57 %). In our case series, most long-COVID patients presenting to our laboratory with OI had no significant HUTT abnormalities; only 3 patients met the criteria for POTS.

Source: Eldokla AM, Ali ST. Autonomic function testing in long-COVID syndrome patients with orthostatic intolerance. Auton Neurosci. 2022 Jun 2;241:102997. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2022.102997. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35679657. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35679657/

Long COVID in the long run – 23 months follow-up study of persistent symptoms

Abstract:

Symptoms of long COVID were found in 38% of 170 patients followed median 22.6 months. Most prevalent symptoms were fatigue, affected taste and smell, and difficulties remembering and concentrating. Predictors for long COVID were older age and number of symptoms in the acute phase. Long COVID may take many months, maybe years to resolve.

Source: Gunnhild Helmsdal, Katrin Dahl Hanusson, Marnar Fríðheim Kristiansen, Billa Mouritsardóttir Foldbo, Marjun Eivindardóttir Danielsen, Bjarni á Steig, Shahin Gaini, Marin Strøm, Pál Weihe, Maria Skaalum Petersen, Long COVID in the long run – 23 months follow-up study of persistent symptoms, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022;, ofac270, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac270 (Full text available as PDF file)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of long term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 pandemic: call for research priority and action

Abstract:

The long-term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 are a growing public health concern, yet there is considerable uncertainty about their prevalence, persistence and predictors. We conducted a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis of survivors’ health consequences and sequelae for COVID-19. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched through Sep 30th, 2021. Observational studies that reported the prevalence of sequelae of COVID-19 were included. Two reviewers independently undertook the data extraction and quality assessment.

Of the 36,625 records identified, a total of 151 studies were included involving 1,285,407 participants from thirty-two countries. At least one sequelae symptom occurred in 50.1% (95% CI 45.4-54.8) of COVID-19 survivors for up to 12 months after infection. The most common investigation findings included abnormalities on lung CT (56.9%, 95% CI 46.2–67.3) and abnormal pulmonary function tests (45.6%, 95% CI 36.3–55.0), followed by generalized symptoms, such as fatigue (28.7%, 95% CI 21.0–37.0), psychiatric symptoms (19.7%, 95% CI 16.1–23.6) mainly depression (18.3%, 95% CI 13.3–23.8) and PTSD (17.9%, 95% CI 11.6–25.3), and neurological symptoms (18.7%, 95% CI 16.2–21.4), such as cognitive deficits (19.7%, 95% CI 8.8–33.4) and memory impairment (17.5%, 95% CI 8.1–29.6).

Subgroup analysis showed that participants with a higher risk of long-term sequelae were older, mostly male, living in a high-income country, with more severe status at acute infection. Individuals with severe infection suffered more from PTSD, sleep disturbance, cognitive deficits, concentration impairment, and gustatory dysfunction. Survivors with mild infection had high burden of anxiety and memory impairment after recovery.

Our findings suggest that after recovery from acute COVID-19, half of survivors still have a high burden of either physical or mental sequelae up to at least 12 months. It is important to provide urgent and appropriate prevention and intervention management to preclude persistent or emerging long-term sequelae and to promote the physical and psychiatric wellbeing of COVID-19 survivors.

Source: Zeng N, Zhao YM, Yan W, Li C, Lu QD, Liu L, Ni SY, Mei H, Yuan K, Shi L, Li P, Fan TT, Yuan JL, Vitiello MV, Kosten T, Kondratiuk AL, Sun HQ, Tang XD, Liu MY, Lalvani A, Shi J, Bao YP, Lu L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 pandemic: call for research priority and action. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 6:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01614-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35668159; PMCID: PMC9168643. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168643/ (Full text)

Is post-COVID syndrome an autoimmune disease?

Abstract:

Introduction: Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) is recognized as a new entity in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Though its pathogenesis is not completely understood, persistent inflammation from acute illness and the development of autoimmunity play a critical role in its development.

Areas covered: The mechanisms involved in the emergence of PCS, their similarities with post-viral and post-care syndromes, its inclusion in the spectrum of autoimmunity and possible targets for its treatment.

