Category: Overlapping Illnesses

Gut Microbiome Wellness Index 2 enhances health status prediction from gut microbiome taxonomic profiles

Abstract:

Recent advancements in translational gut microbiome research have revealed its crucial role in shaping predictive healthcare applications. Herein, we introduce the Gut Microbiome Wellness Index 2 (GMWI2), an enhanced version of our original GMWI prototype, designed as a standardized disease-agnostic health status indicator based on gut microbiome taxonomic profiles.

Our analysis involves pooling existing 8069 stool shotgun metagenomes from 54 published studies across a global demographic landscape (spanning 26 countries and six continents) to identify gut taxonomic signals linked to disease presence or absence. GMWI2 achieves a cross-validation balanced accuracy of 80% in distinguishing healthy (no disease) from non-healthy (diseased) individuals and surpasses 90% accuracy for samples with higher confidence (i.e., outside the “reject option”).

This performance exceeds that of the original GMWI model and traditional species-level α-diversity indices, indicating a more robust gut microbiome signature for differentiating between healthy and non-healthy phenotypes across multiple diseases. When assessed through inter-study validation and external validation cohorts, GMWI2 maintains an average accuracy of nearly 75%.

Furthermore, by reevaluating previously published datasets, GMWI2 offers new insights into the effects of diet, antibiotic exposure, and fecal microbiota transplantation on gut health. Available as an open-source command-line tool, GMWI2 represents a timely, pivotal resource for evaluating health using an individual’s unique gut microbial composition.

Source: Chang, D., Gupta, V.K., Hur, B. et al. Gut Microbiome Wellness Index 2 enhances health status prediction from gut microbiome taxonomic profiles. Nat Commun 15, 7447 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51651-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51651-9 (Full text)

A multimodal approach for treating post-acute infectious syndrome

Abstract:

Long-term complications, such as extensive fatigue and cognitive issues, are known from various infections, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza
virus, or Borrelia burgdorferi. The pathology is mostly unknown and differs between patients. Unfortunately, there is currently no common and
effective treatment. In this perspective, we imply that post-acute infectious syndromes are due to a variety of factors, including among others
diminished tissue perfusion, tissue infiltration by viruses, inflammation, and oxidative stress, and that not one specific biomarker can be used
to measure these syndromes. Thus, we suggest that a score based on a number of criteria/factors should be used to assess post-acute infectious
syndromes.

Consequently, probably not one single treatment can be used to treat this group of patients, and we suggest a multimodal
treatment regimen comprising a combination of pharmacotherapy, such as metformin and naltrexone with anti-inflammatory effects,
alongside physical therapies such as extracorporeal apheresis and transcutaneous neurotherapy. This combined approach aims to reduce
biomarker levels and enhance cognitive functions. This implies that a reset of the systems can be achieved by a multimodal approach based on a
score for post-acute infectious syndromes.

Source:  Charlotte Steenblock, Nicole Toepfner, Yannick P. Kok, Philip Mavberg, Horst Bruckmoser, Alfons Breu, Johannes Korth, Harald Heidecke, Milo A. Puhan, and Stefan R. Bornstein. A multimodal approach for treating post-acute infectious syndrome. Brain Medicine (2024) 1, 1–7; doi: https://doi.org/10.61373/bm024p.0064; Published online: 30 August 2024. https://bm.genomicpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/BM0064-Steenblock-2024.pdf (Full text)

Long COVID Is Not a Functional Neurologic Disorder

Abstract:

Long COVID is a common sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data from numerous scientific studies indicate that long COVID involves a complex interaction between pathophysiological processes. Long COVID may involve the development of new diagnosable health conditions and exacerbation of pre-existing health conditions. However, despite this rapidly accumulating body of evidence regarding the pathobiology of long COVID, psychogenic and functional interpretations of the illness presentation continue to be endorsed by some healthcare professionals, creating confusion and inappropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for people living with long COVID.

The purpose of this perspective is to present a clinical and scientific rationale for why long COVID should not be considered as a functional neurologic disorder. It will begin by discussing the parallel historical development of pathobiological and psychosomatic/sociogenic diagnostic constructs arising from a common root in neurasthenia, which has resulted in the collective understandings of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and functional neurologic disorder (FND), respectively. We will also review the case definition criteria for FND and the distinguishing clinical and neuroimaging findings in FND vs. long COVID.

We conclude that considering long COVID as FND is inappropriate based on differentiating pathophysiologic mechanisms and distinguishing clinical findings.

