Tag: long covid rehabilitation

Acupuncture as an Additional Method of Rehabilitation Post-COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of complex rehabilitation with and without acupuncture in a hospital setting.

Methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed at Rehabilitation center “Kamenskoe Plato” in Almaty, Kazakhstan. 160 patients with Post COVID-19 condition were randomly equally divided into an acupuncture with complex rehabilitation methods and a only complex rehabilitation methods group in the period from March 1, 2022 to July 1, 2022. Either groups was performed for an 10-14 days period. The outcome measures were the Bartel index, the Borg scale, Modified Dyspnea Scale and the 6-minute walking test. Adverse events also were monitored and documented.

Results: We found statistically significant improvement after the rehabilitation course with acupuncture in the all scales. And in the group without acupuncture, only on two scales MDS and Borg scale.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation with acupuncture is possible and effective in patients recovering from post-COVID-19. Our findings may be useful to guide clinicians taking care of patients with post-COVID-19.

Source: Omarova I, Akanova A, Kurmanova A, Kurmanova G, Glushkova N, Seidanova A, Turysbekov K. Acupuncture as an Additional Method of Rehabilitation Post-COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial. J Pharmacopuncture. 2023 Sep 30;26(3):238-246. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2023.26.3.238. PMID: 37799621; PMCID: PMC10547817. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547817/ (Full text)

Efficiency of comprehensive rehabilitation of chronic fatigue syndrome due to coronavirus infections COVID-19

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to study the effectiveness of complex rehabilitation in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome caused by coronavirus infections.

In 120 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) aged 20-58 years, post-COVID syndrome or chronic fatigue syndrome was detected, 52 men and 68 women. Patients had asthenic, cognitive, vegetative manifestations, sleep disorders, smell and taste disorders, anxiety and depression.

Patients received drug therapy: succinic acid preparations, brain metabolic drugs, stimulating antidepressants, sleeping pills – melatonin and B vitamins, among other things, received micropolarization of the head and translingualneurostimulation.

The results of treatment confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed conservative therapy. The neurological symptoms of post-COVID syndrome – chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were studied in 120 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), aged 20-58 years.

Patients were examined according to the “Questionnaire for the detection of asthenia”, “Mini Mental State Assessment (MMSE)”, et.al. Sleep disorders were studied using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, anxiety and depression were studied using the “Questionnaire for Determining Anxiety and Depression”.

The patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group (MG) – 69 patients and the control group (CG) – 51 patients. Patients with MG and CG received drug therapy: succinic acid preparations, brain metabolic drugs, stimulating antidepressants, sleeping pills – melatonin and B vitamins. And patients with MG, among other things, received micropolarization of the head and translingualneurostimulation.

Source: Z.I. Adambaev, I.A. Kilichev, A.B. Nurzhonov, N.Yu. Khudoyberganov, and M.R. Niyazmetov. Efficiency of comprehensive rehabilitation of chronic fatigue syndrome due to coronavirus infections COVID-19. BIO Web of Conferences 65, 05039 (2023) https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/abs/2023/10/bioconf_ebwff2023_05039/bioconf_ebwff2023_05039.html (Full text available as PDF file)

Sonographic Diaphragm Abnormalities are an Unexpectedly Frequent Feature of Long COVID Outpatients with Unexplained Dyspnea and Fatigue

Abstract:

Purpose: The primary aim of this study is to define the sonographic diaphragm phenotype of Long COVID rehabilitation outpatients with non-specific dyspnea and fatigue. We analyzed patients referred from a pulmonary post-COVID clinic that were lacking a specific cardiopulmonary diagnosis for their symptoms. Additionally, we report the functional outcomes of subset of patients who completed an outpatient cardiopulmonary physical therapy program.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study (n = 58) of consecutive patients referred for neuromuscular ultrasound assessment of diaphragm muscle using B-mode technique. Patients were recruited from a single academic hospital between February 25, 2021 and November 22, 2022.

Results: Sonographic abnormalities were identified in 57% (33/58) of patients, and in the vast majority of cases (33/33) was defined by a low diaphragm muscle thickness. Thinner diaphragm muscles are correlated with lower serum creatinine and creatine kinase values, but there was no association with markers of systemic inflammation. Thirty three patients participated in outpatient cardiopulmonary physical therapy that included respiratory muscle training, and 75.8% (25/33) had documented improvement.

