Tag: cognitive impairment

Long-Term cognitive dysfunction after the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review

Abstract:

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought a conglomerate of novel chronic disabling conditions described as ‘Long COVID/Post-COVID-19 Syndrome’. Recent evidence suggests that the multifaceted nature of this syndrome results in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary sequelae, chronic dyspnoea, persistent fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction being the most common, debilitating symptoms. Several mechanisms engender or exacerbate cognitive impairment, including central nervous system (CNS) and extra-CNS causes, although the exact mechanism remains unclear. Both hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients may suffer varying degrees of cognitive impairment, ranging from fatigue and brain fog to prolonged deficits in memory and attention, detrimental to the quality-of-life years post-recovery. The aim of this review is to understand the underlying mechanisms, associations, and attempts for prevention with early intervention of long-term cognitive impairment post-COVID-19.

Methodology: A systematic search was conducted through multiple databases such as Medline, National Library of Medicine, Ovid, Scopus database to retrieve all the articles on the long term sequalae of cognitive dysfunction after Sars-Cov2 infection. The inclusion criteria included all articles pertinent to this specific topic and exclusion criteria subtracted studies pertaining to other aetiologies of cognitive dysfunction. This search was carefully screened for duplicates and the relevant information was extracted and analysed.

Results/discussion: To date, the exact pathogenesis, and underlying mechanisms behind cognitive dysfunction in COVID-19, remain unclear, hindering the development of adequate management strategies. However, the proposed mechanisms suggested by various studies include direct damage to the blood-brain barrier, systemic inflammation, prolonged hypoxia, and extended intensive care admissions. However, no clear-cut guidelines for management are apparent.

Conclusion: This review of the COVID-19 pandemic has elucidated a new global challenge which is affecting individuals’ quality of life by inducing long-term impaired cognitive function. We have found that comprehensive evaluations and interventions are crucial to address the cognitive sequelae in all COVID-19 patients, especially in patients with pre-existing cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, the authors recommend further research for the development of relevant, timely neurocognitive assessments and treatment plans.

Source: Shariff, Sanobar; Uwishema, Olivier; Mizero, Jocelyn; Devi Thambi, Vimala; Nazir, Abubakar; Mahmoud, Ashraf; Kaushik, Ikshwaki; Khayat, Saadeddine; Yusif Maigoro, Abdulkadir; Awde, Sara; Al Maaz, Zeina; Alwan, Iktimal; Hijazi, Mahdi; Wellington, Jack MSc (LSHTM) FGMS; Soojin, Lee. Long-Term cognitive dysfunction after the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review. Annals of Medicine & Surgery ():10.1097/MS9.0000000000001265, September 8, 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001265 https://journals.lww.com/annals-of-medicine-and-surgery/abstract/9900/long_term_cognitive_dysfunction_after_the_covid_19.1011.aspx

Prevalence, pathogenesis and spectrum of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome: a narrative review

Summary:

  • Neurological symptoms are not uncommon during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and reflect a broad spectrum of neurological disorders of which clinicians should be aware.
  • The underlying pathogenesis of neurological disease in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be due to four mechanisms of nervous system dysfunction and injury: i) direct viral neurological invasion; ii) immune dysregulation; iii) endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy; and iv) severe systemic COVID-19 disease.
  • Neurological manifestations of acute COVID-19 include headache, peripheral neuropathies, seizures, encephalitis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, and cerebrovascular disease.
  • Commonly reported long term neurological sequelae of COVID-19 are cognitive dysfunction and dysautonomia, which despite being associated with severe acute disease are also seen in people with mild disease.
  • Assessment of cognitive dysfunction after COVID-19 is confounded by a high prevalence of comorbid fatigue, anxiety, and mood disorders. However, other markers of neuroaxonal breakdown suggest no significant neuronal injury apart from during severe acute COVID-19.
  • The long term impact of COVID-19 on neurological diseases remains uncertain and requires ongoing vigilance.

Source: Wesselingh, R. (2023), Prevalence, pathogenesis and spectrum of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome: a narrative review. Med J Aust. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52063 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52063 (Full text available as PDF file)

 

Evaluation of Post–COVID-19 Cognitive Dysfunction: Recommendations for Researchers

Opinion:

SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased rates of postillness cognitive dysfunction, colloquially referred to as “brain fog,”1 that may portend significant consequences for patient functioning and quality of life. Post–COVID-19 cognitive dysfunction is 1 of approximately 200 symptoms of post–COVID-19 condition (PCC), defined by the World Health Organization as developing within 3 months of an initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, lasting at least 2 months, and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis. A pooled analysis of 54 studies and 1.2 million individuals found that 3.2% of patients’ self-reported cognitive problems 3 months after symptomatic infection,1 while other studies have shown objective evidence of cognitive dysfunction in approximately 24% of patients nearly 1 year later.2 Accumulating evidence also supports the hypothesis that COVID-19 may increase risk for later neurodegeneration3 and exacerbate preexisting cognitive dysfunction.4 As one of the most common symptoms of PCC and one for which affected individuals may seek accommodations and disability benefits in accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, it is imperative that we use more rigorous studies of cognitive outcomes. Accordingly, the following recommendations have been generated by members of the NeuroCOVID International Neuropsychology Taskforce based on initial guidelines.5

Source: Jaqueline H. Becker, PhD; Tracy D. Vannorsdall, PhD; Sara L. Weisenbach, PhD. JAMA Psychiatry. Published online August 16, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2820 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2808155

Post-COVID cognitive dysfunction: current status and research recommendations for high risk population

Abstract:

Post-COVID cognitive dysfunction (PCCD) is a condition in which patients with a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, usually three months from the onset, exhibit subsequent cognitive impairment in various cognitive domains, and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.

While our knowledge of the risk factors and management strategy of PCCD is still incomplete, it is necessary to integrate current epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment evidence, and form consensus criteria to better understand this disease to improve disease management. Identifying the risk factors and vulnerable population of PCCD and providing reliable strategies for effective prevention and management is urgently needed.

In this paper, we reviewed epidemiology, diagnostic markers, risk factors and available treatments on the disease, formed research recommendation framework for vulnerable population, under the background of post-COVID period.

Source: Quan M, Wang X, Gong M, Wang Q, Li Y, Jia J. Post-COVID cognitive dysfunction: current status and research recommendations for high risk population. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jul 5;38:100836. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100836. PMID: 37457901; PMCID: PMC10344681. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344681/ (Full text)

Cognitive impairment after Long COVID-19: Current Evidence and Perspectives

Abstract:

COVID-19 is a respiratory infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Most patients recover after treatment, but COVID-19 treatment may lead to cognitive impairment. Recent studies have found that some recoverers experience cognitive impairments such as decreased memory and attention, and sleep disorder, indicating that COVID-19 may have longerterm effects on cognitive function.

Studies have found that COVID-19 may cause cognitive decline by damaging key brain regions such as the hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex. Studies have also found that COVID-19 patients have active neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and microglial activation, suggesting that neuroinflammation, mitochondrial stress, and neurodegenerative changes may be potential mechanisms leading to cognitive impairment.

In summary, the possibility of cognitive impairment after COVID-19 treatment deserves close attention. Large-scale follow-up studies will help further explore the impact of COVID-19 on cognitive function and provide evidence to support clinical treatment and rehabilitation practices. Neuropathological and biological studies can explore precise mechanisms in-depth and provide a theoretical basis for prevention, treatment, and intervention research.

Given the risks of long-term COVID-19 and reinfection, it is necessary to integrate basic and clinical research data to maximize the maintenance of patient’s cognitive function and life quality. This also provides important experience in responding to similar public health events. This article integrates clinical and basic evidence of cognitive impairment after COVID-19 and discusses potential mechanisms and future research directions.

Source: Zhi-Tao Li, ZHANG ZHEN, Zhuoya Zhang, Zhi-Yong Wang, Hao Li. Cognitive impairment after Long COVID-19: Current Evidence and Perspectives. Front. Neurol. Sec. Neuroinfectious Diseases. Volume 14 – 2023 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1239182 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1239182/abstract

Cortical thickness alterations and systemic inflammation define long-COVID patients with cognitive impairment

Abstract:

As the heterogeneity of symptoms is increasingly recognized among long-COVID patients, it appears highly relevant to study potential pathophysiological differences along the different subtypes. Preliminary evidence suggests distinct alterations in brain structure and systemic inflammatory patterns in specific groups of long-COVID patients.

To this end, we analyzed differences in cortical thickness and peripheral immune signature between clinical subgroups based on 3T-MRI scans and signature inflammatory markers in n=120 participants comprising healthy never-infected controls, healthy COVID-19 survivors, and subgroups of long-COVID patients with and without cognitive impairment according to screening with Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Whole-brain comparison of cortical thickness between the 4 groups was conducted by surface-based morphometry. We identified distinct cortical areas showing a progressive increase in cortical thickness across different groups, starting from healthy individuals who had never been infected with COVID-19, followed by healthy COVID-19 survivors, long-COVID patients without cognitive deficits (MoCA ≥ 26), and finally, long-COVID patients exhibiting significant cognitive deficits (MoCA < 26). These findings highlight the continuum of cortical thickness alterations associated with COVID-19, with more pronounced changes observed in individuals experiencing cognitive impairment (p<0.05, FWE-corrected).

