2020 – Page 11 – American ME and CFS Society

Health Care Responsibility and Compassion-Visiting the Housebound Patient Severely Affected by ME/CFS

Abstract:

Many people with severe Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) commonly receive no care from healthcare professionals, while some have become distanced from all statutory medical services. Paradoxically, it is often the most seriously ill and needy who are the most neglected by those responsible for their healthcare. Reasons for this include tensions around the complexity of making an accurate diagnosis in the absence of a biomarker, the bitter debate about the effectiveness of the few available treatments, and the very real stigma associated with the diagnosis.

Illness severity often precludes attendance at healthcare facilities, and if an individual is well enough to be able to attend an appointment, the presentation will not be typical; by definition, patients who are severely affected are home-bound and often confined to bed. We argue that a holistic model, such as ‘‘Compassion in Practice’’, can help with planning appointments and caring for people severely affected by ME/CFS. We show how this can be used to frame meaningful interactions between the healthcare practitioners (HCPs) and the homebound patient.

Source: Kingdon, C.; Giotas, D.; Nacul, L.; Lacerda, E. Health Care Responsibility and Compassion-Visiting the Housebound Patient Severely Affected by ME/CFS. Healthcare 2020, 8, 197. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/3/197/htm (Full text)

A Concerning Display of Medical Indifference: Reply to ‘Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and an Illness-Focused Approach to Care: Controversy, Morality and Paradox’

Abstract:

In ‘Chronic fatigue syndrome and an illness-focused approach to care: controversy, morality and paradox’, authors Michael Sharpe and Monica Greco begin by characterising myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) as illness-without-disease. On that basis they ask why patients reject treatments for illness-without-disease, and they answer with a philosophical idea. Whitehead’s ‘bifurcation of nature’, they suggest, still dominates public and professional thinking, and that conceptual confusion leads patients to reject the treatment they need. A great deal has occurred, however, since Whitehead characterised his culture’s confusions 100 years ago.

In our time, I suggest, experience is no longer construed as an invalid second cousin of bodily states in philosophy, in medicine or in the culture at large. More importantly, we must evaluate medical explanations before we reach for philosophical alternatives. The National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Medicine have concluded that ME/CFS is, in fact, a biomedical disease, and all US governmental health organisations now agree.

Although it would be productive for Sharpe and Greco to state and support their disagreement with the other side of the disease debate, it is no longer tenable, or safe, to ignore the possibility of disease in patients with ME/CFS, or to recommend that clinicians should do so. When we find ourselves in a framework that suggests the possibility of medical need is somehow beside the point for medical providers, it is time to reconsider our conceptual foundations.

Source: O’Leary D. A concerning display of medical indifference: reply to ‘Chronic fatigue syndrome and an illness-focused approach to care: controversy, morality and paradox’ [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 29]. Med Humanit. 2020;medhum-2019-011743. doi:10.1136/medhum-2019-011743 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32601171/

Review of the Quality Control Checks Performed by Current Genome-Wide and Targeted-Genome Association Studies on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Introduction:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disease characterized by persistent fatigue and post-exertion malaise, accompanied by other symptoms (1, 2). The direct cause of the disease remains elusive, but it may include genetic factors alongside environmental triggers, such as strong microbial infections and other stressors (3, 4).

With the aim to identify putative genetic factors that could explain the pathophysiological mechanisms of ME/CFS, four genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and two targeted-genome association studies (TGAS) were conducted in the past decade (5–10). In the four GWAS, thousands of genetic markers located across the whole genome were evaluated for their statistical association with ME/CFS (5–8). The two TGAS had the same statistical objective of the four GWAS, but alternatively investigated the association of the disease with numerous genetic markers located in candidate genes related to inflammation and immunity (9) and in genes encoding diverse adrenergic receptors (10).

The findings from all these different studies suggested conflicting evidence of genetic association with ME/CFS: from absence of association (7), through mild association (10) up to moderate associations of a relatively small number of genetic markers (5, 6, 9). The most optimistic GWAS suggested more than 5,500 candidate gene-disease associations (8). This inconsistency in the reported findings prompted us to review the respective data. With this purpose, the present opinion paper first revisits the recommended quality control (QC) checks for GWAS and TGAS, and then summarizes which ones were performed by those studies on ME/CFS.

