Tag: covid-19

Oxytocin, the panacea for long-COVID? a review

Abstract:

Objectives: In this hypothesis paper we explore the underlying mechanisms for long-COVID and how the oxytocinergic neurones could be infected by SARS-CoV-2 leading to a reduction in plasma oxytocin (OXT). Furthermore, we aim to review the relevance of OXT and hypothalamic function in recovery from long-COVID symptoms and pathology, through exploring the pro-health effects of the OXT neuropeptide.

Methods: A review of published literature was surveyed using Google Scholar and PubMed.

Results: Numerous experimental data can be shown to correlate with OXT and long-COVID symptoms and conditions, thus providing strong circumstantial evidence to support our hypothesis. It is postulated that the reduction in plasma OXT due to acute and post-viral damage to the hypothalamus and oxytocinergic neurones contributes to the variable multi-system, remitting and relapsing nature of long-COVID. The intranasal route of OXT application was determined to be most appropriate and clinically relevant for the restoration of oxytocinergic function post COVID-19 infection.

Conclusions: We believe it is imperative to further investigate whether OXT alleviates the prolonged suffering of patients with long-COVID. Succinctly, OXT may be the much-needed post-pandemic panacea.

Source: Diep, Phuoc-Tan, Chaudry, Mohammed, Dixon, Adam, Chaudry, Faisal and Kasabri, Violet. “Oxytocin, the panacea for long-COVID? a review” Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation, vol. , no. , 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2021-0034 (Full text)

Trajectory of long covid symptoms after covid-19 vaccination: community based cohort study

Abstract:

Objective: To estimate associations between covid-19 vaccination and long covid symptoms in adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: Community dwelling population, UK.

Participants: 28 356 participants in the Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey aged 18-69 years who received at least one dose of an adenovirus vector or mRNA covid-19 vaccine after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main outcome measure: Presence of long covid symptoms at least 12 weeks after infection over the follow-up period 3 February to 5 September 2021.

Results: Mean age of participants was 46 years, 55.6% (n=15 760) were women, and 88.7% (n=25 141) were of white ethnicity. Median follow-up was 141 days from first vaccination (among all participants) and 67 days from second vaccination (83.8% of participants). 6729 participants (23.7%) reported long covid symptoms of any severity at least once during follow-up. A first vaccine dose was associated with an initial 12.8% decrease (95% confidence interval -18.6% to -6.6%, P<0.001) in the odds of long covid, with subsequent data compatible with both increases and decreases in the trajectory (0.3% per week, 95% confidence interval -0.6% to 1.2% per week, P=0.51). A second dose was associated with an initial 8.8% decrease (95% confidence interval -14.1% to -3.1%, P=0.003) in the odds of long covid, with a subsequent decrease by 0.8% per week (-1.2% to -0.4% per week, P<0.001). Heterogeneity was not found in associations between vaccination and long covid by sociodemographic characteristics, health status, hospital admission with acute covid-19, vaccine type (adenovirus vector or mRNA), or duration from SARS-CoV-2 infection to vaccination.

Conclusions: The likelihood of long covid symptoms was observed to decrease after covid-19 vaccination and evidence suggested sustained improvement after a second dose, at least over the median follow-up of 67 days. Vaccination may contribute to a reduction in the population health burden of long covid, although longer follow-up is needed.

Source: Ayoubkhani D, Bermingham C, Pouwels KB, Glickman M, Nafilyan V, Zaccardi F, Khunti K, Alwan NA, Walker AS. Trajectory of long covid symptoms after covid-19 vaccination: community based cohort study. BMJ. 2022 May 18;377:e069676. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069676. PMID: 35584816; PMCID: PMC9115603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115603/ (Full text)

Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) Has Potential as a Novel Method for Long COVID Treatment

Abstract:

COVID-19 often causes sequelae after initial recovery, referred to collectively as long COVID. Long COVID is considered to be caused by the persistence of chronic inflammation after acute COVID-19 infection. We found that all long COVID patients had residual inflammation in the epipharynx, an important site of coronavirus replication, and some long COVID symptoms are similar to those associated with chronic epipharyngitis.

Epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) is a treatment for chronic epipharyngitis in Japan that involves applying zinc chloride as an anti-inflammatory agent to the epipharyngeal mucosa. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of EAT for the treatment of long COVID. The subjects in this study were 58 patients with long COVID who were treated with EAT in the outpatient department once a week for one month (mean age = 38.4 ± 12.9 years). The intensities of fatigue, headache, and attention disorder, which are reported as frequent symptoms of long COVID, were assessed before and after EAT using the visual analog scale (VAS).

EAT reduced inflammation in the epipharynx and significantly improved the intensity of fatigue, headache, and attention disorder, which may be related to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). These results suggest that EAT has potential as a novel method for long COVID treatment.

Source: Imai K, Yamano T, Nishi S, Nishi R, Nishi T, Tanaka H, Tsunoda T, Yoshimoto S, Tanaka A, Hiromatsu K, Shirasawa S, Nakagawa T, Nishi K. Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) Has Potential as a Novel Method for Long COVID Treatment. Viruses. 2022 Apr 27;14(5):907. doi: 10.3390/v14050907. PMID: 35632649. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/907/htm (Full text)

The Impact of COVID Vaccination on Symptoms of Long COVID: An International Survey of People with Lived Experience of Long COVID

Abstract:

Long COVID is a multi-system syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection with persistent symptoms of at least 4 weeks, and frequently for several months. It has been suggested that there may be an autoimmune component. There has been an understandable caution amongst some people experiencing long COVID that, by boosting their immune response, a COVID vaccine may exacerbate their symptoms. We aimed to survey people living with long COVID, evaluating the impact of their first COVID vaccination on their symptoms.

Methods: Patients with long COVID were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire through postings on social media and direct mailing from support groups. Basic demographics, range and severity of long COVID symptoms, before and after their vaccine, were surveyed.

Results: 900 people participated in the questionnaire, of whom 45 had pre-existing myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) but no evidence of COVID infection, and a further 43 did not complete the survey in full. The demographics and symptomology of the remaining 812 people were similar to those recorded by the UK Office of National Statistics. Following vaccination, 57.9% of participants reported improvements in symptoms, 17.9% reported deterioration and the remainder no change. There was considerable individual variation in responses. Larger improvements in symptom severity scores were seen in those receiving the mRNA vaccines compared to adenoviral vector vaccines.

Conclusions: Our survey suggests COVID-19 vaccination may improve long COVID patients, on average. The observational nature of the survey limits drawing direct causal inference, but requires validation with a randomised controlled trial.

Source: Strain WD, Sherwood O, Banerjee A, Van der Togt V, Hishmeh L, Rossman J. The Impact of COVID Vaccination on Symptoms of Long COVID: An International Survey of People with Lived Experience of Long COVID. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;10(5):652. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050652. PMID: 35632408. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/5/652  (Full text)

LOng COvid Multidisciplinary consortium Optimising Treatments and servIces acrOss the NHS (LOCOMOTION): protocol for a mixed-methods study in the UK

Abstract:

Introduction: Long COVID, a new condition whose origins and natural history are not yet fully established, currently affects 1.5 million people in the UK. Most do not have access to specialist long COVID services. We seek to optimise long COVID care both within and outside specialist clinics, including improving access, reducing inequalities, helping self-management and providing guidance and decision support for primary care. We aim to establish a ‘gold standard’ of care by systematically analysing current practices, iteratively improving pathways and systems of care.

Methods and analysis: This mixed-methods, multisite study is informed by the principles of applied health services research, quality improvement, co-design, outcome measurement and learning health systems. It was developed in close partnership with patients (whose stated priorities are prompt clinical assessment; evidence-based advice and treatment and help with returning to work and other roles) and with front-line clinicians. Workstreams and tasks to optimise assessment, treatment and monitoring are based in three contrasting settings: workstream 1 (qualitative research, up to 100 participants), specialist management in 10 long COVID clinics across the UK, via a quality improvement collaborative, experience-based co-design and targeted efforts to reduce inequalities of access, return to work and peer support; workstream 2 (quantitative research, up to 5000 participants), patient self-management at home, technology-supported monitoring and validation of condition-specific outcome measures and workstream 3 (quantitative research, up to 5000 participants), generalist management in primary care, harnessing electronic record data to study population phenotypes and develop evidence-based decision support, referral pathways and analysis of costs. Study governance includes an active patient advisory group.

