Predisposing and Precipitating Factors in Epstein–Barr Virus-Caused Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Long COVID following SARS-CoV-2 and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) following infectious mononucleosis (IM) are two examples of post-viral syndromes. The identification of risk factors predisposing patients to developing and maintaining post-infectious syndromes may help uncover their underlying mechanisms.
The majority of patients with ME/CFS report infectious illnesses before the onset of ME/CFS, with 30% of cases of ME/CFS due to IM caused by the Epstein–Barr virus. After developing IM, one study found 11% of adults had ME/CFS at 6 months and 9% had ME/CFS at 1 year. Another study of adolescents found 13% and 7% with ME/CFS at 6 and 12 months following IM, respectively. However, it is unclear which variables are potential risk factors contributing to the development and maintenance of ME/CFS following IM, because few prospective studies have collected baseline data before the onset of the triggering illness.
The current article provides an overview of a study that included pre-illness predictors of ME/CFS development following IM in a diverse group of college students who were enrolled before the onset of IM. Our data set included an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse group of young adult students, and we were able to longitudinally follow these youths over time to better understand the risk factors associated with the pathophysiology of ME/CFS.
General screens of health and psychological well-being, as well as blood samples, were obtained at three stages of the study (Stage 1—Baseline—when the students were well, at least 6 weeks before the student developed IM; Stage 2—within 6 weeks following the diagnosis of IM, and Stage 3—six months after IM, when they had either developed ME/CFS or recovered). We focused on the risk factors for new cases of ME/CFS following IM and found factors both at baseline (Stage 1) and at the time of IM (Stage 2) that predicted nonrecovery. We are now collecting seven-year follow-up data on this sample, as well as including cases of long COVID. The lessons learned in this prospective study are reviewed.
Source: Jason LA, Katz BZ. Predisposing and Precipitating Factors in Epstein–Barr Virus-Caused Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(4):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040702 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/4/702 (Full text)

Pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): A Diagnostic and Communication Case Study for Health Care Providers in Training

Abstract:

Introduction: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, complex illness. No diagnostic tests exist; illness evaluation relies on medical history, physical exam, and laboratory tests. While more is known about ME/CFS in adults, it can affect children and adolescents as a chronic condition.

Methods: We implemented an ME/CFS pediatric educational activity (diagnosis, management, and communication) with medical, physician assistant, and nursing students at one university and with medical students at a second university. Pretests, two videos and slides, and posttests were completed in approximately 40 minutes. Evaluation included quantitative and qualitative measures for knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, confidence, and clinical information about ME/CFS.

Results: The first group included 31 students who reported low familiarity and clinical exposure to ME/CFS. At posttest, 25 students (81%) recognized ME/CFS as a medical condition compared to seven (23%) at pretest. Using 0-5 scales, mean pretest-to-posttest ability to diagnose increased from 1.0 to 3.5, and confidence to communicate increased from 1.4 to 3.9. The second group, including 26 students pretest and 19 posttest, also reported low familiarity and clinical exposure The posttest showed increased self-rated ability to diagnose (pretest M: 0.6, posttest M: 3.3) and confidence to communicate (pretest M: 1.4, posttest M: 3.7). Qualitative feedback for this group showed understanding of pediatric ME/CFS symptoms, management, and communication.

Discussion: This educational activity increased knowledge of ME/CFS as self-reported ability to make a diagnosis and increased confidence to communicate about pediatric ME/CFS. Participating students showed changes in attitudes towards ME/CFS as a medical condition.

Source: Brimmer DJ, Lin JS, Selinger HA, Issa A, Fall EA, Unger ER. Pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): A Diagnostic and Communication Case Study for Health Care Providers in Training. MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Mar 14;21:11507. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11507. PMID: 40092054; PMCID: PMC11906784. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11906784/ (Full text)

Efficacy of vitamin D replacement therapy on 28 cases of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination

Abstract:

Background: Prolonged symptoms have been reported following both COVID-19 infection and vaccination, with some cases leading to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Of 80 patients presenting to our hospital with postvaccination syndrome, 28 met the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS. We conducted a retrospective study on these 28 patients.

Methods: We measured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in 28 patients who developed ME/CFS after COVID-19 vaccination between August 2022 and February 2024. Vitamin D replacement therapy included dietary counseling, sun exposure recommendations, and oral vitamin D supplementation. We evaluated changes in blood vitamin D levels and symptom improvement.

