Pale rider: the Spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world

Book Review:

Pale rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and How it Changed the World by Laura Spinney, Public Affairs; 1st edition (September 12, 2017)

Formerly Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed life for humanity, nothing is “normal” anymore! In the last 100 years, there has not been any similar event. The common feeling among professionals, planners, press, politicians, and people is that “life will not be the same as we knew it, after the pandemic.” Understanding the likely impact of the pandemic and its consequences would be valuable to humanity in general and mental health professionals in particular. Against this current world-shaking event, it is natural to look for similar events in human history. In this, the 1918 flu is the closest event to understand a variety of aspects of the current pandemic. The book, Pale Rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and how it changed the world, is one of the best books in this field.[1] That many people are looking at the 1918 flu can be seen by the number of articles in the lay press that have focused on the 1918 flu.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Even now, a new book was published as latest as July 23, 2020.[8],[9]

Nevertheless, the book, under review, has 21 chapters with attractive chapter titles such as Like a Thief in the Night; The Doctor’s Dilemma; The Wrath of God; Chalking Doors with Crosses; Good Samaritans; The Human Factor; The Green Shoots of Recovery; Alternate Histories; and Health Care for all and Melancholy Muse.

Between the first case recorded on March 4, 1918, and the last case sometime in March 1920, it killed 50–100 million people, or between 2.5% and 5% of the global population. In terms of a single event causing major loss of life, it surpassed the First World War (17 million dead) and the Second World War (60 million dead). India was specially affected and lost around 6% of its population, the greatest loss in absolute numbers of any country in the world (an estimate of 13–18 million). The book has a special focus on India,[1] presented through the lives of Mahatma Gandhi, Tagore, Munshi Premchand, and Nirala and its impact on the Independence struggle.

Mahatma Gandhi was affected by the gastric variety of flu. At Gandhi’s ashram, several prominent members of the Independence Movement were laid low with flu. Gandhi was too feverish to speak or read; he couldn’t shake a sense of doom: “All interest in living had ceased.” Interestingly, Gandhi’s reaction was: This protracted and first long illness in my life thus afforded me a unique opportunity to examine my principles and to test them. Rabindranath Tagore returned his knighthood as a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, and observed that British were guilty of “the same kind of ignorance of the eternal laws which primitive people show when they hunt for some so-called witch to whom they ascribe the cause of their illness, while carrying the disease germs in their own blood.” Spinney observes that disease was a major preoccupation in the writing that emerged in the 1920s, where it dovetailed with ideas about the need to reform the caste system and throw off the yoke of British rule. Munshi Premchand became the self-styled “chronicler of village life” around 1918 when he was living in the United Provinces (Uttar Pradesh), where the Spanish flu claimed an estimated 2–3 million lives alone. Also living there at that time was the poet Nirala, who lost his wife and many other members of his family to the flu. He later recalled seeing the River Ganges “swollen with dead bodies.” This was the strangest time in my life. My family disappeared in the blink of an eye.

There are sections in the book describing the feelings of anxiety accompanying the acute phase of the disease, and reports of people killing themselves while delirious. Following recovery, some patients found themselves plunged into a lingering state of lassitude and despair. Norwegian epidemiologist Svenn-Erik Mamelund studied asylum records in his country from 1872 to 1929 and found that, every year, in which there was no pandemic of influenza, only a few cases were admitted of mental illness associated with flu. However, in each of the 6 years following the 1918 pandemic, the average number of such admissions was seven times higher than in those nonpandemic years (emphasis added). Mamelund speculates that the patients admitted in those 6 years were survivors of Spanish flu who were suffering from what today we would call “postviral or chronic fatigue syndrome.”

The book provides similar creative responses in a number of countries following the pandemic. The paragraph about controversies about the quarantine makes for contemporary reading: “Quarantine and other disease containment strategies place the interests of the collective over those of the individual. When the collective is very large, those strategies have to be imposed in a top-down fashion. But mandating a central authority to act in the interests of the collective potentially creates two kinds of problems. First, the collective may have competing priorities-the need to make money, or the need to raise an army-and deny or water-down the authority’s powers of enforcement. Second, the rights of individuals risk getting trampled on, especially if the authority abuses the measures placed at its disposal.”

