Tag: covid-19

Herpesvirus and neurological manifestations in patients with severe coronavirus disease

Abstract:

Background: Certain clinical manifestations of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mimic those associated with human herpesvirus (HHV) infection. In this study, we estimated the prevalence of herpesvirus in patients with COVID-19 and determined if coinfection is associated with poorer outcomes and neurological symptoms.

Methods: We analyzed samples of 53 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The samples were evaluated for the presence of alphaherpesviruses, betaherpesviruses, and gammaherpesviruses, and the viral loads were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method.

Results: Among the patients, in 79.2% had detection at least one type of herpesvirus. HHV-6 (47.2%), cytomegalovirus (43.3%), and HHV-7 (39.6%) showed the highest detection rates. Patients with a high severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) load were more likely to show herpes simplex virus 1 detection (p = 0.037). Among patients coinfected with SARS-CoV-2 and HHVs, 26.4% showed central nervous system-associated neurological symptoms and herpetic manifestations. A statistically significant association was observed between neurological changes and HHV-6 detection (p = 0.034).

Conclusions: The findings showed a high prevalence of herpesvirus in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, even though SARS-CoV-2 and HHV coinfection was not associated with poorer outcomes, the findings demonstrated the association between neurological symptoms and HHV-6 detection.

Source: Carneiro VCS, Alves-Leon SV, Sarmento DJS, Coelho WLDCNP, Moreira ODC, Salvio AL, Ramos CHF, Ramos Filho CHF, Marques CAB, da Costa Gonçalves JP, Leon LAA, de Paula VS. Herpesvirus and neurological manifestations in patients with severe coronavirus disease. Virol J. 2022 Jun 8;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01828-9. PMID: 35676707; PMCID: PMC9174631. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174631/  (Full text)

Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients

Summary:

Background: COVID-19 is associated with increased risks of neurological and psychiatric sequelae in the weeks and months thereafter. How long these risks remain, whether they affect children and adults similarly, and whether SARS-CoV-2 variants differ in their risk profiles remains unclear.

Methods: In this analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies, we extracted data from the TriNetX electronic health records network, an international network of de-identified data from health-care records of approximately 89 million patients collected from hospital, primary care, and specialist providers (mostly from the USA, but also from Australia, the UK, Spain, Bulgaria, India, Malaysia, and Taiwan). A cohort of patients of any age with COVID-19 diagnosed between Jan 20, 2020, and April 13, 2022, was identified and propensity-score matched (1:1) to a contemporaneous cohort of patients with any other respiratory infection. Matching was done on the basis of demographic factors, risk factors for COVID-19 and severe COVID-19 illness, and vaccination status. Analyses were stratified by age group (age <18 years [children], 18–64 years [adults], and ≥65 years [older adults]) and date of diagnosis. We assessed the risks of 14 neurological and psychiatric diagnoses after SARS-CoV-2 infection and compared these risks with the matched comparator cohort. The 2-year risk trajectories were represented by time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and summarised using the 6-month constant HRs (representing the risks in the earlier phase of follow-up, which have not yet been well characterised in children), the risk horizon for each outcome (ie, the time at which the HR returns to 1), and the time to equal incidence in the two cohorts. We also estimated how many people died after a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis during follow-up in each age group. Finally, we compared matched cohorts of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 directly before and after the emergence of the alpha (B.1.1.7), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) variants.

Findings: We identified 1 487 712 patients with a recorded diagnosis of COVID-19 during the study period, of whom 1 284 437 (185 748 children, 856 588 adults, and 242 101 older adults; overall mean age 42·5 years [SD 21·9]; 741 806 [57·8%] were female and 542 192 [42·2%] were male) were adequately matched with an equal number of patients with another respiratory infection. The risk trajectories of outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the whole cohort differed substantially. While most outcomes had HRs significantly greater than 1 after 6 months (with the exception of encephalitis; Guillain-Barré syndrome; nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorder; and parkinsonism), their risk horizons and time to equal incidence varied greatly. Risks of the common psychiatric disorders returned to baseline after 1–2 months (mood disorders at 43 days, anxiety disorders at 58 days) and subsequently reached an equal overall incidence to the matched comparison group (mood disorders at 457 days, anxiety disorders at 417 days).

