The immunology of long COVID

Abstract:

Long COVID is the patient-coined term for the disease entity whereby persistent symptoms ensue in a significant proportion of those who have had COVID-19, whether asymptomatic, mild or severe. Estimated numbers vary but the assumption is that, of all those who had COVID-19 globally, at least 10% have long COVID. The disease burden spans from mild symptoms to profound disability, the scale making this a huge, new health-care challenge.

Long COVID will likely be stratified into several more or less discrete entities with potentially distinct pathogenic pathways. The evolving symptom list is extensive, multi-organ, multisystem and relapsing–remitting, including fatigue, breathlessness, neurocognitive effects and dysautonomia. A range of radiological abnormalities in the olfactory bulb, brain, heart, lung and other sites have been observed in individuals with long COVID. Some body sites indicate the presence of microclots; these and other blood markers of hypercoagulation implicate a likely role of endothelial activation and clotting abnormalities.

Diverse auto-antibody (AAB) specificities have been found, as yet without a clear consensus or correlation with symptom clusters. There is support for a role of persistent SARS-CoV-2 reservoirs and/or an effect of Epstein–Barr virus reactivation, and evidence from immune subset changes for broad immune perturbation. Thus, the current picture is one of convergence towards a map of an immunopathogenic aetiology of long COVID, though as yet with insufficient data for a mechanistic synthesis or to fully inform therapeutic pathways.

Source: Altmann, D.M., Whettlock, E.M., Liu, S. et al. The immunology of long COVID. Nat Rev Immunol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-023-00904-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-023-00904-7 (Full text)

Exploring potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets of long COVID-associated inflammatory cardiomyopathy

Background: The negative impact of long COVID on social life and human health is increasingly prominent, and the elevated risk of cardiovascular disease in patients recovering from COVID-19 has also been fully confirmed. However, the pathogenesis of long COVID-related inflammatory cardiomyopathy is still unclear. Here, we explore potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets of long COVID-associated inflammatory cardiomyopathy.

Methods: Datasets that met the study requirements were identified in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained by the algorithm. Then, functional enrichment analysis was performed to explore the basic molecular mechanisms and biological processes associated with DEGs. A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed and analyzed to identify hub genes among the common DEGs. Finally, a third dataset was introduced for validation.

Results: Ultimately, 3,098 upregulated DEGs and 1965 downregulated DEGs were extracted from the inflammatory cardiomyopathy dataset. A total of 89 upregulated DEGs and 217 downregulated DEGs were extracted from the dataset of convalescent COVID patients. Enrichment analysis and construction of the PPI network confirmed VEGFA, FOXO1, CXCR4, and SMAD4 as upregulated hub genes and KRAS and TXN as downregulated hub genes. The separate dataset of patients with COVID-19 infection used for verification led to speculation that long COVID-associated inflammatory cardiomyopathy is mainly attributable to the immune-mediated response and inflammation rather than to direct infection of cells by the virus.

Conclusion: Screening of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets sheds new light on the pathogenesis of long COVID-associated inflammatory cardiomyopathy as well as potential therapeutic approaches. Further clinical studies are needed to explore these possibilities in light of the increasingly severe negative impacts of long COVID.

Source: Peng Qi, Mengjie Huang and Haiyan Zhu. Exploring potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets of long COVID-associated inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Front. Med., 29 June 2023. Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy. Volume 10 – 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1191354 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1191354/full (Full text)

Increased circulating fibronectin, depletion of natural IgM and heightened EBV, HSV-1 reactivation in ME/CFS and long COVID

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, debilitating, long-term illness without a diagnostic biomarker. ME/CFS patients share overlapping symptoms with long COVID patients, an observation which has strengthened the infectious origin hypothesis of ME/CFS. However, the exact sequence of events leading to disease development is largely unknown for both clinical conditions.