One of the quotes from the book can portend what we can expect in the coming years in the country. Spinney notes, “The 1918 pandemic accelerated the pace of change in the first half of the twentieth century, and helped shape our modern world. It influenced the course of the First World War and arguably, contributed to the Second. It pushed India closer to Independence, South Africa closer to Apartheid, and Switzerland to the brink of Civil War. It ushered in universal healthcare and alternative medicine, our love of fresh air and our passion for sport, and it was probably responsible, at least in part, for the obsession of twentieth-century artists with all the myriad ways in which the human body can fail.”

The book made me realize that the current pandemic will bring about extensive changes. Against this expected “mental health tsunami,” there are three tasks for each one of us: firstly, to document the experiences of individuals, families, communities, and the government; secondly, to identify the social factors contributing to vulnerabilities and resilience, to guide corrective actions; and lastly, to utilize the opportunity of heightened awareness of societal-level issues, to work toward addressing the predisposing causes for higher mortality and morbidity such as inequalities, intolerances, inadequate health infrastructure, the weak welfare network to support the vulnerable, and decentralization of powers and plans to enhance community participation.

I recommend it as an essential reading during the current pandemic period.

Source: Murthy R S. Pale rider: the spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Jul 4];36, Suppl S1:189-90. Available from: https://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2020/36/5/189/297158

The 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Back to the Future?

Abstract:

Background: It is just over a century since the 1918 flu pandemic, sometimes referred to as the “mother” of pandemics. This brief retrospective of the 1918 pandemic is taken from the viewpoint of the current SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic and is based on a short lecture given during the 2021 Virtual Congress of the ERA-EDTA.

Summary: This review summarizes and highlights some of the earlier pandemic’s salient features, some parallels with today, and some potential learnings, bearing in mind that the flu pandemic occurred over 100 years ago at a time of major turmoil during the climax to WWl, and with limited medical expertise and knowledge, research facilities, or well-structured and resourced healthcare services. While there is little or no information on renal complications at the time, or an effective treatment, some observations in relation to COVID-19 and vaccination are included.

Key Messages: Lessons are difficult to draw from 1918 other than the importance and value of non-pharmaceutical measures to limit viral transmission. While the economic impact of the 1918 pandemic was significant, as it is now with COVID-19, subsequent economic analysis has shown that protecting public health and preserving economic activity are not mutually exclusive. Both H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 viruses are neurotropic and may cause chronically debilitating neurological diseases, including conditions such as encephalitis lethargica (still debated) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (chronic fatigue syndrome), respectively. Although coronavirus and influenza viral infections have some similarities, they are certainly not the same, as we are realising, and future infectious pandemics may still surprise us, but being “forewarned is forearmed.”

Source: Unwin RJ. The 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Back to the Future? Kidney Blood Press Res. 2021 Oct 18:1-8. doi: 10.1159/000519288. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34662882. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34662882/ 

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is associated with pandemic influenza infection, but not with an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is associated to infections and it has been suggested that vaccination can trigger the disease. However, little is known about the specific association between clinically manifest influenza/influenza vaccine and CFS/ME. As part of a registry surveillance of adverse effects after mass vaccination in Norway during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, we had the opportunity to estimate and contrast the risk of CFS/ME after infection and vaccination.

METHODS: Using the unique personal identification number assigned to everybody who is registered as resident in Norway, we followed the complete Norwegian population as of October 1, 2009, through national registries of vaccination, communicable diseases, primary health, and specialist health care until December 31, 2012. Hazard ratios (HRs) of CFS/ME, as diagnosed in the specialist health care services (diagnostic code G93.3 in the International Classification of Diseases, Version 10), after influenza infection and/or vaccination were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards regression.

RESULTS: The incidence rate of CFS/ME was 2.08 per 100,000 person-months at risk. The adjusted HR of CFS/ME after pandemic vaccination was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.04), while it was 2.04 (95% CI: 1.78-2.33) after being diagnosed with influenza infection during the peak pandemic period.

CONCLUSIONS: Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection was associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of CFS/ME. We found no indication of increased risk of CFS/ME after vaccination. Our findings are consistent with a model whereby symptomatic infection, rather than antigenic stimulation may trigger CFS/ME.

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Magnus P, Gunnes N, Tveito K, Bakken IJ, Ghaderi S, Stoltenberg C, Hornig M, Lipkin WI, Trogstad L, Håberg SE. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is associated with pandemic influenza infection, but not with an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2015 Nov 17;33(46):6173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475444