New Clinical Phenotype of the Post-Covid Syndrome: Fibromyalgia and Joint Hypermobility Condition

Abstract:

Fibromyalgia can be defined as a chronic pain condition, affecting the musculoskeletal system, etiology and pathophysiology of which is sufficiently understudied. Despite the fact that many authors consider this entity to be a manifestation of central sensitization, and not an autoimmune disease, the high prevalence of fibromyalgia in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions requires taking a fresh look at the causes of the disease development.

During the patient examination, the authors identified a combination of symptoms that occurs so often, that they can be carefully described as a clinical pattern. These manifestations include young age, female gender, joint hypermobility, the onset of pain after COVID-19, physical traumatization of one particular tendon and the development of the fibromyalgia pain syndrome during the next several weeks. As well as an increase in the titer of antinuclear antibodies and some other systemic inflammation factors. It can be assumed with great caution that local damage to the connective tissue in patients with joint hypermobility, having COVID-19 as a trigger factor can lead to the development of fibromyalgia syndrome. This article presents three clinical cases that illustrated this hypothesis.

Source: Gavrilova N, Soprun L, Lukashenko M, Ryabkova V, Fedotkina TV, Churilov LP, Shoenfeld Y. New Clinical Phenotype of the Post-Covid Syndrome: Fibromyalgia and Joint Hypermobility Condition. Pathophysiology. 2022 Jan 19;29(1):24-29. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29010003. PMID: 35366287. https://www.mdpi.com/1873-149X/29/1/3/htm (Full text)

The Journey Towards Becoming Diagnosed with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – Patients’ Experiences

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is a disease that negatively affects patients’ quality of life. Previous research has shown that these patients are commonly not taken seriously when seeking medical attention.

Aim: The aim was to examine the experiences of patients with ME/CFS regarding their interaction with Swedish primary healthcare professionals.

Method: The study used a qualitative and exploratory design, taking place in a specialist clinic in Sweden. Data consisted of interviews with 13 patients with ME/CFS, which were analysed using content analysis.

Findings: For patients, it was Feeling truly connected during the period before they received a diagnosis. Time is an important factor, and in the phase from initial symptoms to diagnosis, Knowledge is power.

Conclusion: Patients with ME/CFS were met with different levels of knowledge and interest from healthcare professionals. These challenges might be related to the relative unawareness and lack of knowledge of the disease and the underlying cultural scepticism still present.

Source: Bo Christer Bertilson., et al. “The Journey Towards Becoming Diagnosed with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – Patients’ Experiences”. EC Neurology 14.2 (2022): 49-56.  https://www.ecronicon.com/ecne/pdf/ECNE-14-01012.pdf (Full text as PDF file)

Plasma metabolomics reveals disrupted response and recovery following maximal exercise in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a hallmark symptom of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). We monitored the evolution of 1,157 plasma metabolites in 60 ME/CFS cases (45 females, 15 males) and in 45 matched healthy control subjects (30 females, 15 males) before and after two maximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) challenges separated by 24 hours, with the intent of provoking PEM in patients. Four timepoints allowed exploration of the metabolic response to maximal energy-producing capacity and the recovery pattern of ME/CFS cases compared to the healthy control group.

Baseline comparison identified several significantly different metabolites, along with an enriched percentage of yet-to-be identified compounds. Additionally, temporal measures demonstrated an increased metabolic disparity between cohorts, including unknown metabolites. The effects of exertion in the ME/CFS cohort predominantly highlighted lipid- as well as energy-related pathways and chemical structure clusters, which were disparately affected by the first and second exercise sessions.

The 24-hour recovery period was distinct in the ME/CFS cohort, with over a quarter of the identified pathways statistically different. The pathways that are uniquely different 24 hours after an exercise challenge provide clues to metabolic disruptions that lead to PEM. Numerous altered pathways were observed to depend on glutamate metabolism, a crucial component to the homeostasis of many organs in the body, including the brain.

Source: Germain A, Giloteaux L, Moore GE, Levine SM, Chia JK, Keller BA, Stevens J, Franconi CJ, Mao X, Shungu DC, Grimson A, Hanson MR. Plasma metabolomics reveals disrupted response and recovery following maximal exercise in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. JCI Insight. 2022 Mar 31:e157621. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.157621. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35358096. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35358096/

Volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields and associations with clinical measures in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients suffer from a cognitive and memory dysfunction. Because the hippocampus plays a key role in both cognition and memory, we tested for volumetric differences in the subfields of the hippocampus in ME/CFS.

