Category: Medical Care

Medical students highlight the importance of medical education, kindness, compassion and belief when learning about patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

‘Imagine my surprise to discover ME/CFS is definitely not rare, but inexplicably and infuriatingly unacknowledged’. Fifth year medical student, Scotland.
Earlier this year, medical students at Scottish medical schools were invited to take part in an essay competition, 500 words on the topic of ‘What is your most important learning point about myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)?’ This edition proudly features the first prize winning essay of the competition which was funded by the Scottish Government’s education project; Learn About ME.1
ME/CFS affects at least 280,000 people in the UK, including approximately 23,000 in Scotland. It is a neurological disease with multisystem symptoms, often triggered by a virus. People with ME/CFS may be left bedbound or housebound with a significantly reduced quality of life.2 Yet many healthcare professionals do not know how to diagnose or manage this devastating disease, nor do they know how, or what, to teach our next generation of doctors.3
People with ME/CFS, and a subset of those with long COVID, experience symptoms including post-exertional malaise (PEM), unrefreshing sleep, profound fatigue, brain fog and orthostatic intolerance.4
Patients can also present with sore throats, muscle aches, disrupted sleep, changes in bowel habit, joint and bone pain, problems with multitasking and short-term memory, word-finding difficulties, headaches, changes in smell and taste, tinnitus, disrupted menses, breathlessness, dizziness, skin rashes and hair loss.4
Research into underlying mechanisms has revealed key defects: an abnormal response to repeat exercise, gait and strength abnormalities, immune system dysfunction, neuroinflammation, altered blood cell morphology and clotting, problems with cellular-energy delivery, microbial gut dysbiosis and changes in metabolomics.5
The lack of medical education on this topic and resulting weak clinical knowledge of ME/CFS has resulted in delays to diagnosis, multiple clinic referrals and a huge cost to every taxpayer. ME/CFS costs the UK an estimated £3.3 billion a year6 and long COVID clinics cost millions, with funding being extended for this chronic condition. Yet Scottish services are struggling to find healthcare practitioners to deliver this care or worse, offering potentially harmful patient support workshops that are directly in conflict with the NICE (NG206) 2021 ME/CFS guidelines such as the highly criticised ‘Lightning Process’.7 Medical education on ME/CFS and post-acute infectious disease is urgently needed for earlier recognition and better management.
One student described the experience and delay in diagnosis for two of their family members: ‘. . .these young women were discarded as victims of teenage laziness or anxiety. They had to fight to gain support from their GP (General Practitioner) and their diagnosis took several second opinions and ultimately years’.
Outdated treatment using graded exercise, shown to harm ME/CFS patients, has been rebranded as ‘activity management’ in some services and offered to both ME/CFS and long COVID patients. Another medical student displayed incredible insight in recognising the deficiency of the current system, which relies largely on patient self-help: ‘the burden being placed on the patient to improve their condition through mental work’.
The key feature of ME/CFS is PEM. The most important thing to learn about PEM is that even trivial activity (whether physical, mental or emotional) can exacerbate symptoms, and that this exacerbation or flare can be delayed. A person with ME/CFS who can sit upright for five minutes on a given day could be too ill to sit up at all the next day due to PEM.8
A traditional rehabilitation programme led by a physiotherapist might include graded activity or exercise. For a non-ME/CFS person following a sports injury, orthopaedic surgery or intensive care, gently increasing activity for just a few minutes, or a few steps at a time is ideal. However, for ME/CFS patients, this approach could be incredibly harmful. People with ME/CFS need to conserve their energy and pace themselves to avoid a flare in symptoms.4
People who are only mildly affected still experience a major negative impact on their ability to work. They have very little energy for socialising, hobbies and housework. For those moderately affected, basic activities of normal daily living such as preparing food, washing and dressing can cause symptom exacerbation. Very severely affected individuals, who are often bedbound, can experience PEM from simply turning in bed, speaking and digesting food.9
ME/CFS also has a major impact on family members’ quality of life.2 Nearly a third of medical students responding commented on the impact on quality of life as being one of the most important things to learn about this disease.
Several students wrote about a family member, or friend, whom they knew with ME/CFS. Sadly, it was a recurring theme that the medical students explained they had not been taught about ME/CFS at medical school. One commented: ‘Alas, the only time in the last four years I have encountered the term ME/CFS at medical school was as a differential diagnosis for fibromyalgia’.
It is vital that this topic features more prominently in the medical curriculum, and in our medical textbooks, to avoid patient harm due to delayed or mis-diagnosis and mismanagement. There is a lot we can offer ME/CFS patients: an early and accurate diagnosis, medication for symptom control, practical support with disability applications and mobility aids, but above all, these medical students have reminded us that ME/CFS patients should be treated with kindness, compassion and belief.10
Source: Muirhead NL. Medical students highlight the importance of medical education, kindness, compassion and belief when learning about patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2024 May 27:14782715241255977. doi: 10.1177/14782715241255977. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38798174. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14782715241255977 (Full text)

Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling yet clinically “contested” condition, previously theorised through a lens of epistemic injustice. Phenomena conceptually close to epistemic injustice, including stigma, are known to have deleterious consequences on a person’s health and life-world. Yet, no known primary studies have explored how people with ME/CFS experience healthcare through a lens of epistemic injustice, whilst a dearth of research explicitly exploring healthcare-related injustice from a patient perspective has been noted. This qualitative study seeks to address this gap.

Semi-structured interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) were used to explore the experiences of five people with ME/CFS in the UK, vis-à-vis healthcare-related epistemic injustice. One superordinate theme is presented, “Being de-centred in patient-centred care,” alongside two sub-themes: “Struggling for epistemic-existential validation” and “Negotiating socio-epistemic hierarchies, politics and ‘power’.”

Findings suggest that healthcare-related epistemic injustice may differentially impact according to the patient’s social positionality (here, notably gender), and that a potential pathway of existential harm operates through threats to identity and personhood. Findings also indicate that cultural and political factors may further epistemic injustice in healthcare. Finally, epistemic injustice impacting as a chronic stressor cannot be ruled out and is worthy of further research.

The experience of healthcare-related epistemic injustice can carry far-reaching yet varied consequences for patients. Future research should consider drawing upon more socio-demographically diverse samples and an intersectional approach is recommended. Further exploration of structural drivers of epistemic injustice may highlight a need for politically and socio-culturally cognisant clinical approaches.

Source: Hunt, J., Runacres, J., Herron, D., & Sheffield, D. (2024). Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 1125-1148. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6519 https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol29/iss4/15/ (Full text available as PDF file)

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence

Abstract:

In 2021, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced an evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a disabling long-term condition of unknown cause. The guideline provides clear support for people living with ME/CFS, their families and carers, and for clinicians. A recent opinion piece published in the journal suggested that there were anomalies in the processing and interpretation of the evidence when developing the guideline and proposed eight areas where these anomalies were thought to have occurred. We outline how these opinions are based on a misreading or misunderstanding of the guideline process or the guideline, which provides a balanced and reasoned approach to the diagnosis and management of this challenging condition.

Source: Barry PW, Kelley K, Tan T, et al. NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry Published Online First: 28 February 2024. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332731 https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/early/2024/02/28/jnnp-2023-332731 (Full text)

Heterogeneity in Measures of Illness among Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Not Explained by Clinical Practice: A Study in Seven U.S. Specialty Clinics

Abstract:

Background: One of the goals of the Multi-site Clinical Assessment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (MCAM) study was to evaluate whether clinicians experienced in diagnosing and caring for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) recognized the same clinical entity.
Methods: We enrolled participants from seven specialty clinics in the United States. We used baseline data (n = 465) on standardized questions measuring general clinical characteristics, functional impairment, post-exertional malaise, fatigue, sleep, neurocognitive/autonomic symptoms, pain, and other symptoms to evaluate whether patient characteristics differed by clinic.
Results: We found few statistically significant and no clinically significant differences between clinics in their patients’ standardized measures of ME/CFS symptoms and function. Strikingly, patients in each clinic sample and overall showed a wide distribution in all scores and measures.
Conclusions: Illness heterogeneity may be an inherent feature of ME/CFS. Presenting research data in scatter plots or histograms will help clarify the challenge. Relying on case–control study designs without subgrouping or stratification of ME/CFS illness characteristics may limit the reproducibility of research findings and could obscure underlying mechanisms.
Source: Unger ER, Lin J-MS, Chen Y, Cornelius ME, Helton B, Issa AN, Bertolli J, Klimas NG, Balbin EG, Bateman L, et al. Heterogeneity in Measures of Illness among Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Not Explained by Clinical Practice: A Study in Seven U.S. Specialty Clinics. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(5):1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051369 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/5/1369 (Full text)

Systems thinking, subjective findings and diagnostic “pigeonholing” in ME/CFS: A mainly qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: ME/CFS (Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) is an illness that is predominantly viewed as a neuroimmunological multisystem disease, which is still unknown to many doctors in Germany or which they classify as a psychosomatic disease. From their perspective, ME/CFS patients report significant deficits in terms of medical treatment and a doctor-patient relationship (DP relationship) that is perceived as problematic. The aim of the present study is to more precisely analyse the process of finding a diagnosis as an influencing factor on the DP relationship in ME/CFS from the point of view of those affected.

