Tag: covid-19

Regulatory T Cells (Tregs) and COVID-19: Unveiling the Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Potentialities with a Special Focus on Long COVID

Abstract:

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused havoc all around the world. The causative agent of COVID-19 is the novel form of the coronavirus (CoV) named SARS-CoV-2, which results in immune system disruption, increased inflammation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). T cells have been important components of the immune system, which decide the fate of the COVID-19 disease. Recent studies have reported an important subset of T cells known as regulatory T cells (Tregs), which possess immunosuppressive and immunoregulatory properties and play a crucial role in the prognosis of COVID-19 disease.
Recent studies have shown that COVID-19 patients have considerably fewer Tregs than the general population. Such a decrement may have an impact on COVID-19 patients in a number of ways, including diminishing the effect of inflammatory inhibition, creating an inequality in the Treg/Th17 percentage, and raising the chance of respiratory failure. Having fewer Tregs may enhance the likelihood of long COVID development in addition to contributing to the disease’s poor prognosis.
Additionally, tissue-resident Tregs provide tissue repair in addition to immunosuppressive and immunoregulatory activities, which may aid in the recovery of COVID-19 patients. The severity of the illness is also linked to abnormalities in the Tregs’ phenotype, such as reduced expression of FoxP3 and other immunosuppressive cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-beta.
Hence, in this review, we summarize the immunosuppressive mechanisms and their possible roles in the prognosis of COVID-19 disease. Furthermore, the perturbations in Tregs have been associated with disease severity. The roles of Tregs are also explained in the long COVID. This review also discusses the potential therapeutic roles of Tregs in the management of patients with COVID-19.
Source: Dhawan M, Rabaan AA, Alwarthan S, Alhajri M, Halwani MA, Alshengeti A, Najim MA, Alwashmi ASS, Alshehri AA, Alshamrani SA, AlShehail BM, Garout M, Al-Abdulhadi S, Al-Ahmed SH, Thakur N, Verma G. Regulatory T Cells (Tregs) and COVID-19: Unveiling the Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Potentialities with a Special Focus on Long COVID. Vaccines. 2023; 11(3):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030699 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/3/699 (Full text)

Immunometabolic rewiring in long COVID patients with chronic headache

Abstract:

Almost 20% of patients with COVID-19 experience long-term effects, known as post-COVID condition or long COVID. Among many lingering neurologic symptoms, chronic headache is the most common. Despite this health concern, the etiology of long COVID headache is still not well characterized. Here, we present a longitudinal multi-omics analysis of blood leukocyte transcriptomics, plasma proteomics and metabolomics of long COVID patients with chronic headache. L

ong COVID patients experienced a state of hyper-inflammation prior to chronic headache onset and maintained persistent inflammatory activation throughout the progression of chronic headache. Metabolomic analysis also revealed augmented arginine and lipid metabolisms, skewing towards a nitric oxide-based pro-inflammation. Furthermore, metabolisms of neurotransmitters including serotonin, dopamine, glutamate, and GABA were markedly dysregulated during the progression of long COVID headache.

Overall, these findings illustrate the immuno-metabolomics landscape of long COVID patients with chronic headache, which may provide insights to potential therapeutic interventions.

Source: Foo SS, Chen W, Jung KL, Azamor T, Choi UY, Zhang P, Comhair SA, Erzurum SC, Jehi L, Jung JU. Immunometabolic rewiring in long COVID patients with chronic headache. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Mar 6:2023.03.06.531302. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.06.531302. PMID: 36945569; PMCID: PMC10028820. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.06.531302v1.full (Full text)

Post-COVID-19 condition at 6 months and COVID-19 vaccination in non-hospitalised children and young people

Abstract:

Objectives: To describe the physical and mental health of children and young people (CYP) 6 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and explore whether this varies by COVID-19 vaccination.

Design: A non-hospitalised, national cohort of people aged 11-17 years old with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and PCR negatives matched at study invitation, by age, sex, region and date of testing who completed questionnaires 6 months after PCR testing. The questionnaire included 21 symptoms and standardised scales (eg, EQ-5D-Y and Chalder Fatigue Scale).

