A personal encounter with a mystery illness

Abstract:

I urge all practitioners to accept that ‘chronic fatigue’ patients have genuine symptoms. This disease can cause depression, but for most patients it is not caused by depression. I acknowledge that a depressed patient can develop the chronic fatigue syndrome in the same way that they can contract any other disease. If you are unable to diagnose a patient with these symptoms please refer them to a centre specialising in this devastating and poorly understood disease.

 

Source: Lopis R. A personal encounter with a mystery illness. Aust Fam Physician. 1991 Mar;20(3):316-7.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2039419

 

Cognitive and mood-state changes in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In this paper the cognitive and psychiatric impairments associated with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and related disorders are reviewed. It is concluded that while acute mononucleosis and infection with Epstein-Barr virus occasionally result in impaired cognition, such changes have not yet been objectively verified in patients with CFS.

However, when patients with CFS are carefully studied, concurrent or premorbid psychiatric disorders are revealed at a greater than chance level. Finally, some suggestions are offered regarding improved neuropsychological assessment of fatigue, concentration, and attention for patients with CFS. The findings to date, while suggesting that psychological predisposition may play a role in the expression of CFS, are still inconclusive regarding the etiology of CFS.

 

Source: Grafman J, Johnson R Jr, Scheffers M. Cognitive and mood-state changes in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S45-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1850543

 

Assessment of depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Assessment of the relationship of depression to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complicated but important topic. This relationship may range from the misdiagnostic (i.e., depression misidentified as CFS) to the etiologic (i.e., CFS causes an organic affective syndrome). Assessment should focus on the symptoms and syndromes of depressive disorder, utilization of a single rating scale to assess presumed depression is discouraged, and alternate approaches to classification that allow for symptomatic overlap of a major depressive disorder and CFS are suggested. Careful attention needs to be given to the use of external validating criteria in empiric studies, such as natural history, clinical course (including treatment response), and family history.

 

Source:  Thase ME. Assessment of depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S114-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2020797

 

Chronic fatigue. A prospective clinical and virologic study

Abstract:

To evaluate the clinical and virologic course of patients with chronic fatigue who had elevated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) titers, we prospectively followed up 26 patients with serial cultures for EBV in blood and saliva and serial EBV serologic and clinical and psychiatric evaluations, and we compared these results with those for healthy controls.

The frequency of isolating EBV in blood or demonstrating EBV infection by in situ hybridization in blood lymphocytes or in saliva was similar in patients and controls. The prevalence and titers of antibody to human herpesvirus type 6 were also similar in the two populations. Patients with chronic fatigue did demonstrate higher in vitro natural killer activity and lower in vitro interleukin 2 production than controls, and patients had a high frequency of DSM-III depressive illness. Over 50% of patients with chronic fatigue improved over the course of follow-up. Improvement was not associated with any discernible change in titers of EBV proteins.

No evidence of ongoing EBV infection with either transforming or nontransforming strains was demonstrated in this population of patients with chronic fatigue. Clinically, most patients gradually improve over time.

 

Source: Gold D, Bowden R, Sixbey J, Riggs R, Katon WJ, Ashley R, Obrigewitch RM, Corey L. Chronic fatigue. A prospective clinical and virologic study. JAMA. 1990 Jul 4;264(1):48-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2162397

 

Depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis

This comment, published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in May 1990, was written in response to a letter by Dr. Lev. You can read the letter here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292388/

 

We read the letter from Lev (November 1989 JRSM, p 693) with interest, but see a danger in using assumptions as to aetiology in definition of study groups. Operational definitions not making this assumption will produce replicable findings and progress towards better definitions and understanding of aetiology.

Definitions of depressed control groups are difficult, for example the following need to be controlled:

(1) Demographic variables

(2) Severity of depression symptoms: inappropriate control groups for ME patients would be severely depressed inpatients. Outpatient depressives are not too dissimilar in severity.