Affected cortical regions covered prefrontal and temporal gyri, insula, posterior cingulate, parahippocampal gyrus, and parietal areas. Additionally, we discovered a distinct immunophenotype, with elevated levels of IL-10, IFNg, and sTREM2 in long-COVID patients, especially in the group suffering from cognitive impairment.

We demonstrate lingering cortical and immunological alterations in healthy and impaired subgroups of COVID-19 survivors. This implies a complex underlying pathomechanism in long-COVID and emphasizes the necessity to investigate the whole spectrum of post-COVID biology to determine targeted treatment strategies targeting specific sub-groups.

Source: Bianca Besteher, Tonia Rocktaeschel, Alejandra Patricia Garza, Marlene Machnik, Johanna Ballez, Dario Lucas Helbing, Katrhin Finke, Philipp Reuken, Daniel Guellmar, Christian Gaser, Martin Walter, Nils Opel, Ildiko Rita Dunay. Cortical thickness alterations and systemic inflammation define long-COVID patients with cognitive impairment. medRxiv 2023.07.21.23292988; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.21.23292988 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.21.23292988v1v (Full text available as PDF file)

Cognitive functioning in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome among different body positions: a prospective pilot study (POTSKog study)

Abstract:

Purpose: Approximately 96% of patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) report cognitive complaints. We investigated whether cognitive function is impaired during sitting and active standing in 30 patients with PoTS compared with 30 healthy controls (HCs) and whether it will improve with the counter manoeuvre of leg crossing.

Methods: In this prospective pilot study, patients with PoTS were compared to HCs matched for age, sex, and educational level. Baseline data included norepinephrine plasma levels, autonomic testing and baseline cognitive function in a seated position [the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Leistungsprüfsystem (LPS) subtests 1 and 2, and the Test of Attentional Performance (TAP)]. Cognitive functioning was examined in a randomized order in supine, upright and upright legs crossed position. The primary outcomes were the cognitive test scores between HCs and patients with PoTS at baseline testing, and among the different body positions.

Results: Patients with PoTS had impaired attention (TAP median reaction time) in the seated position and impaired executive functioning (Stroop) while standing compared with HC. Stroop was influenced by position (supine versus upright versus upright legs crossed) only in the PoTS group. Leg crossing did not result in an improvement in executive function. In patients with PoTS, there was a negative correlation of Stroop with norepinephrine plasma levels while standing.

Conclusion: Compared with HCs, PoTS participants showed impaired cognitive attention and executive function in the upright position that did not improve in the legs crossed position. Data provide further evidence for orthostatic cognitive deterioration in patients with PoTS.

Trial Registration Information: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03681080).

Source: Maier, A., Schopen, L., Thiel, J.C. et al. Cognitive functioning in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome among different body positions: a prospective pilot study (POTSKog study). Clin Auton Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-023-00950-0 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10286-023-00950-0 (Full text)

Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent COVID-19 symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:

Long-term persistent symptoms of COVID-19 affect 30-80% of patients who have recovered from the disease and may continue for a long time after the disease has been overcome. The duration of these symptoms over time might have consequences that affect different aspects of health, such as cognitive abilities.

The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to objectify the persistent COVID-19 cognitive deficits after acute phase of infection and to summarize the existing evidence. Additionally, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview to further understand and address the consequences of this disease. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021260286).

Systematic research was conducted in the Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from January 2020 to September 2021. Twenty-five studies were included, six of which were analyzed for the meta-analysis, and consisted of 175 patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and 275 healthy individuals. Analyses of cognitive performance of post-COVID-19 patients and healthy volunteers were compared using a random-effects model.

The results showed an overall medium-high effect size (g = -.68, p = .02) with a 95% CI (-1.05 to -.31), with a significantly moderate level of heterogeneity among studies (Z = 3.58, p < .001; I2 = 63%). The results showed that individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 showed significant cognitive deficits compared to controls.

Future studies should carefully assess the long-term progression of cognitive impairments in patients with persistent COVID-19 symptoms, as well as the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to know the profile to speed up development of prevention plans as well as specific interventions. Since more information is being obtained and more studies are being conducted on the subject, the need to examine this symptomatology multidisciplinary to achieve greater scientific evidence of its incidence and prevalence has become increasingly clear.

Source: Sobrino-Relaño S, Balboa-Bandeira Y, Peña J, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Zubiaurre-Elorza L, Ojeda N. Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent COVID-19 symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 26;13(1):10309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37420-6. PMID: 37365191; PMCID: PMC10293265. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10293265/ (Full text)

Cognitive impairment in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and short duration myalgic encephalomyelitis patients is mediated by orthostatic hemodynamic changes

Introduction: Cognitive impairment is experienced by people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Patients report difficulty remembering, concentrating, and making decisions. Our objective was to determine whether orthostatic hemodynamic changes were causally linked to cognitive impairment in these diseases.

Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study enrolled PASC, ME/CFS, and healthy controls. All participants underwent clinical evaluation and assessment that included brief cognitive testing before and after an orthostatic challenge. Cognitive testing measured cognitive efficiency which is defined as the speed and accuracy of subject’s total correct responses per minute. General linear mixed models were used to analyze hemodynamics and cognitive efficiency during the orthostatic challenge. Additionally, mediation analysis was used to determine if hemodynamic instability induced during the orthostatic challenge mediated the relationship between disease status and cognitive impairment.

Results: Of the 276 participants enrolled, 256 were included in this study (34 PASC, 71 < 4 year duration ME/CFS, 69 > 10 year ME/CFS duration, and 82 healthy controls). Compared to healthy controls, the disease cohorts had significantly lower cognitive efficiency scores immediately following the orthostatic challenge. Cognitive efficiency remained low for the >10 year ME/CFS 2 and 7 days after orthostatic challenge. Narrow pulse pressure less than 25% of systolic pressure occurred at 4 and 5 min into the orthostatic challenge for the PASC and ME/CFS cohorts, respectively. Abnormally narrow pulse pressure was associated with slowed information processing in PASC patients compared to healthy controls (−1.5, p = 0.04). Furthermore, increased heart rate during the orthostatic challenge was associated with a decreased procedural reaction time in PASC and < 4 year ME/CFS patients who were 40 to 65 years of age.

Discussion: For PASC patients, both their disease state and hemodynamic changes during orthostatic challenge were associated with slower reaction time and decreased response accuracy during cognitive testing. Reduced cognitive efficiency in <4 year ME/CFS patients was associated with higher heart rate in response to orthostatic stress. Hemodynamic changes did not correlate with cognitive impairment for >10 year ME/CFS patients, but cognitive impairment remained. These findings underscore the need for early diagnosis to mitigate direct hemodynamic and other physiological effects on symptoms of cognitive impairment.

Source: Day Heather, Yellman Brayden, Hammer Sarah, Rond Candace, Bell Jennifer, Abbaszadeh Saeed, Stoddard Greg, Unutmaz Derya, Bateman Lucinda, Vernon Suzanne D. Cognitive impairment in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and short duration myalgic encephalomyelitis patients is mediated by orthostatic hemodynamic changes. Frontiers in Neuroscience, VOLUME=17, 2023. DOI=10.3389/fnins.2023.1203514. ISSN=1662-453X. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1203514 (Full text)

Long COVID: Plasma levels of neurofilament light chain in mild COVID-19 patients with neurocognitive symptoms

Abstract:

It is well known the potential of severe acute respiratory coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to induce post-acute sequelae, a condition called Long COVID. This syndrome includes several symptoms, but the central nervous system (CNS) main one is neurocognitive dysfunction. Recently it has been demonstrated the relevance of plasma levels of neurofilament light chain (pNfL), as a biomarker of early involvement of the CNS in COVID-19.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pNfL in patients with post-acute neurocognitive symptoms and the potential of NfL as a prognostic biomarker in these cases. A group of 63 long COVID patients ranging from 18 to 59 years-old were evaluated, submitted to a neurocognitive battery assessment, and subdivided in different groups, according to results. Plasma samples were collected during the long COVID assessment and used for measurement of pNfL with the Single molecule array (SIMOA) assays. Levels of pNfL were significantly higher in long COVID patients with neurocognitive symptoms when compared to HC (p = 0.0031).

Long COVID patients with cognitive impairment and fatigue symptoms presented higher pNfL levels when compared to long COVID patients without these symptoms, individually and combined (p = 0.0263, p = 0.0480, and 0.0142, respectively). Correlation analysis showed that levels of cognitive lost and exacerbation of fatigue in the neurocognitive evaluation had a significative correlation with higher pNfL levels (p = 0.0219 and 0.0255, respectively). Previous reports suggested that pNfL levels are related with higher risk of severity and predict lethality of COVID-19.

Our findings demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to have a long-term impact on the brain, even in patients who presented mild acute disease. NfL measurements might be useful to identify CNS involvement in long COVID associated with neurocognitive symptoms and to identify who will need continuous monitoring and treatment support.

Source: Gutman E, Salvio A, Fernandes R, et al. Long COVID: Plasma levels of neurofilament light chain in mild COVID-19 patients with neurocognitive symptoms. Research Square; 2023. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2921879/v1. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2921879/v1 (Full text)