Expert opinion: An autoimmune phenomenon plays a major role in most causative theories explaining PCS. There is a need for both PCS definition and classification criteria (including severity scores). Longitudinal and controlled studies are necessary to better understand this new entity, and to find what additional factors participate into its development. With the high prevalence of COVID-19 cases worldwide, together with the current evidence on latent autoimmunity in PCS, we may observe an increase of autoimmune diseases (ADs) in the coming years. Vaccination’s effect on the development of PCS and ADs will also receive attention in the future. Health and social care services need to develop a new framework to deal with PCS.

Source: Anaya JM, Herrán M, Beltrán S, Rojas M. Is post-COVID syndrome an autoimmune disease? Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun 14:1-14. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2085561. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35658801. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35658801/

Comprehensive clinical assessment identifies specific neurocognitive deficits in working-age patients with long-COVID

Abstract:

Introduction: There have been more than 425 million COVID-19 infections worldwide. Post-COVID illness has become a common, disabling complication of this infection. Therefore, it presents a significant challenge to global public health and economic activity.

Methods: Comprehensive clinical assessment (symptoms, WHO performance status, cognitive testing, CPET, lung function, high-resolution CT chest, CT pulmonary angiogram and cardiac MRI) of previously well, working-age adults in full-time employment was conducted to identify physical and neurocognitive deficits in those with severe or prolonged COVID-19 illness.

Results: 205 consecutive patients, age 39 (IQR30.0-46.7) years, 84% male, were assessed 24 (IQR17.1-34.0) weeks after acute illness. 69% reported ≥3 ongoing symptoms. Shortness of breath (61%), fatigue (54%) and cognitive problems (47%) were the most frequent symptoms, 17% met criteria for anxiety and 24% depression. 67% remained below pre-COVID performance status at 24 weeks. One third of lung function tests were abnormal, (reduced lung volume and transfer factor, and obstructive spirometry). HRCT lung was clinically indicated in <50% of patients, with COVID-associated pathology found in 25% of these. In all but three HRCTs, changes were graded ‘mild’. There was an extremely low incidence of pulmonary thromboembolic disease or significant cardiac pathology. A specific, focal cognitive deficit was identified in those with ongoing symptoms of fatigue, poor concentration, poor memory, low mood, and anxiety. This was notably more common in patients managed in the community during their acute illness.

Conclusion: Despite low rates of residual cardiopulmonary pathology, in this cohort, with low rates of premorbid illness, there is a high burden of symptoms and failure to regain pre-COVID performance 6-months after acute illness. Cognitive assessment identified a specific deficit of the same magnitude as intoxication at the UK drink driving limit or the deterioration expected with 10 years ageing, which appears to contribute significantly to the symptomatology of long-COVID.

Source: Holdsworth DA, Chamley R, Barker-Davies R, O’Sullivan O, Ladlow P, Mitchell JL, Dewson D, Mills D, May SLJ, Cranley M, Xie C, Sellon E, Mulae J, Naylor J, Raman B, Talbot NP, Rider OJ, Bennett AN, Nicol ED. Comprehensive clinical assessment identifies specific neurocognitive deficits in working-age patients with long-COVID. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0267392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267392. PMID: 35687603; PMCID: PMC9187094. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187094/ (Full text)

“Long COVID” results after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract:

Long-term sequelae of symptomatic infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 are largely undiscovered. We performed a prospective cohort study on consecutively hospitalized Sars-CoV-2 patients (March-May 2020) for evaluating COVID-19 outcomes at 6 and 12 months. After hospital discharge, patients were addressed to two follow-up pathways based on respiratory support needed during hospitalization. Outcomes were assessed by telephone consultation or ambulatory visit.

