Biological mechanisms underpinning the development of Long COVID

Abstract:

As COVID-19 evolves from a pandemic to an endemic disease, the already staggering number of people that have been or will be infected with SARS-COV-2 is only destined to increase, and the majority of humanity will be infected. It is well understood that COVID-19, like many other viral infections, leaves a significant fraction of the infected with prolonged consequences.

Continued high number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, viral evolution with escape from post-infection and vaccinal immunity, and reinfections heighten the potential impact of Long COVID. Hence, the impact of COVID-19 on human health will be seen for years to come until more effective vaccines and pharmaceutical treatments become available.

To that effect, it is imperative that the mechanisms underlying the clinical manifestations of Long COVID be elucidated. In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of the evidence on several potential mechanisms of Long COVID and discuss their relevance to its pathogenesis.

Source: Perumal R, Shunmugam L, Naidoo K, Wilkins D, Garzino-Demo A, Brechot C, Vahlne A, Nikolich J. Biological mechanisms underpinning the development of Long COVID. iScience. 2023 May 18:106935. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106935. Epub ahead of print. PMCID: PMC10193768. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193768/ https://www.cell.com/iscience/pdf/S2589-0042(23)01012-X.pdf?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS258900422301012X%3Fshowall%3Dtrue (Full text)

Viable SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sub-variants isolated from autopsy tissues

Introduction: Pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations have been described after infection with SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The virus is known to persist in multiple organs due to its tropism for several tissues. However, previous reports were unable to provide definitive information about whether the virus is viable and transmissible. It has been hypothesized that the persisting reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 in tissues could be one of the multiple potentially overlapping causes of long COVID.

Methods: In the present study, we investigated autopsy materials obtained from 21 cadaveric donors with documented first infection or reinfection at the time of death. The cases studied included recipients of different formulations of COVID-19 vaccines. The aim was to find the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, and intestines. We used two technical approaches: the detection and quantification of viral genomic RNA using RT-qPCR, and virus infectivity using permissive in vitro Vero E6 culture.

Results: All tissues analyzed showed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA but at dissimilar levels ranging from 1.01 × 102 copies/mL to 1.14 × 108 copies/mL, even among those cases who had been COVID-19 vaccinated. Importantly, different amounts of replication-competent virus were detected in the culture media from the studied tissues. The highest viral load were measured in the lung (≈1.4 × 106 copies/mL) and heart (≈1.9 × 106 copies/mL) samples. Additionally, based on partial Spike gene sequences, SARS-CoV-2 characterization revealed the presence of multiple Omicron sub-variants exhibiting a high level of nucleotide and amino acid identity among them.

Discussion: These findings highlight that SARS-CoV-2 can spread to multiple tissue locations such as the lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, and intestines, both after primary infection and after reinfections with the Omicron variant, contributing to extending knowledge about the pathogenesis of acute infection and understanding the sequelae of clinical manifestations that are observed during post-acute COVID-19.

Source: Santiago Maffia-Bizzozero, Cintia Cevallos, Federico Remes Lenicov, Rosa Nicole Freiberger, Cinthya Alicia Marcela Lopez, Alex Guano Toaquiza, Franco Sviercz, Patricio Jarmoluk, Cristina Bustos, Adriana Claudia D’Addario, Jorge Quarleri, and M. Victoria Delpino. Viable SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sub-variants isolated from autopsy tissues. Front. Microbiol., 22 May 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1192832/full (Full text)

Viral persistence, reactivation, and mechanisms of long COVID

Abstract:

The COVID-19 global pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has infected hundreds of millions of individuals. Following COVID-19 infection, a subset can develop a wide range of chronic symptoms affecting diverse organ systems referred to as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), also known as long COVID. A National Institutes of Health-sponsored initiative, RECOVER: Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery, has sought to understand the basis of long COVID in a large cohort. Given the range of symptoms that occur in long COVID, the mechanisms that may underlie these diverse symptoms may also be diverse.

In this review, we focus on the emerging literature supporting the role(s) that viral persistence or reactivation of viruses may play in PASC. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigens is reported in some organs, yet the mechanism by which they do so and how they may be associated with pathogenic immune responses is unclear. Understanding the mechanisms of persistence of RNA, antigen or other reactivated viruses and how they may relate to specific inflammatory responses that drive symptoms of PASC may provide a rationale for treatment.

