Safety and efficacy of low dose naltrexone in a long covid cohort; an interventional pre-post study

Abstract:

Background: Up to 37.7% of patients experience symptoms beyond 12 weeks after infection with SARS-CoV-2. To date care for people with long covid has centred around multidisciplinary rehabilitation, self care and self pacing. No pharmacotherapy has been shown to be beneficial.

Methods: In this single centre interventional pre post study, the safety of Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) was explored in patients with Post COVID-19 Syndrome (PCS), defined by NICE as patients with ongoing symptoms 12 or more weeks after initial infections with SARS-CoV-2 where alternative explanation for symptoms cannot be found. Patients were recruited through a Post COVID clinic, had a baseline quality of life questionnaire in symmetrical Likert format, were prescribed 2 months (1 mg month one, 2 mg month two) of LDN and repeated the same questionnaire at the end of the second month. Patients were monitored to adverse events.

Findings: In total 52 patients participated of whom 40(76.9%) were female. The median age was 43.5 years(IQR 33.2–49). Healthcare workers represented the largest occupational cohort n = 16(34.8%). The median time from diagnosis of COVID-19 until enrolment was 333 days (IQR 171–396.5). Thirty-eight participants (73.1%) were known to commence LDN, two of whom (5.3%) stopped taking LDN post commencement due to new onset diarrhoea and also described fatigue. In total 36(69.2%) participants completed the questionnaire at the end of the two-month period. Improvement was seen in 6 of 7 parameters measured; recovery from COVID-19, limitation in activities of daily living, energy levels, pain levels, levels of concentration and sleep disturbance (p ≤ 0.001), improvement in mood approached but was not significant (p = 0.054).

Conclusions: LDN is safe in patients with PCS and may improve well-being and reduce symptomatology in this cohort. Randomised control trials are needed to further explore this.

Source: Brendan O’Kelly, Louise Vidal, Tina McHugh, James Woo, Gordana Avramovic, John S. Lambert. Safety and efficacy of low dose naltrexone in a long covid cohort; an interventional pre-post study. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity – Health; Volume 24, October 2022, 100485 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354622000758  (Full text)

Rapid improvement in severe long COVID following perispinal etanercept

Abstract:

Background: This study aimed to describe the neurological improvements in a patient with severe long COVID brain dysfunction following perispinal etanercept administration. Perispinal administration of etanercept, a novel method designed to enhance its brain delivery via carriage in the cerebrospinal venous system, has previously been shown to reduce chronic neurological dysfunction after stroke. Etanercept is a recombinant biologic that is capable of ameliorating two components of neuroinflammation: microglial activation and the excess bioactivity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a proinflammatory cytokine that is a key neuromodulator in the brain. Optimal synaptic and brain network function require physiological levels of TNF. Neuroinflammation, including brain microglial activation and excess central TNF, can be a consequence of stroke or peripheral infection, including infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19.

Methods: Standardized, validated measures, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck Depression Index-II (BDI-II), Fatigue Assessment Scale, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Tests, Timed Finger-to-Nose Test, 20 meter Self-Paced Walk Test, 5 Times Sit-to-Stand Test and Grip Strength measured with a Jamar Dynamometer were used to quantitate changes in cognition, depression, fatigue and neurological function after a single 25mg perispinal etanercept dose in a patient with severe long COVID of 12 months duration.

Results: Following perispinal etanercept administration there was immediate neurological improvement. At 24 hours there were remarkable reductions in chronic post-COVID-19 fatigue and depression, and significant measureable improvements in cognition, executive function, phonemic verbal fluency, balance, gait, upper limb coordination and grip strength. Cognition, depression and fatigue were examined at 29 days; each remained substantially improved.

