A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

AIM: To perform a systematic review of studies describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue (CF) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and to identify occupational outcomes from such studies.

METHOD: A literature search was used to identify all studies describing the clinical follow-up of patients following a diagnosis of CF or CFS. The prognosis is described in terms of the proportion of individuals improved during the period of follow-up. Return to work, other medical illnesses and death as outcomes are also considered, as are variables which may influence prognosis.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and, for the 14 studies of subjects meeting operational criteria for CFS, the median full recovery rate was 5% (range 0-31%) and the median proportion of patients who improved during follow-up was 39.5% (range 8-63%). Less fatigue severity at baseline, a sense of control over symptoms and not attributing illness to a physical cause were all associated with a good outcome. Return to work at follow-up ranged from 8 to 30% in the three studies that considered this outcome.

CONCLUSIONS: Full recovery from untreated CFS is rare. The prognosis for an improvement in symptoms is less gloomy. This review looks at the course of CF/CFS without systematic intervention. However, there is increasing evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural and graded exercise therapies. Medical retirement should be postponed until a trial of such treatment has been given.

 

Source: Cairns R, Hotopf M. A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Jan;55(1):20-31. http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/55/1/20.long (Full artricle)

 

Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There are few data on the natural history and prognosis of persons with chronic fatigue (CF) or CF syndrome (CFS). Therefore, we compared functional outcomes in patients with each condition and tested the validity of various prognostic indicators.

METHODS: Four hundred forty-five (89%) of 498 consecutive referral patients were surveyed an average of 1.5 years after an initial evaluation. Data from the initial evaluation were used to predict outcomes.

RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of all patients reported improvement, but only 2% reported complete resolution of symptoms. Patients initially diagnosed as having CFS reported greater symptom severity and lower level of functioning at follow-up than did patients with CF. Major depression predicted unemployment in the CF group. Older age, longer duration of illness, and a lifetime history of dysthymia predicted less improvement in the CF group. Current dysthymia predicted less improvement for the CFS group.

CONCLUSIONS: The case definition of CFS according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identifies chronically fatigued patients with poorer prognosis. In a tertiary care setting, recovery from CF or CFS is rare, but improvement is common. Prognostic indicators vary for the two groups, but the coexistence of dysthymia suggests poorer outcomes generally.

 

Source: Bombardier CH, Buchwald D. Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 23;155(19):2105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7575071

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The authors followed up for a period of 1-14 years 52 patients with CFS who met the criteria outlined by Holmes. The group comprised 10 men and 42 women. In 15% of these patients after a mean period of 5.5 years thyroiditis was diagnosed. Complete recovery was recorded in 20%, improvement in 32% of the patients, on average after 7 years. In the course of treatment mainly immunomodulating preparations were used. Indication of these drugs was individual based on immunological examinations. The success was only partial. The clinical condition of the patients did not correlate with serological findings of IgM, IgA and IgG antibodies against VCA nor with antibodies against EA of the EBV virus.

 

Source: Fucíková T, Petanová J. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Vnitr Lek. 1993 Oct;39(10):995-1002. [Article in Czech] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8236872