Here we show antibody response to herpesvirus dUTPases, particularly to that of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and HSV-1, increased circulating fibronectin (FN1) levels in serum and depletion of natural IgM against fibronectin ((n)IgM-FN1) are common factors for both severe ME/CFS and long COVID. We provide evidence for herpesvirus dUTPases-mediated alterations in host cell cytoskeleton, mitochondrial dysfunction and OXPHOS.

Our data show altered active immune complexes, immunoglobulin-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation as well as adaptive IgM production in ME/CFS patients. Our findings provide mechanistic insight into both ME/CFS and long COVID development. Finding of increased circulating FN1 and depletion of (n)IgM-FN1 as a biomarker for the severity of both ME/CFS and long COVID has an immediate implication in diagnostics and development of treatment modalities.

Source: Zheng Liu, Claudia Hollmann, Sharada Kalanidhi, Arnhild Grothey, Samuel Keating, Irene Mena-Palomo, Stephanie Lamer, Andreas Schlosser, Agnes Kaiping, Carsten Scheller, Franziska Sotzny, Anna Horn, Carolin Nuernberger, Vladimir Cejka, Boshra Afshar, Thomas Bahmer, Stefan Schreiber, Joerg Janne Vehreschild, Olga Milljukov, Christian Schaefer, Luzie Kretzler, Thomas Keil, Jens-Peter Reese, Felizitas A Eichner, Lena Schmidbauer, Peter U Heuschmann, Stefan Stoerk, Caroline Morbach, Gabriela Riemekasten, Niklas Beyersdorf, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Robert K Naviaux, Marshall Williams, Maria E Ariza, Bhupesh Kumar Prusty. Increased circulating fibronectin, depletion of natural IgM and heightened EBV, HSV-1 reactivation in ME/CFS and long COVID. medRxiv 2023.06.23.23291827; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.23291827 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.23.23291827v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Vagus Nerve Dysfunction in the Post-COVID-19 Condition

Abstract:

Background: The post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is a disabling syndrome affecting 5-15% of subjects who survive COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 mediated vagus nerve dysfunction could explain some of the PCC symptoms, including persistent dysphonia, dysphagia, dyspnea, dizziness, tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, gastrointestinal disturbances or neurocognitive complaints.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional pilot study in subjects with PCC with symptoms suggesting vagus nerve dysfunction (n=30) and compared them to subjects fully recovered from acute COVID-19 (n=14) and individuals never infected with SARS-CoV-2 (n=16), matched by age and sex. We evaluated the structure and function of the vagus nerve, including dysphonia, dysphagia, and dysautonomia tests, and evaluated the structure and function of respiratory muscles with vagus nerve innervation.

Findings: Participants were mostly (80%) women with median 44 years of age. Their most prevalent symptoms were cognitive dysfunction (83%), dyspnea (80%) and tachycardia (80%). Compared with COVID-19-recovered and uninfected controls, respectively, subjects with PCC were more likely to show thickening and hyperechogenic vagus nerve in neck ultrasounds (mean ± SD left vagus nerve cross-sectional area: 2.4 ± 0.97mm2 vs. 2 ± 0.52mm2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.73 mm2, p=0.080), flattened diaphragmatic curve (47% vs 6% vs 14%, p=0.007), reduced esophageal peristalsis (34% vs 0% vs 21%, p=0.020), gastroesophageal reflux (34% vs 19% vs 7%, p=0.130), hiatal hernia (25% vs 0% vs 7%, p=0.050) and reduced maximal inspiratory pressure in functional respiratory tests (62% vs. 6% vs. 17%, p ≤0.001).

Interpretation: Vagus nerve dysfunction has a central pathogenic role in the pathophysiology of the post-COVID condition.

