Category: Media Coverage

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2021 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines on Public Perspectives Toward Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis on Twitter (Rebranded as X)

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), also referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), is a complex illness that typically presents with disabling fatigue and cognitive and functional impairment. The etiology and management of ME/CFS remain contentious and patients often describe their experiences through social media.

Objective: We explored public discourse on Twitter (rebranded as X) to understand the concerns and priorities of individuals living with ME/CFS, with a focus on (1) the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) publication of the 2021 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the diagnosis and management of ME/CFS.

Methods: We used the Twitter application programming interface to collect tweets related to ME/CFS posted between January 1, 2010, and January 30, 2024. Tweets were sorted into 3 chronological periods (pre-COVID-19 pandemic, post-COVID-19 pandemic, and post-UK 2021 NICE Guidelines publication). A Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Embedding Representations from Transformers Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa) language processing model was used to categorize the sentiment of tweets as positive, negative, or neutral. We identified tweets that mentioned COVID-19, the UK NICE guidelines, and key themes identified through latent Dirichlet allocation (ie, fibromyalgia, research, and treatment). We sampled 1000 random tweets from each theme to identify subthemes and representative quotes.

Results: We retrieved 906,404 tweets, of which 427,824 (47.2%) were neutral, 369,371 (40.75%) were negative, and 109,209 (12.05%) were positive. Over time, both the proportion of negative and positive tweets increased, and the proportion of neutral tweets decreased (P<.001 for all changes). Tweets mentioning fibromyalgia acknowledged similarities with ME/CFS, stigmatization associated with both disorders, and lack of effective treatments. Treatment-related tweets often described frustration with ME/CFS labeled as mental illness, dismissal of concerns by health care providers, and the need to seek out “good physicians” who viewed ME/CFS as a physical disorder. Tweets on research typically praised studies of biomarkers and biomedical therapies, called for greater investment in biomedical research, and expressed frustration with studies suggesting a biopsychosocial etiology for ME/CFS or supporting management with psychotherapy or graduated activity. Tweets about the UK NICE guidelines expressed frustration with the 2007 version that recommended cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy, and a prolonged campaign by advocacy organizations to influence subsequent versions. Tweets showed high acceptance of the 2021 UK NICE guidelines, which were seen to validate ME/CFS as a biomedical disease and recommended against graded exercise therapy. Tweets about COVID-19 often noted overlaps between post-COVID-19 condition and ME/CFS, including claims of a common biological pathway, and advised there was no cure for either condition.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest research is needed to inform how best to support patients’ engagement with evidence-based care. Furthermore, while patient involvement with ME/CFS research is critical, unmanaged intellectual conflicts of interest may threaten the trustworthiness of research efforts.

Source: Khakban I, Jain S, Gallab J, Dharmaraj B, Zhou F, Lokker C, Abdelkader W, Zeraatkar D, Busse JW. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2021 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines on Public Perspectives Toward Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis on Twitter (Rebranded as X). J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 21;27:e65087. doi: 10.2196/65087. PMID: 40397934. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e65087 (Full text)

Efficacy Of SARS–CoV-2 Specific Antiviral Therapy for Enteroviral Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ChronicFatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Etiology remains elusive for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), and no treatment exists. Antivirals had no efficacy in randomized clinical trials (RCT) for Epstein-Barr Virus and HHV-6. Enteroviruses (EV) have been implicated, but no antivirals are available. Many patients who received SARS–CoV-2-specific antiviral drugs for acute Covid-19 (COV19) infection experienced significant improvement of prior ME/CFS symptoms. This study summarizes their responses to antivirals for SARS-Cov-2.
Methods: Neutralizing Antibody (NA) for Coxsackievirus B (CVB)1-6 and Echovirus 6, 7, 9, 11, 30 were done by ARUP lab. Enterovirus Protein (EVP) of Peripheral Blood Leukocytes (PBL) was determined by Western Blot. ME/CFS patients fulfilled Canadian consensus criteria, and had either elevated NA for enteroviruses and/or positive EVP in PBL. ME/CFS patients hospitalized for acute COV19 infection and patients without COV19, were given 5-10 days of IV Remdesivir (Rem) +/- immune modulators. Controls: 20 ME/CFS patients seen concurrently without Remdesivir treatment. Other ME/CFS patients (non-COV19) were given Nirmaltrelvir/Ritonavir (PAX) daily for 10 days +/- one repeat. The energy index (EI) was monitored by the patients before, during and after treatment. Significant improvement was defined as > 30%.
Results: 15/20 (75%) ME/CFS patients – 10/12 hospitalized, 5/8 non-COV19 patients – responded to IV Rem 2-6 weeks after infusions; remission lasted 6-8 weeks to 6-9 months before relapse. Of Controls: 2/20 had mild improvement (< 0.001, X 2 ).

104/200 (52%) of PAX-treated ME/CFS patients improved, often within 2-3 days; all relapsed within days to weeks after treatment. 66%, 33% and 44% of CVB4+, CVB3+, non-CVB3,4+ patients responded to treatment, respectively. EVP decreased and increased with clinical response and relapse.

Conclusion: Rem and PAX demonstrated clinical efficacy in ME/CFS patients with chronic enterovirus infections. Placebo-controlled RCT will be needed to clarify the role of antivirals in ME/CFS.
Source: John K Chia, David Wang, P-2363. Efficacy Of SARS–CoV-2 Specific Antiviral Therapy for Enteroviral Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ChronicFatigue Syndrome, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 12, Issue Supplement_1, February 2025, ofae631.2514, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2514 https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/12/Supplement_1/ofae631.2514/7988721?login=false 

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

UK health standards body delays new ME guidance in therapy row

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) has withdrawn long-awaited landmark guidance on ME hours before its planned publication amid a backlash from medical groups.

Charities and patient groups fighting for greater recognition of the poorly understood condition as a medical illness rather than a psychological problem had welcomed the planned guidance, which was due to stop advising doctors to administer a controversial therapy.

This disputed therapy, called graded exercise therapy (GET), involves incremental increases in physical activity to gradually build up tolerance. Patient groups have argued its use suggests those with ME have no underlying physical problem but are having symptoms due to inactivity.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

A content analysis of chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis in the news from 1987 to 2013

Abstract:

Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the content of American newspaper articles ( n=214) from 1987 to 2013, in order to understand how the public digests information related to Chronic Fatigue syndrome, a controversial and misunderstood illness.

Methods A novel codebook derived from the scientific literature was applied to 214 newspaper articles collected from Lexis Nexis Academic®. These articles were coded quantitatively and frequency tables were created to delineate the variables as they appeared in the articles.

Results The etiology was portrayed as organic in 64.5% ( n=138) of the articles, and there was no mention of case definitions or diagnostic criteria in 56.1% ( n=120) of the articles. The most common comorbidity was depression, appearing in 22.9% ( n=49) of the articles. In 55.6% ( n=119) of the articles, there was no mention of prevalence rates. In 50.9% ( n=109) of the articles, there was no mention of any form of treatment for the illness. A total of 19.4% ( n=42) of the headlines mislabeled the name of the illness.

Discussion Based on descriptive statistics of all 214 coded articles, media communicated mixed messages for salient variables such as the name of the illness, its etiology and treatment.

 

Source: Siegel ZA, Brown A, Devendorf A, Collier J, Leonard J. A content analysis of chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis in the news from 1987 to 2013. Chronic Illn. 2017 Jan 1:1742395317703175. doi: 10.1177/1742395317703175. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28403636