Category: Exercise

Long COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis share similar pathophysiologic mechanisms of exercise limitation

Abstract:

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC or “long COVID”) and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME) share symptoms such as exertional dyspnea. We used exercise oxygen pathway analysis, comprising six parameters of oxygen transport and utilization, to identify limiting mechanisms in both conditions. Invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed on 15 PASC patients, 11 CFS/ME patients, and 11 controls.

We evaluated the contributions of alveolar ventilation (V̇a), lung diffusion capacity (DL ), cardiac output (Q̇), skeletal muscle diffusion capacity (DM ), hemoglobin (Hb), and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (Vmax) to peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak). To simulate targeted interventions, each variable was sequentially normalized to assess its impact on V̇O2peak. V̇O2peak was significantly reduced in both PASC and CFS/ME compared to controls.

Skeletal muscle O2 diffusion (DM ) was the most impaired parameter in both patient groups (p = 0.01). Correcting DM alone improved V̇O2 by 66% in PASC (p = 0.008) and 34.7% in CFS/ME (p = 0.06), suggesting a dominant role for peripheral O2 extraction in exercise limitation. Impaired skeletal muscle oxygen diffusion (DM ) is a shared mechanism of exercise intolerance in PASC and CFS/ME and may represent a therapeutic target. However, our findings are limited by small sample size.

Source: Jothi S, Insel M, Claessen G, Kubba S, Howden EJ, Ruiz-Carmona S, Levine T, Rischard FP. Long COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis share similar pathophysiologic mechanisms of exercise limitation. Physiol Rep. 2025 Sep;13(17):e70535. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70535. PMID: 40892700. https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14814/phy2.70535 (Full text)

Skeletal muscle properties in long COVID and ME/CFS differ from those induced by bed rest

Abstract:

Patients with long COVID and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) suffer from a reduced exercise capacity, skeletal muscle abnormalities and post-exertional malaise (PEM), where symptoms worsen with cognitive or physical exertion. PEM often results in avoidance of physical activity, resulting in a lower aerobic fitness, which may contribute to skeletal muscle abnormalities. Here, we compared whole-body exercise responses and skeletal muscle adaptations after strict 60-day bed rest in healthy people with those in patients with long COVID and ME/CFS, and healthy age- and sex-matched controls.

Bed rest altered the respiratory and cardiovascular responses to (sub)maximal exercise, while patients exhibited respiratory alterations only at submaximal exercise. Bed rest caused muscle atrophy, and the reduced oxidative phosphorylation related to reductions in maximal oxygen uptake.

Patients with long COVID and ME/CFS did not have muscle atrophy, but had less capillaries and a more glycolytic fibers, none of which were associated with maximal oxygen uptake. While the whole-body aerobic capacity is similar following bed rest compared to patients, the skeletal muscle characteristics differed, suggesting that physical inactivity alone does not explain the lower exercise capacity in long COVID and ME/CFS.

Source: Braeden T. Charlton, Anouk Slaghekke, Brent Appelman, Moritz Eggelbusch, Jelle Y. Huijts, Wendy Noort, Paul W. Hendrickse, Frank W. Bloemers, Jelle J. Posthuma, Paul van Amstel, Richie P. Goulding, Hans Degens, Richard T. Jaspers, Michèle van Vugt, Rob C.I. Wüst. Skeletal muscle properties in long COVID and ME/CFS differ from those induced by bed rest. medRxiv 2025.05.02.25326885; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.02.25326885 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.02.25326885v1.full?_x_tr_sl=nl&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en (Full text)

Extracellular vesicle proteomics uncovers energy metabolism, complement system, and endoplasmic reticulum stress response dysregulation postexercise in males with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating illness characterized by post-exertional malaise (PEM), a worsening of symptoms following exertion. The biological mechanisms underlying PEM remain unclear. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a key role in cell-cell communication and may provide insight into ME/CFS pathophysiology post-exertion. Emerging evidence suggests similarities between ME/CFS and Long COVID, including PEM and overlapping immune and metabolic dysfunctions, highlighting the need for deeper mechanistic understanding.

Methods: This study explores the EV proteome response to exercise in 10 males with ME/CFS and 12 well-matched sedentary male controls. Participants underwent a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, and plasma samples were collected at baseline, 15 min, and 24 h postexercise. EVs were isolated from plasma using size-exclusion chromatography and characterized with nanoparticle tracking analysis. EV protein abundance was quantified with untargeted proteomics (nanoLC-MS/MS). Comprehensive analyses included differential abundance, pathway enrichment, protein-protein interaction networks, and correlations between EV protein dynamics and clinical or exercise physiology data.

