Tag: covid-19

Metabolic and endocrine complications of long COVID-19: A review

Abstract:

Over the past two years, the COVID-19 outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), centralized the interest of the health care systems and the scientific world. Majority of the COVID-19 infected individuals fully recover. However, about 12%-50% of patients experience a variety of mid- and long-term effects after recovering from the initial illness. These mid- and long-term effects are collectively known as post-COVID-19 condition or ‘long-COVID’. In the coming months, the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on the metabolic and endocrine systems may expect to rise and pose a global health care challenge. This review article aims to discuss the possible metabolic and endocrine complications of long-COVID and the relevant research findings.

Source: Bandara T, Deshmukh HA, Abdalla M, Sathyapalan T. Metabolic and endocrine complications of long COVID-19: A review. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2023 Mar 28. doi: 10.1055/a-2063-8697. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36977491. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36977491/

Miscellaneous neuromuscular symptoms and signs in long Covid

Abstract:

We have completed the 3rd year of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the early stages of the disease, we were faced with a wide variety of symptoms and signs, including the neuromuscular system, as well as life-threatening cardiopulmonary, neurovascular and immune complications.

In our study, we questioned fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, dyspnea, headache, dizziness, neck pain, back pain, low back pain, knee-hip-foot joint pain, vascular claudication (lower extremity pain/cramp), neuropathic pain, morning stiffness, joint swelling, pernio, imbalance in walking in patients (N=111; 65 female, 29 male) aged 20-59 years, who applied to our outpatient clinic in the last 1 year and had Covid-19.

The mean time after Covid-19 was 5.8 ±2.1 months. The duration of Covid-19 treatment was a minimum of 5 days and a maximum of 12 days (median=5 days). Weight loss in 14.4% (median=3.5 kg), anorexia 17.1%, myalgia 41.4% (visual analog scale, VAS=5.1±1.9 cm), arthralgia 24.3% (VAS=5.1±2 cm), fatigue 63.1%, joint swelling 1.8%, pernio sign 0.9%, morning stiffness 7.2% (median=15 min, min 5-maximum 60 min), headache 39.6%, neuropathic pain 15.3%, effort dyspnea 38.7%, 30 second chair stand test= 14.9 ±3.6, vascular claudication symptom 11.7%, neck pain 27.0%, low back pain 30.6%, back pain 36%, hip-knee-foot pain 18.0%, gait imbalance 1.8%, dizziness 18.9% were observed. While fatigue (p=0.05), headache (p=0.04), and dyspnea (p=0.021) complaints were higher in males; VAS (arthralgia) was found higher in females (p=0.026).

In the post-Covid-19 period, we see many neuromuscular symptoms and signs, especially fatigue, myalgia, headache and back pain. In addition, lower extremity vascular claudication and neuropathic pain related with chronic pain should not be overlooked in these patients.

Source: Koca TT, Erzurumluoglu O, Kocyigit BF. Miscellaneous neuromuscular symptoms and signs in long Covid. Med Science. 2023;12(1):238-43. https://www.medicinescience.org/article/3381 (Full text)

COVID-19 Vaccination for the Prevention and Treatment of Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract:

Empirical evidence addressing the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and long COVID would guide public health priorities and inform personal health decisions. Herein, the co-primary objectives are to determine the differential risk of long COVID in vaccinated versus unvaccinated patients, and the trajectory of long COVID following vaccination.

Of 2775 articles identified via systematic search, 17 were included, and 6 were meta-analyzed. Meta-analytic results determined that at least one vaccine dose was associated with a protective effect against long COVID (OR 0.539, 95% CI 0.295-0.987, p = 0.045, N= 257 817).

Qualitative analysis revealed that trajectories of pre-existing long COVID following vaccination were mixed, with most patients reporting no changes. The evidence herein supports SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for the prevention of long COVID, and recommends long COVID patients adhere to standard SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedules.

Source: Ceban F, Kulzhabayeva D, Rodrigues NB, Di Vincenzo JD, Gill H, Subramaniapillai M, Lui LMW, Cao B, Mansur RB, Ho RC, Burke MJ, Rhee TG, Rosenblat JD, McIntyre RS. COVID-19 Vaccination for the Prevention and Treatment of Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2023 Mar 27:S0889-1591(23)00079-X. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.03.022. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36990297; PMCID: PMC10067136. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067136/ (Full text)

Direct and indirect impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the brain

Abstract:

Although COVID-19 is mostly a pulmonary disease, it is now well accepted that it can cause a much broader spectrum of signs and symptoms and affect many other organs and tissue. From mild anosmia to severe ischemic stroke, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the central nervous system is still a great challenge to scientists and health care practitioners.

