Tag: disability benefits

Austerity and identity formation: How welfare cutbacks condition narratives of sickness

Abstract:

In recent years, Swedish sick insurance has become more restrictive. In this article, we analyse how people not being granted payments, despite being seriously ill, are affected. Scholarship on identity formation and sickness stress the importance of constructing narratives in order to come to terms with one’s situation. Our analysis of 30 qualitative interviews with people diagnosed with ME/CFS shows that workfare politics conditions such identity formation and often prevents it from taking place.

Interviewees describe extreme stress as a result of their contacts with the Social Insurance Agency (SIA), which results in a perpetual crisis that is renewed with each new denied application. In particular, the sense of not having a future means that it is hard to construct narratives to make sense of one’s situation. To escape the perpetual crisis, some people have politicised their situation, constructing a narrative about themselves as suffering from oppressive politics. Others have escaped by not applying for sick insurance or other social insurances. But generally speaking, the most common effect of being denied sick insurance is an ongoing crisis that leads to deteriorating health.

Source: Altermark N, Plesner Å. Austerity and identity formation: How welfare cutbacks condition narratives of sickness. Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Sep;44(8):1270-1286. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13545. Epub 2022 Sep 6. PMID: 36066495. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13545 (Full text)

Long COVID – One Year On

Abstract:

Long COVID is now a recognized complication of acute COVID-19 infection. As the COVID-19 pandemic moves into its third year, the prevalence of Long COVID continues to increase. Many individuals report symptoms lasting longer than a year, and a subset of this group is unable to work. This article will provide an update on Long COVID, with a particular focus on distinguishing it from other clinical entities. It will review several proposed disease mechanisms and will attempt to anticipate the impact on disability insurance.

Source: Timothy Meagher; Long COVID – One Year On. J Insur Med 2022; doi: https://doi.org/10.17849/insm-49-3-1-6.1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Documenting disability in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: According to the 2015 National Academy of Medicine report, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) “is a serious, chronic, complex, and systemic disease that frequently and dramatically limits the activities of affected patients.” ME/CFS affects between 1 and 2.5 million Americans, leaving as many as 75% unable to work due to physical, cognitive and functional impairment. Unfortunately, many doctors and lawyers lack the knowledge of how to properly document an ME/CFS disability claim, leaving patients unable to access disability benefits.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to summarize the approaches used by experienced clinicians and lawyers in successful ME/CFS disability claims.

METHODS: The authors reviewed the types of US disability insurance programs and the evidence commonly required by these programs to demonstrate ME/CFS disability.

RESULTS: This article summarizes the range of methods used in successful US disability claims, which include documentation of the functional impact of post-exertional malaise and the use of methods that provide objective evidence of impairment.

CONCLUSIONS: Medical providers and lawyers can use these tested methods to obtain disability benefits for people with ME/CFS. Physical therapists, occupational therapists, and other specialists play an important role in providing objective evidence for ME/CFS disability claims.

Source: Podell, Richard, Dimmock, Mary E., and Comerford, Barbara B. ‘Documenting Disability in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)’. 1 Jan. 2020 : 339 – 352. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor203178 (Full text)

Documenting Disability in Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

Background: According to the 2015 National Academy of Medicine report, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) “is a serious, chronic, complex, and systemic disease that frequently and dramatically limits the activities of affected patients.” ME/CFS affects between 1 and 2.5 million Americans, leaving as many as 75% unable to work due to physical, cognitive and functional impairment. Unfortunately, many doctors and lawyers lack the knowledge of how to properly document an ME/CFS disability claim, leaving patients unable to access disability benefits.

Objective: The goal of this article is to summarize the approaches used by experienced clinicians and lawyers in successful ME/CFS disability claims.

Methods: The authors reviewed the types of US disability insurance programs and the evidence commonly required by these programs to demonstrate ME/CFS disability.

Results: This article summarizes the range of methods used in successful US disability claims, which include documentation of the functional impact of post-exertional malaise and the use of methods that provide objective evidence of impairment.