Source: Davenport TE, Blitshteyn S, Clague-Baker N, Davies-Payne D, Treisman GJ, Tyson SF. Long COVID Is Not a Functional Neurologic Disorder. J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 29;14(8):799. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080799. PMID: 39201991. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/14/8/799 (Full text)

Impact of age and sex on neuroinflammation following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a murine model

Abstract:

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of COVID-19, is known to infect people of all ages and both sexes. Senior populations have the greatest risk of severe COVID-19, and sexual dimorphism in clinical outcomes has been reported. Neurological symptoms are widely observed in COVID-19 patients, with many survivors exhibiting persistent neurological and cognitive impairment. The present study aims to investigate the impact of age and sex on the neuroinflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection using a mouse model. Wild-type C57BL/6J mice were intranasally inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.351, a variant known to infect mice.

Older male mice exhibited a significantly greater weight loss and higher viral loads in the lung at 3 days post infection. Notably, no viral RNA was detected in the brains of infected mice. Nevertheless, expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and CCL-2 in the lung and brain increased with viral infection. RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis of brains showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection caused significant changes in gene expression profiles, implicating innate immunity, defense response to virus, and cerebrovascular and neuronal functions.

These findings demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers a neuroinflammatory response, despite the lack of detectable virus in the brain. Aberrant activation of innate immune response, disruption of blood-brain barrier and endothelial cell integrity, and suppression of neuronal activity and axonogenesis underlie the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the brain. Understanding the role of these affected pathways in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis helps identify appropriate points of therapeutic interventions to alleviate neurological dysfunction observed during COVID-19.

Source: Krishna VD, Chang A, Korthas H, Var SR, Low WC, Li L, Cheeran MC. Impact of age and sex on neuroinflammation following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a murine model. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Aug 14:2023.08.11.552998. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.11.552998. Update in: Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1404312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1404312. PMID: 37645925; PMCID: PMC10462071. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462071/ (Full text)

The association between prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and work outcomes

Abstract:

While the early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States labor market are well-established, less is known about the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and Long COVID on employment. To address this gap, we analyzed self-reported data from a prospective, national cohort study to estimate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms at three months post-infection on missed workdays and return to work.

The analysis included 2,939 adults in the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE) study who tested positive for their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of enrollment, were employed before the pandemic, and completed a baseline and three-month electronic survey. At three months post-infection, 40.8% of participants reported at least one SARS-CoV-2 symptom and 9.6% of participants reported five or more SARS-CoV-2 symptoms.

When asked about missed work due to their SARS-CoV-2 infection at three months, 7.2% of participants reported missing ≥10 workdays and 13.9% of participants reported not returning to work since their infection. At three months, participants with ≥5 symptoms had a higher adjusted odds ratio of missing ≥10 workdays (2.96, 95% CI 1.81–4.83) and not returning to work (2.44, 95% CI 1.58–3.76) compared to those with no symptoms. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms were common, affecting 4-in-10 participants at three-months post-infection, and were associated with increased odds of work loss, most pronounced among adults with ≥5 symptoms at three months.

Despite the end of the federal Public Health Emergency for COVID-19 and efforts to “return to normal”, policymakers must consider the clinical and economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on people’s employment status and work absenteeism, particularly as data characterizing the numerous health and well-being impacts of Long COVID continue to emerge. Improved understanding of risk factors for lost work time may guide efforts to support people in returning to work.

Source: Venkatesh AK, Yu H, Malicki C, Gottlieb M, Elmore JG, Hill MJ, et al. (2024) The association between prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and work outcomes. PLoS ONE 19(7): e0300947. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300947 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300947 (Full text)

Characterizing Long COVID in Children and Adolescents

Key Points:

Question  What prolonged symptoms experienced by youth are most associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection?

Findings  Among 5367 participants in the RECOVER-Pediatrics cohort study, 14 symptoms in both school-age children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) were more common in those with vs without SARS-CoV-2 infection history, with 4 additional symptoms in school-age children only and 3 in adolescents only. Empirically derived indices for PASC research and associated clustering patterns were developed.

Meaning  This study developed research indices for characterizing pediatric PASC. Symptom patterns were similar but distinguishable between school-age children and adolescents, highlighting the importance of characterizing PASC separately in different age groups.

Abstract

Importance  Most research to understand postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID, has focused on adults, with less known about this complex condition in children. Research is needed to characterize pediatric PASC to enable studies of underlying mechanisms that will guide future treatment.