Besides the acute and severe neurological problems described, as encephalopathies, leptomeningitis, and stroke, after 2 years of pandemic, the chronic impact observed during long-COVID or the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) greatly intrigues scientists worldwide. Strikingly, even asymptomatic, and mild diseased patients may evolve with important neurological and psychiatric symptoms, as confusion, memory loss, cognitive decline, chronic fatigue, associated or not with anxiety and depression. Thus, the knowledge on the correlation between COVID-19 and the central nervous system is of great relevance.

In this sense, here we discuss some important mechanisms obtained from in vitro and in vivo investigation regarding how SARS-CoV-2 impacts the brain and its cells and function.

Source: Peron JPS. Direct and indirect impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the brain. Hum Genet. 2023 Apr 1:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02549-x. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37004544; PMCID: PMC10066989. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066989/ (Full text)

Brain disorders: Impact of mild SARS-CoV-2 may shrink several parts of the brain

Abstract:

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a highly infectious respiratory infection discovered in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. As a result of the pandemic, several individuals have experienced life-threatening diseases, the loss of loved ones, lockdowns, isolation, an increase in unemployment, and household conflict. Moreover, COVID-19 may cause direct brain injury via encephalopathy. The long-term impacts of this virus on mental health and brain function need to be analysed by researchers in the coming years.

This article aims to describe the prolonged neurological clinical consequences related to brain changes in people with mild COVID-19 infection. When compared to a control group, people those who tested positive for COVID-19 had more brain shrinkage, grey matter shrinkage, and tissue damage. The damage occurs predominantly in areas of the brain that are associated with odour, ambiguity, strokes, reduced attention, headaches, sensory abnormalities, depression, and mental abilities for few months after the first infection. Therefore, in patients after a severe clinical condition of COVID-19, a deepening of persistent neurological signs is necessary.

Source: Kumar PR, Shilpa B, Jha RK. Brain Disorders: Impact of Mild SARS-CoV-2 May Shrink Several Parts of the Brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Mar 31;149:105150. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105150. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37004892; PMCID: PMC10063523. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10063523/ (Full text)

Long-COVID fatigue is not predicted by pre-pandemic plasma IL-6 levels in mild COVID-19 infection

Abstract:

Objective and design: Fatigue is a prominent symptom in the general population and may follow viral infection, including SARS-CoV2 infection which causes COVID-19. Chronic fatigue lasting more than three months is a major symptom of the long-COVID syndrome. The mechanisms underlying long-COVID fatigue are unknown. We hypothesized that the development of long-COVID chronic fatigue is driven by the pro-inflammatory immune status of an individual prior to COVID-19 infection.

Subjects and methods: We tested this hypothesis by analysing pre-pandemic plasma levels of IL-6, which plays a key role in persistent fatigue, in N = 1274 community dwelling adults from TwinsUK. Subsequent COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants were categorized based on antigen and antibody testing. Chronic fatigue was assessed using the Chalder Fatigue Scale.

Results: COVID-19 positive participants exhibited mild symptoms of infection. Chronic fatigue was a prevalent symptom among this population and was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive participants than COVID-19 negative participants (17% vs 11%, respectively; p = 0.001). The qualitative nature of chronic fatigue as determined by individual questionnaire responses was similar in COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants. Pre-pandemic plasma IL-6 levels were positively associated with chronic fatigue in COVID-19 negative, but not COVID-19 positive
individuals. Raised BMI was associated with chronic fatigue in COVID-19 positive participants.

Conclusions: We found evidence that pre-existing increased levels of IL-6 provide the ground for chronic fatigue symptoms but there was no specific link seen with mild COVID-19 status. Elevated BMI increased the risk of chronic fatigue in mild COVID-19 infection consistent with previous reports.

Source: B Freidin, M., Borsini, A., Pariante, C., & MK Williams, F. (2023). Long-COVID fatigue is not predicted by prepandemic plasma IL-6 levels in mild COVID-19 infection. Inflammation Research. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/201594849/Freidin_et_al._2023.pdf (Full text)

Multiplatform analyses reveal distinct drivers of systemic pathogenesis in adult versus pediatric severe acute COVID-19

Abstract:

The pathogenesis of multi-organ dysfunction associated with severe acute SARS-CoV-2 infection remains poorly understood. Endothelial damage and microvascular thrombosis have been identified as drivers of COVID-19 severity, yet the mechanisms underlying these processes remain elusive. Here we show alterations in fluid shear stress-responsive pathways in critically ill COVID-19 adults as compared to non-COVID critically ill adults using a multiomics approach.

