Compounding for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID, Part 4: The Legacy of Chronic COVID

Abstract:

People infected by severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) risk the development of not only acute coronavirus- disease-2019 (COVID-19) – the signs and symptoms of which range from none to severe illness that requires intensive treatment – but also long COVID (i.e., chronic COVID), a cyclical, progressive, multiphasic illness characterized by myriad debilitating conditions that persist long term. In some patients, those sequelae result in psychiatric disorders that can lead to suicide or other forms of self-harm, incidences of which have increased exponentially since before the COVID pandemic. It has been suggested that long COVID develops in an estimated 10% to 35% of people diagnosed as having COVID-19.

Because the success of therapy for either form of COVID can be complicated by each patient’s pharmacogenomic profile, personal treatment preferences, medical needs, and/or dosing requirements, we have found that in some people so afflicted, manufactured medications are ineffective or intolerable, and that for those individuals, a customized compound often provides relief and promotes recovery. The primary focus of this article is long COVID. The pathogenesis of that disease is reviewed, therapies for the signs and symptoms it engenders are examined, and 2 compounded formulations effective in treating both acute and chronic COVID-19 are presented.

Source: Riepl M, Kaiser J. Compounding for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID, Part 4: The Legacy of Chronic COVID. Int J Pharm Compd. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):284-293. PMID: 37595172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37595172/

Fighting Post-COVID and ME/CFS – development of curative therapies

Abstract:

The sequela of COVID-19 include a broad spectrum of symptoms that fall under the umbrella term post-COVID-19 condition or syndrome (PCS). Immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, endothelial dysfunction, viral persistence, and viral reactivation have been identified as potential mechanisms.

However, there is heterogeneity in expression of biomarkers, and it is unknown yet whether these distinguish different clinical subgroups of PCS. There is an overlap of symptoms and pathomechanisms of PCS with postinfectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

No curative therapies are available for neither ME/CFS nor PCS. The mechanisms identified so far provide targets for therapeutic interventions.

To accelerate the development of therapies, we propose evaluating drugs targeting different mechanisms in clinical trial networks using harmonized diagnostic and outcome criteria and subgrouping patients based on a thorough clinical profiling including a comprehensive diagnostic and biomarker phenotyping.

Source: Carmen Scheibenbogen, Judith T. Bellmann-Strobl, Cornelia Heindrich, Kirsten Wittke, Elisa Stein, Christiana Franke, Harald Prüss, Hannah Preßler, Marie-Luise Machule, Heinrich Audebert, Carsten Finke, Hanna G. Zimmerman,  Birgit Sawitzki, Christian Meisel, Markus Tölle, Anne Krüger, Anna C. Aschenbrenner, Joachim L. Schultz, Marc D. Beyer, Markus Ralser, Michael Mülleder, Leif E. Sander, Frank Konietschke, Friedemann Paul, Silvia Stojanov, Lisa Bruckert, Dennis M. Hedderich, Franziska Knolle, Gabriela Riemekasten, Maria J. Vehreschild, Oliver A. Cornely, Uta Behrends and Susen Burock.  Fighting Post-COVID and ME/CFS – development of curative therapies. Frontiers in Medicine, Sec. Infectious Diseases: Pathogenesis and Therapy: Volume 10 – 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1194754/abstract

 

Therapeutical interventions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; A review of phase IV Clinical trials

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a disabling and complex illness with multifactorial etiology. Current clinical trials were examined to understand the characteristics of ME/CFS as well as possible therapeutical interventions.

Aim: To identify features of clinical trials related to ME/CFS registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, specifically, the therapeutical interventions used to manage the syndrome in phase IV.

Method: Analysis of all clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov for ME/CFS. Those clinical trials that employed a targeted therapy were included. The analysis identified a selection of clinical trials examining a targeted therapy for ME/CFS, providing a platform for further exploration of potential treatments.

Results: By November 19th, 2022, 151 clinical trials related to ME/CFS had been found. Interventional studies were the most prevalent type. However, the trials were restricted to specific continents and were not extensively conducted in pediatric patients. Micronutrients were the most commonly used intervention. Phase IV studies had fewer clinical trials with limited interventional measures. Only three out of nine studies completed pharmacological interventional studies, and of these, sodium oxybate was being used most frequently.

Conclusion: Among the clinical trials identified through this paper, there were few related to ME/CFS treatment. The interventions in the completed phase IV studies involved drugs that mainly interacted with the CNS, and more rarely that had an effect on blood vessels and blood perfusion. The limited number of phase IV clinical trials meant that the results were inconclusive.

Source: Alorfi, N. (2023). Therapeutical interventions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; A review of phase IV Clinical trials. Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut, (), -. doi: 10.21608/bfsa.2023.199974.1690 https://bpsa.journals.ekb.eg/article_294098.html

Presence of depression and anxiety with distinct patterns of pharmacological treatments before the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome: a population-based study in Taiwan

Abstract:

Objective: An increased prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (including depression and anxiety disorder) has been observed among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). However, few studies have examined the presence of depression and anxiety disorder before the diagnosis of CFS. This study aimed to clarify the preexisting comorbidities and treatments associated with patients with subsequent CFS diagnosis in a population-based cohort in Taiwan.