By contrast, risks of cognitive deficit (known as brain fog), dementia, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures were still increased at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Post-COVID-19 risk trajectories differed in children compared with adults: in the 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, children were not at an increased risk of mood (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·94–1·10) or anxiety (1·00 [0·94–1·06]) disorders, but did have an increased risk of cognitive deficit, insomnia, intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, nerve, nerve root, and plexus disorders, psychotic disorders, and epilepsy or seizures (HRs ranging from 1·20 [1·09–1·33] to 2·16 [1·46–3·19]). Unlike adults, cognitive deficit in children had a finite risk horizon (75 days) and a finite time to equal incidence (491 days).

A sizeable proportion of older adults who received a neurological or psychiatric diagnosis, in either cohort, subsequently died, especially those diagnosed with dementia or epilepsy or seizures. Risk profiles were similar just before versus just after the emergence of the alpha variant (n=47 675 in each cohort). Just after (vs just before) the emergence of the delta variant (n=44 835 in each cohort), increased risks of ischaemic stroke, epilepsy or seizures, cognitive deficit, insomnia, and anxiety disorders were observed, compounded by an increased death rate. With omicron (n=39 845 in each cohort), there was a lower death rate than just before emergence of the variant, but the risks of neurological and psychiatric outcomes remained similar.

Interpretation: This analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 showed that the increased incidence of mood and anxiety disorders was transient, with no overall excess of these diagnoses compared with other respiratory infections. In contrast, the increased risk of psychotic disorder, cognitive deficit, dementia, and epilepsy or seizures persisted throughout. The differing trajectories suggest a different pathogenesis for these outcomes. Children have a more benign overall profile of psychiatric risk than do adults and older adults, but their sustained higher risk of some diagnoses is of concern. The fact that neurological and psychiatric outcomes were similar during the delta and omicron waves indicates that the burden on the health-care system might continue even with variants that are less severe in other respects. Our findings are relevant to understanding individual-level and population-level risks of neurological and psychiatric disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection and can help inform our responses to them.

Source: Maxime Taquet, PhD, Rebecca Sillett, BA, Lena Zhu, BS, Jacob Mendel, MMath, Isabella Camplisson, BS, Quentin Dercon, MSc, et al. Open Access Published: August 17, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00260-7 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(22)00260-7/fulltext# (Full text)

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is common in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC): Results from a post-COVID-19 multidisciplinary clinic

Summary:

Background The global prevalence of PASC is estimated to be present in 0·43 and based on the WHO estimation of 470 million worldwide COVID-19 infections, corresponds to around 200 million people experiencing long COVID symptoms. Despite this, its clinical features are not well defined.

Methods We collected retrospective data from 140 patients with PASC in a post-COVID-19 clinic on demographics, risk factors, illness severity (graded as one-mild to five-severe), functional status, and 29 symptoms and principal component symptoms cluster analysis. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2015 criteria were used to determine the ME/CFS phenotype.

Findings The median age was 47 years, 59·0% were female; 49·3% White, 17·2% Hispanic, 14·9% Asian, and 6·7% Black. Only 12·7% required hospitalization. Seventy-two (53·5%) patients had no known comorbid conditions. Forty-five (33·9%) were significantly debilitated. The median duration of symptoms was 285·5 days, and the number of symptoms was 12. The most common symptoms were fatigue (86·5%), post-exertional malaise (82·8%), brain fog (81·2%), unrefreshing sleep (76·7%), and lethargy (74·6%). Forty-three percent fit the criteria for ME/CFS.

Interpretations Most PASC patients evaluated at our clinic had no comorbid condition and were not hospitalized for acute COVID-19. One-third of patients experienced a severe decline in their functional status. About 43% had the ME/CFS subtype.