Method: As part of an explorative qualitative survey, 544 ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) with a medical diagnosis of ME/CFS were asked in writing about their experiences with regard to the process of finding a diagnosis. The sampling was previously done by self-activation and via the snowball principle. The questionnaire to be answered was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The evaluation was carried out as part of a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Some of the results were subsequently quantified.

Results: The participants described what they saw as the inadequate process of making a diagnosis as a central factor in a problematic DP relationship in ME/CFS. From their point of view, many doctors deny the existence of ME/CFS or classify it as a solely psychosomatic illness, insist on their level of knowledge, ignore patient knowledge and disregard scientific information provided. They follow the standard program, think in “pigeonholes” and are incapable of systemic thinking. This has a significant impact on the DP relationship.

Discussion: From the point of view of ME/CFS patients, the process of making a diagnosis and the recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological multisystem disease are the central aspects of a DP relationship that they experience as problematic. In the past, findings classified as “subjective” and thus ignored, the pigeonholing that is characteristic of biomedically oriented medicine and a healthcare system that opposes systemic thinking when making a diagnosis have all been identified as factors that may have a significant impact on the DP relationship.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Systemisches Denken, subjektive Befunde und das diagnostische „Schubladendenken“ bei ME/CFS – Eine vorwiegend qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Systems thinking, subjective findings and diagnostic “pigeonholing” in ME/CFS: A mainly qualitative public health study from a patient perspective]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Dec 14. German. doi: 10.1055/a-2197-6479. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38096913. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38096913/

Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Most patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are dissatisfied with medical care. They complain about e. g. the lack of medical recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological disease and the medical perception of those affected as “difficult patients”.

Method: As part of an exploratory qualitative survey, 544 medically diagnosed ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) were asked about their subjective experiences with regard to the doctor-patient relationships (DP relationship) to their treating physicians. The questionnaire was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The written answers were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results: The participants reported a significant deterioration in their health situation and their quality of life as a result of misdiagnoses and incorrect treatments, the strained DP relationship and the lack of support from the physicians. All of this leads to fear of visiting the doctor, a general loss of trust in physicians, a feeling of helplessness up to bitterness and resignation – with suicide as the last mental option for some patients to escape from this precarious situation. During medical consultations, other participants only addressed health problems that were not related to ME/CFS, or only went to the doctor in an emergency, or refrained from contacting doctors entirely.

Conclusions: The DP relationship described by the participants as problematic in their opinion has significant negative health consequences for them. It is therefore of great urgency to develop a patient-centred treatment concept that focuses on ME/CFS patients as experts on their own illness.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Auswirkungen der Qualität der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung auf die Gesundheit von erwachsenen ME/CFS-Erkrankten : Eine qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patien perspective]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2023 Dec;165(Suppl 5):16-27. German. doi: 10.1007/s15006-023-2894-z. PMID: 38062324.

‘We have no services for you… so you have to make the best out of it’: A qualitative study of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients’ dissatisfaction with healthcare services

Abstract:

Introduction: People should have access to healthcare services that are effective, safe and secure, patient-centred, and coordinated and continuous. One group that has consistently reported negative experiences and feels dissatisfied with services are patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The objective of this study was to develop a deeper understanding of the experiences of dissatisfaction among ME/CFS patients and explore the reasons for such dissatisfaction.

Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 48 people from 24 households (comprising patients and family members), providing insight into the experiences of 37 ME/CFS sufferers in Norway. The participants were purposively sampled and included persons of different ages, genders, time since having the condition (3-30 years), and severity.

Results: Four main themes were developed: (1) ‘Nonexistent services’ cover patients’ experience that healthcare services had nothing to offer them after receiving their ME/CFS-diagnosis. (2) ‘Nonpersonalised services’ documents experiences where patients did receive services, which in theory was appropriate for relieving a specific health problem, but in practice were experienced as inappropriate because they were not adapted to the patient’s need. (3) ‘Slow services’ address patients’ experience of getting services too late (or too little) to be useful. (4) ‘Wrong services’ comprise patients’ experiences of being offered and/or ‘forced’ to accept services that they felt were inappropriate for their health problems.

Conclusions: Providers’ lacking knowledge of the condition and lack of precise recommendations for follow up may partly explain unsatisfactory experiences. Providers’ belief (or disbelief) in the condition could furthermore influence caregiving. Also, systemic issues in the healthcare sector, like high workloads and bureaucracy, can negatively affect care provision. Finally, users’ unsatisfactory experiences may also be due to a lack of patient involvement in the design of such services. Further research should investigate how patients can be involved in service design, and also providers’ perspectives on caregiving and the barriers they experience for providing high-quality care.

