Chronic fatigue in adolescents

Abstract:

Nine female and 6 male adolescents (mean age 14.5 +/- 1.7 [SD] years) were evaluated for chronic fatigue associated with at least three additional symptoms present for 18.4 +/- 8.4 months. Eleven subjects experienced the onset of symptoms with an acute illness (seven Monospot-positive). Medical history, physical examination, and laboratory testing yielded little helpful information. Serologic testing for Coxsackie B viruses 1 through 6, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6, and Toxoplasma gondii in subjects and healthy controls provided little evidence for an infectious cause of persistent fatigue.

Children’s Depression Inventory scores and psychiatric interviews with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Children’s Version (K-SADS) identified five subjects with major depression. On the K-SADS, the 10 fatigued subjects without major depression endorsed many secondary symptoms of depression but were less likely than depressed psychiatric clinic patients to endorse primary symptoms such as depressed mood, guilt, and suicidality. At telephone follow-up 13 to 32 months after intake, 4 subjects were completely well, 4 markedly improved, and 7 unimproved or worse.

Further research is necessary to determine whether chronic fatigue in adolescents is prodromal depression, a discrete psychosomatic condition, or an infectious or immunologic disorder that mimics depression.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue in children: illness or disease? [Pediatrics. 1993]

Chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome: an epidemic? [Pediatrics. 1992]

Chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome: an epidemic? [Pediatrics. 1992]

Chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome: an epidemic? [Pediatrics. 1992]

 

Source: Smith MS, Mitchell J, Corey L, Gold D, McCauley EA, Glover D, Tenover FC. Chronic fatigue in adolescents. Pediatrics. 1991 Aug;88(2):195-202. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1861915

 

Myth of the chronic fatigue syndrome

THE CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME is a symptom complex characterized by fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias, neurologic symptoms-headaches, paresthesias, dizziness-lymph node swelling or tenderness, cognitive dysfunction, sleep disorders, and depression. The symptoms are similar to those seen in inflammatory illnesses and can be induced by the systemic administration of interferon beta. Severe fatigue is a perplexing and constant complaint in many patients with multiple sclerosis. This indicates that the perception of energy level has a sensitive physiologic basis that is dependent on the homeostasis of other body systems.

The chronic fatigue syndrome has gained popularity among the lay public and has stimulated considerable scientific debate about its existence. Many investigators and practitioners have attributed the disorder to chronic depression. Difficulty arises from the diverse symptoms associated with fatigue states; fatigue is a prominent feature of many systemic, neurologic, and psychiatric disorders. Also, fatigue is a subjective complaint without a quantifiable measure. This interweaving of many symptoms and diagnoses with disabling fatigue makes it difficult to compare patient groups. Terms applied to disorders that probably represent chronic fatigue syndrome are chronic infectious mononucleosis, myalgic encephalomyelitis, idiopathic chronic fatigue and myalgia syndrome, epidemic neuromyasthenia, postviral fatigue syndrome, and fibrositis-fibromyalgia.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1002920/pdf/westjmed00095-0070a.pdf

 

Source: Murray RS. Myth of the chronic fatigue syndrome. West J Med. 1991 Jul;155(1):68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1002920/

 

Depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, and the adolescent

Abstract:

To summarize, CFS and depression present very real problems for adolescent patients, their families, and their physicians. The wealth of symptoms presented may signal the presence of any number of psychiatric or physiologic disorders. As part of the evaluation to rule out other maladies, the physician must identify the developmental issues and life stress events with which patients or their families are struggling. Helping patients to accept psychiatric referral to address these issues is indicated if it is thought that they may be contributing to the onset or maintenance of the symptoms. Referral is also indicated if a protracted clinical course evolves and the patient’s normal course of growth and development appears to be in jeopardy.

 

Source: Strickland MC. Depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, and the adolescent. Prim Care. 1991 Jun;18(2):259-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1876612

 

Psychiatric symptoms, personality and ways of coping in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the psychological characteristics of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS: Holmes et al. 1988).