Conclusion: Perispinal etanercept is a promising treatment for the chronic neurologic dysfunction that may persist after resolution of acute COVID-19, including chronic cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and depression. These results suggest that long COVID brain neuroinflammation is a potentially reversible pathology and viable treatment target. In view of the increasing unmet medical need, clinical trials of perispinal etanercept for long COVID are urgently necessary. The robust results of the present case suggest that perispinal etanercept clinical trials studying long COVID populations with severe fatigue, depression and cognitive dysfunction may have improved ability to detect a treatment effect. Positron emission tomographic methods that image brain microglial activation and measurements of cerebrospinal fluid proinflammatory cytokines may be useful for patient selection and correlation with treatment effects, as well as provide insight into the underlying pathophysiology.

Source: Tobinick E, Spengler RN, Ignatowski TA, Wassel M, Laborde S. Rapid improvement in severe long COVID following perispinal etanercept. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Jul 6:1-23. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2096351. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35791687.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35791687/

Evidence-Based Care for People with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Letter to the Editor:

Sharpe et al. suggest that “the available evidence from randomized trials supports the use of the rehabilitative therapies of CBT and GET for patients with CFS/ME”.1 However, the current NICE guideline on the diagnosis and management of ME/CFS (which replaced the out-of-date guideline CG53 cited by Sharpe et al.) recommends that CBT and GET should not be prescribed as treatments for ME/CFS, due to the lack of evidence of efficacy and concerns about safety.2 As part of the process of updating its guidance, NICE reviewed all the relevant evidence from trials of these therapies. It concluded that none was better than low quality and that most was very low quality.3

It is notable that such therapies were first promoted and prescribed for ME/CFS before any clinical trials had been conducted to assess their efficacy or safety. In 1989, Wessely et al. acknowledged that it “may be correct in some cases” that physical and mental exertion should be avoided by people with ME/CFS, but they went on to recommend behavioural and cognitive therapies which encouraged patients to ignore their symptoms and gradually increase exercise, as there was “as yet no way” to identify the cases where such approaches may be harmful. Furthermore, the authors suggested that “it is reasonable to expect a patient to cooperate with treatment before being labelled as chronically disabled” for the purposes of receiving sickness benefits.4

Sharpe et al. acknowledge that since then CBT and GET have been “the most researched approaches” to treating what they refer to as CFS/ME. However, despite this, they conclude that “more research is needed into these approaches” and that “it would be a disservice to our patients to tell them we have nothing to offer them”.

It is deeply regrettable that, as NICE has concluded, there are currently no proven effective treatments for ME/CFS. However, it would be a far greater disservice to patients to prescribe ineffective and potentially harmful therapies than to tell them the truth. Given the history of how these therapies have been promoted, prescribed and researched, it is perhaps not surprising if some are reluctant to accept the evidence that they do not work and may be harmful. However, as Wilshire et al. concluded in their 2018 reanalysis of the PACE trial data: “The time has come to look elsewhere for effective treatments.”5

Read this article HERE.

Source: Saunders R. Evidence-Based Care for People with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07715-x. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35790668. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-022-07715-x (Full text)

Inflammation From Peripheral Organs to the Brain: How Does Systemic Inflammation Cause Neuroinflammation?

Abstract:

As inflammation in the brain contributes to several neurological and psychiatric diseases, the cause of neuroinflammation is being widely studied. The causes of neuroinflammation can be roughly divided into the following domains: viral infection, autoimmune disease, inflammation from peripheral organs, mental stress, metabolic disorders, and lifestyle. In particular, the effects of neuroinflammation caused by inflammation of peripheral organs have yet unclear mechanisms.

Many diseases, such as gastrointestinal inflammation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), trigger neuroinflammation through several pathways. The mechanisms of action for peripheral inflammation-induced neuroinflammation include disruption of the blood-brain barrier, activation of glial cells associated with systemic immune activation, and effects on autonomic nerves via the organ-brain axis. In this review, we consider previous studies on the relationship between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation, focusing on the brain regions susceptible to inflammation.