Source: Chen B, Julg B, Mohandas S, Bradfute SB; RECOVER Mechanistic Pathways Task Force. Viral persistence, reactivation, and mechanisms of long COVID. Elife. 2023 May 4;12:e86015. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86015. PMID: 37140960; PMCID: PMC10159620. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159620/ (Full text)

Intrinsic factors behind long-COVID: I. Prevalence of the extracellular vesicles

Abstract:

It can be argued that the severity of COVID-19 has decreased in many countries. This could be a result of the broad coverage of the population by vaccination campaigns, which often reached an almost compulsory status in many places. Furthermore, significant roles were played by the multiple mutations in the body of the virus, which led to the emergence of several new SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced infectivity but dramatically reduced pathogenicity.

However, the challenges associated with the development of various side effects and their persistence for long periods exceeding 20 months as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, or taking available vaccines against it, are spreading horizontally and vertically in number and repercussions. For example, the World Health Organization announced that there are more than 17 million registered cases of long-COVID (also known as post-COVID syndrome) in the European Union countries alone. Furthermore, by using the PubMed search engine, one can find that more than 10 000 articles have been published focusing exclusively on long-COVID.

In light of these enormous and ever-increasing numbers of cases and published articles, most of which are descriptive of the various long-COVID symptoms, the need to know the reasons behind this phenomenon raises several important questions. Is long-COVID caused by the continued presence of the virus or one/several of its components in the recovering individual body for long periods of time, which urges the body to respond in a way that leads to long-COVID development? Or are there some latent and limited reasons related to the recovering patients themselves? Or is it a sum of both?

Many observations support a positive answer to the first question, whereas others back the second question but typically without releasing a fundamental reason/signal behind it. Whatever the answer is, it seems that the real reasons behind this widespread phenomenon remain unclear. This report opens a series of articles, in which we will try to shed light on the underlying causes that could be behind the long-COVID phenomenon.

Source: El-Maradny YA, Rubio-Casillas A, Uversky VN, Redwan EM. Intrinsic factors behind long-COVID: I. Prevalence of the extracellular vesicles. J Cell Biochem. 2023 May;124(5):656-673. doi: 10.1002/jcb.30415. Epub 2023 May 1. PMID: 37126363. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37126363/

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 is characterized by diminished peripheral CD8+β7 integrin+ T cells and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA response

Abstract:

Several millions of individuals are estimated to develop post-acute sequelae SARS-CoV-2 condition (PASC) that persists for months after infection. Here we evaluate the immune response in convalescent individuals with PASC compared to convalescent asymptomatic and uninfected participants, six months following their COVID-19 diagnosis.

Both convalescent asymptomatic and PASC cases are characterised by higher CD8+ T cell percentages, however, the proportion of blood CD8+ T cells expressing the mucosal homing receptor β7 is low in PASC patients. CD8 T cells show increased expression of PD-1, perforin and granzyme B in PASC, and the plasma levels of type I and type III (mucosal) interferons are elevated. The humoral response is characterized by higher levels of IgA against the N and S viral proteins, particularly in those individuals who had severe acute disease.  Our results also show that consistently elevated levels of IL-6, IL-8/CXCL8 and IP-10/CXCL10 during acute disease increase the risk to develop PASC.

In summary, our study indicates that PASC is defined by persisting immunological dysfunction as late as six months following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including alterations in mucosal immune parameters, redistribution of mucosal CD8+β7Integrin+ T cells and IgA, indicative of potential viral persistence and mucosal involvement in the etiopathology of PASC.

Source: Santa Cruz A, Mendes-Frias A, Azarias-da-Silva M, André S, Oliveira AI, Pires O, Mendes M, Oliveira B, Braga M, Lopes JR, Domingues R, Costa R, Silva LN, Matos AR, Ângela C, Costa P, Carvalho A, Capela C, Pedrosa J, Castro AG, Estaquier J, Silvestre R. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 is characterized by diminished peripheral CD8+β7 integrin+ T cells and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA response. Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 30;14(1):1772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37368-1. PMID: 36997530; PMCID: PMC10061413. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061413/ (Full text)

Post-COVID Syndrome

Abstract:

Background: As defined by the WHO, the term post-COVID syndrome (PCS) embraces a group of symptoms that can occur following the acute phase of a SARS-CoV-2 infection and as a consequence thereof. PCS is found mainly in adults, less frequently in children and adolescents. It can develop both in patients who initially had only mild symptoms or none at all and in those who had a severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods: The data presented here were derived from a systematic literature review.