Results: 6407 test-positive and 6542 test-negative CYP completed the 6-month questionnaire: 60.9% of test-positive vs 43.2% of test-negative CYP reported at least one symptom 6 months post-test; 27.6% of test-positive vs 15.9% of test-negative CYP reported 3+ symptoms. Common symptoms at 6 months were tiredness and shortness of breath among both test-positive and test-negative CYP; however, the prevalence of both was higher in test-positive (38.4% and 22.8%, respectively) compared with test-negative CYP (26.7% and 10.9%, respectively). 24.5% test-positive vs 17.8% test-negative CYP met the Delphi research definition of long COVID. Mental health, well-being, fatigue and health-related quality of life scores were similar among test-positive and test-negative CYP 6 months post-test. Similarly, symptomatology was similar among COVID-19-vaccinated and COVID-19-unvaccinated test-positive and test-negative CYP.

Conclusions: Six-months post-PCR testing, CYP who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 had similar symptoms to those who tested negative, but test-positive CYP had higher symptom prevalence. Mental health, well-being, fatigue and health-related quality of life were similar among test-positive and test-negative CYP, and symptoms at 6 months were similar in COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Source: Pinto Pereira SM, Nugawela MD, Rojas NK, Shafran R, McOwat K, Simmons R, Ford T, Heyman I, Ladhani SN, Cheung EY, Fox-Smith L, Dalrymple E, Stephenson T. Post-COVID-19 condition at 6 months and COVID-19 vaccination in non-hospitalised children and young people. Arch Dis Child. 2023 Apr;108(4):289-295. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324656. Epub 2023 Jan 4. PMID: 36599625. https://adc.bmj.com/content/108/4/289.long (Full text)

Neurological Dysfunction in Long COVID Should Not Be Labelled as Functional Neurological Disorder

Abstract:

There have been suggestions that Long COVID might be purely functional (meaning psychological) in origin. Labelling patients with neurological dysfunction in Long COVID as having functional neurological disorder (FND) in the absence of proper testing may be symptomatic of that line of thought. This practice is problematic for Long COVID patients, as motor and balance symptoms have been reported to occur in Long COVID frequently.
FND is characterized by the presentation of symptoms that seem neurological but lack compatibility of the symptom with a neurological substrate. Although diagnostic classification according to the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR is dependent predominantly on the exclusion of any other medical condition that could account for the symptoms, current neurological practice of FND classification allows for such comorbidity. As a consequence, Long COVID patients with motor and balance symptoms mislabeled as FND have no longer access to Long COVID care, whereas treatment for FND is seldom provided and is ineffective.
Research into underlying mechanisms and diagnostic methods should explore how to determine whether motor and balance symptoms currently diagnosed as FND should be considered one part of Long COVID symptoms, in other words, one component of symptomatology, and in which cases they correctly represent FND. Research into rehabilitation models, treatment and integrated care are needed, which should take into account biological underpinnings as well as possible psychological mechanisms and the patient perspective.
Source: Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Moriarty AS, Strain WD. Neurological Dysfunction in Long COVID Should Not Be Labelled as Functional Neurological Disorder. Viruses. 2023; 15(3):783. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030783 https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/15/3/783 (Full text)

Pooled Prevalence of Long COVID-19 Symptoms at 12 Months and Above Follow-Up Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract:

Current data suggests that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors experience long-lasting problems. It is not yet understood how long these symptoms last. The goal of this study was to compile all the data that was currently available to evaluate COVID-19’s long-term effects at 12 months and above.

We looked for studies published by December 15, 2022, in PubMed and Embase that discussed follow-up findings for COVID-19 survivors who had been alive for at least a year. A random-effect model was carried out to determine the combined prevalence of different long-COVID symptoms. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the risk of bias for the included studies, and the I2 statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity. After reviewing 3,209 studies, 46 were deemed admissible, with an aggregate COVID-19 population of 17976.