Source: Sun Y, Koyama Y, Shimada S. Inflammation From Peripheral Organs to the Brain: How Does Systemic Inflammation Cause Neuroinflammation? Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 16;14:903455. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.903455. PMID: 35783147; PMCID: PMC9244793. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244793/ (Full text)

Challenges of memory enhancers

Abstract:

40 per cent of people over the age of 65 experience some form of memory loss, called as the age related memory impairment. This might be due to hormone and proteins (Growth factors) which repair the brain cells decline with age. Certain conditions such as age, stress, disease and excessive emotional response may lead to loss of memory, loss of learning ability and altered mood and behaviour. These conditions may be treated by using nootropic agents which can help to improve learning abilities and memory.

Source: Chaudhry, Sunil. Challenges of memory enhancers. Annals of Geriatric Education and Medical Sciences; 2020/08/22. https://www.agems.in/article-details/11990 (Full text)

Pale rider: the Spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world

Book Review:

Pale rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and How it Changed the World by Laura Spinney, Public Affairs; 1st edition (September 12, 2017)

Formerly Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed life for humanity, nothing is “normal” anymore! In the last 100 years, there has not been any similar event. The common feeling among professionals, planners, press, politicians, and people is that “life will not be the same as we knew it, after the pandemic.” Understanding the likely impact of the pandemic and its consequences would be valuable to humanity in general and mental health professionals in particular. Against this current world-shaking event, it is natural to look for similar events in human history. In this, the 1918 flu is the closest event to understand a variety of aspects of the current pandemic. The book, Pale Rider: The Spanish Flu of 1918 and how it changed the world, is one of the best books in this field.[1] That many people are looking at the 1918 flu can be seen by the number of articles in the lay press that have focused on the 1918 flu.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Even now, a new book was published as latest as July 23, 2020.[8],[9]

Nevertheless, the book, under review, has 21 chapters with attractive chapter titles such as Like a Thief in the Night; The Doctor’s Dilemma; The Wrath of God; Chalking Doors with Crosses; Good Samaritans; The Human Factor; The Green Shoots of Recovery; Alternate Histories; and Health Care for all and Melancholy Muse.

Between the first case recorded on March 4, 1918, and the last case sometime in March 1920, it killed 50–100 million people, or between 2.5% and 5% of the global population. In terms of a single event causing major loss of life, it surpassed the First World War (17 million dead) and the Second World War (60 million dead). India was specially affected and lost around 6% of its population, the greatest loss in absolute numbers of any country in the world (an estimate of 13–18 million). The book has a special focus on India,[1] presented through the lives of Mahatma Gandhi, Tagore, Munshi Premchand, and Nirala and its impact on the Independence struggle.

Mahatma Gandhi was affected by the gastric variety of flu. At Gandhi’s ashram, several prominent members of the Independence Movement were laid low with flu. Gandhi was too feverish to speak or read; he couldn’t shake a sense of doom: “All interest in living had ceased.” Interestingly, Gandhi’s reaction was: This protracted and first long illness in my life thus afforded me a unique opportunity to examine my principles and to test them. Rabindranath Tagore returned his knighthood as a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, and observed that British were guilty of “the same kind of ignorance of the eternal laws which primitive people show when they hunt for some so-called witch to whom they ascribe the cause of their illness, while carrying the disease germs in their own blood.” Spinney observes that disease was a major preoccupation in the writing that emerged in the 1920s, where it dovetailed with ideas about the need to reform the caste system and throw off the yoke of British rule. Munshi Premchand became the self-styled “chronicler of village life” around 1918 when he was living in the United Provinces (Uttar Pradesh), where the Spanish flu claimed an estimated 2–3 million lives alone. Also living there at that time was the poet Nirala, who lost his wife and many other members of his family to the flu. He later recalled seeing the River Ganges “swollen with dead bodies.” This was the strangest time in my life. My family disappeared in the blink of an eye.