Results: At initial visit, 27 of 28 patients diagnosed with ME/CFS had insufficient or deficient serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (16 ± 4 ng/mL, mean ± SD). Following vitamin D replacement therapy, we observed an increase in blood vitamin D levels (28 ± 5 ng/mL) associated with a decrease in ME/CFS diagnostic symptoms (from 10.3 ± 2.1 to 3.3 ± 2.0). Notably, 23 of 28 patients (82%) no longer met ME/CFS diagnostic criteria after the therapy. Among the symptoms, sleep problems showed the most improvement (71%), followed by autonomic symptoms (68%).

Conclusions: For patients developing ME/CFS after COVID-19 vaccination with insufficient or deficient vitamin D levels, appropriate vitamin D replacement therapy under medical guidance may lead to symptomatic relief. We are preparing a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D replacement therapy in individuals with ME/CFS who have developed vitamin D deficiency following COVID-19 infection or vaccination.

Source: Kodama S, Konishi N, Hirai Y, Fujisawa A, Nakata M, Teramukai S, Fukushima M. Efficacy of vitamin D replacement therapy on 28 cases of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination. Nutrition. 2025 Feb 18;134:112718. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2025.112718. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40090177. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089990072500036X (Full text)

Letter: Time to correct the record on the global burden of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Dear Editor,

We have read Lim et al.’s study [1] with great interest. Studies of this illness are scarce, so their article is important in establishing the global prevalence systematically. In fact, it has been cited over 200 times and has had a significant influence on global reporting of the burden of ME/CFS. Unfortunately, the core figure that is most frequently drawn from the article is a significant underestimate of the prevalence of ME/CFS, and has led to the spread of misinformation about the burden of this disease.

A global ME/CFS population of 17 to 24 million people is reported in articles such as those published in BMC Medicine [2] and Science [3], all referencing Lim et al. The same range of numbers is also easy to find in patient advocacy websites and news reports, such as those of the American Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Society [4] and CNN [5], all updated after Lim et al.’s article was published. However, this figure is drawn from the Background section of Lim et al.’s article, where they state, “In worldwide statistics, approximately 1% of the population, 17 to 24 million people, suffer from this condition [14], which is likely to be as common as rheumatoid arthritis” [1]. The cited reference (reference [14]) is an article about the global burden of multiple sclerosis, and is not relevant to the global ME/CFS population.

The actual headline result of the study by Lim et al. was an estimated prevalence of 0.89% using the CDC-1994 definition, as indicated in the Discussion and Conclusions sections of their article [1]. If we correctly apply this to the global population of 8 billion, the true prevalence of ME/CFS would be 71.2 million (71,200,000). However, new research using more up-to-date datasets and methods is essential to gain a full understanding of the burden of this disease.

Due to this unfortunate misreading and misattribution by others of an erroneous reference in the Background section of Lim et al.’s article, there is widespread underestimation of the true burden of ME/CFS. Such underestimation may exacerbate the isolation, stigmatization, and suffering of people living with this poorly-understood and under-recognized illness. More effort is needed to correct this underestimation globally, develop treatment methods and welfare support, and relieve the burden of ME/CFS. Correct reporting of the true prevalence of this disease is an important first step to addressing the ongoing neglect that its sufferers experience, and this can begin with the correct reporting of Lim et al.’s research.

Source: Vardaman M, Gilmour S. Letter: Time to correct the record on the global burden of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Transl Med. 2025 Mar 14;23(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06281-0. PMID: 40087760. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-025-06281-0 (Full text)

Cognitive Dysfunction in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Aetiology and Potential Treatments

Abstract:

Systemic infection and inflammation impair mental function through a combination of altered attention and cognition. Here, we comprehensively review the relevant literature and report personal clinical observations to discuss the relationship between infection, peripheral inflammation, and cerebral and cognitive dysfunction in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Cognitive dysfunction in ME/CFS could result from low-grade persistent inflammation associated with raised pro-inflammatory cytokines. This may be caused by both infectious and non-infectious stimuli and lead to altered regional cerebral blood flow accompanied by disturbed neuronal function. Immune dysregulation that manifests as a subtle immunodeficiency or the autoimmunity targeting of one or more neuronal receptors may also be a contributing factor.

