prognosis – Page 3 – American ME and CFS Society

Chronic fatigue in the community: ‘a question of attribution’

Abstract:

Thirty-eight subjects identified in a large community survey were found to attribute their fatigue to ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’ (ME). They were matched randomly to two other groups of subjects who attributed their fatigue to either psychological or social factors. All three groups were followed up 18 months later and were asked to complete a series of questionnaires that examined fatigue, psychological distress, number of symptoms, attributional style and levels of disability.

At onset the ‘ME’ group were found to be more fatigued, had been tired for longer but were less psychologically distressed than the other two groups. At follow-up the ‘ME’ group were more handicapped in relation to home, work, social and private leisure activities, even when controlling for both duration of fatigue and fatigue at time 1, but were less psychologically distressed.

The relationships between psychological distress, specific illness attributions, attributional style and their effect on the experience of illness and its prognosis are discussed. Attributing fatigue to social reasons appears to be most protective.

Source: Chalder T, Power MJ, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue in the community: ‘a question of attribution’. Psychol Med. 1996 Jul;26(4):791-800. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8817714

Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine spontaneous improvement after a follow up interval of 18 months in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and to identify factors that predict improvement.

METHODS: A longitudinal study was used. Of 298 initially assessed self referred patients fulfilling criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome, 246 patients completed self report questionnaires at follow up (response rate 83%). A multidimensional assessment method was used, measuring behavioural, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning. Comparison data from 53 healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and educational level were available.

RESULTS: Three per cent of patients reported complete recovery and 17% reported improvement. At follow up, there were considerable problems at work and consumption of medication was high. Subjective improvement was confirmed by dimensional change: at follow up recovered patients had similar scores to healthy subjects and improved patients showed significant improvement on four out of seven outcome measures and had higher scores than healthy subjects in all dimensions. Sociodemographic variables or treatment by specialists and alternative practitioners did not predict improvement. Predictors of improvement were: subjective sense of control over symptoms, less fatigue, shorter duration of complaints, and a relative absence of physical attributions.

CONCLUSION: The improvement rate in patients with a relatively long duration of complaints is small. Psychological factors are related to improvement, especially cognitive factors.

Source: Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):489-94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC486359/ (Full article)

Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There are few data on the natural history and prognosis of persons with chronic fatigue (CF) or CF syndrome (CFS). Therefore, we compared functional outcomes in patients with each condition and tested the validity of various prognostic indicators.

METHODS: Four hundred forty-five (89%) of 498 consecutive referral patients were surveyed an average of 1.5 years after an initial evaluation. Data from the initial evaluation were used to predict outcomes.

RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of all patients reported improvement, but only 2% reported complete resolution of symptoms. Patients initially diagnosed as having CFS reported greater symptom severity and lower level of functioning at follow-up than did patients with CF. Major depression predicted unemployment in the CF group. Older age, longer duration of illness, and a lifetime history of dysthymia predicted less improvement in the CF group. Current dysthymia predicted less improvement for the CFS group.

CONCLUSIONS: The case definition of CFS according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identifies chronically fatigued patients with poorer prognosis. In a tertiary care setting, recovery from CF or CFS is rare, but improvement is common. Prognostic indicators vary for the two groups, but the coexistence of dysthymia suggests poorer outcomes generally.

Source: Bombardier CH, Buchwald D. Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 23;155(19):2105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7575071

Influence of patients’ expectations on disease

EDITOR,-Michael Loudon continues the debate about the contribution of psychological factors to the development of the chronic fatigue syndrome and the influence of patients’ expectations on the prognosis.

I developed glandular fever over a year ago. For three months earlier this year I had considerable but variable difficulty in getting out of bed in the morning, muscle “woodenness” all over, and wobbly legs in association with a still positive PaulBunnell test. Normal activities have not been a problem for some time now, but I am still struggling to resume sporting activities at something like my previous level.

Why do we seek to make general statements? It is so easy to illustrate the futility of trying to generalise. For example, the teenage son of one of my colleagues on the nursing staff at our hospice died of hepatitis arising from the early stages of glandular fever, despite his transfer to a liver unit. By contrast, I had a normal appetite from the beginning of my illness and no abdominal tenderness. If this lad died of hepatitis and I had no hepatitis at all, does anyone suggest that he did not have a helpful attitude to his illness, while I did to mine? I think not. Why not? Because when we understand and can measure we accept that there is a range of organically based illness.

Surely the reason why there is scepticism about whether the chronic fatigue syndrome has an organic basis is because of the implications for long term absenteeism from work as well as the cost to the country in benefits.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2541947/pdf/bmj00463-0066e.pdf

Source: Ife S. Influence of patients’ expectations on disease. BMJ. 1994 Oct 29;309(6962):1160-1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2541947/

Chronic fatigue syndrome. ME Association is honest about prognosis

Comment on: Chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence and outcome. [BMJ. 1994]

Editor,-I wish to challenge the assertion by S M Lawrie and A J Pelosi that the prognosis given by some myalgic encephalomyelitis associations is nihilistic. In fact, the figures currently used by the ME Association are in line with the data on chronicity and disability found in various follow up studies of patients, including those of the epidemics of the ’30s, ’40s, and ’50s.

