Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex disorder characterized by heterogeneous symptoms, which lack specific biomarkers for its diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels as a potential biomarker for ME/CFS and explore associations with cognitive, autonomic, and neuropathic symptoms.
Here, 67 ME/CFS patients and 43 healthy controls (HCs) underwent comprehensive assessments, including neuropsychological evaluation, autonomic nervous system (ANS) testing, and plasma NfL level analysis. ME/CFS patients exhibited significantly higher plasma NfL levels compared to HC (F = 4.30, p < 0.05). Correlations were observed between NfL levels and cognitive impairment, particularly in visuospatial perception (r = -0.42; p ≤ 0.001), verbal memory (r = -0.35, p ≤ 0.005), and visual memory (r = -0.26; p < 0.05) in ME/CFS. Additionally, higher NfL levels were associated with worsened autonomic dysfunction in these patients, specifically in parasympathetic function (F = 9.48, p ≤ 0.003).
In ME/CFS patients, NfL levels explained up to 17.2% of the results in cognitive tests. Unlike ME/CFS, in HC, NfL levels did not predict cognitive performance. Elevated plasma NfL levels in ME/CFS patients reflect neuroaxonal damage, contributing to cognitive dysfunction and autonomic impairment.
These findings support the potential role of NfL as a biomarker for neurological dysfunction in ME/CFS. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.
Source: Azcue N, Tijero-Merino B, Acera M, Pérez-Garay R, Fernández-Valle T, Ayo-Mentxakatorre N, Ruiz-López M, Lafuente JV, Gómez Esteban JC, Del Pino R. Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain: A Potential Biomarker for Neurological Dysfunction in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 11;12(7):1539. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071539. PMID: 39062112; PMCID: PMC11274366. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11274366/ (Full text)
A cross-sectional study demonstrated significant impairments in attention, memory, and higher cognitive functions among a cohort of patients with fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), according to a study published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management.1
Investigators believe deficits in the fibromyalgia cohort could be explained by secondary symptoms coupled with more severe pain. A cognitive screening could help curate personalized treatment plans to improve the quality of life among patients with RA and fibromyalgia.
“Research directly comparing cognitive performance between patients with fibromyalgia and RA is still scarce. Some studies suggested deficits of similar magnitude in both patient groups,” wrote a group of investigators led by Carmen María Galvez Sánchez, PhD, associated with the Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment at the University of Murcia, Spain. “In response to this exigency, there is a requisite for the evaluation of cognitive impairments in individuals with chronic pain, aiming to formulate and implement interventions rooted in neuropsychological training. This approach is intended to ameliorate cognitive performance and mitigate its consequential impact on health-related quality of life.”
In certain patients with fibromyalgia, cognitive impairment was linked to clinical pain severity, depression, fatigue, insomnia, and anxiety. Similarly, these were also reported in patients with RA, although pain and emotional symptoms within the fibromyalgia cohort.2 Symptoms of fibromyalgia and RA often include depression, fatigue, insomnia, and cognitive issues.
Investigators analyzed the performance in cognitive domains between patients with RA and fibromyalgia using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Questionnaire scores were combined to determine the symptom severity factor, which was used as a control variable within the group comparisons.
A total of 64 patients with fibromyalgia, 34 patients with RA, and 32 healthy controls were included in the study. All patients were female.
Without controlling for the severity of symptoms, patients with either fibromyalgia or RA performed worse when compared with controls in terms of cognitive domains including verbal memory, visual memory, and strategic planning.
Additionally, over deficits were observed in the fibromyalgia cohort compared with RA. Patients with fibromyalgia reported more severe symptoms, such as pain intensity, total pain, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and fatigue, compared with patients with RA. After controlling for symptom severity a significant proportion of cognitive test, a large proportion of cognitive test parameters were not different between rheumatologic cohorts.
Limitations included the lack of information regarding the influence of psychotropic and pain medication on cognitive performance among rheumatic patients. Although the limitation could have been determined using subgroup analysis, the current sample size was too small to form these subgroups.