Efforts to reduce low-grade systemic inflammation and viral reactivation and to improve mitochondrial energy generation in ME/CFS have the potential to improve cognitive dysfunction in this highly disabling condition.

Source: Bansal AS, Seton KA, Brooks JCW, Carding SR. Cognitive Dysfunction in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Aetiology and Potential Treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 22;26(5):1896. doi: 10.3390/ijms26051896. PMID: 40076522. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/5/1896 (Full text)

 

Health-related quality of life in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post COVID-19 Condition: a systematic review

Abstract:

Purpose: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) are debilitating, chronic multi-systemic illnesses that require multidisciplinary care. However, people with ME/CFS (pwME/CFS) and people with PCC (pwPCC) are often precluded from accessing necessary disability and social support services. These unmet care needs exacerbate the existing illness burdens experienced by pwME/CFS and pwPCC. To deliver appropriate care and optimise health outcomes for pwME/CFS and pwPCC, the development of evidence-based healthcare policies that recognise the disabling impacts of these illnesses must be prioritised. This systematic review summarises the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pwME/CFS and pwPCC when compared with healthy controls (HCs) to elucidate the impacts of these illnesses and guide healthcare policy reform.

Methods: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Web of Science Core Collection were systematically searched from 1st January 2003 to 23rd July 2024. Eligible publications included observational studies capturing quantitative HRQoL data among pwME/CFS or pwPCC when compared with HCs. The use of validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was mandatory. Eligible studies were also required to employ the most stringent diagnostic criteria currently available, including the Canadian Consensus Criteria or International Consensus Criteria for ME/CFS and the World Health Organization case definition for PCC (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024501309).

Results: This review captured 16 studies, including eight studies among pwME/CFS, seven studies among pwPCC and one study among both illness cohorts. Most participants were female and middle-aged. All pwPCC had experienced prolonged COVID-19 symptoms for at least three months. When compared with HCs, all HRQoL domains were significantly impaired among pwME/CFS and pwPCC. Both illnesses had a salient impact on physical health, including pain and ability to perform daily and work activities. While direct comparisons between pwME/CFS and pwPCC were limited by inconsistencies in the PROMs employed, comparable impact trends across HRQoL domain scores were observed.

Conclusion: ME/CFS and PCC have similar, profound impacts on HRQoL that warrant access to multidisciplinary disability and social support services. Future research must harmonise HRQoL data collection and prioritise longitudinal investigations among pwME/CFS and pwPCC to characterise PCC subgroups (including those fulfilling ME/CFS criteria) and predictors of prognosis.

Source: Weigel B, Inderyas M, Eaton-Fitch N, Thapaliya K, Marshall-Gradisnik S. Health-related quality of life in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post COVID-19 Condition: a systematic review. J Transl Med. 2025 Mar 13;23(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06131-z. PMID: 40075382. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-025-06131-z (Full text)

Recognizing the role of fibromyalgia in post-exertional malaise

Letter:

The recent opinion by Charlton et al. published in Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism [] provides a thought-provoking discussion of the overlap between long coronavirus disease (long-COVID) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), emphasizing the centrality of post-exertional malaise (PEM) as a shared mechanism.

Here, we suggest that fibromyalgia should be included in the discussion, given the established role of PEM in this condition []. In addition, fibromyalgia not only shares symptomatic and mechanistic overlaps with ME/CFS, but also offers a complementary perspective on the pathophysiology of PEM. Considering that PEM is a key symptom in both fibromyalgia and long COVID, exploring skeletal muscle function in fibromyalgia could provide complementary insights into the muscle-specific alterations that contribute to this debilitating phenomenon.

Source: Giollo A, Salvato M, Doria A. Recognizing the role of fibromyalgia in post-exertional malaise. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Mar 11:S1043-2760(25)00045-1. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2025.02.005. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40074568. https://www.cell.com/trends/endocrinology-metabolism/abstract/S1043-2760(25)00045-1

mTORC1 syndrome (TorS): unifying paradigm for PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS

Abstract:

Post-acute SarS-Cov2 (PASC), Myalgia encephalomyelitis/Chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Post-acute infection syndrome (PAIS) consist of chronic post-acute infectious syndromes, sharing exhaustive fatigue, post exertional malaise, intermittent pain, postural tachycardia and neuro-cognitive-psychiatric dysfunction. However, the concerned shared pathophysiology is still unresolved in terms of upstream drivers and transducers. Also, risk factors which may determine vulnerability/progression to the chronic phase still remain to be defined.