There are sections in the book describing the feelings of anxiety accompanying the acute phase of the disease, and reports of people killing themselves while delirious. Following recovery, some patients found themselves plunged into a lingering state of lassitude and despair. Norwegian epidemiologist Svenn-Erik Mamelund studied asylum records in his country from 1872 to 1929 and found that, every year, in which there was no pandemic of influenza, only a few cases were admitted of mental illness associated with flu. However, in each of the 6 years following the 1918 pandemic, the average number of such admissions was seven times higher than in those nonpandemic years (emphasis added). Mamelund speculates that the patients admitted in those 6 years were survivors of Spanish flu who were suffering from what today we would call “postviral or chronic fatigue syndrome.”

The book provides similar creative responses in a number of countries following the pandemic. The paragraph about controversies about the quarantine makes for contemporary reading: “Quarantine and other disease containment strategies place the interests of the collective over those of the individual. When the collective is very large, those strategies have to be imposed in a top-down fashion. But mandating a central authority to act in the interests of the collective potentially creates two kinds of problems. First, the collective may have competing priorities-the need to make money, or the need to raise an army-and deny or water-down the authority’s powers of enforcement. Second, the rights of individuals risk getting trampled on, especially if the authority abuses the measures placed at its disposal.”

One of the quotes from the book can portend what we can expect in the coming years in the country. Spinney notes, “The 1918 pandemic accelerated the pace of change in the first half of the twentieth century, and helped shape our modern world. It influenced the course of the First World War and arguably, contributed to the Second. It pushed India closer to Independence, South Africa closer to Apartheid, and Switzerland to the brink of Civil War. It ushered in universal healthcare and alternative medicine, our love of fresh air and our passion for sport, and it was probably responsible, at least in part, for the obsession of twentieth-century artists with all the myriad ways in which the human body can fail.”

The book made me realize that the current pandemic will bring about extensive changes. Against this expected “mental health tsunami,” there are three tasks for each one of us: firstly, to document the experiences of individuals, families, communities, and the government; secondly, to identify the social factors contributing to vulnerabilities and resilience, to guide corrective actions; and lastly, to utilize the opportunity of heightened awareness of societal-level issues, to work toward addressing the predisposing causes for higher mortality and morbidity such as inequalities, intolerances, inadequate health infrastructure, the weak welfare network to support the vulnerable, and decentralization of powers and plans to enhance community participation.

I recommend it as an essential reading during the current pandemic period.

Source: Murthy R S. Pale rider: the spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Jul 4];36, Suppl S1:189-90. Available from: https://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2020/36/5/189/297158

Study on the active components and mechanism of Suanzaoren decoction in improving cognitive impairment caused by sleep deprivation

Abstract:

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Suanzaoren Decoction (SZRD) is a traditional and classic prescription for the treatment of insomnia, with a history of more than 1,000 years. It replenishes blood components, calms the nerves, reduces fever and irritability. It is commonly used in the clinical treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome, cardiac neurosis, and menopausal syndromes. Modern pharmacological studies have shown that it improves cognitive impairment; however, its mechanism of action remains unclear.

Aim of the study: This study preliminarily investigated the potential bioactive components and mechanism of SZRD in improving cognitive impairment by exploring network pharmacology, molecular docking, and conducting in vivo experiments.

Materials and methods: The components of various Chinese herbs in SZRD and their disease-related targets were identified through network pharmacology and literature. Gene ontology (GO) function enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses of intersection targets were performed using the relevant database. Next, the “Components-Targets-Pathways” (C-T-P) and “Protein-Protein interaction” networks were constructed using the enrichment analysis results to further identify potential pathways, bioactive components, and hub genes. At the same time, molecular docking was used to further distinguish the key bioactive components and genes of SZRD responsible for improving cognitive impairment. Finally, the potential mechanism of action was further analysed and verified using in vivo experiments.

Results: A total of 117 potential active components and 138 intersection targets were identified by network pharmacology screening. The key bioactive components, including calycosin, 5-Prenylbutein, licochalcone G, glypallichalcone, and ZINC189892, were identified by analysing the networks and molecular docking results. Hub genes included ACHE, CYP19A1, EGFR, ESR1, and ESR2. The oestrogen signalling pathway was the most important in the enrichment analysis. In vivo experiments further proved that SZRD could improve cognitive impairment by affecting the oestrogen signalling pathway and the expression of ACHE and CYP19A1.