Source:  H Bonilla, TC Quach, A Tiwari, AE Bonilla, M Miglis, P Yang, L Eggert, H Sharifi, A Horomanski, A Subramanian, L Smirnoff, N Simpson, H Halawi, O Sum-Ping, A Kalinowski, Z Patel, R Shafer, L. Geng. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is common in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC): Results from a post-COVID-19 multidisciplinary clinic. medRxiv 2022.08.03.22278363; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.03.22278363

Persistent capillary rarefication in long COVID syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Recent studies have highlighted Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a multisystemic vascular disease. Up to 60% of the patients suffer from long-term sequelae and persistent symptoms even 6 months after the initial infection.

Methods: This prospective, observational study included 58 participants, 27 of whom were long COVID patients with persistent symptoms > 12 weeks after recovery from PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fifteen healthy volunteers and a historical cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients (n = 16) served as controls. All participants underwent sublingual videomicroscopy using sidestream dark field imaging. A newly developed version of Glycocheck™ software was used to quantify vascular density, perfused boundary region (PBR-an inverse variable of endothelial glycocalyx dimensions), red blood cell velocity (VRBC) and the microvascular health score (MVHS™) in sublingual microvessels with diameters 4-25 µm.

Measurements and main results: Although dimensions of the glycocalyx were comparable to those of healthy controls, a µm-precise analysis showed a significant decrease of vascular density, that exclusively affected very small capillaries (D5: – 45.16%; D6: – 35.60%; D7: – 22.79%). Plotting VRBC of capillaries and feed vessels showed that the number of capillaries perfused in long COVID patients was comparable to that of critically ill COVID-19 patients and did not respond adequately to local variations of tissue metabolic demand. MVHS was markedly reduced in the long COVID cohort (healthy 3.87 vs. long COVID 2.72 points; p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Our current data strongly suggest that COVID-19 leaves a persistent capillary rarefication even 18 months after infection. Whether, to what extent, and when the observed damage might be reversible remains unclear.

Source: Osiaevi I, Schulze A, Evers G, Harmening K, Vink H, Kümpers P, Mohr M, Rovas A. Persistent capillary rarefication in long COVID syndrome. Angiogenesis. 2022 Aug 11:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10456-022-09850-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35951203; PMCID: PMC9366128. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366128/ (Full text)

Distinguishing features of Long COVID identified through immune profiling

Abstract:

SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in the development of a constellation of persistent sequelae following acute disease called post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) or Long COVID. Individuals diagnosed with Long COVID frequently report unremitting fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and a variety of cognitive and autonomic dysfunctions; however, the basic biological mechanisms responsible for these debilitating symptoms are unclear. Here, 215 individuals were included in an exploratory, cross-sectional study to perform multi-dimensional immune phenotyping in conjunction with machine learning methods to identify key immunological features distinguishing Long COVID.

Marked differences were noted in specific circulating myeloid and lymphocyte populations relative to matched control groups, as well as evidence of elevated humoral responses directed against SARS-CoV-2 among participants with Long COVID. Further, unexpected increases were observed in antibody responses directed against non-SARS-CoV-2 viral pathogens, particularly Epstein-Barr virus.

Analysis of circulating immune mediators and various hormones also revealed pronounced differences, with levels of cortisol being uniformly lower among participants with Long COVID relative to matched control groups. Integration of immune phenotyping data into unbiased machine learning models identified significant distinguishing features critical in accurate classification of Long COVID, with decreased levels of cortisol being the most significant individual predictor. These findings will help guide additional studies into the pathobiology of Long COVID and may aid in the future development of objective biomarkers for Long COVID.