Ethics and dissemination: LOng COvid Multidisciplinary consortium Optimising Treatments and servIces acrOss the NHS study is sponsored by the University of Leeds and approved by Yorkshire & The Humber-Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/YH/0276). Participants will provide informed consent. Dissemination plans include academic and lay publications, and partnerships with national and regional policymakers.

Source: Sivan M, Greenhalgh T, Darbyshire JL, Mir G, O’Connor RJ, Dawes H, Greenwood D, O’Connor D, Horton M, Petrou S, de Lusignan S, Curcin V, Mayer E, Casson A, Milne R, Rayner C, Smith N, Parkin A, Preston N, Delaney B; LOCOMOTION consortium. LOng COvid Multidisciplinary consortium Optimising Treatments and servIces acrOss the NHS (LOCOMOTION): protocol for a mixed-methods study in the UK. BMJ Open. 2022 May 17;12(5):e063505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063505. PMID: 35580970; PMCID: PMC9114312. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114312/ (Full text)

Long COVID – One Year On

Abstract:

Long COVID is now a recognized complication of acute COVID-19 infection. As the COVID-19 pandemic moves into its third year, the prevalence of Long COVID continues to increase. Many individuals report symptoms lasting longer than a year, and a subset of this group is unable to work. This article will provide an update on Long COVID, with a particular focus on distinguishing it from other clinical entities. It will review several proposed disease mechanisms and will attempt to anticipate the impact on disability insurance.

Source: Timothy Meagher; Long COVID – One Year On. J Insur Med 2022; doi: https://doi.org/10.17849/insm-49-3-1-6.1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Serum NGF and BDNF in Long-COVID-19 Adolescents: A Pilot Study

Abstract:

COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 19) is an infectious disease also known as an acute respiratory syndrome caused by the SARS-CoV-2. Although in children and adolescents SARS-CoV-2 infection produces mostly mild or moderate symptoms, in a certain percentage of recovered young people a condition of malaise, defined as long-COVID-19, remains. To date, the risk factors for the development of long-COVID-19 are not completely elucidated. Neurotrophins such as NGF (Nerve Growth Factor) and BDNF (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor) are known to regulate not only neuronal growth, survival and plasticity, but also to influence cardiovascular, immune, and endocrine systems in physiological and/or pathological conditions; to date only a few papers have discussed their potential role in COVID-19.

In the present pilot study, we aimed to identify NGF and BDNF changes in the serum of a small cohort of male and female adolescents that contracted the infection during the second wave of the pandemic (between September and October 2020), notably in the absence of available vaccines. Blood withdrawal was carried out when the recruited adolescents tested negative for the SARS-CoV-2 (“post-infected COVID-19”), 30 to 35 days after the last molecular test. According to their COVID-19 related outcomes, the recruited individuals were divided into three groups: asymptomatics, acute symptomatics and symptomatics that over time developed long-COVID-19 symptoms (“future long-COVID-19”). As a control group, we analyzed the serum of age-matched healthy controls that did not contract the infection. Inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, TGF-β), MCP-1, IL-1α, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12) were also analyzed with the free oxygen radicals’ presence as an oxidative stress index.

We showed that NGF serum content was lower in post-infected-COVID-19 individuals when compared to healthy controls; BDNF levels were found to be higher compared to healthy individuals only in post-infected-COVID-19 symptomatic and future long-COVID-19 girls, leaving the BDNF levels unchanged in asymptomatic individuals if compared to controls. Oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers were unchanged in male and female adolescents, except for TGF-β that, similarly to BDNF, was higher in post-infected-COVID-19 symptomatic and future long-COVID-19 girls. We predicted that NGF and/or BDNF could be used as early biomarkers of COVID-19 morbidity in adolescents.