Source: Lladós, Gemma and Massanella, Marta and Coll-Fernández, Roser and Rodríguez, Raúl and Hernández, Electra and Lucente, Giuseppe and López, Cristina and Loste, Cora and Santos, José Ramón and España-Cueto, Sergio and Nevot, Maria and Muñoz-López, Francisco and Arrieta, Sandra Silva and Brander, Christian and Durà, Maria José and Cuadras, Patricia and Bechini, Jordi and Tenesa, Montserrat and Martinez-Piñeiro, Alicia and Herrero, Cristina and Chamorro, Anna and Garcia, Anna and Grau, Eulalia and Clotet, Bonaventura and Paredes, Roger and Mateu, Lourdes and Unit, Germans Trias Long-COVID, Vagus Nerve Dysfunction in the Post-COVID-19 Condition. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4479598 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4479598

Coronary microvascular health in symptomatic patients with prior COVID-19 infection: an updated analysis

Abstract:

Aims: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to determine the effects of prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the coronary microvasculature accounting for time from COVID-19, disease severity, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and in subgroups of patients with diabetes and those with no known coronary artery disease.

Methods and results: Cases consisted of patients with previous COVID-19 who had clinically indicated positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and were matched 1:3 on clinical and cardiovascular risk factors to controls having no prior infection. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow (MBF) in mL/min/g of the left ventricle. Comparisons between cases and controls were made for the odds and prevalence of impaired MFR (MFR < 2). We included 271 cases matched to 815 controls (mean ± SD age 65 ± 12 years, 52% men). The median (inter-quartile range) number of days between COVID-19 infection and PET imaging was 174 (58-338) days. Patients with prior COVID-19 had a statistically significant higher odds of MFR <2 (adjusted odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 2.8-4.25 P < 0.001). Results were similar in clinically meaningful subgroups. The proportion of cases with MFR <2 peaked 6-9 months from imaging with a statistically non-significant downtrend afterwards and was comparable across SARS-CoV-2 variants but increased with increasing severity of infection.

Conclusion: The prevalence of impaired MFR is similar by duration of time from infection up to 1 year and SARS-CoV-2 variants, but significantly differs by severity of infection.

Source: Ahmed AI, Al Rifai M, Alahdab F, Saad JM, Han Y, Alfawara MS, Nayfeh M, Malahfji M, Nabi F, Mahmarian JJ, Cooke JP, Zoghbi WA, Al-Mallah MH. Coronary microvascular health in symptomatic patients with prior COVID-19 infection: an updated analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 May 31:jead118. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead118. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37254693. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37254693/

Clinical Features of Post-Covid Syndrome

Abstract:

There is no common understanding of the clinical picture of post-covid syndrome. The US regulator CDC proposes to highlight:

(A) persistent symptoms and conditions that begin during acute COVID-19 illness;

B) new onset late complications after asymptomatic disease or a period of acute symptomatic relief or remission;

(C) the evolution of symptoms and conditions that include some persistent symptoms (eg, shortness of breath) with the addition of new symptoms or conditions over time (eg, cognitive difficulties).

Some manifestations may resemble other postviral syndromes such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, dysautonomia (eg, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome), or mast cell activation syndrome.

Source: Sayfulloyevich, P. S. ., & Musayevich, U. R. . (2023). Clinical Features of Post-Covid Syndrome. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN NONFORMAL EDUCATION3(6), 34–36. Retrieved from http://inovatus.es/index.php/ejine/article/view/1786 http://inovatus.es/index.php/ejine/article/view/1786/1794 (Full text)

Long COVID: Complications, Underlying Mechanisms, and Treatment Strategies

Abstract:

Long Covid is one of the most prevalent and puzzling conditions that arose with the Covid pandemic. Covid-19 infection generally resolves within several weeks but some experience new or lingering symptoms. Though there is no formal definition for such lingering symptoms the CDC boadly describes long Covid as persons having a wide range of new, recurring or sustained health issues four or more weeks after first being infected with SARS-CoV2. The WHO defines long Covid as the manifestation of symptoms from a “probable or confirmed” Covid-19 infection that start approximately 3 months after the onset of the acute infection and last for more than 2 months.