Conclusion: In the outpatient rehabilitation setting, patients with Long COVID display low diaphragm muscle thickness, but intact muscle contractility, with surprising frequency on neuromuscular ultrasound. We speculate this represents a form of disuse atrophy. Also, these patients appear to have a favorable response to cardiopulmonary physical therapy that includes respiratory muscle training.

Source: Prabhav P. Deo, Joseph I. Bailey, Alexandra S. Jensen, Ellen Farr, Meghan Fahey, Matthew Isherwood, Keerthana Chakka, Lisa F. Wolfe, Ishan Roy, Marc A. Sala, Colin K. Franz. Sonographic Diaphragm Abnormalities are an Unexpectedly Frequent Feature of Long COVID Outpatients with Unexplained Dyspnea and Fatigue. medRxiv 2022.06.29.22277054; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.29.22277054 (Full text)

Two-year follow-up of patients with post-COVID-19 condition in Sweden: a prospective cohort study

Summary:

Background: Few studies have reported the long-term health effects of COVID-19. The regional population-based Linköping COVID-19 study (LinCoS) included all patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave. Four months post-discharge, over 40% (185/433) experienced persisting symptoms and activity/participation limitations, indicating post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). The present follow-up study aimed to determine the long-term recovery among these patients 24 months post-admission.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included all patients from LinCoS with PCC at four months post-discharge. We repeated the same structured interview at a 24-month follow-up to identify persisting symptoms and their impact on daily life. Intercurrent health issues were identified by reviewing medical records.

Findings: Of 185 patients with PCC at 4 months post-discharge, 181 were alive at the 24-month assessment and 165 agreed to participate. Of those, 21% (35/165) had been readmitted to hospital for various causes in the interim period. The majority of patients (139/165, 84%) reported persisting problems affecting everyday life at 24 months. Significant improvements were seen in the prevalence and magnitude of some symptoms/limitations compared with four months post-discharge. Cognitive, sensorimotor, and fatigue symptoms were the most common persisting symptoms at 24 months. No clear difference was evident between individuals treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU-treated individuals. Approximately half of those who were on sick leave related to PCC at four months after infection were on sick leave at 24 months.

Interpretation: This is one of the first studies to report 2-year outcomes in patients with PCC following COVID-19 hospitalisation. Despite some improvements over time, we found a high prevalence of persisting symptoms and a need for long-term follow-up and rehabilitation post COVID-19 infection.

Source: Carl Wahlgren et al. Two-year follow-up of patients with post-COVID-19 condition in Sweden: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health – Europe. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100595 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(23)00013-3/fulltext (Full text)

STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: A structured protocol

Abstract:

Introduction: Long COVID (LC), the persistent symptoms ≥12 weeks following acute COVID-19, presents major threats to individual and public health across countries, affecting over 1.5 million people in the UK alone. Evidence-based interventions are urgently required and an integrated care pathway approach in pragmatic trials, which include investigations, treatments and rehabilitation for LC, could provide scalable and generalisable solutions at pace.

Methods and analysis: This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster-randomised clinical trial of two components of an integrated care pathway (Coverscan™, a multi-organ MRI, and Living with COVID Recovery™, a digitally enabled rehabilitation platform) with a nested, Phase III, open label, platform randomised drug trial in individuals with LC. Cluster randomisation is at level of primary care networks so that integrated care pathway interventions are delivered as “standard of care” in that area. The drug trial randomisation is at individual level and initial arms are rivaroxaban, colchicine, famotidine/loratadine, compared with no drugs, with potential to add in further drug arms. The trial is being carried out in 6-10 LC clinics in the UK and is evaluating the effectiveness of a pathway of care for adults with LC in reducing fatigue and other physical, psychological and functional outcomes at 3 months. The trial also includes an economic evaluation which will be described separately.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was reviewed by South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (reference: 21/SC/0416). All participating sites obtained local approvals prior to recruitment. Coverscan™ has UK certification (UKCA 752965). All participants will provide written consent to take part in the trial. The first participant was recruited in July 2022 and interim/final results will be disseminated in 2023, in a plan co-developed with public and patient representatives. The results will be presented at national and international conferences, published in peer reviewed medical journals, and shared via media (mainstream and social) and patient support organisations.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN10665760.

