Tag: survey

Impacts of online support groups on quality of life, and perceived anxiety and depression in those with ME/CFS: A survey

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating condition that can negatively affect physical and mental health [1,2]. People with ME/CFS report lower perceived levels of social support, which further exacerbate challenges with mental health and has been linked to a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in this population [3]. There are many mental health benefits associated with participation in in-person support groups; however, it is unknown if these benefits translate to online support groups [5].

Purpose: To examine the perceived impacts of participation in online support groups on depression, anxiety and quality of life among people with ME/CFS.

Results: Responses (n = 76) to an online survey indicated positive and negative experiences with participation in online support groups. Positive experiences included a sense of belonging, validation, supportive friendships and feelings of positively impacting others. Negative experiences included jealousy, decreased hope and optimism and disagreement regarding treatment strategies.

Conclusion: Participation in online support groups was believed to decrease perceived feelings of depression and increase the quality of life in those with ME/CFS. No significant impacts on anxiety were found. Overall, participants reported engagement in online support groups to be a positive experience.

Source: Samantha Morehouse, Krystal Schaible, Olivia Williams, Ellen Herlache-Pretzer & Stacey Webster (2021) Impacts of online support groups on quality of life, and perceived anxiety and depression in those with ME/CFS: a survey, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2021.1950406

Report on the impact of Covid-19 on ME

Summary:

This summary report provides the preliminary findings from responses to the survey we are carrying out, in partnership with Action for ME, to identify the impact that Covid-19 has on people with ME. The report is based on the analysis of the 220 responses received in the three weeks after the survey went live in late March.

These initial responses show clearly that Covid-19 had a significant impact on respondents, with more than three quarters (76%) of respondents saying that Covid-19 made their ME symptoms worse. This impact appears to be long lasting, with over two thirds of respondents reporting that the worsening in symptoms has lasted more than 6 months and have still not resolved.

The wider impact of Covid-19 is illustrated by the negative impacts on the health of respondents, including 72% reporting new symptoms. The analysis also shows that respondents’ ability to attend education or work had decreased and their use of health services had increased significantly, highlighting the potential economic impact of Covid-19.

Read the full report HERE.

Specifics of chronic fatigue syndrome coping strategies identified in a French flash survey during the COVID-19 containment

Abstract:

The COVID-19 pandemic has focused health systems on supporting patients affected by this virus. Meanwhile in the community, many other contained patients could only use self-care strategies, especially in countries that have set up a long and strict containment such as France. The study aimed to compare coping strategies deployed by patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS; a poorly recognised syndrome) to those with better known and referenced chronic conditions. An online flash survey was conducted during the containment period in partnership with French Patients Organizations including ME/CFS national association. Therefore, ‘Brief COPE’ version of Lazarus and Folkman’s Ways of Coping Check List has been adapted to the specificity of the containment.

The survey was e-distributed in France from 15 April to 11 May 2020. Differences of coping strategies were analyzed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Withney test. Amongst 637 responses, 192 were complete, presenting a wide variety of diseases, including 93 ME/CFS. The latter have significantly different coping strategies than recognised diagnosed diseases patients: similar uses of emotion focused coping but less uses of seek social support and problem-focused copings.

In conclusion, coping strategies are different for those who deal with the daily experience of ME/CFS, highly disabling chronic condition with diagnostic ambiguity, low degree of medical and social recognition and without treatment. Better understanding of those strategies is needed to provide the means for health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians, to accompany those patients.

Source: Moncorps F, Jouet E, Bayen S, Fornasieri I, Renet S, Las-Vergnas O, Messaadi N. Specifics of chronic fatigue syndrome coping strategies identified in a French flash survey during the COVID-19 containment. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Apr 6. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13376. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33825299. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33825299/

Comparative Survey of People with ME/CFS in Italy, Latvia, and the UK: A Report on Behalf of the Socioeconomics Working Group of the European ME/CFS Research Network (EUROMENE)

Abstract:

Background and Objectives: A comparative survey of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients was carried out in three countries, with the aim of identifying appropriate policy measures designed to alleviate the burden of disease both on patients and their families, and also on public institutions. The survey addressed demographic features, the economic impact of the disease on household incomes, patterns of medical and social care, specific therapies, social relationships, and the impact of the illness on quality of life.

