Tag: slow processing speed

Brain and cognitive changes in patients with long COVID compared with infection-recovered control subjects

Abstract:

Between 2.5 and 28% of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 suffer Long COVID or persistence of symptoms for months after acute illness. Many symptoms are neurological, but the brain changes underlying the neuropsychological impairments remain unclear. This study aimed to provide a detailed description of the cognitive profile, the pattern of brain alterations in Long COVID and the potential association between them.

To address these objectives, 83 patients with persistent neurological symptoms after COVID-19 were recruited, and 22 now healthy controls chosen because they had suffered COVID-19 but did not experience persistent neurological symptoms. Patients and controls were matched for age, sex and educational level. All participants were assessed by clinical interview, comprehensive standardized neuropsychological tests and structural MRI. The mean global cognitive function of patients with Long COVID assessed by ACE III screening test (Overall Cognitive level – OCLz= -0.39± 0.12) was significantly below the infection recovered-controls (OCLz= +0.32± 0.16, p< 0.01).

We observed that 48% of patients with Long COVID had episodic memory deficit, with 27% also impaired overall cognitive function, especially attention, working memory, processing speed and verbal fluency. The MRI examination included grey matter morphometry and whole brain structural connectivity analysis. Compared to infection recovered controls, patients had thinner cortex in a specific cluster centred on the left posterior superior temporal gyrus.

In addition, lower fractional anisotropy (FA) and higher radial diffusivity (RD) were observed in widespread areas of the patients’ cerebral white matter relative to these controls. Correlations between cognitive status and brain abnormalities revealed a relationship between altered connectivity of white matter regions and impairments of episodic memory, overall cognitive function, attention and verbal fluency.

This study shows that patients with neurological Long COVID suffer brain changes, especially in several white matter areas, and these are associated with impairments of specific cognitive functions.

Source: Serrano Del Pueblo VM, Serrano-Heras G, Romero Sánchez CM, Piqueras Landete P, Rojas-Bartolome L, Feria I, Morris RGM, Strange B, Mansilla F, Zhang L, Castro-Robles B, Arias-Salazar L, López-López S, Payá M, Segura T, Muñoz-López M. Brain and cognitive changes in patients with long COVID compared with infection-recovered control subjects. Brain. 2024 Apr 2:awae101. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae101. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38562097. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38562097/

Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic

Abstract:

Introduction: Fatigue, brain fog, and sleep disturbance are among the most common symptoms of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). We sought to determine the impact of sleep disruption on cognition and quality of life in patients with neurologic manifestations of PASC (Neuro-PASC).
Methods: Thirty-nine patients were recruited from Neuro-COVID-19 clinic. Mean age was 48.1 years, 71.8% were female, and 82% were never hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients were evaluated via clinical assessment, quality-of-life measures in domains of cognitive function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, NIH Toolbox cognitive tests, and 7 days of wrist actigraphy.
Results: The median number of neurologic symptoms attributed to PASC was 6, with brain fog being the most common in 89.7%. Regarding non-neurologic symptoms, 94.9% complained of fatigue and 74.4% of insomnia. Patients reported significant impairment in all quality-of-life domains and performed worse in a task of attention compared to a normative US population. Actigraphy showed Neuro-PASC patients had lower sleep efficiency, longer sleep latency (both p < 0.001), and later sleep midpoint (p = 0.039) compared to 71 age-matched healthy controls with no PASC history. Self-reported cognitive symptoms correlated with the severity of fatigue (p < 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.05), and depression (p < 0.01). Objective evidence of sleep disruption measured by wakefulness after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, and latency were associated with decreased performance in attention and processing speed.
Conclusion: Prospective studies including larger populations of patients are needed to fully determine the interplay of sleep disruption on the cognitive function and quality of life of patients with PASC.

Source: Kathryn J Reid, Louis T Ingram, Millenia Jimenez, Zachary S Orban, Sabra M Abbott, Daniela Grimaldi, Kristen L Knutson, Phyllis C Zee, Igor J Koralnik, Mathew B Maas, Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic, SLEEP Advances, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2024, zpae002, https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae002 https://academic.oup.com/sleepadvances/article/5/1/zpae002/7517273 (Full text)

Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Abstract:

Background: COVID-19 survivors may experience a wide range of chronic cognitive symptoms for months or years as part of post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC). To date, there is no definitive objective cognitive marker for PCC. We hypothesised that a key common deficit in people with PCC might be generalised cognitive slowing.