Patient or public contribution: The ME-patient organisation suggested research topics to the call from which this study got funding. Patients and caregivers provided feedback during analysis and interpretation of data.

Source: Melby L, Nair RD. ‘We have no services for you… so you have to make the best out of it’: A qualitative study of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients’ dissatisfaction with healthcare services. Health Expect. 2023 Oct 31. doi: 10.1111/hex.13900. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37905602. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.13900 (Full text)

eLearning improves allied health professionals’ knowledge and confidence to manage medically unexplained chronic fatigue states: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of eLearning by allied health professionals on improving the knowledge and confidence to manage people with medically unexplained chronic fatigue states (FS).

Methods: Using a parallel randomized controlled trial design, participants were randomized 1:1 to a 4-week eLearning or wait-list control group. Knowledge and self-reported confidence in clinical skills to implement a therapeutic intervention for patients with FS were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Secondary outcomes (adherence and satisfaction with online education, knowledge retention) were also assessed. Data was analyzed using intention-to-treat.

Results: There were 239 participants were randomized (eLearning n = 119, control n = 120), of whom 101 (85%) eLearning and 107 (89%) control participants completed baseline assessments and were included in the analysis. Knowledge (out of 100) improved significantly more in the eLearning group compared to the control group [mean difference (95% CI) 8.6 (5.9 to 11.4), p < 0.001]. Knowledge was reduced in the eLearning group at follow-up but was still significantly higher than baseline [6.0 (3.7 to 8.3), p < 0.001]. Median change (out of 5) in confidence in clinical skills to implement the FS intervention was also significantly greater in the eLearning group compared to the control group [knowledge: eLearning (1.2), control (0); clinical skills: eLearning (1), control (0.1); both p < 0.001)]. Average time spent on the eLearning program was 8.8 h. Most participants (80%) rated the lesson difficulty as at the “right level”, and 91% would recommend it to others.

Conclusions: eLearning increased knowledge and confidence to manage FS amongst allied health professionals and was well-accepted.

Registration: ACTRN12616000296437 https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370222&isReview=true.

Source: Jones MD, Casson SM, Barry BK, Li SH, Valenzuela T, Cassar J, Lamanna C, Lloyd AR, Sandler CX. eLearning improves allied health professionals’ knowledge and confidence to manage medically unexplained chronic fatigue states: A randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2023 Aug 16;173:111462. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111462. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37619433. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399923003197 (Full text)

A technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID and other fatiguing illnesses within a federally qualified health center: protocol for a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement professional cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

Background: The clinical burden of Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other post-infectious fatiguing illnesses (PIFI) is increasing. There is a critical need to advance understanding of the effectiveness and sustainability of innovative approaches to clinical care of patients having these conditions.

Methods: We aim to assess the effectiveness of a Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP) in a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement, professional cluster, randomized controlled trial in which 20 consenting clinicians across primary care clinics in a Federally Qualified Health Center system in San Diego, CA, will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either participate in (1) weekly multi-disciplinary team-based case consultation and peer-to-peer sharing of emerging best practices (i.e., teleECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes)) with monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses or (2) monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses alone (a control group); 856 patients will be assigned to participating clinicians (42 patients per clinician). Patient outcomes will be evaluated according to the study arm of their respective clinicians. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes will be measured at 3- and 6-months post-baseline for clinicians and every 3-months post assignment to a participating clinician for patients. The primary patient outcome is change in physical function measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29. Analyses of differences in outcomes at both the patient and clinician levels will include a linear mixed model to compare change in outcomes from baseline to each post-baseline assessment between the randomized study arms. A concurrent prospective cohort study will compare the LC&FIRP patient population to the population enrolled in a university health system. Longitudinal data analysis approaches will allow us to examine differences in outcomes between cohorts.

Discussion: We hypothesize that weekly teleECHO sessions with monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses will significantly improve clinician- and patient-level outcomes compared to the control group. This study will provide much needed evidence on the effectiveness of a technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID, ME/CFS, and other PIFI within a federally qualified health center.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05167227 . Registered on December 22, 2021.

Source: Godino JG, Samaniego JC, Sharp SP, Taren D, Zuber A, Armistad AJ, Dezan AM, Leyba AJ, Friedly JL, Bunnell AE, Matthews E, Miller MJ, Unger ER, Bertolli J, Hinckley A, Lin JS, Scott JD, Struminger BB, Ramers C. A technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID and other fatiguing illnesses within a federally qualified health center: protocol for a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement professional cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 12;24(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07550-3. PMID: 37573421. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-023-07550-3 (Full text)