Mechanistic in-vitro studies, using microvasculature-on-chip devices, reveal that plasma from critically ill COVID-19 adults induces fibrinogen-dependent red blood cell aggregation that mechanically damages the microvascular glycocalyx. This mechanism appears unique to COVID-19, as plasma from non-COVID sepsis patients demonstrates greater red blood cell membrane stiffness but induces less significant alterations in overall blood rheology.

Multiomics analyses in pediatric patients with acute COVID-19 or the post-infectious multi-inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) demonstrate little overlap in plasma cytokine and metabolite changes compared to adult COVID-19 patients. Instead, pediatric acute COVID-19 and MIS-C patients show alterations strongly associated with cytokine upregulation. These findings link high fibrinogen and red blood cell aggregation with endotheliopathy in adult COVID-19 patients and highlight differences in the key mediators of pathogenesis between adult and pediatric populations.

Source: Druzak, S., Iffrig, E., Roberts, B.R. et al. Multiplatform analyses reveal distinct drivers of systemic pathogenesis in adult versus pediatric severe acute COVID-19. Nat Commun 14, 1638 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37269-3 (Full text)

Para-infectious brain injury in COVID-19 persists at follow-up despite attenuated cytokine and autoantibody responses

Abstract:

We measured brain injury markers, inflammatory mediators, and autoantibodies in 203 participants with COVID-19; 111 provided acute sera (1-11 days post admission) and 56 with COVID-19-associated neurological diagnoses provided subacute/convalescent sera (6-76 weeks post-admission).

Compared to 60 controls, brain injury biomarkers (Tau, GFAP, NfL, UCH-L1) were increased in acute sera, significantly more so for NfL and UCH-L1, in patients with altered consciousness. Tau and NfL remained elevated in convalescent sera, particularly following cerebrovascular and neuroinflammatory disorders. Acutely, inflammatory mediators (including IL-6, IL-12p40, HGF, M-CSF, CCL2, and IL-1RA) were higher in participants with altered consciousness, and correlated with brain injury biomarker levels. Inflammatory mediators were lower than acute levels in convalescent sera, but levels of CCL2, CCL7, IL-1RA, IL-2Rα, M-CSF, SCF, IL-16 and IL-18 in individual participants correlated with Tau levels even at this late time point.

When compared to acute COVID-19 patients with a normal GCS, network analysis showed significantly altered immune responses in patients with acute alteration of consciousness, and in convalescent patients who had suffered an acute neurological complication. The frequency and range of autoantibodies did not associate with neurological disorders. However, autoantibodies against specific antigens were more frequent in patients with altered consciousness in the acute phase (including MYL7, UCH-L1, GRIN3B, and DDR2), and in patients with neurological complications in the convalescent phase (including MYL7, GNRHR, and HLA antigens).

In a novel low-inoculum mouse model of SARS-CoV-2, while viral replication was only consistently seen in mouse lungs, inflammatory responses were seen in both brain and lungs, with significant increases in CCL4, IFNγ, IL-17A, and microglial reactivity in the brain. Neurological injury is common in the acute phase and persists late after COVID-19, and may be driven by a para-infectious process involving a dysregulated host response.

Source: Benedict D. Michael, Cordelia Dunai, Edward J. Needham, Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam, Robyn Williams, Yun Huang, Sarah A. Boardman, Jordan Clark, Parul Sharma, Krishanthi Subramaniam, Greta K. Wood, Ceryce Collie, Richard Digby, Alexander Ren, Emma Norton, Maya Leibowitz, Soraya Ebrahimi, Andrew Fower, Hannah Fox, Esteban Tato, Mark Ellul, Geraint Sunderland, Marie Held, Claire Hetherington, Franklyn Nkongho, Alish Palmos, Alexander Grundmann, James P. Stewart, Michael Griffiths, Tom Solomon, Gerome Breen, Alasdair Coles, Jonathan Cavanagh, Sarosh R. Irani, Angela Vincent, Leonie Taams, David K. Menon. Para-infectious brain injury in COVID-19 persists at follow-up despite attenuated cytokine and autoantibody responses. medRxiv 2023.04.03.23287902; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.03.23287902 (Full text available as PDF file)

Case Study: COVID-19 Brain Fog or Auditory Processing Disorder?