Results: ME/CFS patients exhibited many significantly altered EV proteomic responses compared with controls, including downregulation of TCA cycle-related proteins and upregulation of complement system proteins at 15 min postexercise. Changes in proteins involved in protein folding and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response during recovery were highly correlated with PEM severity, highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets. EV protein changes postexercise were also associated with disease severity and unrefreshing sleep. Correlations between EV protein levels and the exercise parameters VO₂ peak and ventilatory anaerobic threshold were observed in controls but were absent in ME/CFS patients, suggesting disrupted EV-mediated physiological processes.

Conclusions: ME/CFS patients exhibit a maladaptive EV proteomic response to exercise, characterized by metabolic impairments, immune overactivation, and ER stress response dysregulation. These findings provide insight into the molecular basis of PEM and suggest promising targets for improving recovery and energy metabolism in ME/CFS.

Source: Glass KA, Giloteaux L, Zhang S, Hanson MR. Extracellular vesicle proteomics uncovers energy metabolism, complement system, and endoplasmic reticulum stress response dysregulation postexercise in males with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Transl Med. 2025 May;15(5):e70346. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70346. PMID: 40465195; PMCID: PMC12135887. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12135887/ (Full text)

Multimodal Web-Based Telerehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Condition: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract:

Background: Patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) experience persistent, long-term health consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including fatigue, hyperventilation, cognitive impairment, and limitations in daily activities. There is emerging evidence suggesting that exercise and respiratory therapy-based telerehabilitation is safe and could potentially improve physical capacity while reducing health care costs.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the superiority of a multimodal, symptom-titrated telerehabilitation program over standard care in patients with PCC who are severely affected, using the highest oxygen uptake rate (VO2peak [mL/min/kg]) achieved during the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (VE/VCO2 [full slope]) as primary outcomes. In addition, this study seeks to provide novel insights into the clinical and physiological adaptations associated with PCC, informing future rehabilitation strategies.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, waitlist-controlled trial was approved by the Rhineland-Palatinate Medical Association ethics committee. All procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study comprises 3 examination time points, which include patient-reported outcomes, clinical assessments, and a CPET. It is structured into an 8-week intervention phase followed by an 8-week follow-up phase. Following baseline assessment, patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). During the intervention phase, IG participants will receive a web-based, multimodal, symptom-titrated telerehabilitation program consisting of sports medicine consultations, weekly teleconsultations, a structured pacing approach, and exercise and respiratory therapy. In contrast, CG participants will receive treatment as usual, which includes a single sports medicine consultation on healthy habits and a self-directed pacing approach for managing symptoms and daily activities. During the follow-up phase, IG participants will continue training independently without teleconsultations, whereas CG participants will undergo the same telerehabilitation intervention as the IG. A follow-up assessment will be conducted for both groups to evaluate long-term effects. This study adheres to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines and follows the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template.

Results: Recruitment began in August 2023 and was extended until March 2025. As of March 2025, 80 participants have been recruited, and data analysis is ongoing. Final results are expected by December 2025, with a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data anticipated by July 2025.

Conclusions: This study is the first randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of multimodal and symptom-titrated telerehabilitation in patients with PCC who are severely affected. The integration of various objective diagnostic systems will provide valuable insights into emerging postviral fatigue syndromes, supporting the development of CPET-based diagnostics, personalized rehabilitation strategies, and future research on long-term telerehabilitation effectiveness. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, professional networks, and patient advocacy groups to ensure scientific, clinical, and public impact.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00032394; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00032394.

Source: Tomaskovic A, Weber V, Ochmann DT, Neuberger EW, Lachtermann E, Brahmer A, Haller N, Hillen B, Enders K, Eggert V, Zeier P, Lieb K, Simon P. Multimodal Web-Based Telerehabilitation for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Condition: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e65044. doi: 10.2196/65044. PMID: 40397936. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e65044 (Full text)

Ignorance about post-exertional malaise and continued conflation of ME/CFS with chronic fatigue harms patients and stymies research progress

Dear Editor,

There are numerous issues with the opinion piece by Miller and coauthors. Most concern longstanding fallacies about the nature of ME/CFS and what patients believe about their illness, which — again — need to be corrected. I’d like to focus on just one: The defining and cardinal feature of ME/CFS is not fatigue, but rather post-exertional malaise (PEM).