Further, no data on treatment and disease activity were collected in the RA subgroup and the analysis of the effects of clinical symptoms on cognitive performance was limited. Additionally, not all psychological factors that may impact cognition were assessed in the analysis. The generalizability of findings may be hindered as only women were included in the analysis and the recruitment of subjects was not randomly performed. Lastly, the RA and fibromyalgia diagnoses were performed by different rheumatologists, which may have introduced selection bias.
“Based on the present results, it is recommended that screening for cognitive deficits be part of routine diagnostics for fibromyalgia and RA, which may help to guide the design of personalized interventions to optimize cognitive performance of patients with fibromyalgia and RA,” investigators concluded.
The present study had two objectives: 1) to determine the characteristics that differentiated subjects with multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS), chemical sensitivities (CS), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS); and 2) to evaluate the psychiatric and neuropsychological complaints of these groups relative to normal controls.
A cross-sectional comparison was made of the following groups matched for age, sex, and education: 1) patients whose sensitivities to multiple low level chemical exposures began with a defined exposure (MCS; N = 23); 2) patients with sensitivities to multiple chemicals without a clear date of onset (CS; N = 13); 3) patients meeting CDC criteria for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS; N = 18); and 4) normal controls (N = 18).
Subjects with sensitivities to chemicals (MCS and CS) reported significantly more lifestyle changes due to chemical sensitivities and significantly more chemical substances that made them ill compared with chronic fatigue and normal controls. MCS, CS, and CFS patients had significantly higher rates of current psychiatric disorders than normal controls and reported significantly more physical symptoms with no medical explanation.
Seventy-four percent of MCS and 61% of CFS did not qualify for any current Axis I psychiatric diagnosis. Chemically sensitive subjects without a defined date of onset (CS) had the highest rate of Axis I psychiatric disorders (69%). On the MMPI-2, 44% of MCS, 42% of CS, 53% of CFS, and none of the controls achieved clinically significant elevations on scales associated with somatoform disorders.
With the exception of one complex test of visual memory, no significant differences were noted among the groups on tests of neuropsychological function. Standardized measures of psychiatric and neuropsychological function did not differentiate subjects with sensitivities to chemicals from those with chronic fatigue. Subjects with sensitivities to chemicals and no clear date of onset had the highest rate of psychiatric morbidity. Standardized neuropsychological tests did not substantiate the cognitive impairment reported symptomatically. Cognitive deficits may become apparent under controlled exposure conditions.
Source: Fiedler N, Kipen HM, DeLuca J, Kelly-McNeil K, Natelson B. A controlled comparison of multiple chemical sensitivities and chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;58(1):38-49. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8677287
Neurological symptoms are frequently reported by patients with multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). Methods to compare the psychiatric, personality, and neuropsychological function of patients with MCS, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and normal controls are described. Increased rates of Axis I psychiatric diagnoses are observed in the literature for MCS and CFS subjects relative to controls.
Findings on the MMPI-2 and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale reveal profiles consistent with the tendency to report somatic rather than emotional symptoms in response to stress. However, many of the reported somatic symptoms also coincide with those found in neurologic disorders. The overall neuropsychological profile for MCS subjects does not reflect cognitive impairment.
Relative to normal controls, the only difference in neuropsychological performance observed is reduced recognition of nontarget designs on a visual memory task. More fruitful areas for future psychological research will include measurement of the interaction between behavioral response styles and attentional processes in cognition, as well as observations under controlled challenge conditions.
Source: Fiedler N, Kipen H, Deluca J, Kelly-McNeil K, Natelson B. Neuropsychology and psychology of MCS. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):545-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7778113
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.
Privacy settings
Privacy Settings
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.
NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.
Google Analytics
This website uses cookies that do not collect personal information but that do help us collect anonymous information about how people use our website. We use Google Analytics for this purpose. Google Analytics generates statistical and other information about website usage by means of cookies, which are stored on users’ computers. The information collected by Google Analytics about usage of our website is not personally identifiable. The data is collected anonymously, stored by Google and used by us to create reports about website usage.