Source: Forshaw D, Wall EC, Prescott G, Dehbi HM, Green A, Attree E, Hismeh L, Strain WD, Crooks MG, Watkins C, Robson C, Banerjee R, Lorgelly P, Heightman M, Banerjee A; STIMULATE-ICP trial team. STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: A structured protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0272472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272472. PMID: 36791116; PMCID: PMC9931100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931100/ (Full text)

What interventions or best practice are there to support people with Long COVID, or similar post-viral conditions or conditions characterised by fatigue, to return to normal activities: a rapid review

Abstract:

Previous research has categorised symptoms of COVID-19 / Long COVID into 12 thematic areas including: fever, myalgia, fatigue, impaired cognitive function, and that COVID-19 survivors had reduced levels of physical function, activities of daily living, and health-related quality of life.

Our aim was to review the evidence for interventions or best practice to support people with Long COVID, or similar post-viral conditions characterised by fatigue, to return to normal activities.

Evidence was included from guidelines, systematic reviews (SR), and primary studies. The primary studies focussed on Long COVID (LC) indicated that there should be a needs-based focus to care for those with LC.

Consideration should be given to individuals living with LC in the same way as people with disabilities are accommodated in terms of workplace adjustment.

Two SRs indicated that non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for patients with LC or chronic fatigue syndrome could help improve function for activities of daily life. However, the third, most recent SR, concluded that there is a lack of robust evidence for NPIs.

LC fatigue management methods may be beneficial under certain conditions. One SR reported work capability as an outcome however they did not find any studies which evaluated the impact of interventions on return to work/ normal life.

One primary study, on individuals with CFS, described a written self-management programme. Following this intervention there was an 18% increase in the number of patients in employment.

Policy and practice implications: Long COVID is still being established as a post-viral condition with many symptoms. Patient-centred treatment options such as occupational therapy, self-management therapy and talking therapy may be considered in the same way as for other debilitating conditions. Return-to-work accommodations are needed for all workers unable to return to full-time employment.

Due to the nature of the studies included, there was little reported evidence of effectiveness of getting individuals back into their normal activities.

Source: Llinos Haf Spencer, Annie Hendry, Abraham Makanjuola, Bethany F Anthony, Jacob Davies, Kalpa Pisavadia, Dyfrig Hughes, Deb Fitzsimmons, Clare Wilkinson, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Ruth Lewis, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards. What interventions or best practice are there to support people with Long COVID, or similar post-viral conditions or conditions characterised by fatigue, to return to normal activities: a rapid review. medRxiv 2023.01.24.23284947; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.23284947 (Full text)

Two-Years Follow-Up of Symptoms and Return to Work in Complex Post-COVID-19 Patients

Abstract:

Introduction: Many COVID-19 patients present with severe long-lasting symptoms. They might benefit from a coordination team to manage such complex situations, but late efficacy still needs to be determined.
Population and Methods: Out of 105 contacts, 45 patients had two phone consultations separated by personalized support 15 and 22 months, respectively, after COVID infection. Self-reported symptoms, feelings of improvement and ability to return to work allowed us to determine the efficacy of the therapeutic strategy proposed.
Results: Unlike what was expected, many post-COVID-19 patients directly contacted the coordination team and had significant pre-existing comorbidities. Despite exercise, respiratory, olfactory rehabilitations, cognition/speech therapy and/or psychological support, the more frequent self-reported symptoms (fatigue, neurocognitive disorders, muscles and joint pain) did not resolve. However, dyspnea, anxiety and chest pain were significantly reduced. Finally, 2/3 of the patients felt some degree of improvement and returned to work either partially or fully, but 1/3 remained complaining of symptoms and out of work as late as 22 months after COVID occurrence. All patients greatly appreciated the second phone consultation.
Conclusions: In such complex situations, besides early and adapted rehabilitations and psychological help allowing better symptom management, relatively simple actions such as a phone call might be very useful to reduce patients’ feelings of abandonment.
Source: Van Wambeke E, Bezler C, Kasprowicz A-M, Charles A-L, Andres E, Geny B. Two-Years Follow-Up of Symptoms and Return to Work in Complex Post-COVID-19 Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(3):741. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030741 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/3/741 (Full text)

A Systematic Review of Trials Currently Investigating Therapeutic Modalities for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome and Registered on World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome (PACS) is a well-recognized complex systemic disease that is associated with substantial morbidity. There is a paucity of established interventions to treat patients with this syndrome.

Objectives: To systematically review registered trials currently investigating therapeutic modalities for PACS.