At 12 months and above, 57% of patients reported a minimum of one symptom, and the five most prevalent symptoms were: dyspnea on exertion (34%, 95% CI 0.2; 0.94); difficulty in concentration (32%, 95% CI 0.16; 0.52); fatigue (31%, 95% CI 0.22; 0.40); frailty (31%, 95% CI 0.06; 0.78); and arthromyalgia (28%, 95% CI 0.09; 0.6). The findings of the present study showed that at 12 months and beyond, a sizable fraction of COVID-19 survivors still have lasting symptoms that impair several body systems. Long-COVID patients require an urgent understanding of pathophysiological processes and the development of tailored treatments.

Source: Mudgal S K, Gaur R, Rulaniya S, et al. (March 18, 2023) Pooled Prevalence of Long COVID-19 Symptoms at 12 Months and Above Follow-Up Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 15(3): e36325. doi:10.7759/cureus.36325 https://www.cureus.com/articles/143288-pooled-prevalence-of-long-covid-19-symptoms-at-12-months-and-above-follow-up-period-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis#!/ (Full text)

A Review of Possible Supplements to Relieve the Symptoms of Fatigue after COVID-19

Abstract:

Background: The highly infectious coronavirus has become a global pandemic; the effective medication is yet to be developed. The health care system was strained; millions of people have been suffered from infection and complications. Post COVID-19 fatigue is a dominant characteristic of coronavirus infection. It affects general state of health, muscle strength, sleeping quality, mental health, and life quality. This paper is emphasizing and summarizing the potential beneficial supplementations of post COVID-19 fatigue symptoms.

Methods: The knowledge gained from PubMed and from the National Library of Medicine. Clinical studies and systematic review articles were collected in this topic.

Results: Herein, we discuss the possible therapeutic supplementations with anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antioxidant effect. Vitamin complexes, trace elements, antioxidants, coenzymes, probiotics, essential fatty acids; one and creatine as amino acid derivatives have been appeared to be effective in relieving post COVID-19 fatigue symptoms.

Conclusions: Based on the data, these nutrients and supplements might be important to alleviate the post COVID-19 fatigue symptoms and they could be considered as a supportive therapy

Source: Boglárka Bernadett Tisza, Gyöngyi Iván, Viola Keczeli, Melinda Kóró, Patricia Szántóri, Zsófia Gyócsiné Varga, Henriett Müller, Olivia Pribéli, Zoltán Szabó, Zsófia Verzár, Monika Sélleyné Gyuró, Andrea Gubicskóné Kisbendek and Tímea Stromájer-Rácz. A Review of Possible Supplements to Relieve the Symptoms of Fatigue after COVID-19.  J Med Public Health. 2023;4(2):JMPH-04-1062. https://www.medtextpublications.com/open-access/a-review-of-possible-supplements-to-relieve-the-symptoms-of-1309.pdf (Full text)

The prevalence of stigma in a UK community survey of people with lived experience of long COVID

Abstract:

Background: Stigma can be experienced as perceived or actual disqualification from social and institutional acceptance on the basis of one or more physical, health-related, behavioural, or other attributes deemed to be undesirable. Long COVID is a predominantly multisystem condition that occurs in people with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, often resulting in functional disability, which limits day-to-day activities. We aimed to quantify the burden of stigma experienced in a community-based sample of people with lived experience of long COVID.

Methods: Data from the follow-up of a long COVID longitudinal online survey was used. The survey was coproduced with people living with long COVID. 13 questions on stigma were included to develop a Long COVID Stigma Scale capturing three domains: enacted (overt experiences of discrimination due to long COVID), internalised (internalising negative associations with long COVID and accepting them as self-applicable), and anticipated (expectation of bias or poor treatment by others) stigma. Data were collected through a social media survey with convenience non-probability sampling.