Objective  To identify the most common prolonged symptoms experienced by children (aged 6 to 17 years) after SARS-CoV-2 infection, how these symptoms differ by age (school-age [6-11 years] vs adolescents [12-17 years]), how they cluster into distinct phenotypes, and what symptoms in combination could be used as an empirically derived index to assist researchers to study the likely presence of PASC.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Multicenter longitudinal observational cohort study with participants recruited from more than 60 US health care and community settings between March 2022 and December 2023, including school-age children and adolescents with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection history.

Exposure  SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main Outcomes and Measures  PASC and 89 prolonged symptoms across 9 symptom domains.

Results  A total of 898 school-age children (751 with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [referred to as infected] and 147 without [referred to as uninfected]; mean age, 8.6 years; 49% female; 11% were Black or African American, 34% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 60% were White) and 4469 adolescents (3109 infected and 1360 uninfected; mean age, 14.8 years; 48% female; 13% were Black or African American, 21% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 73% were White) were included. Median time between first infection and symptom survey was 506 days for school-age children and 556 days for adolescents. In models adjusted for sex and race and ethnicity, 14 symptoms in both school-age children and adolescents were more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection history compared with those without infection history, with 4 additional symptoms in school-age children only and 3 in adolescents only. These symptoms affected almost every organ system. Combinations of symptoms most associated with infection history were identified to form a PASC research index for each age group; these indices correlated with poorer overall health and quality of life. The index emphasizes neurocognitive, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms in school-age children but change or loss in smell or taste, pain, and fatigue/malaise–related symptoms in adolescents. Clustering analyses identified 4 PASC symptom phenotypes in school-age children and 3 in adolescents.

Conclusions and Relevance This study developed research indices for characterizing PASC in children and adolescents. Symptom patterns were similar but distinguishable between the 2 groups, highlighting the importance of characterizing PASC separately for these age ranges.

Source: Rachel S. Gross, MD, MS; Tanayott Thaweethai, PhD; Lawrence C. Kleinman, MD, MPH; et al. JAMA. Published online August 21, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.12747 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2822770

Designing and optimizing clinical trials for long COVID

Abstract:

Long COVID is a debilitating, multisystemic illness following a SARS-CoV-2 infection whose duration may be indefinite. Over four years into the pandemic, little knowledge has been generated from clinical trials. We analyzed the information available on ClinicalTrials.gov, and found that the rigor and focus of trials vary widely, and that the majority test non-pharmacological interventions with insufficient evidence.

We highlight promising trials underway, and encourage the proliferation of clinical trials for treating Long COVID and other infection-associated chronic conditions and illnesses (IACCIs). We recommend several guidelines for Long COVID trials: First, pharmaceutical trials with potentially curative, primary interventions should be prioritized, and both drug repurposing and new drug development should be pursued.

Second, study designs should be both rigorous and accessible, e.g., triple-blinded randomized trials that can be conducted remotely, without participants needing to leave their homes.

Third, studies should have multiple illness comparator cohorts for IACCIs such as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS) and dysautonomia, and screen for the full spectrum of symptomatology and pathologies of these illnesses.

Fourth, studies should consider inclusion/exclusion criteria with an eye towards equity and breadth of representation, including participants of all races, ethnicities, and genders most impacted by COVID-19, and including all levels of illness severity.

Fifth, involving patient-researchers in all aspects of studies brings immensely valuable perspectives that will increase the impact of trials. We also encourage the development of efficient clinical trial designs including methods to study several therapies in parallel.

Source: Vogel JM, Pollack B, Spier E, McCorkell L, Jaudon TW, Fitzgerald M, Davis H, Cohen AK. Designing and optimizing clinical trials for long COVID. Life Sci. 2024 Aug 13;355:122970. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122970. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39142505. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320524005605 (Full text)

Nonpelvic comorbid symptoms of 45 patients with pain of pelvic venous origin, before and after treatment

Abstract:

Objective: To report the prevalence and severity of nonpelvic symptoms for patients with venous-origin chronic pelvic pain (VO-CPP) and to describe outcomes after pelvic vein stenting and embolization.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of 45 women with VO-CPP who underwent treatment with iliac vein stenting and/or embolization. Patients completed symptom-severity questionnaires before and after treatment that assessed for pelvic pain, and multiple other symptoms, including brain fog, anxiety, depression, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, migraines and more.