A battery of psychometric instruments comprising the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the Lazarus Ways of Coping (WoC) inventory, was administered to a sample of clinically-defined CFS sufferers (N = 58), to a comparison group of chronic pain (CP) patients (N = 81) and to a group of healthy controls matched for sex and age with the CFS sample (N = 104).

Considerable overlap was found between CFS and CP patients at the level of both physical and psychological symptoms. This raises the possibility that CFS sufferers are a sub-population of CP patients. However, while there was some commonality between CFS and CP patients in terms of personality traits, particularly the MMPI ‘neurotic triad’ (hypochondriasis, depression and hysteria),

CFS patients showed more deviant personality traits reflecting raised levels on the first MMPI factor, emotionality. Moreover, results were not consistent with the raised emotionality being a reaction to the illness, but rather were consistent with the hypothesis that emotionality is a predisposing factor for CFS.

The majority of CFS patients fell within four personality types, each characterized by the two highest MMPI scale scores. One type (N = 20) reported a lack of psychological symptoms or emotional disturbance contrary to the overall trend for the CFS sample. This group conformed to the ICD-10 classification of neurasthenia.

 

Source: Blakely AA, Howard RC, Sosich RM, Murdoch JC, Menkes DB, Spears GF. Psychiatric symptoms, personality and ways of coping in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol Med. 1991 May;21(2):347-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1876640

 

Panic disorder among patients with chronic fatigue

Abstract:

Among 200 adults with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue evaluated in an internal medicine practice, currently active panic disorder was diagnosed in 26 patients (13%), a frequency tenfold greater than that in the general population. Panic disorder preceded or was coincidental with the onset of chronic fatigue in 21 of these patients.

In comparison with the rest of the study cohort, significantly more patients with panic disorder had a history of severe depression, including persistent thoughts of death or suicide. Moreover, more patients with panic disorder showed a lifetime tendency to have physical symptoms that remained unexplained after medical evaluation.

Our findings suggest that treatable panic disorder is an important contributor not only to major depression and somatization, but also to the etiology and clinical presentation of chronic fatigue in patients in an outpatient practice.

 

Source: Manu P, Matthews DA, Lane TJ. Panic disorder among patients with chronic fatigue. South Med J. 1991 Apr;84(4):451-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2014428

 

A personal encounter with a mystery illness

Abstract:

I urge all practitioners to accept that ‘chronic fatigue’ patients have genuine symptoms. This disease can cause depression, but for most patients it is not caused by depression. I acknowledge that a depressed patient can develop the chronic fatigue syndrome in the same way that they can contract any other disease. If you are unable to diagnose a patient with these symptoms please refer them to a centre specialising in this devastating and poorly understood disease.

 

Source: Lopis R. A personal encounter with a mystery illness. Aust Fam Physician. 1991 Mar;20(3):316-7.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039419

 

Cognitive and mood-state changes in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In this paper the cognitive and psychiatric impairments associated with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and related disorders are reviewed. It is concluded that while acute mononucleosis and infection with Epstein-Barr virus occasionally result in impaired cognition, such changes have not yet been objectively verified in patients with CFS.

However, when patients with CFS are carefully studied, concurrent or premorbid psychiatric disorders are revealed at a greater than chance level. Finally, some suggestions are offered regarding improved neuropsychological assessment of fatigue, concentration, and attention for patients with CFS. The findings to date, while suggesting that psychological predisposition may play a role in the expression of CFS, are still inconclusive regarding the etiology of CFS.

 

Source: Grafman J, Johnson R Jr, Scheffers M. Cognitive and mood-state changes in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S45-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1850543

 

Assessment of depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Assessment of the relationship of depression to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complicated but important topic. This relationship may range from the misdiagnostic (i.e., depression misidentified as CFS) to the etiologic (i.e., CFS causes an organic affective syndrome). Assessment should focus on the symptoms and syndromes of depressive disorder, utilization of a single rating scale to assess presumed depression is discouraged, and alternate approaches to classification that allow for symptomatic overlap of a major depressive disorder and CFS are suggested. Careful attention needs to be given to the use of external validating criteria in empiric studies, such as natural history, clinical course (including treatment response), and family history.

