Tag: reaction time

The Conners Continuous Performance Test CPT3™: Is it a reliable marker to predict neurocognitive dysfunction in Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome?

Introduction: The main objective is to delimit the cognitive dysfunction associated with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in adult patients by applying the Continuous Performance Test (CPT3™). Additionally, provide empirical evidence on the usefulness of this computerized neuropsychological test to assess ME/CFS.

Method: The final sample (n = 225; 158 Patients/67 Healthy controls) were recruited in a Central Sensitization Syndromes (CSS) specialized unit in a tertiary hospital. All participants were administered this neuropsychological test.

Results: There were significant differences between ME/CFS and healthy controls in all the main measures of CPT3™. Mainly, patients had a worse indicator of inattentiveness, sustained attention, vigilance, impulsivity, slow reaction time, and more atypical T-scores, which is associated with a likelihood of having a disorder characterized by attention deficits, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In addition, relevant correlations were obtained between the CPT3™ variables in the patient’s group. The most discriminative indicators of ME/CFS patients were Variability and Hit Reaction Time, both measures of response speed.

Conclusion: The CPT3™ is a helpful tool to discriminate neurocognitive impairments from attention and response speed in ME/CFS patients, and it could be used as a marker of ME/CFS severity for diagnosing or monitoring this disease.

Source: Fernández-Quirós J, Lacasa-Cazcarra M, Alegre-Martín J, Sanmartín-Sentañes R, Almirall M, Launois-Obregón P, Castro-Marrero J, Rodríguez-Urrutia A, Navarro-Sanchis JA and Ramos-Quiroga JA (2023) The Conners Continuous Performance Test CPT3™: Is it a reliable marker to predict neurocognitive dysfunction in Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome? Front. Psychol. 14:1127193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127193 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127193/full (Full text)

Orthostatic Challenge Causes Distinctive Symptomatic, Hemodynamic and Cognitive Responses in Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Some patients with acute COVID-19 are left with persistent, debilitating fatigue, cognitive impairment (“brain fog”), orthostatic intolerance (OI) and other symptoms (“Long COVID”). Many of the symptoms are like those of other post-infectious fatigue syndromes and may meet criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Common diagnostic laboratory tests are often unrevealing.

Methods: We evaluated whether a simple, standardized, office-based test of OI, the 10-min NASA Lean Test (NLT), would aggravate symptoms and produce objective hemodynamic and cognitive abnormalities, the latter being evaluated by a simple smart phone-based app.

Participants: People with Long COVID (N = 42), ME/CFS (N = 26) and healthy control subjects (N = 20) were studied just before, during, immediately after, 2 and 7 days following completion of the NLT.

Results: The NLT provoked a worsening of symptoms in the two patient groups but not in healthy control subjects, and the severity of all symptoms was similar and significantly worse in the two patient groups than in the control subjects (p < 0.001). In the two patient groups, particularly those with Long COVID, the NLT provoked a marked and progressive narrowing in the pulse pressure. All three cognitive measures of reaction time worsened in the two patient groups immediately following the NLT, compared to the healthy control subjects, particularly in the Procedural Reaction Time (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: A test of orthostatic stress easily performed in an office setting reveals different symptomatic, hemodynamic and cognitive abnormalities in people with Long COVID and ME/CFS, compared to healthy control subjects. Thus, an orthostatic challenge easily performed in an office setting, and the use of a smart phone app to assess cognition, can provide objective confirmation of the orthostatic intolerance and brain fog reported by patients with Long COVID and ME/CFS.

Source: Vernon SD, Funk S, Bateman L, Stoddard GJ, Hammer S, Sullivan K, Bell J, Abbaszadeh S, Lipkin WI, Komaroff AL. Orthostatic Challenge Causes Distinctive Symptomatic, Hemodynamic and Cognitive Responses in Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 23;9:917019. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.917019. PMID: 35847821; PMCID: PMC9285104. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285104/ (Full text)

Corticospinal inhibition appears normal in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remains unknown. Thresholds and latencies of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are normal but intracortical inhibition has not been investigated.

Eleven patients with CFS were compared with 11 control subjects. Each patient completed a questionnaire using visual analogue indices of pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Subjects released a button to initiate simple (SRTs) and choice reaction time (CRTs) tasks; for each task, movement times were measured between release of the initiation button and depression of a second button 15 cm away. Subjects held a 10 % maximum voluntary contraction in the thenar muscles of their dominant hand while TMS was applied to the motor cortex; the duration and extent of inhibition of surface electromyographic (EMG) activity were assessed at stimulus strengths above and below the threshold for MEPs.

Patients had significantly (P < 0.05) higher mean indices of fatigue than of pain, anxiety or depression. Mean (+/- S.E.M.) SRTs (but not CRTs) were longer in patients (309 +/- 45 ms) than in controls (218 +/- 9 ms). Movement times were longer in patients for both SRTs and CRTs. TMS thresholds, expressed as a percentage of the maximum stimulator output, were not significantly (P > 0.05) different in both groups for both MEPs (patients, 34 +/- 3%; controls, 36 +/- 3%) and inhibition of voluntary contraction (patients, 29 +/- 2%; controls, 34 +/- 4%). The duration and extent of inhibition did not differ significantly between groups at any stimulus strength. The pattern of change in duration and extent of inhibition with increasing stimulus intensity was no different in the two groups. The duration and extent of corticospinal inhibition in patients with CFS did not differ from controls, adding further evidence to the notion that the feeling of fatigue and the slowness of movement seen in CFS is not manifest in corticospinal output pathways.

 

Source: Zaman R, Puri BK, Main J, Nowicky AV, Davey NJ. Corticospinal inhibition appears normal in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Exp Physiol. 2001 Sep;86(5):547-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11571481