We estimated hippocampal subfield volumes for 25 ME/CFS patients who met Fukuda criteria only (ME/CFSFukuda ), 18 ME/CFS patients who met the stricter ICC criteria (ME/CFSICC ), and 25 healthy controls (HC). Group comparisons with HC detected extensive differences in subfield volumes in ME/CFSICC but not in ME/CFSFukuda . ME/CFSICC patients had significantly larger volume in the left subiculum head (p < 0.001), left presubiculum head (p = 0.0020), and left fimbria (p = 0.004).

Correlations of hippocampus subfield volumes with clinical measures were stronger in ME/CFSICC than in ME/CFSFukuda patients. In ME/CFSFukuda patients, we detected positive correlations between fatigue and hippocampus subfield volumes and a negative correlation between sleep disturbance score and the right CA1 body volume.

In ME/CFSICC patients, we detected a strong negative relationship between fatigue and left hippocampus tail volume. Strong negative relationships were also detected between pain and SF36 physical scores and two hippocampal subfield volumes (left: GC-ML-DG head and CA4 head).

Our study demonstrated that volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields have strong statistical inference for patients meeting the ME/CFSICC case definition and confirms hippocampal involvement in the cognitive and memory problems of ME/CFSICC patients.

Source: Thapaliya K, Staines D, Marshall-Gradisnik S, Su J, Barnden L. Volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields and associations with clinical measures in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurosci Res. 2022 Mar 31. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25048. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35355311. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.25048  (Full study)

A distinctive profile of family genetic risk scores in a Swedish national sample of cases of fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome compared to rheumatoid arthritis and major depression

Abstract:

Background: Functional somatic disorders (FSD) feature medical symptoms of unclear etiology. Attempts to clarify their origin have been hampered by a lack of rigorous research designs. We sought to clarify the etiology of the FSD by examining the genetic risk patterns for FSD and other related disorders.

Methods: This study was performed in 5 829 186 individuals from Swedish national registers. We quantified familial genetic risk for FSD, internalizing disorders, and somatic disorders in cases of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), using a novel method based on aggregate risk in first to fifth degree relatives, adjusting for cohabitation. We compared these profiles with those of a prototypic internalizing psychiatric – major depression (MD) – and a somatic/autoimmune disorder: rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Results: Patients with FM carry substantial genetic risks not only for FM, but also for pain syndromes and internalizing, autoimmune and sleep disorders. The genetic risk profiles for IBS and CFS are also widely distributed although with lower average risks. By contrast, genetic risk profiles of MD and RA are much more restricted to related conditions.

Conclusion: Patients with FM have a relatively unique family genetic risk score profile with elevated genetic risk across a range of disorders that differs markedly from the profiles of a classic autoimmune disorder (RA) and internalizing disorder (MD). A similar less marked pattern of genetic risks was seen for IBS and CFS. FSD arise from a distinctive pattern of genetic liability for a diversity of psychiatric, autoimmune, pain, sleep, and functional somatic disorders.

Source: Kendler KS, Rosmalen JGM, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. A distinctive profile of family genetic risk scores in a Swedish national sample of cases of fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome compared to rheumatoid arthritis and major depression. Psychol Med. 2022 Mar 31:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000526. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35354508.

Autoimmunity is a hallmark of post-COVID syndrome

Abstract:

Autoimmunity has emerged as a characteristic of the post-COVID syndrome (PCS), which may be related to sex. In order to further investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and autoimmunity in PCS, a clinical and serological assessment on 100 patients was done. Serum antibody profiles against self-antigens and infectious agents were evaluated by an antigen array chip for 116 IgG and 104 IgM antibodies.

Thirty pre-pandemic healthy individuals were included as a control group. The median age of patients was 49 years (IQR: 37.8 to 55.3). There were 47 males. The median post-COVID time was 219 (IQR: 143 to 258) days. Latent autoimmunity and polyautoimmunity were found in 83% and 62% of patients, respectively.