Methods: To examine cognitive slowing, patients with PCC completed two short web-based cognitive tasks, Simple Reaction Time (SRT) and Number Vigilance Test (NVT). 270 patients diagnosed with PCC at two different clinics in UK and Germany were compared to two control groups: individuals who contracted COVID-19 before but did not experience PCC after recovery (No-PCC group) and uninfected individuals (No-COVID group). All patients with PCC completed the study between May 18, 2021 and July 4, 2023 in Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany and Long COVID clinic, Oxford, UK.

Findings: We identified pronounced cognitive slowing in patients with PCC, which distinguished them from age-matched healthy individuals who previously had symptomatic COVID-19 but did not manifest PCC. Cognitive slowing was evident even on a 30-s task measuring simple reaction time (SRT), with patients with PCC responding to stimuli ∼3 standard deviations slower than healthy controls. 53.5% of patients with PCC’s response speed was slower than 2 standard deviations from the control mean, indicating a high prevalence of cognitive slowing in PCC. This finding was replicated across two clinic samples in Germany and the UK. Comorbidities such as fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and post-traumatic stress disorder did not account for the extent of cognitive slowing in patients with PCC. Furthermore, cognitive slowing on the SRT was highly correlated with the poor performance of patients with PCC on the NVT measure of sustained attention.

Interpretation: Together, these results robustly demonstrate pronounced cognitive slowing in people with PCC, which distinguishes them from age-matched healthy individuals who previously had symptomatic COVID-19 but did not manifest PCC. This might be an important factor contributing to some of the cognitive impairments reported in patients with PCC.

Source: Zhao S, Martin EM, Reuken PA, Scholcz A, Ganse-Dumrath A, Srowig A, Utech I, Kozik V, Radscheidt M, Brodoehl S, Stallmach A, Schwab M, Fraser E, Finke K, Husain M. Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing: a multicentre cross-sectional study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 25;68:102434. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102434. PMID: 38318123; PMCID: PMC10839583. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10839583/ (Full text)

Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic

Abstract:

Introduction: Fatigue, brain fog and sleep disturbance are among the most common symptoms of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). We sought to determine the impact of sleep disruption on cognition and quality-of-life in patients with neurologic manifestations of PASC (Neuro-PASC).

Methods: Thirty-nine patients were recruited from Neuro-COVID-19 clinic. Mean age was 48.1 years, 71.8% were female, and 82% were never hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients were evaluated via clinical assessment, quality-of-life measures in domains of cognitive function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, NIH toolbox cognitive tests, and 7 days of wrist actigraphy.

Results: The median number of neurologic symptoms attributed to PASC was 6, with brain fog being the most common in 89.7%. Regarding non-neurologic symptoms, 94.9% complained of fatigue and 74.4% of insomnia. Patients reported significant impairment in all quality-of-life domains and performed worse in a task of attention compared to a normative US population. Actigraphy showed Neuro-PASC patients had lower sleep efficiency, longer sleep latency (both p<0.001) and later sleep midpoint (p=0.039) compared to 71 age-matched healthy controls with no PASC history. Self-reported cognitive symptoms correlated with severity of fatigue (p<0.001), anxiety (p=0.05), and depression (p<0.01). Objective evidence of sleep disruption measured by wakefulness after sleep onset, sleep efficiency and latency were associated with decreased performance in attention and processing speed.

Conclusion: Prospective studies including larger populations of patients are needed to fully determine the interplay of sleep disruption on the cognitive function and quality of life of patients with PASC.

Source: Kathryn J Reid, Louis T Ingram, Millenia Jimenez, Zachary S Orban, Sabra M Abbott, Daniela Grimaldi, Kristen L Knutson, Phyllis C Zee, Igor J Koralnik, Mathew B Maas, Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic, SLEEP Advances, 2024;, zpae002, https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae002 https://academic.oup.com/sleepadvances/advance-article/doi/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae002/7517273 (Full text available as PDF file)

COVID-19 and Cognitive Function: Evidence for Increased Processing Speed Variability in COVID-19 Survivors and Multifaceted Impairment with LongCOVID Symptoms

Abstract:

Background: There is increasing evidence for cognitive function to be negatively impacted by COVID-19. There is, however, limited research evaluating cognitive function pre- and postCOVID-19 using objective measures.

Methods: We examined processing speed, attention, working memory, executive function and memory in adults (≤69 years) with a history of COVID-19 (n=129; assessed ≥20 days after diagnosis, none acutely unwell), compared to those with no known history of COVID-19 (n=93). We also examined cognitive changes in a sub-group of COVID (n=30) and non-COVID (n=33) participants, compared to their pre-COVID-19 pandemic level (data available through the MyCognition database).

