Tag: somatization

Chronic fatigue syndrome and the somatic expression of emotional distress: Applying the concept of illusory mental health to address the controversy

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The process of somatization in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was investigated using the concept of illusory mental health (IMH). IMH involves self-reporting low emotional distress alongside performance-based assessment of distress.

METHOD: We studied IHM and physical symptoms in 175 women across four groups: (a) CFS plus depression; (b) CFS with no depression (CFS-ND); (c) depressive disorder without CFS; and (d) healthy controls (HC). IMH was assessed using a self-report measure plus the performance-based Early Memory Index (EMI).

RESULTS: CFS-NDs were no more likely to have IMH compared with HCs. Among the CFS-NDs, IMH was associated with more physical symptoms. For CFS-NDs, EMI added meaningfully beyond self-reported mental health in predicting physical symptoms.

CONCLUSION: Findings refute reducing CFS to somatization, but there is a subgroup of CFS whose lacking access to emotional distress is associated with heightened physical symptomatology.

Source: Bram AD, Gottschalk KA, Leeds WM. Chronic fatigue syndrome and the somatic expression of emotional distress: Applying the concept of illusory mental health to address the controversy. J Clin Psychol. 2018 Aug 28. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22692. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30152867
.

Biological phenotypes underpin the physio-somatic symptoms of somatization, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Somatization is a symptom cluster characterized by ‘psychosomatic’ symptoms, that is, medically unexplained symptoms, and is a common component of other conditions, including depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). This article reviews the data regarding the pathophysiological foundations of ‘psychosomatic’ symptoms and the implications that this has for conceptualization of what may more appropriately be termed physio-somatic symptoms.

METHOD: This narrative review used papers published in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases using the keywords: depression and chronic fatigue, depression and somatization, somatization and chronic fatigue syndrome, each combined with inflammation, inflammatory, tryptophan, and cell-mediated immune (CMI).

RESULTS: The physio-somatic symptoms of depression, ME/CFS, and somatization are associated with specific biomarkers of inflammation and CMI activation, which are correlated with, and causally linked to, changes in the tryptophan catabolite (TRYCAT) pathway. Oxidative and nitrosative stress induces damage that increases neoepitopes and autoimmunity that contribute to the immuno-inflammatory processes. These pathways are all known to cause physio-somatic symptoms, including fatigue, malaise, autonomic symptoms, hyperalgesia, intestinal hypermotility, peripheral neuropathy, etc.

CONCLUSION: Biological underpinnings, such as immune-inflammatory pathways, may explain, at least in part, the occurrence of physio-somatic symptoms in depression, somatization, or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and thus the clinical overlap among these disorders.

© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Comment in

Source: Anderson G, Berk M, Maes M. Biological phenotypes underpin the physio-somatic symptoms of somatization, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Feb;129(2):83-97. doi: 10.1111/acps.12182. Epub 2013 Aug 17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23952563

 

Biological underpinnings of the commonalities in depression, somatization, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Somatization is a multisomatoform disorder characterized by medically unexplained, functional or psychosomatic symptoms. Similar somatic symptoms are key components of depression and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).

METHODS: This paper reviews the evidence that such symptoms are organically based. We use the term “physio-somatic” to describe these symptoms.

RESULTS: Inflammation, cell-mediated immune (CMI) activation and alterations in the tryptophan catabolite (TRYCAT) pathway are associated with the physio-somatic symptoms of depression, ME/CFS and/or somatization. Proinflammatory cytokines, decreased tryptophan and aberrations in TRYCATs may cause physio-somatic symptoms, such as fatigue, autonomic symptoms, hyperalgesia and somatic presentations.

CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest co-ordinated and interacting biological pathways driving the occurrence of physio-somatic symptoms across these three disorders, giving a biologically validated “pathway phenotype”. These data have far-reaching implications for DSM-IV diagnostic conceptualizations of somatization (and ME/CFS) suggesting the presence of an emerging organic explanation. Future research should focus on the role of immune regulation, and co-ordination, of neuronal activity and, through larger data sets, ultimately creating new, biologically validated classification rules. These data have implications for the development of novel therapies utilizing these insights, buttressing the role of psychotherapy in psychosomatic presentations.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Anderson G, Maes M, Berk M. Biological underpinnings of the commonalities in depression, somatization, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2012 Jun;78(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.02.023. Epub 2012 Mar 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445460

 

Comparative study of anxiety, depression, somatization, functional disability, and illness attribution in adolescents with chronic fatigue or migraine

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare adolescents with migraine, unexplained profound chronic fatigue of >6 months duration, and normal school controls on measures of anxiety, depression, somatization, functional disability, and illness attribution.

METHODS: Adolescents referred to Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center for behavioral treatment of migraine (n = 179) or evaluation of chronic fatigue (n = 97) were compared with a group of healthy controls of similar age and sex from a middle school (n = 32). Subjects completed the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait Form, the Children’s Depression Inventory, the Childhood Somatization Inventory, and estimated the number of school days missed in the past 6 months because of illness. Migraine and fatigued subjects completed an illness attribution questionnaire.