Three patients developed an overt autoimmune disease. IgG antibodies against IL-2, CD8B, and thyroglobulin were found in more than 10% of the patients. Other IgG autoantibodies, such as anti-interferons, were positive in 5-10% of patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were found in > 85% of patients and were positively correlated with autoantibodies, age, and body mass index (BMI). Few autoantibodies were influenced by age and BMI. There was no effect of gender on the over- or under-expression of autoantibodies. IgG anti-IFN-λ antibodies were associated with the persistence of respiratory symptoms.

In summary, autoimmunity is characteristic of PCS, and latent autoimmunity correlates with humoral response to SARS-CoV-2.

Source: Rojas M, Rodríguez Y, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Monsalve DM, Zhu C, Li QZ, Ramírez-Santana C, Anaya JM. Autoimmunity is a hallmark of post-COVID syndrome. J Transl Med. 2022 Mar 16;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03328-4. PMID: 35296346; PMCID: PMC8924736. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924736/ (Full text)

What Are the Long-term Pulmonary Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection?

The COVID-19 pandemic has been ongoing for almost two years. Over this period, Radiology and other peer-reviewed journals have distributed information regarding the nature of the pandemic with unprecedented speed. Based upon the extensively documented clinical and imaging manifestations of acute COVID-19 infection, expert thoracic imagers have developed imaging categories that classify patterns according to the likelihood that they represent COVID-19 infection(1).

Acute COVID-19 has a somewhat unique appearance amongst viral infections on CT. It manifests as ground-glass opacities and/or consolidation often with a strong peripheral distribution. Also, there are CT findings suggesting that organizing pneumonia is a common pattern of injury. Organizing pneumonia is associated with a wide variety of different infections, however, it appears particularly common with COVID-19(2). However, the long-term pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 pneumonia (part of so-called “long-COVID”) remain lacking in the literature.

It is important to understand our current knowledge of viral infections and their typical manifestations within the lungs. The long-term sequela of viral pneumonia, in general, vary depending upon two factors: 1) direct injury caused by the viral organisms, and 2) the host’s immune reaction to those organisms. These result in a variety of different patterns of injury, each of which is associated with specific permanent long-term sequela. The histologic manifestations of acute pulmonary viral infections can be divided broadly into two primary patterns: 1) bronchiolitis and inflammation adjacent to airways, and 2) diffuse alveolar damage. On imaging, bronchiolitis and airway inflammation manifest as bronchial wall thickening, centrilobular nodules, and tree-in-bud opacities; whereas diffuse alveolar damage manifests as bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or consolidation.

The long-term effects of these two patterns are also characteristic. Inflammation within and around the airways may induce concentric fibrosis around the bronchioles resulting in airway narrowing or obliteration. This is termed constrictive (or obliterative) bronchiolitis. Development of constrictive bronchiolitis may result in persistent dyspnea after resolution of the acute infection with an associated obstructive defect on pulmonary function tests. Typical CT findings of constrictive bronchiolitis include mosaic attenuation and air trapping, sometimes associated with bronchiectasis. The long-term manifestations of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), on the other hand, are quite different. Histologically, fibrosis develops 1-2 weeks after the development of acute symptoms. On imaging, this is associated with the development of reticulation and traction bronchiectasis. Over time, usually months, this fibrosis may improve, although residual fibrosis is common(3). This residual fibrosis is often located in the anterior subpleural lung and may be associated with restrictive physiology on pulmonary function testing.

Organizing pneumonia (OP) is particularly common with COVID-19. The clinical and imaging features of OP have been studied (4) mainly in the setting of cryptogenic (idiopathic) disease. Organizing pneumonia is usually a highly steroid-responsive disease with opacities that quickly improve or resolve with treatment, although residual fibrosis may occur. This residual fibrosis often has a pattern that resembles nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with basilar predominant reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, and subpleural sparing(5). It is also important to note that OP and DAD may co-exist with overlapping imaging findings.

Understanding the different patterns of injury associated with viral infections and their long-term sequela is important in putting the long-term effects of COVID-19 infection in context. Han et al(6). were among the first to describe the persistent CT findings of COVID-19 six months after the onset of acute symptoms. In their study, over one-third of patients showed evidence of fibrotic changes.