Numerous studies have looked at the implications of long Covid on various organs. Many specific mechanisms have been proposed for such changes. In this article, we provide an overview of some of the main mechanisms by which long Covid induces end-organ damage proposed in recent research studies. We also review various treatment options, current clinical trials, and other potential therapeutic avenues to control long Covid followed by the information about the effect of vaccination on long Covid.

Lastly, we discuss some of the questions and knowledge gaps in the present understanding of long Covid. We believe more studies of the effects long Covid has on quality of life, future health and life expectancy are required to better understand and eventually prevent or treat the disease. We acknowledge the effects of long Covid are not limited to those in this article but as it may affect the health of future offspring and therefore, we deem it important to identify more prognostic and therapeutic targets to control this condition.

Source: Farigol Hakem Zadeh, Daniel R. Wilson, Devendra K. Agrawal. Long COVID: Complications, Underlying Mechanisms, and Treatment Strategies. Archives of Microbiology and Immunology. 7 (2023): 36-61. http://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/long-covid-complications-underlying-mechanisms-and-treatment-strategies.html (Full text)

Persistent serum protein signatures define an inflammatory subcategory of long COVID

Abstract:

Long COVID or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) is a clinical syndrome featuring diverse symptoms that can persist for months following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aetiologies may include persistent inflammation, unresolved tissue damage or delayed clearance of viral protein or RNA, but the biological differences they represent are not fully understood. Here we evaluate the serum proteome in samples, longitudinally collected from 55 PASC individuals with symptoms lasting ≥60 days after onset of acute infection, in comparison to samples from symptomatically recovered SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected individuals.

Our analysis indicates heterogeneity in PASC and identified subsets with distinct signatures of persistent inflammation. Type II interferon signaling and canonical NF-κB signaling (particularly associated with TNF), appear to be the most differentially enriched signaling pathways, distinguishing a group of patients characterized also by a persistent neutrophil activation signature.

These findings help to clarify biological diversity within PASC, identify participants with molecular evidence of persistent inflammation, and highlight dominant pathways that may have diagnostic or therapeutic relevance, including a protein panel that we propose as having diagnostic utility for differentiating inflammatory and non-inflammatory PASC.

Source: Talla, A., Vasaikar, S.V., Szeto, G.L. et al. Persistent serum protein signatures define an inflammatory subcategory of long COVID. Nat Commun 14, 3417 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38682-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38682-4 (Full text)

The plasma metabolome of long COVID-19 patients two years after infection

Abstract:

Background One of the major challenges currently faced by global health systems is the prolonged COVID-19 syndrome (also known as “long COVID”) which has emerged as a consequence of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognized long COVID as a distinct clinical entity in 2021. It is estimated that at least 30% of patients who have had COVID-19 will develop long COVID. This has put a tremendous strain on still-overstretched healthcare systems around the world.

Methods In this study, our goal was to assess the plasma metabolome in a total of 108 samples collected from healthy controls, COVID-19 patients, and long COVID patients recruited in Mexico between 2020 and 2022. A targeted metabolomics approach using a combination of LC-MS/MS and FIA MS/MS was performed to quantify 108 metabolites. IL-17 and leptin concentrations were measured in long COVID patients by immunoenzymatic assay.

Results The comparison of paired COVID-19/post-COVID-19 samples revealed 53 metabolites that were statistically different (FDR < 0.05). Compared to controls, 29 metabolites remained dysregulated even after two years. Notably, glucose, kynurenine, and certain acylcarnitines continued to exhibit altered concentrations similar to the COVID-19 phase, while sphingomyelins and long saturated and monounsaturated LysoPCs, phenylalanine, butyric acid, and propionic acid levels normalized. Post-COVID-19 patients displayed a heterogeneous metabolic profile, with some showing no symptoms while others exhibiting a variable number of symptoms. Lactic acid, lactate/pyruvate ratio, ornithine/citrulline ratio, sarcosine, and arginine were identified as the most relevant metabolites for distinguishing patients with more complicated long COVID evolution. Additionally, IL-17 levels were significantly increased in these patients.