 

Source:  Thase ME. Assessment of depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S114-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2020797

 

Chronic fatigue. A prospective clinical and virologic study

Abstract:

To evaluate the clinical and virologic course of patients with chronic fatigue who had elevated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) titers, we prospectively followed up 26 patients with serial cultures for EBV in blood and saliva and serial EBV serologic and clinical and psychiatric evaluations, and we compared these results with those for healthy controls.

The frequency of isolating EBV in blood or demonstrating EBV infection by in situ hybridization in blood lymphocytes or in saliva was similar in patients and controls. The prevalence and titers of antibody to human herpesvirus type 6 were also similar in the two populations. Patients with chronic fatigue did demonstrate higher in vitro natural killer activity and lower in vitro interleukin 2 production than controls, and patients had a high frequency of DSM-III depressive illness. Over 50% of patients with chronic fatigue improved over the course of follow-up. Improvement was not associated with any discernible change in titers of EBV proteins.

No evidence of ongoing EBV infection with either transforming or nontransforming strains was demonstrated in this population of patients with chronic fatigue. Clinically, most patients gradually improve over time.

 

Source: Gold D, Bowden R, Sixbey J, Riggs R, Katon WJ, Ashley R, Obrigewitch RM, Corey L. Chronic fatigue. A prospective clinical and virologic study. JAMA. 1990 Jul 4;264(1):48-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2162397

 

Depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis

This comment, published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in May 1990, was written in response to a letter by Dr. Lev. You can read the letter here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292388/

 

We read the letter from Lev (November 1989 JRSM, p 693) with interest, but see a danger in using assumptions as to aetiology in definition of study groups. Operational definitions not making this assumption will produce replicable findings and progress towards better definitions and understanding of aetiology.

Definitions of depressed control groups are difficult, for example the following need to be controlled:

(1) Demographic variables

(2) Severity of depression symptoms: inappropriate control groups for ME patients would be severely depressed inpatients. Outpatient depressives are not too dissimilar in severity.

(3) Psychotropic medication: this is less likely to be given to ME patients where treatment is not agreed and could modify symptoms to be compared.

(4) Psychiatric history: in possible ME patients a previous significant psychiatric illness prior to fatigue symptoms leads to difficulty in studying this symptom and produces too much overlap with depressed controls.

(5) History of febrile illness: to minimize overlap, one must also control for preceding febrile illness in otherwise typical depressive illness.

Comparison of control groups should be serial, not cross-sectional as physical symptoms and markers may fluctuate, as may fatigue and depression.

Assessment of depressive symptoms is difficult, as Lev points out, due to non-specific ‘biological’ symptoms of depression. However, psychic ones such as pessimism should not overlap and could be assessed.

The concept of fatigue is poorly understood, as is its assessment. The paradigm of pain research has much to offer, where ‘dichotomization’ of physical and psychological components is not thought useful, but assessment emphasizes all components of the experience of pain. Thus, psychometric assessment of fatigue, for example, its severity, frequency, and pattern may be a future research area. Using such a paradigm, our initial findings of differences in fatigue in the two groups are because depressed patients are predominantly anergic, but ‘ME’ patients have more variability and unpredictable onset of fatigue relative to the severity of exercise attempted. Lack of motivation overlaps in both groups, explicable in Lev’s own terms as due to a reaction to a chronic illness.

~SEAN LYNCH Lecturer and Honorary Senior Registrar in Psychiatry

~RAM SETH Senior Registrar in Psychiatry St Charles Hospital, London

 

Source: S Lynch and R Seth. Depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis. J R Soc Med. 1990 May; 83(5): 341. PMCID: PMC1292666. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292666/pdf/jrsocmed00136-0073a.pdf