In this issue of Radiology, Cho and Villacreses and colleagues (7) address these long-term pulmonary manifestations in a prospective study of 100 patients with persistent (>30 days) pulmonary symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection. One hundred and six healthy controls were also evaluated. The particular emphasis of this investigation was on the presence of air trapping on expiratory CT. The severity of disease among studied patients varied and included outpatients, hospitalized patients, and those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Cho and Villacreses et al. discovered that air trapping was present in 58% of patients with post-COVID-19 and had its highest prevalence in the group of patients hospitalized for their infection (73%). Using quantitative analysis, air trapping affected a mean of 25-35% of the lungs in patients with post-COVID-19 depending on the clinical severity of disease compared to 7% in controls (p<.001). The authors did not identify obstructive airways disease on spirometry in any of the groups. This lack of obstruction on spirometry in patients with air trapping is not surprising. In a cohort of soldiers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan with biopsy-proven constrictive bronchiolitis(8), the majority did not have obstruction on pulmonary function tests. Restriction was present on spirometry in the patients with COVID-19 in the study by Cho and Villacreses et al., specifically in the inpatient and ICU groups. Ground-glass opacity, traction bronchiectasis, and other signs of fibrosis were most frequent in patients admitted to the ICU (94%, 69%, 81% of patients, respectively compared with 36%, 8%, and 3% of outpatients, respectively).

In summary, the study by Cho and Villacreses et al. demonstrates that air trapping on CT is common in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. When considering the long-term pulmonary effects of COVID-19 infection, this is an important finding and may correspond to the development of post-viral constrictive bronchiolitis, an entity seen with other viral infections and in particular, adenovirus infection. Interestingly, the CT findings of acute COVID-19 are not highly airway-centric. Centrilobular nodules and tree-in-bud opacities, reflecting airway-centric inflammation, are not a typical finding of acute COVID-19 infection. Regardless, these results indicate a long-term impact on bronchiolar obstruction. In the study by Cho and Villacreses et al, the presence of ground glass opacity and/or fibrosis on CT were most common in the patients admitted to the ICU and likely correspond to post-OP and/or post-DAD fibrosis.

It is important to note that not all pulmonary fibrosis, including that of the airway and of the parenchyma, is permanent. Collagen may be absorbed for months after the acute insult, thus it is not entirely clear if the abnormalities seen in the current study will be permanent. The median time from COVID-19 diagnosis to the clinic visit for persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms was only 75 days. However, 8 of 9 patients (out of 100 patients total) with imaging more than 200 days from the acute infection had persistent air trapping. Regardless of the imaging findings, the most important question is whether the airway obstruction and/or fibrosis result in clinical symptoms. This paper suggests that airways obstruction and post-OP/DAD fibrosis contribute to persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection with the contribution of airways disease higher in the outpatients, and the contribution of OP/DAD greater in the patients admitted to ICU. Longer-term studies assessing the clinical and imaging manifestations 1-2 years after the initial infection are needed to fully ascertain the permanent manifestations of post-COVID fibrosis.

Source: Brett M. Elicker. What Are the Long-term Pulmonary Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection? Radiology. Published Online:

Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: a scoping review and recommendations for research

Abstract:

Background: A considerable proportion of individuals report persistent, debilitating and disparate symptoms despite resolution of acute COVID-19 infection (i.e. long COVID). Numerous registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID are expected to be completed in 2021–2022. The aim of this review is to provide a scope of the candidate treatments for long COVID. A synthesis of ongoing long COVID clinical trials can inform methodologic approaches for future studies and identify key research vistas.

Methods: Scoping searches were conducted on multiple national and international clinical trial registries. Interventional trials testing treatments for long COVID were selected. The search timeline was from database inception to 28 July 2021.

Results: This scoping review included 59 clinical trial registration records from 22 countries with a total projected enrolment of 6718. Considerable heterogeneity was exhibited amongst component records with respect to the characterization of long COVID (i.e. name, symptoms- including frequency, intensity, trajectory and duration- mode of ascertainment, and definition of acute phase). In addition, the majority of proposed interventions were non-pharmacological and either targeted multiple long COVID symptoms simultaneously, or focussed on treatment of respiratory/pulmonary sequelae. Multiple interventions targeted inflammation, as well as tissue oxygenation and cellular recovery, and several interventions were repurposed from analogous conditions.