(3) Psychotropic medication: this is less likely to be given to ME patients where treatment is not agreed and could modify symptoms to be compared.

(4) Psychiatric history: in possible ME patients a previous significant psychiatric illness prior to fatigue symptoms leads to difficulty in studying this symptom and produces too much overlap with depressed controls.

(5) History of febrile illness: to minimize overlap, one must also control for preceding febrile illness in otherwise typical depressive illness.

Comparison of control groups should be serial, not cross-sectional as physical symptoms and markers may fluctuate, as may fatigue and depression.

Assessment of depressive symptoms is difficult, as Lev points out, due to non-specific ‘biological’ symptoms of depression. However, psychic ones such as pessimism should not overlap and could be assessed.

The concept of fatigue is poorly understood, as is its assessment. The paradigm of pain research has much to offer, where ‘dichotomization’ of physical and psychological components is not thought useful, but assessment emphasizes all components of the experience of pain. Thus, psychometric assessment of fatigue, for example, its severity, frequency, and pattern may be a future research area. Using such a paradigm, our initial findings of differences in fatigue in the two groups are because depressed patients are predominantly anergic, but ‘ME’ patients have more variability and unpredictable onset of fatigue relative to the severity of exercise attempted. Lack of motivation overlaps in both groups, explicable in Lev’s own terms as due to a reaction to a chronic illness.

~SEAN LYNCH Lecturer and Honorary Senior Registrar in Psychiatry

~RAM SETH Senior Registrar in Psychiatry St Charles Hospital, London

 

Source: S Lynch and R Seth. Depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis. J R Soc Med. 1990 May; 83(5): 341. PMCID: PMC1292666. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292666/pdf/jrsocmed00136-0073a.pdf

 

The psychiatric status of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The prevalence of psychiatric disorder in 48 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was determined. Twenty-two had had a major depressive (non-endogenous) episode during the course of their illness, while seven had a current major (non-endogenous) depression.

The pre-morbid prevalence of major depression (12.5%) and of total psychiatric disorder (24.5%) was no higher than general community estimates. The pattern of psychiatric symptoms in the CFS patients was significantly different to that of 48 patients with non-endogenous depression, but was comparable with that observed in other medical disorders. Patients with CFS were not excessively hypochondriacal.

We conclude that psychological disturbance is likely to be a consequence of, rather than an antecedent risk factor to the syndrome.

 

Source: Hickie I, Lloyd A, Wakefield D, Parker G. The psychiatric status of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Apr;156:534-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2386862

 

Myalgic encephalomyelitis

Note: This letter appeared in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in March 1990.

 

We accept that Martin Lev (November 1989 JRSM, p 693) is correct to point out that the anxiety and depression noted in patients labelled as suffering from ‘ME’ are the consequence of ‘underlying organic processes’. The demonstration of hyperventilation in the overwhelming majority of these patients (Rosen SD, King JC, Nixon PGF, unpublished results), provides a clear metabolic reason for the anxiety (1-3). ‘Depression’ is a predictable reaction to the inability to make and sustain effort due in part to the ease of acidosis of muscle cells depleted of buffer base reserves(4).

We agree with Sargant(5), that the sufferers from the late stages of effort syndrome, who have nothing to gain from their ill health and much to lose, are among the most gifted and energetic of people, and consequently the most upset about the frustration caused by loss of performance.

~S D ROSEN Cardiac Registrar

~J C KING Honorary Head Occupational Therapist (Research)

~P G F NIXON Consultant Cardiologist Charing Cross Hospital London

 

 References

1 Lewis T, et al. Breathlessness in soldiers suffering from irritable heart. Br Med J 14 October 1916:517-19

2 Lum LC. The syndrome of chronic habitual hyperventilation. In: Hill OW, ed. Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine, vol. 3. London: Butterworths, 1976: 196-230

3 Groen JJ. The measurement of emotion and arousal in the clinical physiological laboratory and in medical practice. In: Levi L, ed. The emotions: their parameters and measurement. New York: Raven Press, 1975:727-46