RESULTS: Subjects in the 3 groups were 56% to 70% female and ranged from 11 years old to 18 years old with a mean age of 14.0 +/- 2.0. Forty-six of the 97 chronically fatigued adolescents met 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CDC-CFS), while 51 had idiopathic chronic fatigue syndrome (I-CFS) that did not meet full CDC criteria. Adolescents with migraine had significantly higher anxiety scores than those with I-CFS or controls and higher somatization scores than controls. Adolescents with CDC-CFS had significantly higher anxiety scores than those with I-CFS or controls, and higher depression and somatization scores than all other groups. There were significant differences between all groups for school days missed with CDC-CFS more than I-CFS more than migraine more than controls. Parents of adolescents with unexplained I-CFS had significantly lower attribution scores relating illness to possible psychological or stress factors than parents of adolescents with CDC-CFS or migraine.

CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents referred to an academic center for evaluation of unexplained chronic fatigue had greater rates of school absenteeism than adolescents with migraine or healthy controls. Those meeting CDC-CFS criteria had higher anxiety scores than controls and higher depression and somatization scores than migraineurs or controls. Parents of adolescents with I-CFS were less likely to endorse psychological factors as possibly contributing to their symptoms than parents of adolescents with CDC-CFS or migraine.

 

Source: Smith MS, Martin-Herz SP, Womack WM, Marsigan JL. Comparative study of anxiety, depression, somatization, functional disability, and illness attribution in adolescents with chronic fatigue or migraine. Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):e376-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12671155

 

Serum neopterin and somatization in women with chemical intolerance, depressives, and normals

Abstract:

The symptom of intolerance to low levels of environmental chemicals (CI, chemical intolerance) is a feature of several controversial polysymptomatic conditions that overlap symptomatically with depression and somatization, i.e., chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, multiple chemical sensitivity, and Persian Gulf syndrome. These syndromes can involve many somatic symptoms consistent with possible inflammation. Immunological or neurogenic triggering might account for such inflammation.

Serum neopterin, which has an inverse relationship with l-tryptophan availability, may offer a marker of inflammation and macrophage/monocyte activation. This study compared middle-aged women with CI (who had high levels of affective distress; n = 14), depressives without CI (n = 10), and normals (n = 11).

Groups did not differ in 4 p.m. resting levels of serum neopterin. However, the CI alone had strong positive correlations between neopterin and all of the scales measuring somatization. These preliminary findings suggest the need for additional research on biological correlates of ‘unexplained’ multiple somatic symptoms in subtypes of apparent somatizing disorders.

 

Source: Bell IR, Patarca R, Baldwin CM, Klimas NG, Schwartz GE, Hardin EE. Serum neopterin and somatization in women with chemical intolerance, depressives, and normals. Neuropsychobiology. 1998;38(1):13-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9701717

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a 20th century illness?

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome has become the fin de siècle illness, now getting similar attention to that of neurasthenia, which dominated medical thinking at the turn of the century.

Myalgic encephalomyelitis was an early term introduced in the United Kingdom in 1957 for this state, but it had little or no public or professional prominence. Until then “chronic fatigue had become invisible”, with “no name, no known etiology, no case illustrations or clinical accounts in the medical textbook, no ongoing research activity–nothing to relate it to current medical knowledge”.

The reconstruction of chronic fatigue began in the mid-1980s, with the emergence of “chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome”, which was later converted to chronic fatigue syndrome. The former term, which first emerged in the mid-1980s, is now regarded as a misnomer and should be abandoned.

In the popular American literature the term “chronic fatigue and immune deficiency syndrome” is preferred by the most active of the patient lobbies, while myalgic encephalomyelitis continues to be the usual label in the United Kingdom.

The relevant research linking chronic fatigue syndrome with somatization is reviewed in this article. Understanding the nature of somatization can still shed some light on the meaning of chronic fatigue at the end of the 20th century.

 

Source: Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a 20th century illness? Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23 Suppl 3:17-34. http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=239 (Full article)

 

Neuropsychology and psychology of MCS

Abstract:

Neurological symptoms are frequently reported by patients with multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). Methods to compare the psychiatric, personality, and neuropsychological function of patients with MCS, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and normal controls are described. Increased rates of Axis I psychiatric diagnoses are observed in the literature for MCS and CFS subjects relative to controls.

Findings on the MMPI-2 and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale reveal profiles consistent with the tendency to report somatic rather than emotional symptoms in response to stress. However, many of the reported somatic symptoms also coincide with those found in neurologic disorders. The overall neuropsychological profile for MCS subjects does not reflect cognitive impairment.

Relative to normal controls, the only difference in neuropsychological performance observed is reduced recognition of nontarget designs on a visual memory task. More fruitful areas for future psychological research will include measurement of the interaction between behavioral response styles and attentional processes in cognition, as well as observations under controlled challenge conditions.

 

Source: Fiedler N, Kipen H, Deluca J, Kelly-McNeil K, Natelson B. Neuropsychology and psychology of MCS. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):545-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7778113