Source: Grabowska AD, Lacerda EM, Nacul L, Sepúlveda N. Review of the Quality Control Checks Performed by Current Genome-Wide and Targeted-Genome Association Studies on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:293. Published 2020 Jun 12. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00293 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304330/ (Full text)

Cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in an individual with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome during long-term treatment with intravenous saline: A case study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) causes significant impairment in daily activities, including the ability to pursue daily activities. Chronotropic intolerance is becoming better characterized in ME/CFS and may be the target of supportive treatment.

OBJECTIVE:To document the effect of repeated intravenous (IV) saline administration on cardiovascular functioning and symptoms in a 38-year old female with ME/CFS.

METHODS:The patient received 1 L of 0.9% IV saline through a central line for a total of 675 days. Single CPETs were completed periodically to assess the effect of treatment on cardiopulmonary function at peak exertion and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT). An open-ended symptom questionnaire was used to assess subjective responses to CPET and self-reported recovery time.

RESULTS:Improvements were noted in volume of oxygen consumed (VO2), heart rate (HR), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at peak and VAT. Self-reported recovery time from CPET reduced from 5 days to 1–2 days by the end of treatment. The patient reported improved quality of life related, improved capacity for activities of daily living, and reduced symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS:IV saline may promote beneficial effects for cardiopulmonary function and symptoms in people with ME/CFS, which should be the focus of formal study.

Source: Davenport, Todd E., Ward, Michael K., Stevens, Staci R., Stevens, Jared, Snell, Christopher R., VanNess, J. Mark. Cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in an individual with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome during long-term treatment with intravenous saline: A case study. Work, vol. Pre-press, no. Pre-press, pp. 1-7, 2020 https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor203214

Altered Structural Brain Networks Related to Adrenergic/Muscarinic Receptor Autoantibodies in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Recent studies suggest that the autoantibodies against adrenergic/muscarinic receptors might be one of the causes and potential markers of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural network changes related to autoantibody titers against adrenergic/muscarinic receptors in ME/CFS by performing a single-subject gray matter similarity-based structural network analysis.

Methods: We prospectively examined 89 consecutive right-handed ME/CFS patients who underwent both brain MRI including 3D T1-wighted images and a blood analysis of autoantibodies titers against β1 adrenergic receptor (β1 AdR-Ab), β2 AdR-Ab, M3 acetylcholine receptor (M3 AchR-Ab), and M4 AchR-Ab. Single-subject gray matter similarity-based structural networks were extracted from segmented gray matter images for each patient. We calculated local network properties (betweenness centrality, clustering coefficient, and characteristic path length) and global network properties (normalized path length λ, normalized clustering coefficient γ, and small-world network value δ). We investigated the correlations between the autoantibody titers and regional gray matter/white matter volumes, the local network properties, and the global network properties.

Results: Betweenness centrality showed a significant positive correlation with β1-AdR-Ab in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The characteristic path length showed a significant negative correlation with β2-AdR-Ab in the right precentral gyrus. There were no significant correlations between the antibody titers and the regional gray matter/white matter volumes, and the global network properties.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that β1 AdR-Ab and β2 AdR-Ab are potential markers of ME/CFS.

Source: Fujii H, Sato W, Kimura Y, et al. Altered Structural Brain Networks Related to Adrenergic/Muscarinic Receptor Autoantibodies in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 1]. J Neuroimaging. 2020;10.1111/jon.12751. doi:10.1111/jon.12751 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32609410/

Post-viral fatigue and COVID-19: lessons from past epidemics

Abstract:

The COVID-19 pandemic, resulting from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has severely impacted the population worldwide with a great mortality rate. The current article reviews the literature on short- and long-term health consequences of prior epidemics and infections to assess potential health complications that may be associated with post-COVID-19 recovery. Past research on post-epidemic and post-infection recovery has suggested that such complications include the development of severe fatigue.