Source: Jon Klein, Jamie Wood, Jillian Jaycox, Peiwen Lu, Rahul M. Dhodapkar, Jeffrey R. Gehlhausen, Alexandra Tabachnikova, Laura Tabacof, Amyn A. Malik, Kathy Kamath, Kerrie Greene, Valter Silva Monteiro, Mario Pena-Hernandez, Tianyang Mao, Bornali Bhattacharjee, Takehiro Takahashi, Carolina Lucas, Julio Silva, Dayna Mccarthy, Erica Breyman, Jenna Tosto-Mancuso, Yile Dai, Emily Perotti, Koray Akduman, Tiffany Tzeng, Lan Xu, Inci Yildirim, Harlan M. Krumholz, John Shon, Ruslan Medzhitov, Saad B. Omer, David van Dijk, Aaron M. Ring, David Putrino, Akiko Iwasaki. Distinguishing features of Long COVID identified through immune profiling. medRxiv 2022.08.09.22278592; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.09.22278592

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and gut dysbiosis linger beyond 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 clearance

We recently published in Gut to show that gut dysbiosis persisted for at least 6 months in patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS).1 Murine and human studies have also reported microbial alterations associated with different PACS symptoms.2 3 With the pandemic entering its third year, PACS could potentially affect recovered individuals for over 1 year.4 It remains unknown whether PACS-associated gut dysbiosis would also linger for such a long time.

Here, we conducted a prospective study to determine long-term alterations in the gut microbiome of patients with COVID-19 using shotgun metagenomic sequencing (online supplemental materials). A total of 155 patients with COVID-19 in Hong Kong were followed up for an average of 14 months after SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance, and 155 age-matched, sex-matched and body mass index-matched subjects without COVID-19 were recruited as controls. Patients with COVID-19 were infected with the original or earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2 from January 2020 to February 2021. Consistent with previous finding that 76.4% of patients had PACS 6 months after recovery from acute COVID-19,1 we found that the prevalence of PACS was 78.7% at an average of 14-month (IQR 11–18 months) follow-up. The three most common symptoms were fatigue (50.9%), memory problems (44.5%) and difficulty in sleeping (35.5%, figure 1A). Gut dysbiosis in these patients did not fully recover. Both bacteria diversity (p=0.0036, figure 1B) and richness (p=0.00032, figure 1C) of patients with COVID-19 were still significantly lower than that of controls. Principal coordinates analysis of beta diversity also showed distinct separation of patients with COVID-19 from controls (F=8.3822, p<0.001, figure 1D). These observations suggest persistent gut dysbiosis beyond 1 year in patients with PACS

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Su Q, Lau RI, Liu Q, Chan FKL, Ng SC. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and gut dysbiosis linger beyond 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Gut. 2022 Aug 8:gutjnl-2022-328319. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328319. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35940857. https://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2022/08/08/gutjnl-2022-328319 (Full text)

Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Patients often report various symptoms after recovery from acute COVID-19. Previous studies on post-COVID-19 condition have not corrected for the prevalence and severity of these common symptoms before COVID-19 and in populations without SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to analyse the nature, prevalence, and severity of long-term symptoms related to COVID-19, while correcting for symptoms present before SARS-CoV-2 infection and controlling for the symptom dynamics in the population without infection.

Methods: This study is based on data collected within Lifelines, a multidisciplinary, prospective, population-based, observational cohort study examining the health and health-related behaviours of people living in the north of the Netherlands. All Lifelines participants aged 18 years or older received invitations to digital COVID-19 questionnaires. Longitudinal dynamics of 23 somatic symptoms surrounding COVID-19 diagnoses (due to SARS-CoV-2 alpha [B.1.1.7] variant or previous variants) were assessed using 24 repeated measurements between March 31, 2020, and Aug 2, 2021. Participants with COVID-19 (a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or a physician’s diagnosis of COVID-19) were matched by age, sex, and time to COVID-19-negative controls. We recorded symptom severity before and after COVID-19 in participants with COVID-19 and compared that with matched controls.