The chronicity of myalgic encephalomyelitis was documented as long ago as 1956 when Sigurdsson and Gudmundsson reported that, of 39 patients involved in the 1948 Icelandic epidemic, only five (1/3%) had recovered completely. Thirty two years later a re-examination of 10 Icelandic patients by Hyde and Bergmann showed that the recovery rate was no more than 20% (two of the 10).

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540204/pdf/bmj00440-0055d.pdf

Source: Howes S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. ME Association is honest about prognosis. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1299-300. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540204/

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a follow up study

Abstract:

Forty-six of 47 patients diagnosed as having chronic fatigue and offered treatment four years previously were followed up. Twenty-nine patients were interviewed, three patients refused an interview, and information on the remaining 14 was obtained from their general practitioners. All the instruments used at interview had been used in the initial study. The long-term prognosis for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome who have initially responded to treatment is good. Spontaneous recovery in those who declined or who did not benefit from treatment is unlikely. Patients who continue to fulfil the criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome four years after they were initially diagnosed are likely to have had more somatic disorders, to have been more fatigued, and to have had a previous psychiatric history when they were initially assessed.

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome. [J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995]

Source: Bonner D, Ron M, Chalder T, Butler S, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 May;57(5):617-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1072927/

You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1072927/pdf/jnnpsyc00035-0089.pdf

Chronic fatigue syndrome–51 cases in the Jikei University School of Medicine

Abstract:

Between April 1991 and August 1992, we diagnosed 51 cases of CFS who met definition of CFS designated by CDC, 1988. They are 41 female and 11 male, and 78% are women. At first visit, their ages are ranged from 16 to 64 years old, and approximately 45% is 20 to 30 years old.

In periods of illness from onset, 39.2% of the patients are in period of 6 month to 1 year, 19.6% within 2 years, and 15.6% within 3 years, respectively. The sufferer who have symptoms of CFS over 10 years long are in 6 cases.

Most of patients have already been examined by many other clinics and hospitals. They have been told as no abnormal medical condition, or often as neurosis, depressive state and autonomous imbalance etc.

Interesting things are trigger of CFS. 77.5% of patients have onset of flu-like symptom, including 5 cases of acute infectious mononucleosis. In many female patients, symptoms of CFS begun after hard work in addition to psychological factors. Specific laboratory results are not shown in CBC, urinalysis, biochemical studies and inflammatory markers. 6 cases have positive Rheumatoid factor and positive ANF are shown in 16 cases (31.3%).

Specific patterns of anti EBV antibodies are not shown. Lymphocyte subsets used by monoclonal antibodies are not specific. At the present, prognosis is good and 56.8% of CFS patients are generally improved. For severe cases, NSAID, Sulpiride, Amitryptiline and minor tranquilizer are used.

Source: Hashimoto N, Kuraishi Y, Yokose T, Tajima N, Mochio S, Shimizu M, Yokoyama J, Kobayashi N, Nohara A, Taniguchi I, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome–51 cases in the Jikei University School of Medicine. Nihon Rinsho. 1992 Nov;50(11):2653-64. [Article in Japanese] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1287241

Chronic fatigue syndrome–symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and prognosis

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an undefined clinical problem and is perceived as a complex of multiple symptomatology with an unexplained persistent fatigue. Major symptoms include fatigue lasting for more than 6 months, low-grade fever, moderate lymphadenopathy, muscle and joint pain, and various psychological presentations. Since no specific laboratory tests are available, clinical diagnosis demands that known causes of chronic fatigue should be excluded. The pathogenesis is at present unknown, but it is suspected that CFS is a physical and psychological condition associated with some unrecognized infectious agent. Further study is needed to clarify the precise pathophysiology of this newly recognized entity.

Source: Kanayama Y. Chronic fatigue syndrome–symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and prognosis. Nihon Rinsho. 1992 Nov;50(11):2586-90. [Article in Japanese] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1287234

Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic studies in four clusters of the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to provide a case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome in an outbreak occurring in the Nevada-California region to evaluate candidate etiologic agents and observe the natural history of the illness.

METHODS: Patients diagnosed as having chronic fatigue syndrome were studied by repeated interviews, questionnaires, and blood collection over a 3-year period. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus-6, and human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II. Leukocytes from typical cases were also assayed for human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II.

RESULTS: Cases were defined as persons who had: (1) severe persistent fatigue following an acute illness appearing in an individual with no previous physical or psychological symptoms; (2) presenting signs and symptoms of an acute infection; (3) severe and persistent headache and/or myalgias; and (4) abrupt change in cognitive function or the appearance of a new mood disorder. After 3 years of follow-up, almost all study subjects were able to return to pre-illness activity. None of the viruses evaluated–human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II, Epstein-Barr virus, or human herpesvirus-6–could be etiologically linked to these outbreaks.

CONCLUSION: Clinical features of outbreaks of chronic fatigue syndrome differ sufficiently to suggest different etiologic agents. Giardiasis appears to have precipitated one of the four clusters in this study but the cause(s) of the other three outbreaks is as yet uncertain. The overall prognosis ofchronic fatigue syndrome is usually favorable.

Comment in: Human herpesvirus type 6 and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Arch Intern Med. 1993]

Source: Levine PH, Jacobson S, Pocinki AG, Cheney P, Peterson D, Connelly RR, Weil R, Robinson SM, Ablashi DV, Salahuddin SZ, et al. Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic studies in four clusters of the chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Aug;152(8):1611-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1323246