Certain factors, such as the severity of infection, in addition to the ‘cytokine storm’ experienced by many COVID-19 patients, may contribute to the development of later health problems. We suggest that the patterns observed in past epidemics and infections may re-occur in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Source: Mohammed F. Islam, Joseph Cotler & Leonard A. Jason (2020) Post-viral fatigue and COVID-19: lessons from past epidemics, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2020.1778227 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2020.1778227 (Full article)

Attentional Processing and Interpretative Bias in Functional Neurological Disorder

Abstract:

Objective: Altered attentional processing (automatically attending to negative or illness-relevant information) and interpretative biases (interpreting ambiguous information as negative or illness-relevant) may be mechanistically involved in functional neurological disorder (FND). Common mechanisms between FND and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have been proposed but not compared experimentally.

Methods: We compared cognitive task performance of FND, CFS and healthy control (HC) groups. Tasks assessed attentional bias towards illness-relevant stimuli (visual probe task), attentional control (attention network task) and somatic interpretations (interpretative bias task), alongside self-reported depression, anxiety, fatigue and general health.

Results: Thirty-seven participants diagnosed with FND, 52 participants diagnosed with CFS and 51 HC participants were included. Whilst participants with CFS showed attentional bias for illness-relevant stimuli relative to HC (t = -3.13 p = 0.002, d = 0.624), individuals with FND did not (t = -1.59, p = 0.118, d = 0.379). Both FND (t = 3.08, p = 0.003, d = 0.759) and CFS (t = 2.74, p = 0.007, d = 0.548) groups displayed worse attentional control than HC. Similarly, FND (t = 3.63, p < 0.001, d = 0.801) and CFS groups (t = 4.58, p < 0.001, d = 0.909) showed more somatic interpretative bias than HC.

Conclusions: Similar attentional control deficits and somatic interpretative bias in individuals with FND and CFS support potential shared mechanisms underlying symptoms. Interpretative bias towards somatic and illness-relevant stimuli in functional disorders may prove a therapeutic target.

Source: Keynejad RC, Fenby E, Pick S, et al. Attentional processing and interpretative bias in functional neurological disorder [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 12]. Psychosom Med. 2020;10.1097/PSY.0000000000000821. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000821 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32541544/

Inclusion of Family Members Without ME/CFS in Research Studies Promotes Discovery of Biomarkers Specific for ME/CFS

Abstract:

Background: The search for a biomarker specific for ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) has been long, arduous and, to date, unsuccessful. Researchers need to consider their expenditures on each new candidate biomarker. In a previous study of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) by natural killer lymphocytes, we found lower ADCC for ME/CFS patients vs. unrelated donors but ruled against low ADCC as a biomarker because of similar ADCC for patients vs. their family members without ME/CFS.

Objective: We applied inclusion of family members without ME/CFS, from families with multiple CFS patients, as a second non-ME/CFS control group in order to re-examine inflammation in ME/CFS.

Method: Total and CD16A-positive ‘non-classical’ anti-inflammatory monocytes were monitored.

Results: Non-classical monocytes were elevated for patients vs. unrelated healthy donors but these differences were insignificant between patients vs. unaffected family members.

Conclusions: Inclusion of family members ruled against biomarker considerations for the monocytes characterized. These pilot findings for the non-classical monocytes are novel in the field of ME/CFS. We recommend that occupational therapists advocate and explain to family members without ME/CFS the need for the family members’ participation as a second set of controls in pilot studies to rapidly eliminate false biomarkers, optimize patient participation, and save researchers’ labor.

Source: Tokunaga K, Sung AP, Tang JJ, et al. Inclusion of family members without ME/CFS in research studies promotes discovery of biomarkers specific for ME/CFS [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 16]. Work. 2020;10.3233/WOR-203177. doi:10.3233/WOR-203177 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32568152/

Clinical History Segment Extraction From Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Assessments to Model Disease Trajectories

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a long-term illness with a wide range of symptoms and condition trajectories. To improve the understanding of these, automated analysis of large amounts of patient data holds promise. Routinely documented assessments are useful for large-scale analysis, however relevant information is mainly in free text. As a first step to extract symptom and condition trajectories, natural language processing (NLP) methods are useful to identify important textual content and relevant information. In this paper, we propose an agnostic NLP method of extracting segments of patients’ clinical histories in CFS assessments. Moreover, we present initial results on the advantage of using these segments to quantify and analyse the presence of certain clinically relevant concepts.

Source: Priou S, Viani N, Vernugopan V, et al. Clinical History Segment Extraction from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Assessments to Model Disease Trajectories. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;270:98-102. doi:10.3233/SHTI200130 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32570354/