Materials and Methods: Parallel surveys were undertaken in Italy, Latvia, and the UK. There were 88 completed responses from Italy, 75 from Latvia, and 448 from the UK. To facilitate comparisons, 95% confidence intervals were calculated in respect of responses to questions from all three countries. To explore to what extent general practitioners (GPs) manage ME/CFS disease, a separate questionnaire for GPs, with questions about the criteria for granting a diagnosis, laboratory examinations, the involvement of specialists, and methods of treatment, was undertaken in Latvia, and there were 91 completed responses from GPs.

Results: The results are presented in respect of sociodemographic information, household income, disease progression and management, perceived effectiveness of treatment, responsibility for medical care, personal care, difficulty explaining the illness, and quality of life. Demographic details were similar in all three countries, and the impact of illness on net household incomes and quality of life. There were significant differences between the three countries in illness progression and management, which may reflect differences in patterns of health care and in societal attitudes. Graded exercise therapy, practiced in the UK, was found to be universally ineffective.

Conclusions: There were similarities between respondents in all three countries in terms of demographic features, the impact of the illness on household incomes and on quality of life, and on difficulties experienced by respondents in discussing their illness with doctors, but also differences in patterns of medical care, availability of social care, and societal attitudes to ME/CFS.

Source: Brenna E, Araja D, Pheby DFH. Comparative Survey of People with ME/CFS in Italy, Latvia, and the UK: A Report on Behalf of the Socioeconomics Working Group of the European ME/CFS Research Network (EUROMENE). Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 23;57(3):300. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030300. PMID: 33806902. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33806902/

Survey: Doctor’s Knowledge and Understanding of ME, 2018

It has long been the experience of patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) that their doctors have little knowledge and understanding of the condition, and are largely unable to help. Worse, many report that their doctors do not appear to believe their illness is real, resulting in tragic lack of support.

Examination of sample medical curriculums in the United Kingdom in 2018 confirmed that as far as could be determined, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis was not in the syllabus at either undergraduate or postgraduate levels. It is therefore quite conceivable that patients’ widely reported impression is indeed true.

Read the full report HERE.

Paediatric patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome value understanding and help to move on with their lives

Abstract:

AIM: The aim of this study was to document qualitative questionnaire feedback regarding management from a cohort observational study of young people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

METHODS: Between 1991 and 2009, 784 paediatric patients, age 6-18 years, were diagnosed with ME/CFS following referral to a specialised clinic at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. Over a 14-year period, feedback was requested on up to seven occasions. Management included the following: symptom management and a self-management lifestyle plan that included social, educational, physical and a pleasurable activity outside of home. They adjusted it by severity of illness, stage of education, family circumstances and life interests.

RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 626 (80%) with 44% providing feedback more than once. They reported that their management plan allowed them to regain control over their lives. They cited early diagnosis, empathetic, informed physicians, self-management strategies and educational liaison as helping them to function and remain socially engaged. Ongoing support, particularly assistance to navigate the education system, was essential for general well-being and ability to cope.

CONCLUSION: Young people valued regaining the control over their lives that was lost through illness, support to maintain social contacts and assistance to achieve educational and/or life goals.

© 2019 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.

Source: Rowe K. Paediatric patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome value understanding and help to move on with their lives. Acta Paediatr. 2019 Dec 18. doi: 10.1111/apa.15054. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31854020

What is the current NHS service provision for patients severely affected by chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis? A national scoping exercise

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), in its most severe clinical presentation, can result in patients becoming housebound and bedbound so unable to access most available specialist services. This presents particular clinical risks and treatment needs for which the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises specialist medical care and monitoring. The extent of National Health Service (NHS) specialist provision in England for severe CFS/ME is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the current NHS provision for patients with severe CFS/ME in England.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All 49 English NHS specialist CFS/ME adult services in England, in 2013.

METHOD: Cross-sectional survey by email questionnaire.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence to NICE guidelines for severe CFS/ME.

RESULTS: All 49 services replied (100%). 33% (16/49) of specialist CFS/ME services provided no service for housebound patients. 55% (27/49) services did treat patients with severe CFS/ME and their interventions followed the NICE guidelines. The remaining services (12%, 6/49) offered occasional or minimal support where funding allowed. There was one NHS unit providing specialist inpatient CFS/ME provision in England.