Findings: 966 (47·9%) of 2016 participants from the UK completed the follow-up survey and 888 responded to the questions on stigma. The mean age of respondents was 48·3 years (SD 10·7), and 84·6% identified as female. Roughly half (n=460, 50·4%) reported having a formal, clinical, long COVID diagnosis, and of these, 440 responded to the questions on stigma. The prevalence of people experiencing overall stigma at least sometimes was 95·4% (n=847), prevalence of enacted stigma was 62·7% (n=557), internalised stigma was 86·4% (n=767), and anticipated stigma was 90·8% (n=806). Prevalence of stigma was higher in respondents with a formal diagnosis of long COVID (97·5%; n=429) than in those without (93·2%; n=413).

Interpretation: This study highlights widespread and multilayered stigmas experienced by people living with long COVID in the UK, which presents a serious public health concern. The broader literature on stigmatised health conditions consistently suggests that stigma drives people away from health services, contributes to psychological distress, and compromises long-term physical outcomes. The higher proportion experiencing stigma in those with clinical diagnosis of long COVID might be indicative of stigma within the health-care system. Findings from this study should be taken into consideration within clinical practice and health care, social care, employment, and education policies.

Source: Pantelic M, Ziauddeen N, Boyes M, O’Hara ME, Hastie C, Alwan NA. The prevalence of stigma in a UK community survey of people with lived experience of long COVID. Lancet. 2022 Nov;400 Suppl 1:S84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02294-2. Epub 2022 Nov 24. PMID: 36930033. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02294-2/fulltext

The cost of primary care consultations associated with long COVID in non-hospitalised adults: a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data

Abstract:

Objectives To assess incremental costs of primary care consultations associated with post-Covid-19 condition or long COVID, to estimate associated national costs for the United Kingdom population, and to assess risk factors associated with increased costs.

Design A retrospective cohort study using a propensity score matching approach with an incremental cost method to estimate primary care consultation costs associated with long COVID.

Setting UK based primary care general practitioner (GP), nurse and physiotherapist consultation data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum primary care database from 31st January 2020 to 15th April 2021.

Participants 472,173 non-hospitalised adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were 1:1 propensity score matched to a pool of eligible patients with the same index date, the same number of prior consultations, and similar background characteristics, but without a record of COVID-19. Patients diagnosed with Long COVID (3,871) and those with World Health Organisation (WHO) defined symptoms of long COVID (30,174) formed two subgroups within the cohort with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main outcome measures Costs were calculated using a bottom-up costing approach with consultation cost per working hour in pound sterling (£) obtained from the Personal Social Services Research Unit’s Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2021. The average incremental cost in comparison to patients with no record of COVID-19 was produced for each patient group, considering only consultation costs at least 12 weeks from the SARS-CoV-2 infection date or matched date for the comparator group (from 15th April 2020 to 15th April 2021). A sensitivity analysis was undertaken which restricted the study population to only those who had at least 24 weeks of follow-up. National costs were estimated by extrapolating incremental costs to the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in the UK Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey. The impacts of risk factors on the cost of consultations beyond 12 weeks from SARS-CoV-2 infection were assessed using an econometric ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, where coefficients were interpreted as the percentage change in cost due to a unit increase in the specific factor.

Results The incremental cost of primary care consultations potentially associated with long COVID was £2.44 per patient with COVID-19 per year. This increased to £5.72 in the sensitivity analysis. Extrapolating this to the UK population produced a cost estimate of £23,382,452 (90% credible interval: £21,378,567 to £25,526,052) or £54,814,601 (90% credible interval: £50,116,967 to £59,839,762) in the sensitivity analysis. Among patients with COVID-19 infection, a long COVID diagnosis and longer-term reporting of symptoms were associated with a 43% and 44% increase in primary care consultation costs respectively, compared to patients without long COVID symptoms. Older age (49% relative increase in costs in those aged 80 years or older compared to those aged 18 to 29 years), female sex (4% relative increase in costs compared to males), obesity (4% relative increase in costs compared to those of normal weight), comorbidities and the number of prior consultations were all associated with an increase in the cost of primary care consultations. By contrast, those from black ethnic groups had a 6% reduced relative cost compared to those from white ethnic groups.