Conclusions: Network pharmacology and in vivo experiments demonstrate that SZRD improves cognitive impairment caused by sleep disturbance through estrogen receptor pathway, which provides a basis for its clinical application.

Source: Cheng L, Wang F, Li ZH, Wen C, Ding L, Zhang SB, You QY. Study on the active components and mechanism of Suanzaoren decoction in improving cognitive impairment caused by sleep deprivation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Jun 28:115502. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115502. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35777606. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378874122005414 (Full text)

Functional decline, long term symptoms and course of frailty at 3-months follow-up in COVID-19 older survivors, a prospective observational cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Aging is one of the most important prognostic factors increasing the risk of clinical severity and mortality of COVID-19 infection. However, among patients over 75 years, little is known about post-acute functional decline.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with functional decline 3 months after COVID-19 onset, to identify long term COVID-19 symptoms and transitions between frailty statesafter COVID-19 onset in older hospitalized patients.

Methods: This prospective observational study included COVID-19 patients consecutively hospitalized from March to December 2020 in Acute Geriatric Ward in Nantes University Hospital. Functional decline, frailty status and long term symptoms were assessed at 3 month follow up. Functional status was assessed using the Activities of Daily Living simplified scale (ADL). Frailty status was evaluated using Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We performed multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with functional decline.

Results: Among the 318 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, 198 were alive 3 months after discharge. At 3 months, functional decline occurred in 69 (36%) patients. In multivariable analysis, a significant association was found between functional decline and stroke (OR = 4,57, p = 0,003), history of depressive disorder (OR = 3,05, p = 0,016), complications (OR = 2,24, p = 0,039), length of stay (OR = 1,05, p = 0,025) and age (OR = 1,08, p = 0,028). At 3 months, 75 patients described long-term symptoms (49.0%). Of those with frailty (CFS scores ≥5) at 3-months follow-up, 30% were not frail at baseline. Increasing frailty defined by a worse CFS state between baseline and 3 months occurred in 41 patients (26.8%).

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that both the severity of the COVID-19 infection and preexisting medical conditions correlates with a functional decline at distance of the infection. This encourages practitioners to establish discharge personalized care plan based on a multidimensional geriatric assessment and in parallel on clinical severity evaluation.

Source: Prampart S, Le Gentil S, Bureau ML, Macchi C, Leroux C, Chapelet G, de Decker L, Rouaud A, Boureau AS. Functional decline, long term symptoms and course of frailty at 3-months follow-up in COVID-19 older survivors, a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03197-y. PMID: 35768781. https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-022-03197-y (Full text)

Oxaloacetate Treatment For Mental And Physical Fatigue In Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long-COVID fatigue patients: a non-randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract:

Background: There is no approved pharmaceutical intervention for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Fatigue in these patients can last for decades. Long COVID may continue to ME/CFS, and currently, it is estimated that up to 20 million Americans have significant symptoms after COVID, and the most common symptom is fatigue. Anhydrous Enol-Oxaloacetate, (AEO) a nutritional supplement, has been anecdotally reported to relieve physical and mental fatigue and is diminished in ME/CFS patients. Here, we examine the use of higher dosage AEO as a medical food to relieve pathological fatigue.