CONCLUSIONS: Study findings highlight substantial variation in access to specialist care for patients with severe presentation of CFS/ME. Where treatment was provided, this appeared to comply with NICE recommendations for this patient group.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

 

Source: McDermott C, Al Haddabi A, Akagi H, Selby M, Cox D, Lewith G. What is the current NHS service provision for patients severely affected by chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis? A national scoping exercise. BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 1;4(6):e005083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005083. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078780/ (Full article)

 

Use of an online survey to explore positive and negative outcomes of rehabilitation for people with CFS/ME

Abstract:

PURPOSE:First, to explore the experiences of people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) of rehabilitation therapies so as to build an understanding of reasons for the discrepancy between the notably mixed experiences regarding effectiveness reported in patient surveys and the RCT evidence about the efficacy of Graded Exercise Therapy (GET). GET is a form of structured and supervised activity management that aims for gradual but progressive increases in physical activity. Second, to review patient experiences of two related rehabilitation approaches, Exercise on Prescription (EoP) and Graded Activity Therapy (GAT).

METHOD: An online survey conducted by the charity Action for ME generated qualitative data about 76 patient experiences of rehabilitation undertaken during or after 2008, examined using thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Both positive and negative experiences of rehabilitation were reported. Positive themes included supportive communication, the benefits of a routine linked with baseline setting and pacing, the value of goal setting, and increasing confidence associated with exercise. Negative themes included poor communication, feeling pushed to exercise beyond a sustainable level, having no setback plan, and patients feeling blamed for rehabilitation not working.

CONCLUSIONS: The negative themes may help explain the negative outcomes from rehabilitation reported by previous patient surveys. The negative themes indicate rehabilitation processes which contradict the NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) Guideline advice regarding GET, indicating that some clinical encounters were not implementing these. These findings suggest areas for improving therapist training, and for developing quality criteria for rehabilitation in CFS/ME.

Implications for Rehabilitation: The insensitive delivery of rehabilitation support for people with CFS/ME can explain negative outcomes reported in patient surveys. Therapist-patient collaboration, establishing a sustainable baseline and agreeing a setback plan are all examples of higher quality rehabilitation indicated by this research. Greater awareness of the positive and negative experiences of rehabilitation therapies should enable avoidance of the potential pitfalls identified in this research.

Positive experiences of rehabilitation therapies include supportive communication with a therapist, treatment which included routines and goals, and value attached to baselines and controlled pacing. By contrast, factors leading to negative experiences include poor communication and support, conflict in beliefs about CFS/ME and rehabilitation, pressure to comply with treatment, worsening of symptoms, baselines experienced as unsustainable, and feeling blamed for rehabilitation not working.

Comment in:

 

Source: Gladwell PW, Pheby D, Rodriguez T, Poland F. Use of an online survey to explore positive and negative outcomes of rehabilitation for people with CFS/ME. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):387-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.797508. Epub 2013 Jun 4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23735013

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: labels, meanings and consequences

Abstract:

In this month’s issue, we report a survey of members of the Association of British Neurologists, which asked if they viewed chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as a neurological condition–84% of respondents did not. This is at odds with current classification in ICD-10. We discuss the difficulties of classifying CFS and myalgic encephalopmeylitis (ME), including historical and sociological factors, the pitfalls of the physical/psychological dichotomy and why classification matters to doctors and patients.

 

Source: Wojcik W, Armstrong D, Kanaan R. Chronic fatigue syndrome: labels, meanings and consequences. J Psychosom Res. 2011 Jun;70(6):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Apr 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624573

 

A national cross-sectional survey of diagnosed sufferers of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: pathways to diagnosis, changes in quality of life and service priorities

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is subject to debate.

AIMS: To measure the time to diagnosis and services accessed.

METHOD: A national cross-sectional study. A profile and service utilisation questionnaire, information on the pathways to diagnosis, the WHOQoL Brief and a listing of priorities of the needs of participants were used. Individuals were invited to participate if they had a medical diagnosis of ME/CFS.

RESULTS: A total of 211 surveys were returned. Prior to diagnosis sufferers accessed on average 4.5 services after their initial consultation. The mean time to diagnosis was 3.7 years but time ranged from 0 to 34 years. Quality of life deteriorated post-onset. The priority for future service provision was increased understanding and diagnosis of ME/CFS by the medical profession.

CONCLUSION: In order to alleviate the burden on the sufferer there is a greater need for education on this condition.

 

Source: Comiskey C, Larkan F. A national cross-sectional survey of diagnosed sufferers of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: pathways to diagnosis, changes in quality of life and service priorities. Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):501-5. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0585-0. Epub 2010 Sep 26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20872086