A wide array of symptoms have been directly associated with COVID-19 following recovery, but they can also occur several weeks or months after the diagnosis. These include, but are not limited to, damage to the respiratory tract as well as decreased cognition and other brain functions. The nonmedical term used to describe these post-COVID-19 problems is “brain fog.”

The symptoms of brain fog are similar to mild cognitive impairment or, of interest to audiologists, an auditory processing disorder (APD). 2 COVID-19 has neurological consequences and affects specific areas of the brain, such as the cingulate cortex (i.e. emotions, memory, depression, and decision of action). 3 Brain fog is also associated with several symptoms related to hearing and communication, which can affect the accomplishment of routine daily tasks. Many of those can be mistaken for or coexist with APD symptoms. These include “difficulty attending or staying focused, difficulty concentrating, difficulty understanding or remembering instructions, language problems, short-term memory problems,” to mention a few. 2 However, what might appear as a brain fog case could be an undiagnosed or even a pre-existing APD issue. 2 Symptoms could include struggling to keep track of conversations, forgetfulness and memory issues, problems following directions, and several cognitive difficulties. 2

This report presents the case of a 31-year-old medical doctor who was diagnosed with COVID-19 in December 2020, and later identified with APD symptoms that are now commonly seen in post-COVID-19 brain fog patients. Auditory training following the Buffalo Model 4 resolved the patient’s chief complaints following 12 treatment sessions. This issue is one of many that could shed light on the great potential auditory training has in resolving brain fog complaints that overlap with what is commonly seen in APD patients, highlighting the concerns regarding COVID-19’s direct effects on auditory processing.

Source: Alexander, Angela Loucks AuD, MNZAS, CCC-A; DiSogra, Robert M. AuD; Abbas, Fatima BS; Braund, Stacey AuD, CCC-A; Spokes, Chelsea BSpHLSc, MClinAud. Case Study: COVID-19 Brain Fog or Auditory Processing Disorder?. The Hearing Journal 76(04):p 18,19,20,22,23,24, April 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000927332.17564.4e https://journals.lww.com/thehearingjournal/Fulltext/2023/04000/Case_Study__COVID_19_Brain_Fog_or_Auditory.2.aspx (Full text)

Incident autoimmune diseases in association with a SARS-CoV-2 infection: A matched cohort study

Abstract:

Objectives To investigate whether the risk of developing an incident autoimmune disease is increased in patients with previous COVID-19 disease compared to people without COVID-19.

Method A cohort was selected from German routine health care data covering 38.9 million individuals. Based on documented diagnoses, we identified individuals with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 through December 31, 2020. Patients were matched 1:3 to control patients without COVID-19. Both groups were followed up until June 30, 2021. We used the four quarters preceding the index date until the end of follow-up to analyze the onset of autoimmune diseases during the post-acute period. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years were calculated for each outcome and patient group. Poisson models were deployed to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of developing an autoimmune disease conditional on a preceding diagnosis of COVID-19.

Results In total, 641,704 patients with COVID-19 were included. Comparing the incidence rates in the COVID-19 (IR=15.05, 95% CI: 14.69-15.42) and matched control groups (IR=10.55, 95% CI: 10.25-10.86), we found a 42.63% higher likelihood of acquiring autoimmunity for patients who had suffered from COVID-19. This estimate was similar for common autoimmune diseases, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjögren syndrome. The highest IRR was observed for autoimmune disease of the vasculitis group. Patients with a more severe course of COVID-19 were at a greater risk for incident autoimmune diseases.

Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of developing new-onset autoimmune diseases after the acute phase of infection.

Source: Falko Tesch, Franz Ehm, Annika Vivirito, Danny Wende, Manuel Batram, Friedrich Loser, Simone Menzer, Josephine Jacob, Martin Roessler, Martin Seifert, Barbara Kind, Christina König, Claudia Schulte, Tilo Buschmann, Dagmar Hertle, Pedro Ballesteros, Stefan Baßler, Barbara Bertele, Thomas Bitterer, Cordula Riederer, Franziska Sobik, Lukas Reitzle, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Jochen Schmitt. Incident autoimmune diseases in association with a SARS-CoV-2 infection: A matched cohort study. medRxiv 2023.01.25.23285014; doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.25.23285014 (Full text)