4 Rosen SD, King JC, Nixon PGF. Magnetic resonance muscle studies. J R Soc Med 1988;81:676-7 5 Sargant W. Battle for the mind Aphysiology ofconversion and brain-washing. London: Heinemann 1957

 

Source:  Rosen, SD, King, JC, Nixon, PGF. Myalgic encephalomyelitis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 83 March 1990.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292587/

 

Sensory and cognitive event-related potentials in myalgic encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) is a form of post viral fatigue syndrome resulting in myalgia and fluctuating fatiguability. Symptoms reflecting central nervous system dysfunction are common and include muscle weakness, headache, sensory disturbances, poor short term memory and impairment of concentration.

In view of the fact that sensory and cognitive disturbances are experienced by many patients objective evidence was sought with multi-modality sensory evoked potentials and auditory event-related cognitive potentials in a group of ME patients both with and without the enteroviral antigen, VP1 test positive.

The auditory brainstem, median nerve somatosensory and pattern reversal checkerboard visual potentials were normal for all 37 patients tested. In contrast to the sensory potentials significant differences in the mean latencies of the cognitive potential N2 and P3 were found. Reaction times were also significantly prolonged but the performance in terms of error was not significantly affected. No significant difference emerged in any of the parameters for the VP1 test. P3 was abnormal in latency or amplitude in 36% of the VP1 positive patients for the frequency discrimination task and 48% for the more difficult duration discrimination task.

The abnormalities indicate attentional deficits in some patients and slower speed of information processing in others. The prolonged latencies observed in these patients have not been observed in patients with depression in many other studies.

 

Source: Prasher D, Smith A, Findley L. Sensory and cognitive event-related potentials in myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Mar;53(3):247-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2324756

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1014138/

 

Attributions and self-esteem in depression and chronic fatigue syndromes

Abstract:

There is considerable overlap in symptomatology between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and affective disorder.

We report a comparison of depressive phenomenology and attributional style between a group of CFS subjects seen in a specialized medical setting, which included a high proportion with depression diagnosed by Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), and depressed controls seen in a specialized psychiatric setting.

Significant symptomatic differences between the depressed CFS group and depressed controls were observed for features such as self-esteem and guilt as well as attribution of illness. All the CFS groups tended to attribute their symptoms to external causes whereas the depressed controls experienced inward attribution.

This may have resulted from differences in the severity of mood disorder between the samples, but it is also suggested that an outward style of attribution protects the depressed CFS patients from cognitive changes associated with low mood but at the expense of greater vulnerability towards somatic symptoms such as fatigue.

 

Source: Powell R, Dolan R, Wessely S. Attributions and self-esteem in depression and chronic fatigue syndromes. J Psychosom Res. 1990;34(6):665-73.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2290139

 

Neurasthenia in the 1980s: chronic mononucleosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and anxiety and depressive disorders

Abstract:

In the 1980s, patients suffering from unexplained fatigue and what seemed like a prolonged attack of acute mononucleosis were given the diagnosis of chronic mononucleosis or chronic infection with the Epstein-Barr virus.

Although the diagnosis has great appeal, the Epstein-Barr virus does not cause the syndrome (CFS) of chronic fatigue, which has been renamed and redefined chronic fatigue syndrome to remove the inference that the virus is its cause.

From a historical perspective, both syndromes represent the 1980s equivalent of neurasthenia, a disease of fatigue that influenced the development of psychiatric nosology. Because patients with depression and anxiety also have chronic fatigue and because most patients with CFS have an affective disorder, the assessment of organic causes of this syndrome requires careful psychiatric diagnosis and treatment.

Defining chronic fatigue syndrome as a medical disorder may deprive patients of competent treatment of their affective disorder.

 

Source: Greenberg DB. Neurasthenia in the 1980s: chronic mononucleosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychosomatics. 1990 Spring;31(2):129-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2184452