Results: PCS occurs in up to 15% of unvaccinated adults infected with SARS-CoV-2. The prevalence has decreased in the most recent phase of the pandemic and is lower after vaccination. The pathogenesis of PCS has not yet been fully elucidated. Virus triggered inflammation, autoimmunity, endothelial damage (to blood vessels), and persistence of virus are thought to be causative. Owing to the broad viral tropism, different organs are involved and the symptoms vary. To date, there are hardly any evidence-based recommendations for definitive diagnosis of PCS or its treatment.

Conclusion: The gaps in our knowledge mean that better documentation of the prevalence of PCS is necessary to compile the data on which early detection, diagnosis, and treatment can be based. To ensure the best possible care of patients with PCS, regional PCS centers and networks embracing existing structures from all healthcare system sectors and providers should be set up and structured diagnosis and treatment algorithms should be established. Given the sometimes serious consequences of PCS for those affected, it seems advisable to keep the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections low by protective measures tailored to the prevailing pandemic situation.

Source: Hallek M, Adorjan K, Behrends U, Ertl G, Suttorp N, Lehmann C. Post-COVID Syndrome. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Jan 27;120(4):48-55. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0409. PMID: 36633452; PMCID: PMC10060997. https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article/229208 (Full text)

What is really ‘Long COVID’?

Abstract:

The previous acute respiratory diseases caused by viruses originating from China or the middle east (e.g., SARS, MERS) remained fast developing short diseases without major sequalae or any long-lasting complications. The new COVID-19, on the other hand, not only that it rapidly spread over the world, but some patients never fully recovered or even if they did, a few weeks later started to complain not only of shortness of breath, if any, but general weakness, muscle pains and ‘brain fog’, i.e., fuzzy memories. Thus, these signs and symptoms were eventually labelled ‘long COVID’, for which the most widely used definition is ‘new signs and symptoms occurring 4-8 weeks after recovering from acute stage of COVID-19’.

The other most frequent manifestations associated with long COVID include headache, loss of memory, smell and of hair, nausea, and vomiting. Thus, long COVID is not a simple disease, but complex disorder of several organ systems malfunctioning; hence, it is probably more appropriate to call this a syndrome.

The pathogenesis of long COVID syndrome is poorly understood, but initial and persistent vascular endothelial injury that often triggers the formation of microthrombi that if dislodged as emboli, damage several organs, especially in the brain, heart and kidney, by creating microinfarcts.

The other major contributory mechanistic factor is the persistent cytokine storm that may last longer in long COVID patients than in others, probably triggered by aggregates of SARS-Co-2 discovered recently in the adrenal cortex, kidney and brain.

The prevalence of long COVID is relatively high, e.g., initially varied 3-30%, and recent data indicate that 2.5% of UK population suffers from this syndrome, while in the US 14.7% of acute COVID-19 patients continued to have symptoms longer than 2 months. Thus, the long COVID syndrome deserves to be further investigated, both from clinical and basic research perspectives.

Source: Szabo S, Zayachkivska O, Hussain A, Muller V. What is really ‘Long COVID’? Inflammopharmacology. 2023 Mar 25:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01194-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36964860; PMCID: PMC10039447. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039447/ (Full text)

The Role of Interferons in Long Covid Infection

Abstract:

Although the new generation of vaccines and anti-COVID-19 treatment regimens facilitated the management of acute COVID-19 infections, concerns about post-COVID-19 syndrome or Long Covid are rising. This issue can increase the incidence and morbidity of diseases such as diabetes, and cardiovascular, and lung infections, especially among patients suffering from neurodegenerative disease, cardiac arrhythmias, and ischemia.

There are numerous risk factors that cause COVID-19 patients to experience post-COVID-19 syndrome. Three potential causes attributed to this disorder include immune dysregulation, viral persistence, and autoimmunity. Interferons (IFNs) are crucial in all aspects of post-COVID-19 syndrome etiology.

In this review, we discuss the critical and double-edged role of IFNs in post-COVID-19 syndrome and how innovative biomedical approaches that target IFNs can reduce the occurrence of Long Covid infection.

Source: Karbalaeimahdi M, Farajnia S, Bargahi N, Ghadiri-Moghaddam F, Rasouli Jazi HR, Bakhtiari N, Ghasemali S, Zarghami N. The Role of Interferons in Long Covid Infection. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2023 Feb;43(2):65-76. doi: 10.1089/jir.2022.0193. PMID: 36795973. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36795973/

Inflammation-associated gut microbiome in postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 points towards new therapeutic targets

We read with interest the recent report by Liu et al1 describing faecal microbiome differences with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), commonly referred to as ‘Long-COVID’. We have previously reported elevated levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells with PASC compared with resolved COVID-19 (RC; no lingering symptoms at the time of sample collection) that correlated with increased levels of the inflammatory marker IL-6, suggesting that elevated inflammation in PASC may be related to immune response to residual virus.2 Although several studies have reported gut microbiome differences during acute COVID-19,3 PASC has received less attention. We, thus, sought to characterise gut microbiome differences in PASC versus RC using faecal samples from our study2 and to relate these differences to inflammation.