Conclusions: The results of this scoping review investigating ongoing clinical trials testing candidate treatments for long COVID suggest that a greater degree of definitional stringency and homogeneity is needed insofar as the characterization of long COVID and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Source: Ceban F, Leber A, Jawad MY, Yu M, Lui LMW, Subramaniapillai M, Di Vincenzo JD, Gill H, Rodrigues NB, Cao B, Lee Y, Lin K, Mansur RB, Ho R, Burke MJ, Rosenblat JD, McIntyre RS. Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: a scoping review and recommendations for research. Infect Dis (Lond). 2022 Mar 14:1-11. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2022.2043560. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35282780; PMCID: PMC8935463. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935463/ (Full text)

No difference in serum levels of B-cell activating receptor and antibodies against cytolethal distending toxin B and flagellin in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome after Giardia infection

Abstract :

Background and Aim: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) frequently occur as comorbid conditions to each other. A shared etiology of these syndromes has been proposed because of their shared symptomatology and triggering by infections.

Antibodies against the bacterial antigens cytolethal distending toxin B (CdtB) and flagellin have been proposed to be biomarkers of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), especially diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). It is unknown if they may also be associated with comorbid conditions such as CFS. On the other hand, elevated level of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) has been associated with CFS and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and subjective food intolerance.

Methods: We evaluated serum levels of anti-flagellin and anti-CdtB using an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and BAFF with a commercially available ELISA kit in a cohort of patients who developed fatigue syndromes and/or FGIDs after Giardia infection, by comparing them with healthy controls without these conditions.

Results: We did not find significant differences in circulating BAFF, anti-CdtB, or anti-flagellin antibody levels in these patient groups compared to healthy controls. Therefore, our results do not support a role for BAFF, anti-CdtB, or anti-flagellin antibodies as universal biomarkers for IBS or CFS.

Conclusion: BAFF, anti-CdtB, or anti-flagellin antibodies cannot be considered as universal biomarkers for IBS or CFS.

Source: Hanevik, K., Saghaug, C., Aaland, M., Morch, K. and Langeland, N. (2022), No difference in serum levels of B-cell activating receptor and antibodies against cytolethal distending toxin B and flagellin in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome after Giardia infection. JGH Open, 6: 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12724 (Full text)

Mechanisms of coronavirus infectious disease 2019-related neurologic diseases

Abstract:

Purpose of review: As of January 8, 2022, a global pandemic caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2, a new RNA virus, has resulted in 304,896,785 cases in over 222 countries and regions, with over 5,500,683 deaths (www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/). Reports of neurological and psychiatric symptoms in the context of coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) range from headache, anosmia, and dysgeusia, to depression, fatigue, psychosis, seizures, delirium, suicide, meningitis, encephalitis, inflammatory demyelination, infarction, and acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy. Moreover, 30-50% of COVID-19 survivors develop long-lasting neurologic symptoms, including a dysexecutive syndrome, with inattention and disorientation, and/or poor movement coordination. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA within the central nervous system (CNS) of patients is rare, and mechanisms of neurological damage and ongoing neurologic diseases in COVID-19 patients are unknown. However, studies demonstrating viral glycoprotein effects on coagulation and cerebral vasculature, and hypoxia- and cytokine-mediated coagulopathy and CNS immunopathology suggest both virus-specific and neuroimmune responses may be involved. This review explores potential mechanistic insights that could contribute to COVID-19-related neurologic disease.

Recent findings: While the development of neurologic diseases during acute COVID-19 is rarely associated with evidence of viral neuroinvasion, new evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein exhibits direct inflammatory and pro-coagulation effects. This, in conjunction with immune dysregulation resulting in cytokine release syndrome (CRS) may result in acute cerebrovascular or neuroinflammatory diseases. Additionally, CRS-mediated loss of blood-brain barrier integrity in specific brain regions may contribute to the expression of proinflammatory mediators by neural cells that may impact brain function long after resolution of acute infection. Importantly, host co-morbid diseases that affect vascular, pulmonary, or CNS function may contribute to the type of neurologic disease triggered by SARS-COV-2 infection.

Summary: Distinct effects of SARS-CoV-2 S protein and CNS compartment- and region-specific responses to CRS may underlie acute and chronic neuroinflammatory diseases associated with COVID-19.

Source: Klein RS. Mechanisms of coronavirus infectious disease 2019-related neurologic diseases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Mar 11. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001049. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35283461. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35283461/