Tag: effort syndrome

The rise and fall of the chronic fatigue syndrome as defined by Holmes et al.

Abstract:

This paper is a sequel to my monograph on neurocirculatory asthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome. It pays special attention to the nature of chronic fatigue syndrome, to the forms of neurocirculatory asthenia, and above all to the 6th form in which profound fatigue is the dominant symptom. All forms including the 6th are characterized by the presence of concomitant symptoms due to dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. Chronic fatigue syndrome as defined by Holmes et al is devoid of these symptoms. Up till the present day no case histories of it have been published. It is argued that chronic fatigue syndrome sensu Holmes et al does not exist, the 6th form of neurocirculatory asthenia having to take up its place.

 

Source: van Waveren EK. The rise and fall of the chronic fatigue syndrome as defined by Holmes et al. Med Hypotheses. 1996 Feb;46(2):63-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8692045

 

Effort syndrome: hyperventilation and reduction of anaerobic threshold

Abstract:

Effort syndrome is an entity in danger of being subsumed into “chronic fatigue syndrome” and lost to sight. Its distinctive feature is the reduction of the anaerobic threshold for work by depletion of the body’s alkaline buffering systems through hyperventilation. This article describes the history and clinical features of effort syndrome and reports a study in which capnography is used to identify the anaerobic threshold by registering the respiratory response to the onset of metabolic acidosis. The patients’ thresholds are low, and provide a goal for rehabilitation. In other forms of chronic fatigue syndrome, the pathogenesis and logic of therapy are unclear.

 

Source: Nixon PG. Effort syndrome: hyperventilation and reduction of anaerobic threshold. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1994 Jun;19(2):155-69. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7918753

 

The grey area of effort syndrome and hyperventilation: from Thomas Lewis to today

Abstract:

Lewis used the diagnosis ‘effort syndrome’ for subjects whose ability to make and sustain effort had been reduced by homeostatic failure. A major element was depletion of the body’s capacity for buffering the acids produced by exercise.

In his view this systems disorder was not to be regarded as a specific organ disease, and losing sight of the metabolic element would foster the invention of fanciful, unphysiological diagnoses. His views were dismissed because normal resting plasma bicarbonate levels were considered by others in that era to exclude serious depletion of the body’s total capacity for buffering the effects of exertion.

Today, effort syndrome is still a useful diagnosis for a condition of exhaustion and failure of performance associated with depletion of the body’s buffering systems. Other elements associated with homeostatic failure are now recognised, principally emotional hyperarousal and hyperventilation. Their physiological interrelationships are described. Effort syndrome is amenable to recovery through rehabilitation, and it may be a mistake to treat chronic fatigue syndrome and unspecific illness without including it in the differential diagnosis.

 

Source: Nixon PG. The grey area of effort syndrome and hyperventilation: from Thomas Lewis to today. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Oct;27(4):377-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8289156

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome: what do we know?

Abnormally persistent or recurrent fatigue is a feature of many disorders. Recently, particular attention has been devoted to people whose life is dominated by protracted and disabling fatigue. Such cases are now usually categorised as the chronic fatigue syndrome, the postviral fatigue syndrome, or myalgic encephalomyelitis. Two recent publications bring together current ideas on the topic.

The historical background is important. Although the chronic fatigue syndrome has been advanced as a malaise of the latter part of this century, such cases are not a new phenomenon: they were particularly common during the latter part of the last century. The New York physician George Beard applied the label “neurasthenia” to them although the term was more widely used. After becoming an exceedingly common diagnosis it waned at the time of the first world war.

This first wave in the history of chronic fatigue was followed by a second wave, which can be dated to 1934. Nevertheless, cases of chronic fatigue did not simply disappear in the intervening period. The “effort syndrome” had a considerable vogue at that time. “Fibrositis,” a term introduced by Sir William Gowers in 1894 to designate the occurrence of diffuse muscle aching and pain without detectable explanation, evolved into “fibromyalgia.” This currently popular diagnosis has many overlapping features with the chronic fatigue syndrome, as did the effort syndrome.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1677985/pdf/bmj00024-0007.pdf

 

Comment in:

Functional hypoglycaemia postulated as cause of chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1993]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1993]

 

Source: Thomas PK. The chronic fatigue syndrome: what do we know? BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1557-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1677985/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1992]

Comment on: Antidepressant therapy in the chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

 

Sir, The adoption of the term chronic fatigue syndrome for conditions like myalgic encephalomyelitis and effort syndrome in the paper by Lynch and colleagues (August Journal, p.339) is difficult to understand. The differences between these disorders are so marked, that an umbrella term is destined to be both confusing and misleading.