The faecal microbiome was evaluated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Plasma levels of inflammatory markers IL-6 and C reactive protein (CRP) were measured with ELISA (see online supplemental methods). Cohort information is in table 1. IL-6 and CRP were elevated with PASC (figure 1A). Gut microbiome composition did not significantly differ between the PASC and RC cohorts (PERMANOVA; p=0.087; figure 1B), but did correlate with IL-6 and CRP levels (Adonis; IL-6 p=0.03; CRP p=0.01). IL-6 and CRP also correlated with PC1 from a principal coordinates analysis (figure 1C,D), suggesting a relationship between microbiome composition and inflammation in PASC. Using SELBAL,4 which identifies ratios or ‘Balances’ of microbes that can differentiate between groups, we found that the faecal microbiomes of individuals with PASC had a lower ratio of an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) highly related to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii over ASVs related to species in the genus Bacteroides (B. doreiB. massiliensis and B. thetaiotaomicron) (figure 1E), which provided an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.863 for differentiating individuals with PASC from RC. Balance values also negatively correlated with IL-6 (r=−0.44, p=0.01). These microbiome differences are consistent with Liu et al,1 who also reported higher levels of Bacteroides (B. vulgatus specifically) and lower F. prausnitzii with PASC. Liu et al also reported higher Ruminococcus gnavus with PASC, and lower Collinsella aerofaciens, and Blautia obeum. Interestingly, an ASV highly related to R. gnavus (100% identity over V4 read) correlated positively with IL-6 and ASVs related to F. prausnitzii (98.7% ID), C. aerofaciens (100% ID) and B. obeum (100% ID) all negatively correlated with IL-6 and/or CRP levels in our study (online supplemental table 1). Thus, our results are consistent with those of Liu et al and extend their findings by showing associations between the microbiome and markers of systemic inflammation.

Read the rest of this letter HERE.

Source: Carneiro VL, Littlefield KM, Watson R, Palmer BE, Lozupone C. Inflammation-associated gut microbiome in postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 points towards new therapeutic targets. Gut. 2023 Jan 30:gutjnl-2022-328757. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328757. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36717218. https://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2023/01/29/gutjnl-2022-328757 (Full text)

SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy

Abstract:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to cause multi-organ dysfunction1-3 during acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with some patients experiencing prolonged symptoms, termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (refs. 4,5). However, the burden of infection outside the respiratory tract and time to viral clearance are not well characterized, particularly in the brain3,6-14.

Here we carried out complete autopsies on 44 patients who died with COVID-19, with extensive sampling of the central nervous system in 11 of these patients, to map and quantify the distribution, replication and cell-type specificity of SARS-CoV-2 across the human body, including the brain, from acute infection to more than seven months following symptom onset.

We show that SARS-CoV-2 is widely distributed, predominantly among patients who died with severe COVID-19, and that virus replication is present in multiple respiratory and non-respiratory tissues, including the brain, early in infection. Further, we detected persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNA in multiple anatomic sites, including throughout the brain, as late as 230 days following symptom onset in one case. Despite extensive distribution of SARS-CoV-2 RNA throughout the body, we observed little evidence of inflammation or direct viral cytopathology outside the respiratory tract.

Our data indicate that in some patients SARS-CoV-2 can cause systemic infection and persist in the body for months.

Source: Stein SR, Ramelli SC, Grazioli A, Chung JY, Singh M, Yinda CK, Winkler CW, Sun J, Dickey JM, Ylaya K, Ko SH, Platt AP, Burbelo PD, Quezado M, Pittaluga S, Purcell M, Munster VJ, Belinky F, Ramos-Benitez MJ, Boritz EA, Lach IA, Herr DL, Rabin J, Saharia KK, Madathil RJ, Tabatabai A, Soherwardi S, McCurdy MT; NIH COVID-19 Autopsy Consortium; Peterson KE, Cohen JI, de Wit E, Vannella KM, Hewitt SM, Kleiner DE, Chertow DS. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy. Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7941):758-763. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05542-y. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PMID: 36517603; PMCID: PMC9749650. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749650/ (Full text)