Results: Cross-sectionally, the COVID group showed significantly larger intra-individual variability in processing speed, compared to the non-COVID group. The COVID sub-group also showed significantly larger intra-individual variability in processing speed, compared to their
pre-COVID level; no significant change occurred in non-COVID participants over the same time scale. Other cognitive indices were not significantly impacted in the cross-sectional or withinsubjects investigations, but participants (n=20) who had needed hospitalisation due to COVID19 showed poor attention and executive function relative to those who had not required hospitalisation (n=109). Poor health and long-COVID symptoms  correlated with poor cognitive function across domains in the COVID group.

Conclusions: The findings indicate a limited cognitive impact of COVID-19 with only intraindividual variability in processing speed being significantly impacted in an adult UK sample. However, those who required hospitalisation due to COVID-19 severity and/or experience long-COVID symptoms display multifaceted cognitive impairment and may benefit from repeated cognitive assessments and remediation efforts.

Source: Vakani K, Ratto M, Sandford-James A, Antonova E, Kumari V. COVID-19 and Cognitive Function: Evidence for Increased Processing Speed Variability in COVID-19 Survivors and Multifaceted Impairment with Long-COVID Symptoms. Eur Psychiatry. 2023 May 12:1-34. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.25. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37170616. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/AE8EFA3BF7DC84334EEBC3039427801C/S0924933823000251a.pdf/covid-19-and-cognitive-function-evidence-for-increased-processing-speed-variability-in-covid-19-survivors-and-multifaceted-impairment-with-long-covid-symptoms.pdf (Full text available as PDF file)

Neurologic manifestations of long COVID differ based on acute COVID-19 severity

Abstract:

Objective: To characterize neurologic manifestations in post-hospitalization Neuro-PASC (PNP) and non-hospitalized Neuro-PASC (NNP) patients.

Methods: Prospective study of the first 100 consecutive PNP and 500 NNP patients evaluated at a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic between 5/2020 and 8/2021.

Results: PNP were older than NNP patients (mean 53.9 vs 44.9 y; p < 0.0001) with a higher prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities. An average 6.8 months from onset, the main neurologic symptoms were “brain fog” (81.2%), headache (70.3%), and dizziness (49.5%) with only anosmia, dysgeusia and myalgias being more frequent in the NNP compared to the PNP group (59 vs 39%, 57.6 vs 39% and 50.4 vs 33%, all p < 0.003). Moreover, 85.8% of patients experienced fatigue. PNP more frequently had an abnormal neurologic exam than NNP patients (62.2 vs 37%, p < 0.0001). Both groups had impaired quality of life in cognitive, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, and depression domains. PNP patients performed worse on processing speed, attention, and working memory tasks than NNP patients (T-score 41.5 vs 55, 42.5 vs 47 and 45.5 vs 49, all p < 0.001) and a US normative population. NNP patients had lower results in attention task only. Subjective impression of cognitive ability correlated with cognitive test results in NNP but not in PNP patients.

Interpretation: PNP and NNP patients both experience persistent neurologic symptoms affecting their quality of life. However, they harbor significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, neurologic symptoms and findings, as well as pattern of cognitive dysfunction. Such differences suggest distinct etiologies of Neuro-PASC in these populations warranting targeted interventions.

Source: Perez Giraldo GS, Ali ST, Kang AK, Patel TR, Budhiraja S, Gaelen JI, Lank GK, Clark JR, Mukherjee S, Singer T, Venkatesh A, Orban ZS, Lim PH, Jimenez M, Miller J, Taylor C, Szymanski AL, Scarpelli J, Graham EL, Balabanov RD, Barcelo BE, Cahan JG, Ruckman K, Shepard AG, Slutzky MW, LaFaver K, Kumthekar PU, Shetty NK, Carroll KS, Ho SU, Lukas RV, Batra A, Liotta EM, Koralnik IJ. Neurologic manifestations of long COVID differ based on acute COVID-19 severity. Ann Neurol. 2023 Mar 26. doi: 10.1002/ana.26649. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36966460. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ana.26649 (Full text available as PDF file)

 

The Conners Continuous Performance Test CPT3™: Is it a reliable marker to predict neurocognitive dysfunction in Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome?

Introduction: The main objective is to delimit the cognitive dysfunction associated with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in adult patients by applying the Continuous Performance Test (CPT3™). Additionally, provide empirical evidence on the usefulness of this computerized neuropsychological test to assess ME/CFS.

Method: The final sample (n = 225; 158 Patients/67 Healthy controls) were recruited in a Central Sensitization Syndromes (CSS) specialized unit in a tertiary hospital. All participants were administered this neuropsychological test.