Conclusions Mitochondrial dysfunction, redox state imbalance, impaired energy metabolism, and chronic immune dysregulation are likely to be the main hallmarks of long COVID even two years after acute COVID-19 infection.

Source: Yamilé López-Hernández, Joel Monárrez Aquino, David Alejandro García López, Jiamin Zheng, Juan Carlos Borrego, Claudia Torres-Calzada, José Pedro Elizalde-Díaz, Rupasri Mandal, Mark Berjanskii, Eduardo Martínez-Martínez, Jesús Adrián López, David S. Wishart. The plasma metabolome of long COVID-19 patients two years after infection. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.03.23289456 (Full text)

Maintained imbalance of triglycerides, apolipoproteins, energy metabolites and cytokines in long-term COVID-19 syndrome patients

Abstract:

Background: Deep metabolomic, proteomic and immunologic phenotyping of patients suffering from an infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have matched a wide diversity of clinical symptoms with potential biomarkers for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Several studies have described the role of small as well as complex molecules such as metabolites, cytokines, chemokines and lipoproteins during infection and in recovered patients. In fact, after an acute SARS-CoV-2 viral infection almost 10-20% of patients experience persistent symptoms post 12 weeks of recovery defined as long-term COVID-19 syndrome (LTCS) or long post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). Emerging evidence revealed that a dysregulated immune system and persisting inflammation could be one of the key drivers of LTCS. However, how these biomolecules altogether govern pathophysiology is largely underexplored. Thus, a clear understanding of how these parameters within an integrated fashion could predict the disease course would help to stratify LTCS patients from acute COVID-19 or recovered patients. This could even allow to elucidation of a potential mechanistic role of these biomolecules during the disease course.

Methods: This study comprised subjects with acute COVID-19 (n=7; longitudinal), LTCS (n=33), Recov (n=12), and no history of positive testing (n=73). 1H-NMR-based metabolomics with IVDr standard operating procedures verified and phenotyped all blood samples by quantifying 38 metabolites and 112 lipoprotein properties. Univariate and multivariate statistics identified NMR-based and cytokine changes.

Results: Here, we report on an integrated analysis of serum/plasma by NMR spectroscopy and flow cytometry-based cytokines/chemokines quantification in LTCS patients. We identified that in LTCS patients lactate and pyruvate were significantly different from either healthy controls (HC) or acute COVID-19 patients. Subsequently, correlation analysis in LTCS group only among cytokines and amino acids revealed that histidine and glutamine were uniquely attributed mainly with pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of note, triglycerides and several lipoproteins (apolipoproteins Apo-A1 and A2) in LTCS patients demonstrate COVID-19-like alterations compared with HC. Interestingly, LTCS and acute COVID-19 samples were distinguished mostly by their phenylalanine, 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB) and glucose concentrations, illustrating an imbalanced energy metabolism. Most of the cytokines and chemokines were present at low levels in LTCS patients compared with HC except for IL-18 chemokine, which tended to be higher in LTCS patients.

Conclusion: The identification of these persisting plasma metabolites, lipoprotein and inflammation alterations will help to better stratify LTCS patients from other diseases and could help to predict ongoing severity of LTCS patients.

Source: Berezhnoy G, Bissinger R, Liu A, Cannet C, Schäfer H, Kienzle K, Bitzer M, Häberle H, Göpel S, Trautwein C, Singh Y. Maintained imbalance of triglycerides, apolipoproteins, energy metabolites and cytokines in long-term COVID-19 syndrome patients. Front Immunol. 2023 May 9;14:1144224. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1144224. PMID: 37228606; PMCID: PMC10203989. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203989/ (Full text)