Findings: 76 422 participants (mean age 53·7 years [SD 12·9], 46 329 [60·8%] were female) completed a total of 883 973 questionnaires. Of these, 4231 (5·5%) participants had COVID-19 and were matched to 8462 controls. Persistent symptoms in COVID-19-positive participants at 90-150 days after COVID-19 compared with before COVID-19 and compared with matched controls included chest pain, difficulties with breathing, pain when breathing, painful muscles, ageusia or anosmia, tingling extremities, lump in throat, feeling hot and cold alternately, heavy arms or legs, and general tiredness. In 12·7% of patients, these symptoms could be attributed to COVID-19, as 381 (21·4%) of 1782 COVID-19-positive participants versus 361 (8·7%) of 4130 COVID-19-negative controls had at least one of these core symptoms substantially increased to at least moderate severity at 90-150 days after COVID-19 diagnosis or matched timepoint.

Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the nature and prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition, while correcting for individual symptoms present before COVID-19 and the symptom dynamics in the population without SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic. Further research that distinguishes potential mechanisms driving post-COVID-19-related symptomatology is required.

Funding: ZonMw; Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport; Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs; University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen; Provinces of Drenthe, Friesland, and Groningen.

Source: Ballering AV, van Zon SKR, Olde Hartman TC, Rosmalen JGM; Lifelines Corona Research Initiative. Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):452-461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01214-4. PMID: 35934007. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01214-4/fulltext (Full text)

Serum of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome patients with or without ME/CFS differentially affects endothelial cell function in vitro

Abstract:

A proportion of COVID-19 reconvalescent patients develop post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) including a subgroup fulfilling diagnostic criteria of Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (PCS/CFS). Recently, endothelial dysfunction (ED) has been demonstrated in these patients, but the mechanisms remain elusive. Therefore, we investigated the effects of patients’ sera on endothelia cells (ECs) in vitro.
PCS (n = 17), PCS/CFS (n = 13), and healthy controls (HC, n = 14) were screened for serum anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies (AECAs) and dysregulated cytokines. Serum-treated ECs were analysed for the induction of activation markers and the release of small molecules by flow cytometry. Moreover, the angiogenic potential of sera was measured in a tube formation assay.
While only marginal differences between patient groups were observed for serum cytokines, AECA binding to ECs was significantly increased in PCS/CFS patients. Surprisingly, PCS and PCS/CFS sera reduced surface levels of several EC activation markers. PCS sera enhanced the release of molecules associated with vascular remodelling and significantly promoted angiogenesis in vitro compared to the PCS/CFS and HC groups. Additionally, sera from both patient cohorts induced the release of molecules involved in inhibition of nitric oxide-mediated endothelial relaxation.
Overall, PCS and PCS/CFS patients′ sera differed in their AECA content and their functional effects on ECs, i.e., secretion profiles and angiogenic potential. We hypothesise a pro-angiogenic effect of PCS sera as a compensatory mechanism to ED which is absent in PCS/CFS patients.
Source: Flaskamp L, Roubal C, Uddin S, Sotzny F, Kedor C, Bauer S, Scheibenbogen C, Seifert M. Serum of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Patients with or without ME/CFS Differentially Affects Endothelial Cell Function In Vitro. Cells. 2022; 11(15):2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152376  https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/15/2376/htm (Full text)

Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and myopathy in patients post-COVID-19 infection

Abstract:

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), caused by the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), has become a life-threatening epidemic, affecting multiple organs, including the nervous system. Recent studies have documented that COVID-19-associated peripheral neuropathy is a common and frequent problem, with central and peripheral nervous system complications.

Objective: This work aims to evaluate the peripheral nerves and muscle involvement after COVID-19 infection, in addition to studying the prevalence rate and risk factors of their affection.

Methods: The study involved 400 patients, divided into 2 groups, with a history of COVID-19 infection with or without symptoms of neuromuscular affection, and 30 gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers were involved as controls. They were referred to the Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation for electro-diagnosis. All participants performed complete clinical examination and laboratory measures with an electrophysiological study.

Results: The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and myopathy in post-COVID-19 patients was 56.3% among all patients. A significant difference was detected among patients of both groups regarding serum creatine phosphokinase level, clinical signs, and electrophysiologic findings of neuropathy and myopathy compared to the control group, with more prominent features among the symptomatic group. Histories of hospitalization, severe and long-lasting respiratory symptoms were risk factors for developing neuromuscular complications.