PEM, sometimes referred to as post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), can be defined as episodes during which people with ME/CFS experience significant worsening of existing symptoms and/or onset of new symptoms following amounts of physical or mental exertion or sensory stimuli that they could easily tolerate before the illness [1]. The length and severity of an episode of PEM are out of proportion to the amount of exertion or stimulus that triggered it; in severe or very severe ME/CFS patients, PEM may be triggered by, for example, short conversations with their carers or brief exposure to bright light, and these episodes may last week, months, or longer.

PEM remains poorly understood, but the concept and terminology have over recent years become much more mainstream, owing to the high prevalence of PEM in long covid [2]. The consensus opinion among ME/CFS patients is that daily activities and sensory input should be managed in such a way as to minimise PEM, because PEM severely impacts quality of life and can in some cases lead to further long-term deterioration in patients’ health and functional capacity. This concept forms the basis of pacing, an energy management strategy recommended by NICE [3].

In their opinion piece, Miller and coauthors ignore PEM when listing common symptoms of ME/CFS. This is an attempt to continue framing this illness as belonging to a family of ‘fatiguing conditions’, which, along with other ‘medically unexplained symptoms’, they argue can be treated with psychological interventions and rehabilitation.

Read the rest of this letter here: https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r977/rr-6

The risk of blaming patients for their lack of recovery

Dear Editor,

In their article on the management of patients with severe myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), Miller et al. propose a biopsychosocial model in which “a gradual, controlled approach to increasing activity is an important part of rehabilitation.” This approach, however, is far from new and has been tested in randomized trials with limited success.

The PACE study, for example, examined fourteen sessions of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) or graded exercise therapy (GET), each combined with specialist medical care. Treatment aimed to help ME/CFS patients gradually resume physical activities, address unhelpful cognitions, and reverse deconditioning. Recovery rates for GET and CBT were low and did not differ significantly from the control group, with rates of 4%, 7%, and 3%, respectively, as defined by the study’s pre-registered recovery criteria. [1] Employment and fitness data also showed no clinically significant improvement. [2]

Read the full letter by Michiel Tack here: https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r977/rr-3

Stress-Induced Changes in Immune Signatures in ME/CFS Patients Determined by Transcriptome Analysis

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, complex multi-organ illness characterized by unexplained debilitating fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM). We evaluated transcriptomic changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of ME/CFS patients undergoing an exercise challenge and explored the transcriptomic response to exercise and recovery in PBMC of ME/CFS patients, as compared to healthy controls using RNA sequencing technology. As transcriptomic changes in ME/CFS patients are still in the phase of discovery, analysis of data has to be stringent, and the most important results have to be validated by a different technology, such as real-time PCR or NanoString.

Source: Gamer J, Van Booven D, Zarnowski O, Perez M, Frank J, Pangeni RP, Collado F, Klimas NG, Oltra E, Nathanson L. Stress-Induced Changes in Immune Signatures in ME/CFS Patients Determined by Transcriptome Analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2920:103-112. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4498-0_7. PMID: 40372680. https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-4498-0_7

Repeated Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing of ME/CFS Patients

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise is a cardinal symptom present in 95% of individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS). Repeated cardiopulmonary exercise testing has been momentous in revealing that the physiological systems of those with ME/CFS are impaired or damaged and do not respond to exercise/physical activity like those without the condition. The 24-h repeated exercise test may demonstrate a reduction in peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), VO2 at ventilatory threshold, power output at both peak and ventilatory threshold, along with a reduction/diminished maximal heart rate commensurate with chronotropic intolerance. In this chapter, I describe the process and methods of repeated cardiopulmonary exercise testing, used to assess exercise tolerance in individuals with ME/CFS.

Source: Hodges L. Repeated Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing of ME/CFS Patients. Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2920:163-172. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4498-0_10. PMID: 40372683. https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-0716-4498-0_10

Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment

Abstract:

Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a central feature of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and has emerged as a prominent feature of Long COVID. The optimal clinical approach to PEM is inconclusive, and studies of the impact of exercise have yielded contradictory results.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine PEM in Long COVID by assessing the prevalence of self-reported PEM across study cohorts and symptom responses of Long COVID patients to a standardized exercise stressor. Secondarily, Long COVID symptom responses to exercise were compared to those of ME/CFS and healthy volunteers.