Conclusions: Medical providers and lawyers can use these tested methods to obtaining disability benefits for people with ME/CFS. Physical therapists, occupational therapists, and other specialists play an important role in providing objective evidence for ME/CFS disability claims.

Source: Podell R, Dimmock ME, Comerford BB. Documenting disability in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 16]. Work. 2020;10.3233/WOR-203178. doi:10.3233/WOR-203178 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32568153/

Chronic fatigue syndrome comes out of the closet

An Alberta court ruling and new guidelines for physicians issued by the Quebec medical college are giving chronic fatigue syndrome a legitimacy it never before enjoyed. What will this mean for physicians?

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is gaining unprecedented legitimacy in Canada because of a recent Alberta count ruling, new guidelines from the Quebec medical college and recent research suggesting that the syndrome may have a biological basis. There is little doubt these developments will affect physicians across Canada.

Although viewed as a modern phenomenon, CFS was first reported by Hippocrates and has been known this century under various names: myalgic encephalomyelitis, Iceland disease, Epstein-Barr virus and yuppie flu. It has been labelled as CFS since 1988, and is currently estimated to affect 20 000 to 30 000 Canadian adults. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CFS involves chronic fatigue for at least 6 months and a minimum of 4 other symptoms (p. 519). Scientists and doctors have been debating its existence and symptoms for years, but the debate may be winding down because of an Alberta court case (p. 533).

In March an Alberta woman finally won her case against Crown Life when the court ruled that she qualified for long-term disability benefits because of CFS. The well-publicized case emphasized the difficulty physicians have in diagnosing the illness, and the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons hopes to respond with CFS guidelines within a year. Dr. Brian Ward, the assistant registrar in charge of standards, says the college’s interest “began long before the case.” He says it has received frequent complaints from patients with CFS who can’t find physicians willing to treat them or follow their conditions. “They’ve asked us to increase the level of awareness among physicians and to provide education,” says Ward.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1229658/pdf/cmaj_159_5_537.pdf

Comment in:

What causes chronic fatigue? [CMAJ. 1999]

What causes chronic fatigue? [CMAJ. 1999]

 

Source: Sibbald B. Chronic fatigue syndrome comes out of the closet. CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):537-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1229658/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome gets court’s nod of approval as legitimate disorder

Lawyer Karen Capen looks at the implications of a recent Alberta court case involving chronic fatigue syndrome. She thinks Canada’s physicians should pay close attention to this precedent-setting case.

 

Few medical diagnoses are more hotly debated than chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Now, an Alberta court has added to the controversy. In Baillie v. Crown Life, a judge ruled that a women with CFS qualifies for long-term disability benefits.1 Crown Life was ordered to pay benefits to plaintiff Sharon Baillie, a former senior computer systems analyst with the insurance company.

Part of the case dealt with the insurance policy and the time requirements for filing a claim. For physicians, however, the ruling’s importance centres on how difficult it is to diagnose the condition.

This legal recognition of CFS, which the Alberta court handed down in March, should alert doctors of the need to understand the range of symptoms that fall within the condition’s diagnostic profile. The symptoms assigned to CFS generally include at least 6 months of extreme fatigue that reduces a person’s activity by 50% or more. This is accompanied by at least 4 other problems such as aching muscles and joints, headache, sleep disturbances, memory and concentration problems, and sore throat. Although the cause has yet to be determined conclusively, it is thought to involve a virus and/or a weakened immune system.

In recognizing CFS, the Alberta court recognized that a number of medical bodies have done the same thing, including the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1229657/pdf/cmaj_159_5_533.pdf

Comment in:

What causes chronic fatigue? [CMAJ. 1999]

What causes chronic fatigue? [CMAJ. 1999]

 

Source: Capen K. Chronic fatigue syndrome get court’s nod of approval as legitimate disorder. CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):533-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1229657/pdf/cmaj_159_5_533.pdf