Source: Petrella C, Nenna R, Petrarca L, Tarani F, Paparella R, Mancino E, Di Mattia G, Conti MG, Matera L, Bonci E, Ceci FM, Ferraguti G, Gabanella F, Barbato C, Di Certo MG, Cavalcanti L, Minni A, Midulla F, Tarani L, Fiore M. Serum NGF and BDNF in Long-COVID-19 Adolescents: A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 7;12(5):1162. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051162. PMID: 35626317. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/5/1162/htm (Full text)

Neuropsychological measures of “Long COVID-19 Fog” in older subjects

Abstract:

Covid-19 is known to impact older people more severely and to cause a number of persistent symptoms during the recovery phase, including cognitive and neurological ones. We investigated the cognitive and neurological features of 100 elderly patients with confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19 evaluated in the post-acute phase through a direct neuropsychological evaluation consisting on Mini Mental State Examination and other 8 neuropsychological tests. Overall, a total of 33 subjects were found to perform at a level considered to be pathological; more specifically, 33%, 23% and 20% failed on Trial Making, Digit Span Backwards and Frontal Evaluation Battery tests respectively.

Source: Alessandra Lauria, Angelo Carfì, Francesca Benvenuto, Giulia Bramato, Francesca Ciciarello, Sara Rocchi, Elisabetta Rota, Andrea Salerno, Leonardo Stella, Marcello Tritto, Antonella Di Paola, Cristina Pais, Matteo Tosato, Delfina Janiri, Gabriele Sani, Francesco Cosimo Pagano, Massimo Fantoni, Roberto Bernabei, Francesco Landi, Alessandra Bizzarro. Neuropsychological measures of “Long COVID-19 Fog” in older subjects. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2022. ISSN 0749-0690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2022.05.003. (Full text available as PDF file)

Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community

Abstract:

Background: In 2020, the long-lasting effects of the Covid-19 virus were not included in public messages of risks to public health. Long Covid emerged as a novel and enigmatic illness with a serious and life-changing impact. Long Covid is poorly explained by objective medical tests, leading to widespread disbelief and stigma associated with the condition. The aim of this organic research is to explore the physical and epistemic challenges of living with Long Covid.

Methods: Unlike any previous pandemic in history, online Covid communities and ‘citizen science’ have played a leading role in advancing our understanding of Long Covid. As patient-led research of this grassroots Covid community, a team approach to thematic analysis was undertaken of 66 patient stories submitted online to covid19-recovery.org at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic between April and September 2020.

Results: The overriding theme of the analysis highlights the complexities and challenges of living with Long Covid. Our distinct themes were identified: the life-changing impact of the condition, the importance of validation and how, for many, seeking alternatives was felt to be their only option.

Conclusions: Long Covid does not easily fit into the dominant evidence-based practice and the biomedical model of health, which rely on objective indicators of the disease process. Patient testimonies are vital to understanding and treating Long Covid, yet patients are frequently disbelieved, and their testimonies are not taken seriously leading to stigma and epistemic injustice, which introduces a lack of trust into the therapeutic relationship.

Patient contribution: The research was undertaken in partnership with our consumer representative(s) and all findings and subsequent recommendations have been coproduced.

Source: Ireson J, Taylor A, Richardson E, Greenfield B, Jones G. Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community. Health Expect. 2022 May 12. doi: 10.1111/hex.13518. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35557480. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.13518 (Full text)

A call to action to enhance understanding of long COVID in long-term care home residents

Letter to the editor:

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted significant vulnerabilities in the long-term care (LTC) sector, with widespread outbreaks and high rates of mortality in LTC homes (including nursing homes and assisted living facilities). In Canada, where our team is based, 81% of all COVID-19 deaths in the first wave of the pandemic were among LTC residents.1 By the end of 2020, there had been ~44,000 COVID-19 cases and 9200 related deaths among residents in Canadian LTC homes.2 Although most LTC residents survived acute COVID-19 infection, this does not mean they escaped the lasting impacts of long COVID. There are few studies investigating COVID-19 survivorship, including long COVID prevalence, management, and outcomes among LTC residents.