In lack of drivers and a cohesive pathophysiology, the concerned syndromes still remain unmet therapeutic needs. ‘mTORC1 Syndrome’ (TorS) implies an exhaustive disease entity driven by sustained hyper-activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin C1 (mTORC1), and resulting in a variety of disease aspects of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, some cancers, neurodegeneration and other [Bar-Tana in Trends Endocrinol Metab 34:135-145, 2023]. TorS may offer a cohesive insight of PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS drivers, pathophysiology, vulnerability and treatment options.

Source: Bar-Tana J. mTORC1 syndrome (TorS): unifying paradigm for PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS. J Transl Med. 2025 Mar 10;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06220-z. PMID: 40059164. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-025-06220-z (Full text)

Post-infective myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-COVID as two puzzling faces of the same medal. Recent insights

Background:

How much is truly shared in terms of pathogenesis, symptomatology, and disease progression between the myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-COVID, and why have these two very complex conditions recently been grouped under the same umbrella terms?
The 1st International Conference on Clinical and Scientific Advances of ME/CFS/long COVID”, held in Portugal, on April 3rd and 4th 2024 [1], addressed, for the first time, this concern, shedding light onto two highly…
Source: Chirumbolo S, Franzini M, Tirelli U. Post-infective myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-COVID as two puzzling faces of the same medal. Recent insights. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025 Mar 7:114365. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.114365. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40057420. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1567576925003558

“I still can’t forget those words”: mixed methods study of the persisting impact on patients reporting psychosomatic and psychiatric misdiagnoses

Abstract:

Objectives: This research aimed to improve understanding of persisting impacts of patient-reported psychosomatic and psychiatric misdiagnoses on patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).
Methods: Mixed methods data from two SARDs cohorts were analysed (N = 1,543 and N = 1,853). Validated instruments and patient-designed questions were used to measure self-reported depression, anxiety and mental wellbeing, in addition to medical relationships and healthcare behaviours. Comparative tests were used to evaluate differences between patients reporting a psychosomatic and/or psychiatric misdiagnoses and other patients.
Results: Persisting adverse outcomes of perceived psychosomatic and psychiatric misdiagnoses were identified in multiple domains. This included >80% of patients reporting that it had damaged their self-worth, and 72% reporting that it still upset them. Patients reporting psychosomatic and/or psychiatric misdiagnoses had significantly lower mental wellbeing, and higher depression and anxiety levels (all p< 0.001), and lower levels of satisfaction with every aspect of medical care, compared with patients reporting no psychosomatic or psychiatric misdiagnoses. Psychosomatic and psychiatric misdiagnoses had varying associations with healthcare behaviours, including a significantly higher likelihood of under-reporting symptoms (p< 0.001) and healthcare avoidance (p= 0.012), but not with medication adherence (p= 0.2). Thematic analysis of qualitative data revealed that symptom under-reporting and healthcare avoidance often resulted from distrust and fear that symptoms would be disbelieved and misattributed again.
Conclusion: Patient-reported psychosomatic and psychiatric (mis)diagnoses are associated with persisting adverse impacts in multiple domains including mental health, medical relationships, self-worth, and some healthcare behaviours. Health services and clinicians should consider these potential adverse impacts on patients and offer support to reduce any persisting negative impacts.

Source: Melanie Sloan, Michael Bosley, Caroline Gordon, Thomas A Pollak, Farhana Mann, Efthalia Massou, Stephen Morris, Lynn Holloway, Rupert Harwood, Kate Middleton, Wendy Diment, James Brimicombe, Elliott Lever, Lucy Calderwood, Ellie Dalby, Elaine Dunbar, David D’Cruz, Felix Naughton, “I still can’t forget those words”: mixed methods study of the persisting impact on patients reporting psychosomatic and psychiatric misdiagnoses, Rheumatology, 2025;, keaf115, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf115 https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf115/8042899 (Full text available as PDF file)