Methods: Data from three registered clinical trials comprised four cohorts in this study: Long COVID Questionnaire Cohort (QC; n = 244), Long COVID Exercise Cohort (EC; n = 34), ME/CFS cohort (n = 9), and healthy volunteers (HV; n = 9). All cohorts completed questionnaires related to physical function, fatigue, and/or PEM symptoms. EC also performed a standardized exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET), and the PEM response to CPET was assessed using visual analog scales and qualitative interviews (QIs) administered serially over 72 h. EC PEM measures were compared to ME/CFS and HV cohorts. A secondary analysis of QI explored positive responses to CPET among EC, ME/CFS and HV.

Results: Self-reported PEM was 67% in QC and estimated at 27% in EC. Only 2 of 34 EC patients (5.9%) were observed to develop PEM after a CPET. In addition, PEM responses after CPET in Long COVID were not as severe and prolonged as those assessed in ME/CFS. Twenty-two of 34 EC patients (64.7%) expressed at least one of 7 positive themes after the CPET.

Conclusion: Self-report of PEM is common in Long COVID. However, observable PEM following an exercise stressor was not frequent in this small cohort. When present, PEM descriptions during QI were less severe in Long COVID than in ME/CFS. Positive responses after an exercise stressor were common in Long COVID. Exercise testing to determine the presence of PEM may have utility for guiding clinical management of Long COVID.

Source: Stussman B, Camarillo N, McCrossin G, Stockman M, Norato G, Vetter CS, Ferrufino A, Adedamola A, Grayson N, Nath A, Chan L, Walitt B, Chin LMK. Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1534352. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352. PMID: 40337174; PMCID: PMC12055772. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055772/ (Full text)

Exercise Pathophysiology in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID: Commonalities Detected by Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Abstract:

Rationale: There is substantial overlap of exertional symptoms in Long COVID (LC) and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) including intractable fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and orthostatic intolerance, but very little objective data liking the two. This study compares exercise pathophysiology in the two disorders and normal controls using invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).

Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2024, 1,518 patients underwent a clinical iCPET at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Exclusion criteria included morbid obesity (BMI>40 kg/m2), severe anemia ([Hb]<9.0 g/dL), elite athletes (peak VO2 (pVO2)>120% predicted), sub-maximum effort (RER<1.05), a primary pulmonary mechanical limit (VE @ AT/MVV>0.7), and comorbidities such as active/treated cancer, interstitial lung disease, or other respiratory related diseases. iCPET results from 438 ME/CFS patients, 73 LC patients, and 43 symptomatic but otherwise normal controls were analyzed. pV02, peak cardiac output (pQc), peak right atrial pressure (pRAP), peak systemic oxygen extraction (pSOE; Ca-vO2/[Hb]), and ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) were compared among groups. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis tests for global comparisons, with post-hoc Dunn tests for pairwise group comparisons. Holm-Bonferroni adjustments were applied to control for multiple comparisons.

Results: LC and ME/CFS displayed reduced pVO2 % predicted compared to controls (LC: 78.4 ± 18%, ME/CFS: 78.1 ± 17%, Controls: 97.5 ± 10%, P≤0.0001). Reduced pQc % predicted was also observed compared to controls (LC: 91.1 ± 18%, ME/CFS: 96.3%, Controls: 101 ± 11%, P≤0.001). pRAP were significantly less compared to controls (LC: 1.1 ± 3.1 mmHg, ME/CFS: 1.3 ± 2.8 mmHg, Controls: 3.6 ± 3.4 mmHg, P≤0.001). Significant reductions in pSOE were seen for LC and ME/CFS (LC: 0.81 ± 0.1, ME/CFS: 0.81 ± 0.1, Controls, 0.91 ± 0.1, P≤0.0001). The only measure with no significant difference between disease and control was VE/VCO2 slope (LC: 31.4 ± 8.4, ME/CFS: 31.6 ± 6.9, Controls: 32.0 ± 6.7, P≥0.261). Most interestingly, no significant differences were seen between the two diseases for any of the analyzed measures (P≥0.245).

Conclusions: We report the largest cohort of ME/CFS and LC investigated with iCPET to date. ME/CFS and LC share symptomatic, reduced aerobic capacity at peak exercise, which is driven by preload insufficiency and impaired systemic O2 extraction, the latter compatible with peripheral left-to-right shunting and/or limb skeletal muscle dysfunction. These findings should drive future diagnostics and personalized medicine in both diseases. We hope these data inform the pending prospective NIH RECOVER iCPET study of LC.

Source: J. Squires, S. Palwayi, P. Li, W. Xiao, K. LeWine, S.W. Johnson, D. Felsenstein, A.B. Waxman, and D.M. Systrom. Exercise Pathophysiology in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID: Commonalities Detected by Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A7881. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/​10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A7881