The emphasis on the term fatigue is unfortunate for many reasons. First; research has shown that only a tiny proportion of people with unexplained fatigue fulfil the standard diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis. (1) Secondly, Lynch and colleagues’ definition of chronic fatigue syndrome is too broad to distinguish people with myalgic encephalomyelitis from those who are feeling run down or depressed or suffering from the more common and less severe post-viral syndrome. Thirdly, the term trivializes the illness. Everyone gets tired now and then and most people find it hard to understand how some may be disabled by it. In our view, the name suggests something which is tolerable and volitional, requiring little more than adequate rest and a positive attitude. What the term fails to communicate is that the fatigue reported by people with myalgic encephalomyelitis is severe and debilitating; that it is unlike anything most of them have experienced before and that it is often associated with an intense influenza-like malaise. (2’3) We therefore agree with English that as far as myalgic encephalomyelitis is concerned, ‘fatigue is the most pathetically inadequate term’. (2)

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371802/pdf/brjgenprac00062-0041.pdf

 

Source: Goudsmit EM, Macintyre A, Sullivan M. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Nov;41(352):479-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371802/

 

Is chronic fatigue syndrome synonymous with effort syndrome?

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), including myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and postviral syndrome (PVS), is a term used today to describe a condition of incapacity for making and sustaining effort, associated with a wide range of symptoms. None of the reviews of CFS has provided a proper consideration of the effort syndrome caused by chronic habitual hyperventilation.

In 100 consecutive patients, whose CFS had been attributed to ME or PVS, the time course of their illness and the respiratory psychophysiological studies were characteristic of chronic habitual hyperventilation in 93.

It is suggested that the labels ‘CFS’, ‘ME’ or ‘PVS’ should be withheld until chronic habitual hyperventilation – for which conventional rehabilitation is available – has been definitively excluded.

 

Source: Rosen SD, King JC, Wilkinson JB, Nixon PG. Is chronic fatigue syndrome synonymous with effort syndrome? J R Soc Med. 1990 Dec;83(12):761-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2125315

 

Aerobic work capacity in chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on Aerobic work capacity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1990]

SIR,

The data of Dr Marshall S Riley and colleagues (1) are consistent with our findings (2) that most patients referred with the chronic fatigue syndrome have the effort syndrome-that is, chronic hyperventilation as a consequence of excessive effort and distress.(3)

May we draw attention to three points. Dr Riley and colleagues concluded that the patients could not be hyperventilating because their values of end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide at rest and at peak exercise did not differ significantly from those of the controls.

In our opinion the values published for the controls (35 8 mmHg at rest and 36-3 mmHg at peak exercise) are too low to be accepted as normal. The finding that the patients reached their anaerobic threshold far quicker than did the controls is consistent with the early acidosis on exertion known to occur in chronic hyperventilation. This is a consequence of the depletion of the body’s buffer base reserves,(4) brought about by renal compensation for chronic respiratory alkalosis.(5)

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1664329/pdf/bmj00207-0055b.pdf

 

Source: Rosen SD, King JC, Wilkinson JB, Nixon PG. Aerobic work capacity in chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1990 Nov 24;301(6762):1217. [Comment] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1664329/

 

Myalgic encephalomyelitis

Note: This letter appeared in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine in March 1990.

 

We accept that Martin Lev (November 1989 JRSM, p 693) is correct to point out that the anxiety and depression noted in patients labelled as suffering from ‘ME’ are the consequence of ‘underlying organic processes’. The demonstration of hyperventilation in the overwhelming majority of these patients (Rosen SD, King JC, Nixon PGF, unpublished results), provides a clear metabolic reason for the anxiety (1-3). ‘Depression’ is a predictable reaction to the inability to make and sustain effort due in part to the ease of acidosis of muscle cells depleted of buffer base reserves(4).

We agree with Sargant(5), that the sufferers from the late stages of effort syndrome, who have nothing to gain from their ill health and much to lose, are among the most gifted and energetic of people, and consequently the most upset about the frustration caused by loss of performance.

~S D ROSEN Cardiac Registrar

~J C KING Honorary Head Occupational Therapist (Research)

~P G F NIXON Consultant Cardiologist Charing Cross Hospital London

 

 References

1 Lewis T, et al. Breathlessness in soldiers suffering from irritable heart. Br Med J 14 October 1916:517-19

2 Lum LC. The syndrome of chronic habitual hyperventilation. In: Hill OW, ed. Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine, vol. 3. London: Butterworths, 1976: 196-230

3 Groen JJ. The measurement of emotion and arousal in the clinical physiological laboratory and in medical practice. In: Levi L, ed. The emotions: their parameters and measurement. New York: Raven Press, 1975:727-46

4 Rosen SD, King JC, Nixon PGF. Magnetic resonance muscle studies. J R Soc Med 1988;81:676-7 5 Sargant W. Battle for the mind Aphysiology ofconversion and brain-washing. London: Heinemann 1957

 

Source:  Rosen, SD, King, JC, Nixon, PGF. Myalgic encephalomyelitis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 83 March 1990.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292587/