There has been increasing recognition and research on post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), commonly known as long COVID. PASC is a complex and poorly defined syndrome with several possible mechanisms (e.g., viral persistence, immune dysregulation, autoimmunity).3 It involves diverse, persistent, and sometimes disabling symptoms lasting for weeks to months following acute COVID-19 infection (e.g., fatigue, shortness of breath, malaise, cough, pain, brain fog).4

Long COVID research is challenged by several factors. First, there is a lack of a globally standardized clinical case definition for long COVID. Some definitions,4 but not all, recognize several phases of long COVID, such as ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (4 to 12 weeks) and post COVID-19 syndrome (≥12 weeks).5 Variations across definitions can inadvertently exclude groups with possible atypical presentation and different clusters of symptoms, such as in older adult and pediatric populations. Second, there lacks consensus on the onset and duration of long COVID symptoms and phases, as well as on the symptoms associated with long COVID. In fact, some studies identify more than 200 different symptoms.6 This hampers health professionals’ ability to diagnose and treat persons experiencing long-term sequelae of COVID-19, which also hinders clinical research on long COVID in particular.

Another shortcoming of long COVID research has been the exclusion of older adults – especially the oldest old (80+ years), those with multiple complex comorbidities, frailty, disability, dementia, and impaired immune function, which are characteristic of LTC residents. Challenges in studying this population include distinguishing between long COVID as a clinical entity separate from anticipated decline when recovering from acute illness, and intersecting mechanisms of advanced aging, pre-existing conditions, and long COVID. One of the few studies7 in older adults found that COVID-19 survivors (65+ years) had a higher risk of new or persistent clinical sequelae compared to non-infected older adults. Furthermore, older adult COVID-19 survivors only had increased risk differences of select sequelae (i.e., respiratory failure, dementia, and post-viral fatigue) compared to a group of older adults with viral lower respiratory tract illness.

Emerging, although limited, research in LTC residents has investigated symptoms, clinical outcomes, and wellbeing of COVID-19 survivors.8–10 However, these studies lack consideration of long COVID in their design and interpretation, such as the etiology, symptoms, and follow-up periods consistent with the current evidence on long COVID. The only study8 to our knowledge on COVID-19 disease trajectories in LTC residents found widespread, prolonged symptoms regardless of symptom severity, but neglected to assess differences in the acute COVID-19 infection versus long COVID phases. COVID-19 survivors in LTC have been found to have poorer outcomes related to malnutrition, weight loss, and frailty compared to non-infected residents.9, 10 Studies have also attributed physical and cognitive decline and depressive symptoms among COVID-19 survivors to the isolation and loneliness due to protective measures in LTC.9

Research design and interpretation of long COVID outcomes for LTC residents require special consideration of their complex comorbidities and diverse physical, psychological, and social care needs (e.g., communication impairments that limit self-reporting of symptoms, long COVID symptoms being attributed to pre-existing conditions).5 There is also a need to explore the impact and possible further exacerbation of policies and practices that were enacted in LTC homes during the pandemic. Given the waves of COVID-19 and its variants, it is also important to consider the impacts of policies and practices at different junctures in time, such as visitation restrictions and pre-vaccinations and boosters for LTC residents.

We make a call to action to the research community to rapidly address the dearth of research about long COVID among residents in LTC homes. The knowledge gaps and challenges outlined above emphasize the need for research to inform guidelines for long COVID management in this unique care context. This must be addressed in a timely fashion considering the ongoing COVID-19 outbreaks in LTC homes and the immense challenges currently faced by the LTC sector.

Source: Sorensen JM, Crooks VA, Freeman S, Carroll S, Davison KM, MacPhee M, Berndt A, Walls J, Mithani A. A call to action to enhance understanding of long COVID in long-term care home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May 14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17889. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35567575. https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.17889 (Full text)