Results: Patient age ranged from 18 to 65 years. The prevalence of common symptoms was as follows: migraines, 69%; brain fog, 76%; anxiety attacks, 58%; excess sweating, 64%; hip pain, 73%; diarrhea, 62%; constipation, 76%; and abdominal bloating, 82%. After treatment, most symptom scores improved by more than 50%; exceptions were excessive sweating (41% improvement) and bloating (47% improvement). Prevalence of individual symptoms that bundle into POTS ranged from 29% to 76%, where symptom improvement ranged from 23% to 59% after treatment. Overlapping individual symptoms characteristic of fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) were present in 64% to 82% of patients and all improved by 49% to 63% after treatment.

Conclusions: Pelvic venous flow abnormality is linked causally to a spectrum of interrelated symptoms, of which many can be bundled into named syndromes of unknown cause. With catheter- based treatment of pelvic venous pooling, nonpelvic symptom and syndrome scores improved.

Source: Smith SJ, Smith BH, Sichlau MJ, Chen B, Knight D, Rowe PC. Nonpelvic comorbid symptoms of 45 patients with pain of pelvic venous origin, before and after treatment. Phlebology. 2024 Aug 10:2683555241273109. doi: 10.1177/02683555241273109. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39126670.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39126670/

Post-Exertional Malaise in Veterans with Gulf War Illness

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a potentially debilitating aspect of Gulf War Illness (GWI) that has received limited research attention. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine symptom severity changes following exercise in Veterans with GWI compared to control Veterans without GWI (CO).

Sixty-seven Veterans (n=39 GWI; n=28 CO) underwent a 30-minute submaximal exercise challenge at 70% of heart rate reserve. Symptom measurements (e.g. fatigue, pain) occurred pre-, immediately post-, and 24-hours post-exercise. Self-reported physical and mental health, and physiological and perceptual responses to exercise were compared between groups using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests and repeated measures Analysis of Variance (RM-ANOVA).

Post-exertional malaise was modeled using Group by Time (2 × 3) doubly-multivariate, RM-MANOVAs for (1) mood, (2) pain and (3) GWI-related symptoms, respectively (α=0.05). Data were analyzed for the full sample of Veterans with GWI (n=39) compared to CO (n=28) and a subsample of Veterans (n=18) who endorsed “feeling unwell after physical exercise or exertion” (“PEM endorsers”) during screening.

Veterans with GWI reported significantly lower physical and mental health. Groups exercised at similar relative exercise intensities, but GWI perceived exercise as more painful and fatiguing. Group-by-Time interactions were not significant for the entire sample for the three PEM models, however limiting the GWI sample to “PEM endorsers” resulted in significant interactions for Pain- and GWI-related PEM models.

These results indicate that not all GVs with GWI experience PEM 24 hr after exercise, and that more research is needed to determine the extent that exercise worsens symptoms in GWI.

Source: Lindheimer JB, Stegner AJ, Wylie GR, Klein-Adams JC, Almassi NE, Ninneman JV, Van Riper SM, Dougherty RJ, Falvo MJ, Cook DB. Post-exertional malaise in veterans with gulf war illness. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Jan;147:202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 28. PMID: 31786249; PMCID: PMC6957714. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957714/ (Full text)

Developing a clinical-pathological framework of long COVID-related fatigue applied to public safety workers

Abstract:

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, millions worldwide are still struggling with persistent or recurring symptoms known as long COVID. Fatigue is one of the most prevalent symptoms associated with long COVID, and for many it can be debilitating. Understanding the potential pathological processes that link fatigue to long COVID is critical to better guide treatment. Challenges with diagnosis and treatment are reviewed, recognizing that post-COVID fatigue does not always present with corroborating clinical evidence, a situation that is frustrating for both patients and healthcare providers.

Firefighters are a group of public safety workers who are particularly impacted by long COVID-related fatigue. Firefighters must be able to engage in strenuous physical activity and deal with demanding psychological situations, both of which may be difficult for those suffering from fatigue. Disruption in public safety worker health can potentially impact community welfare. This review creates a framework to explain the clinical-pathological features of fatigue resulting from long COVID, addresses diagnosis and treatment challenges, and explores the unique impact fatigue may pose for public safety workers and their organizations.

Source: Lofrano-Porto A, D’Isabel S, Smith DL. Developing a clinical-pathological framework of long COVID-related fatigue applied to public safety workers. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 17;11:1387499. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1387499. PMID: 39086937; PMCID: PMC11288841. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288841/ (Full text)