Conclusions The costs of primary care consultations associated with long COVID in non-hospitalised adults are substantial. Costs are significantly higher among those diagnosed with long COVID, those with long COVID symptoms, older adults, females, and those with obesity and comorbidities.

What is already known on this topic?

  • Long COVID is a global public health challenge, with millions of people affected worldwide.

  • People with a history of long COVID use health services, including primary care, at a higher rate than uninfected individuals even beyond the period of acute infection.

  • The cost of this increased healthcare use is unknown, impeding planning and forecasting of resource requirements needed to adequately support people with long COVID.

What this study adds?

  • Beyond 12 weeks from acute infection, non-hospitalised adults with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection cost primary care services an additional £2.44 per patient per year greater on average than patients with no prior evidence of infection.

  • Due to the high incidence of COVID-19, this represents a substantial cost to primary care services, in the UK exceeding £20 million for consultations associated with long COVID.

  • These incremental costs are greater in those with a formal diagnosis of long COVID, those reporting related symptoms, older adults, females, and those with obesity.

Source: Jake Tufts, Dawit T Zemedikun,  Anuradhaa Subramanian,  Naijie Guan,  Krishna Gokhale,  Puja Myles,  Tim Williams,  Tom Marshall, Melanie Calvert, Karen Matthews, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Louise Jackson, Shamil Haroon. The cost of primary care consultations associated with long COVID in non-hospitalised adults: a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data. medRxiv 2023.03.12.23287049; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.12.23287049 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.03.12.23287049v1.full-text

Severe Course of COVID-19 and Long-COVID-19 in Children: Difficulties in Diagnosis

Abstract:

The question of COVID-19 and long-COVID-19 course in children remains unsolved. This infection in children, which is associated with COVID-19, can vary from asymptomatic to systemic damage of various systems. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, associated with SARS-CoV-2 (MIS-C), is a serious condition in children and adolescents after experiencing COVID-19.
Published data on MIS-C have indicated that the inflammation can be registered in the gastrointestinal tract (60–100%), as well as in cardiovascular (80%), nervous (29–58%), and respiratory (21–65%) systems. However, with the changing characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, the manifestations of COVID-19 and long-COVID-19 in children have also been changing. Currently, there is no clear understanding of the development of severe COVID-19 and MIS-C in children, especially after being exposed to patients with COVID-19.
We presented two new clinical courses of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with severe multisystem damage after close contact to relatives with COVID-19 or long-COVID-19. Thus, high-risk children, who are positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection after contact with COVID-19 patients, should be clinically managed during the first few months. The identification of the disease complexity requires the involvement of neurologists, cardiologists, and other specialists.
Source: Vasichkina E, Kofeynikova O, Fetisova S, Starshinova AY, Sheyanova E, Vershinina T, Ryzhkov A, Skripnik A, Alekseeva D, Nechaeva E, Glushkova A, Kudlay D, Pervunina T, Starshinova A. Severe Course of COVID-19 and Long-COVID-19 in Children: Difficulties in Diagnosis. Life. 2023; 13(3):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030781 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/3/781 (Full text)

Nutritional deficiencies that may predispose to long COVID

Abstract:

Multiple nutritional deficiencies (MND) confound studies designed to assess the role of a single nutrient in contributing to the initiation and progression of disease states. Despite the perception of many healthcare practitioners, up to 25% of Americans are deficient in five-or-more essential nutrients. Stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic further increases the prevalence of deficiency states. Viral infections compete for crucial nutrients with immune cells. Viral replication and proliferation of immunocompetent cells critical to the host response require these essential nutrients, including zinc. Clinical studies have linked levels of more than 22 different dietary components to the likelihood of COVID-19 infection and the severity of the disease. People at higher risk of infection due to MND are also more likely to have long-term sequelae, known as Long COVID.

Source: Schloss, J.V. Nutritional deficiencies that may predispose to long COVID. Inflammopharmacol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01183-3 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10787-023-01183-3 (Full text)