Conclusions: The present study could indicate that muscle involvement and peripheral nerve affection are common problems even among asymptomatic patients after COVID-19 infection, especially in the presence of any risk factors.

Source: Saif DS, Ibrahem RA, Eltabl MA. Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and myopathy in patients post-COVID-19 infection. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug 1. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14409. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35915515. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.14409 (Full text)

COVID-19 May Be a Trigger for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

ALBANY, N.Y. (July 25, 2022) – UAlbany researcher Roxana Moslehi from the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics is conducting important investigations on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) to better understand the illness, including its potential connection to cancer, auto-immune disease, and long-haul COVID-19.

According to the CDC, 1 in thirteen adults in the U.S. have COVID-19 symptoms lasting three or more months after contracting the virus—a condition often referred to as “long COVID.” However, research suggests that long COVID is complex, and in some instances may not be COVID-19 at all, but rather ME/CFS—triggered by COVID-19.

ME/CFS is a complex disabling disorder with no known treatment. Between 25 and 50 percent of those with the illness are bed or housebound for extended periods of time, with overwhelming fatigue that does not diminish after resting and difficulty performing daily tasks. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was estimated that up to 3.4 million people in the US suffered from the illness—the range is large due to the difficulty in diagnosing the disease as it is often dismissed or assumed to be another disorder.

Since ME/CFS is believed to be triggered by the onset of an infectious illness, research suggests that COVID-19 may be a trigger for ME/CFS. The chronic long-haul COVID-19 symptoms that some people report as following the resolution of their acute illness have similarities to symptoms of ME/CFS, such as persistent fatigue, sleep dysfunction, cognitive impairment, impaired memory, and more.

“It is estimated that in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 10 million new ME/CFS cases may be triggered around the world,” Moslehi explains. “This makes it urgent to identify risk factors and underlying biologic mechanisms for this condition along with its potential connection to COVID-19.”

Moslehi conducted a molecular epidemiologic investigation of ME/CFS (funded by an NIH research grant awarded to her) to better understand the illness, providing the most compelling evidence to date that ME/CFS may be an auto-immune disorder. She compared people who developed ME/CFS after having an infectious illness with a group of individuals without ME/CFS (called the control group). She looked at various intrinsic factors related to the participants’ health, such as personal history of allergy and asthma, and extrinsic or environmental factors such as exposure to contaminants. She also assessed the prevalence of illnesses such as auto-immune diseases and cancer in their families, levels of serum immune system markers such as cytokines, and molecular evidence of viral reactivation such as mono flare-ups.

The study, published in the proceedings of the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), the International Genetic Epidemiology Society (IGES) and the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), found that those with ME/CFS were five times more likely to have a family history of auto-immune diseases than the control group. ME/CFS was also associated with an increased risk of early-onset cancer (diagnosed before 60 years old) among the first-degree relatives. ME/CFS was associated with certain risk factors such as a history of allergies requiring medication and exposure to contaminants. The analysis by the Moslehi lab also identified a panel of cytokines that predict the risk of ME/CFS with high accuracy. A couple of the identified cytokines are involved in inflammatory processes and have been linked to other auto-immune diseases.

“Our multidimensional analysis of pedigree, epidemiologic, and molecular data not only provides the most objective evidence to date that ME/CFS may be an auto-immune disease— it provides etiologic clues and leads for prevention” says Moslehi. “In addition, our results may enable defining a subset of COVID-19 patients, who are at risk of developing long COVID or ME/CFS, for targeted monitoring and/or therapy.”

More recently, Moslehi, in collaboration with her colleagues at the NIH, obtained two additional NIH (intramural) grants to continue her research on ME/CFS. Through these grants, the DNA and RNA of ME/CFS cases and controls have been sequenced and will be analyzed to identify genes and genetic variations that are associated with ME/CFS.

“The ultimate goal is to conduct an integrative analysis of multi-omics (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics) data to gain deeper insight into the biologic mechanisms of ME/CFS and identify druggable targets for ME/CFS therapy,” she says.