Results: There were significant differences between ME/CFS and healthy controls in all the main measures of CPT3™. Mainly, patients had a worse indicator of inattentiveness, sustained attention, vigilance, impulsivity, slow reaction time, and more atypical T-scores, which is associated with a likelihood of having a disorder characterized by attention deficits, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In addition, relevant correlations were obtained between the CPT3™ variables in the patient’s group. The most discriminative indicators of ME/CFS patients were Variability and Hit Reaction Time, both measures of response speed.

Conclusion: The CPT3™ is a helpful tool to discriminate neurocognitive impairments from attention and response speed in ME/CFS patients, and it could be used as a marker of ME/CFS severity for diagnosing or monitoring this disease.

Source: Fernández-Quirós J, Lacasa-Cazcarra M, Alegre-Martín J, Sanmartín-Sentañes R, Almirall M, Launois-Obregón P, Castro-Marrero J, Rodríguez-Urrutia A, Navarro-Sanchis JA and Ramos-Quiroga JA (2023) The Conners Continuous Performance Test CPT3™: Is it a reliable marker to predict neurocognitive dysfunction in Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome? Front. Psychol. 14:1127193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127193 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127193/full (Full text)

Cognitive Impairment after Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract:

The present study aims to provide a critical overview of the literature on the relationships between post-acute COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment, highlighting the limitations and confounding factors. A systematic search of articles published from 1 January 2020 to 1 July 2022 was performed in PubMed/Medline. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies using validated instruments for the assessment of cognitive impairment were included. Out of 5515 screened records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria.

The available evidence revealed the presence of impairment in executive functions, speed of processing, attention and memory in subjects recovered from COVID-19. However, several limitations of the literature reviewed should be highlighted: most studies were performed on small samples, not stratified by severity of disease and age, used as a cross-sectional or a short-term longitudinal design and provided a limited assessment of the different cognitive domains. Few studies investigated the neurobiological correlates of cognitive deficits in individuals recovered from COVID-19. Further studies with an adequate methodological design are needed for an in-depth characterization of cognitive impairment in individuals recovered from COVID-19.

Source: Perrottelli A, Sansone N, Giordano GM, Caporusso E, Giuliani L, Melillo A, Pezzella P, Bucci P, Mucci A, Galderisi S. Cognitive Impairment after Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):2070. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122070. PMID: 36556290; PMCID: PMC9781311. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781311/ (Full text)

COVID fog demystified

Abstract:

Acute mild respiratory SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to a more chronic cognitive syndrome known as “COVID fog.” New findings from Fernández-Castañeda et al. reveal how glial dysregulation and consequent neural circuit dysfunction may contribute to cognitive impairments in long COVID.

Source: Kao J, Frankland PW. COVID fog demystified. Cell. 2022 Jul 7;185(14):2391-2393. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.020. Epub 2022 Jun 15. PMID: 35768007; PMCID: PMC9197953. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9197953/ (Full text)

Cognitive impairments in chronic fatigue syndrome patients: choice reaction time, encoding of new information, response organisation and selective attention

ABSTRACT:

Background: One of the features of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is the reporting of cognitive impairment. Prior research has confirmed this using cognitive performance test batteries. Psychomotor slowing and episodic memory impairments appear to be robust, but little is known about selective attention or the stages of processing leading to slower reaction times. The present study addressed these gaps in the literature.

Methods: CFS patients were recruited from a health service clinic. Sixty-seven patients agreed to carry out cognitive tasks measuring aspects of focused attention and categoric search and the components (encoding and response organisation) of choice reaction time. They were compared with 126 healthy controls. As well as carrying out the performance tasks, the participants also completed symptom checklists and questionnaires measuring fatigue, mental health and cognitive failures.

Results: The questionnaires revealed the typical profile of symptoms of CFS patients. With regards to the objective performance tasks, the CFS patients had significantly slower choice reaction times on both tasks. This is likely to be due to slower motor responses as neither of the measures of stimulus encoding or response organisation showed differences between the groups. There was also little evidence for the groups differing in aspects of selective attention.

Conclusions: CFS patients report greater fatigue, more somatic symptoms, greater mental health issues and more cognitive difficulties. Objective testing revealed slower choice reaction times which probably reflect motor slowing. These measures can now be used to assess the efficacy of the management of CFS.

Source: Smith AP. Cognitive impairments in chronic fatigue syndrome patients: choice reaction time, encoding of new information, response organisation and selective attention. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 8(4): 27-36 https://www.wjpmr.com/home/article_abstract/4110 (Full text available as PDF file)