Data sources: Search was conducted up to the 16th of September 2022 using the COVID-19 section of the World Health Organization (WHO) Internal Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Interventional clinical trials of any sample size examining any therapeutic modality targeting persistent symptoms among individuals after diagnosis with COVID-19.

Methods: Data on trial characteristics and intervention characteristics were collected and summarized.

Results: After screening 17125 trials, 388 trials from 42 countries were eligible. 331 trials tested mono-therapeutic strategies, while 39 trials included a combination of interventions. Among the 824 primary outcomes identified, there were more than 300 different outcomes. Rehabilitation was the most employed class of intervention with 169 trials. We encountered 76 trials examining pharmacological agents of various classes with the most common agent being colchicine. Complementary and alternative medicine encompassed 64 trials exploring Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ayurveda, homeopathic medications, naturopathic medications, vitamins, dietary supplements, and botanicals. Psychotherapeutic and educational interventions were also employed with 12 and 4 trials, respectively. Other interventions including transcranial current direct stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, general electrical stimulation, cranial electrotherapy stimulation, various stem cell interventions, and oxygen therapy interventions were also employed.

Conclusion: We identified 388 registered trials with a high degree of heterogeneity exploring 144 unique interventions for PACS. Most target general alleviation of symptoms. There is a need for further high-quality and methodologically robust PACS treatment trials conducted with standardization of outcomes while following WHO’s recommendation for uniform evaluation and treatment.

Source: Fawzy NA, Shaar BA, Taha R, Arabi TZ, Sabbah BN, Alkodaymi MS, Omrani OA, Makhzoum T, Almahfoudh NE, Al-Hammad QA, Hejazi W, Obeidat Y, Osman N, Al-Kattan KM, Berbari EF, Tleyjeh IM. A Systematic Review of Trials Currently Investigating Therapeutic Modalities for Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome and Registered on World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan 12:S1198-743X(23)00009-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.01.007. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36642173; PMCID: PMC9837206. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837206/ (Full text)

Management and treatment of long COVID symptoms in general practices: An online-based survey

Abstract:

Independent from initial severity, many patients develop persistent symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2, described as long COVID syndrome. Most of these patients are treated by general practitioners (GPs). As evidence-based treatment recommendations are still sparse, GPs must make their therapy decisions under uncertainty.

We investigated (1) the most frequently observed long COVID symptoms in general practices and (2) GPs’ applied treatment and rehabilitation plans for these symptoms. In total, 143 German GPs participated in an online-based survey between 05/2021 and 07/2021. We found that each GP practice was treating on average 12 patients with long COVID symptoms. Most frequently seen symptoms were fatigue and reduced performance. Current therapy options were rated as poor and loss of smell and taste, fatigue, or lack of concentration were perceived to be especially difficult to treat. The use of drug and non-drug therapies and specialist referrals focused primarily on physiological and less on psychosomatic/psychological rehabilitation and followed guidelines of similar conditions.

Our results provide first insights into how GPs approach a newly emerging condition in the absence of guidelines, evidence-based recommendations, or approved therapies, and might inform about GP preparedness in future pandemics. Our results also emphasize a gap between the current knowledge of the long COVID manifestation and knowledge about effective rehabilitation.

Source: Schrimpf A, Braesigk A, Lippmann S, Bleckwenn M. Management and treatment of long COVID symptoms in general practices: An online-based survey. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;10:937100. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.937100. PMID: 36176520; PMCID: PMC9513068. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513068/ (Full text)

Rehabilitation in long COVID-19: A mini-review

Abstract:

We have been experiencing multiple waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. With these unprecedented waves, we have entered into an era of ‘new normal’. This pandemic has enforced us to rethink the very basics of childhood learning: Habits, health etiquette, and hygiene. Rehabilitation has immense importance during this pandemic considering a few aspects. Multidisciplinary COVID-19 rehabilitation clinics are essential to address the demand. The equitable distribution of COVID-19 rehabilitation services for differently-abled individuals during the pandemic is an important aspect. Rehabilitation needs identification and further studies on various rehabilitation interventions are among the key unmet future research needs.

Source: Swarnakar R, Yadav SL. Rehabilitation in long COVID-19: A mini-review. World J Methodol. 2022 Jul 20;12(4):235-245. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.235. PMID: 36159093; PMCID: PMC9350732. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350732/ (Full text)