Methods: ME/CFS and Long-COVID patients were enrolled in an open label dose escalating “Proof of Concept” non-randomized controlled clinical trial with 500 mg AEO capsules. Control was provided by a historical ME/CFS fatigue trial and supporting meta-analysis study, which showed average improvement with oral placebo using the Chalder Scale of 5.9% improvement from baseline. At baseline, 73.7% of the ME/CFS patients were women, average age was 47 and length of ME/CFS from diagnosis was 8.9 years. The Long-COVID patients were a random group that responded to social media advertising (Face Book) with symptoms for at least 6 months. ME/CFS patients were given separate doses of 500 mg BID (N = 23), 1,000 mg BID (N = 29) and 1000 mg TID (N = 24) AEO for six weeks. Long COVID patients were given 500 mg AEO BID (N = 22) and 1000 mg AEO (N = 21), again over a six-week period. The main outcome measure was to compare baseline scoring with results at 6 weeks with the Chalder Fatigue Score (Likert Scoring) versus historical placebo. The hypothesis being tested was formulated prior to data collection.

Results: 76 ME/CFS patients (73.7% women, median age of 47) showed an average reduction in fatigue at 6 weeks as measured by the “Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire” of 22.5% to 27.9% from baseline (P < 0.005) (Likert scoring). Both physical and mental fatigue were significantly improved over baseline and historical placebo. Fatigue amelioration in ME/CFS patients increased in a dose dependent manner from 21.7% for 500 mg BID to 27.6% for 1000 mg Oxaloacetate BID to 33.3% for 1000 mg TID. Long COVID patients’ fatigue was significantly reduced by up to 46.8% in 6-weeks.

Conclusions: Significant reductions in physical and metal fatigue for ME/CFS and Long-COVID patients were seen after 6 weeks of treatment. As there has been little progress in providing fatigue relief for the millions of ME/CFS and Long COVID patients, anhydrous enol oxaloacetate may bridge this important medical need. Further study of oxaloacetate supplementation for the treatment of ME/CFS and Long COVID is warranted.

Source: Cash, A., Kaufman, D.L. Oxaloacetate Treatment For Mental And Physical Fatigue In Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long-COVID fatigue patients: a non-randomized controlled clinical trial. J Transl Med 20, 295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03488-3  https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-022-03488-3 (Full text)

The effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): A prospective cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Symptoms of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) may improve following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However few prospective data that also explore the underlying biological mechanism are available. We assessed the effect of vaccination on symptomatology of participants with PASC, and compared antibody dynamics between those with and without PASC.

Methods: RECoVERED is a prospective cohort study of adult patients with mild to critical COVID-19, enrolled from illness onset. Among participants with PASC, vaccinated participants were exact-matched 1:1 on age, sex, obesity status and time since illness onset to unvaccinated participants. Between matched pairs, we compared the monthly mean numbers of symptoms over a 3-month follow-up period, and, using exact logistic regression, the proportion of participants who fully recovered from PASC. Finally, we assessed the association between PACS status and rate of decay of spike- and RBD-binding IgG titers up to 9 months after illness onset using Bayesian hierarchical linear regression.

Findings: Of 349 enrolled participants, 316 (90.5%) had ≥3 months of follow-up, of whom 186 (58.9%) developed PASC. Among 36 matched pairs with PASC, the mean number of symptoms reported each month during 3 months of follow-up were comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Odds of full recovery from PASC also did not differ between matched pairs (OR 1.57 [95%CI 0.46-5.84]) within 3 months after the matched time-point. The median half-life of spike- and RBD-binding IgG levels were, in days (95%CrI), 233 (183-324) and 181 (147-230) among participants with PASC, and 170 (125-252) and 144 (113-196) among those without PASC, respectively.

Interpretation: Our study found no strong evidence to suggest that vaccination improves symptoms of PASC. This was corroborated by comparable spike- and RBD-binding IgG waning trajectories between those with and without PASC, refuting any immunological basis for a therapeutic effect of vaccination on PASC.

Source: Wynberg E, Han AX, Boyd A, van Willigen HDG, Verveen A, Lebbink R, van der Straten K, Kootstra N, van Gils MJ, Russell C, Leenstra T, de Jong MD, de Bree GJ, Prins M; RECoVERED Study Group. The effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): A prospective cohort study. Vaccine. 2022 Jun 7:S0264-410X(22)00748-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.090. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35725782; PMCID: PMC9170535. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170535/ (Full text)