Among 471 patients, 80.9% received no respiratory support during hospitalization; 19.1% received non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). 58 patients died during hospitalization, therefore 413 were enrolled for follow-up. At 6 months, among 355 patients, the 30.3% had any symptoms, 18.0% dyspnea, 6.2% neurological symptoms. Fifty-two out of 105 had major damages in interstitial computed tomography images. NIV/IMV patients had higher probability to suffer of symptoms (aOR = 4.00, 95%CI:1.99-8.05), dyspnea (aOR = 2.80, 95%CI:1.28-6.16), neurological symptoms (aOR = 9.72, 95%CI:2.78-34.00). At 12 months, among 344, the 25.3% suffered on any symptoms, 12.2% dyspnea, 10.1% neurological symptoms. Severe interstitial lesions were present in 37 out of 47 investigated patients.

NIV/IMV patients in respect to no respiratory support, had higher probability of experiencing symptoms (aOR = 3.66, 95%CI:1.73-7.74), neurological symptoms (aOR = 8.96, 95%CI:3.22-24.90). COVID-19 patients showed prolonged sequelae up to 12 months, highlighting the need of follow-up pathways for post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Source: Rigoni M, Torri E, Nollo G, Donne LD, Rizzardo S, Lenzi L, Falzone A, Cozzio S. “Long COVID” results after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 10;12(1):9581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13077-5. PMID: 35688830; PMCID: PMC9185134. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185134/ (Full text)

SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence throughout the human body and brain

Abstract:

COVID-19 is known to cause multi-organ dysfunction1-3 in acute infection, with prolonged symptoms experienced by some patients, termed Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC)4-5. However, the burden of infection outside the respiratory tract and time to viral clearance is not well characterized, particularly in the brain3,6-14.
We performed complete autopsies on 44 patients with COVID-19 to map and quantify SARS-CoV-2 distribution, replication, and cell-type specificity across the human body, including brain, from acute infection through over seven months following symptom onset. We show that SARS-CoV-2 is widely distributed, even among patients who died with asymptomatic to mild COVID-19, and that virus replication is present in multiple extrapulmonary tissues early in infection.
Further, we detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in multiple anatomic sites, including regions throughout the brain, for up to 230 days following symptom onset. Despite extensive distribution of SARS-CoV-2 in the body, we observed a paucity of inflammation or direct viral cytopathology outside of the lungs. Our data prove that SARS-CoV-2 causes systemic infection and can persist in the body for months.
Source: Daniel Chertow, Sydney Stein, Sabrina Ramelli et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence throughout the human body and brain, 20 December 2021, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1139035/v1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1139035/v1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05542-y (Full text)

Post-acute COVID-19 cognitive impairment and decline uniquely associate with kynurenine pathway activation: a longitudinal observational study

Abstract:

Cognitive impairment and function post-acute mild to moderate COVID-19 are poorly understood. We report findings of 128 prospectively studied SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Cognition and olfaction were assessed at 2-, 4- and 12-months post-diagnosis. Lung function, physical and mental health were assessed at 2-month post diagnosis. Blood cytokines, neuro-biomarkers, and kynurenine pathway (KP) metabolites were measured at 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-months. Mild to moderate cognitive impairment (demographically corrected) was present in 16%, 23%, and 26%, at 2-, 4- and 12-months post diagnosis, respectively. Overall cognitive performance mildly, but significantly (p<.001) declined. Cognitive impairment was more common in those with anosmia (p=.05), but only at 2 months. KP metabolites quinolinic acid, 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, and kynurenine were significantly (p<.001) associated with cognitive decline. The KP as a unique biomarker offers a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19-related cognitive impairment.

Source: Lucette A. Cysique, David Jakabek, Sophia G. Bracken, Yasmin Allen-Davidian, Benjamin Heng, Sharron Chow, Mona Dehhaghi, Ananda Staats Pires, David R. Darley, Anthony Byrne, Chansavath Phetsouphanh, Anthony Kelleher, Gregory J. Dore, Gail V. Matthews, Gilles J Guillemin, Bruce J. Brew. Post-acute COVID-19 cognitive impairment and decline uniquely associate with kynurenine pathway activation: a longitudinal observational study. medRxiv 2022.06.07.22276020; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.07.22276020 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.07.22276020v1.full-text (Full text)