Methods: An analysis utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan was conducted. Participants included were 6303 patients with CFS newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 and 6303 age-/sex-matched controls.

Results: Compared with the control group, the CFS group had a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety disorder before the diagnosis of CFS. Sampled patients who took specific types of antidepressants, namely, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.39), serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors (SARI; aOR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.59-2.19), and tricyclic antidepressants (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.09-1.95), had an increased risk of CFS. CFS risk was also higher among participants taking benzodiazepine, muscle relaxants, and analgesic drugs.

A sub-group analysis revealed that SARI use was related to an increased risk of CFS in the depression, anxiety disorder, male, and female groups. In the depression and anxiety disorder groups, analgesic drug use was associated with an increased CFS risk. Nonpharmacological treatment administration differed between men and women.

Conclusion: This population-based retrospective cohort study revealed an increased risk of CFS among populations with preexisting depression and anxiety disorder, especially those taking SARI and analgesic drugs.

Source: Chen C, Yip HT, Leong KH, Yao WC, Hung CL, Su CH, Kuo CF, Tsai SY. Presence of depression and anxiety with distinct patterns of pharmacological treatments before the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome: a population-based study in Taiwan. J Transl Med. 2023 Feb 8;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-03886-1. PMID: 36755267; PMCID: PMC9907887. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907887/ (Full text)

Challenges of memory enhancers

Abstract:

40 per cent of people over the age of 65 experience some form of memory loss, called as the age related memory impairment. This might be due to hormone and proteins (Growth factors) which repair the brain cells decline with age. Certain conditions such as age, stress, disease and excessive emotional response may lead to loss of memory, loss of learning ability and altered mood and behaviour. These conditions may be treated by using nootropic agents which can help to improve learning abilities and memory.

Source: Chaudhry, Sunil. Challenges of memory enhancers. Annals of Geriatric Education and Medical Sciences; 2020/08/22. https://www.agems.in/article-details/11990 (Full text)

A Systematic Review of Drug Therapies for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

PURPOSE: The pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is complex and remains poorly understood. Evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in CFS/ME is currently limited and conflicting. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence on the efficacy of drug therapies and determine whether any can be recommended for patients with CFS/ME.

METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched from the start of their records to March 2016 to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials focusing solely on drug therapy to alleviate and/or eliminate chronic fatigue symptoms were included in the review. Any trials that considered graded exercise therapy, cognitive behavior therapy, adaptive pacing, or any other nonpharmaceutical treatment plans were excluded. The inclusion criteria were examined to ensure that study participants met specific CFS/ME diagnostic criteria. Study size, intervention, and end point outcome domains were summarized.

FINDINGS: A total of 1039 studies were identified with the search terms; 26 studies met all the criteria and were considered suitable for review. Three different diagnostic criteria were identified: the Holmes criteria, International Consensus Criteria, and the Fukuda criteria. Primary outcomes were identified as fatigue, pain, mood, neurocognitive dysfunction and sleep quality, symptom severity, functional status, and well-being or overall health status. Twenty pharmaceutical classes were trialed. Ten medications were shown to be slightly to moderately effective in their respective study groups (P < 0.05).

IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that no universal pharmaceutical treatment can be recommended. The unknown etiology of CFS/ME, and complications arising from its heterogeneous nature, contributes to the lack of clear evidence for pharmaceutical interventions. However, patients report using a large number and variety of medications. This finding highlights the need for trials with clearly defined CFS/ME cohorts. Trials based on more specific criteria such as the International Consensus Criteria are recommended to identify specific subgroups of patients in whom treatments may be beneficial.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Collatz A, Johnston SC, Staines DR, Marshall-Gradisnik SM. A Systematic Review of Drug Therapies for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1263-1271.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27229907

 

Treating chronic fatigue syndrome – a study into the scientific evidence for pharmacological treatments

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome, or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS), is a severe disabling condition. Patients with CFS usually trial many different medicines, both conventional and complementary. An overview of the pharmacological treatments used by CFS patients and the available evidence underpinning the use of these treatments would be of great value to both patients and their healthcare providers.

METHODS: Ninety-four CFS patients recruited into an Australian study investigating immunological biomarkers filled out a questionnaire assessing the medicines they were taking. Evidence from randomised clinical trials was sought in biomedical databases.

RESULTS: The 94 CFS patients used 474 different medicines and supplements. The most commonly used medicines were antidepressants, analgesics, sedatives, and B vitamins. We identified 20 randomised controlled trials studying these medicines in CFS patients.

DISCUSSION: While conventional and complementary medicines are widely used by CFS patients, the evidence for effectiveness in CFS is very limited.

 

Source: Kreijkamp-Kaspers S, Brenu EW, Marshall S, Staines D, Van Driel ML. Treating chronic fatigue syndrome – a study into the scientific evidence for pharmacological treatments. Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Nov;40(11):907-12. http://www.racgp.org.au/download/documents/AFP/2011/November/201111kkaspers.pdf (Full article)

 

Cognitive dysfunction and mental fatigue in childhood chronic fatigue syndrome–a 6-month follow-up study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive function was investigated in patients with childhood type chronic fatigue syndrome (CCFS) using the modified advanced trail making test (mATMT).

METHODS: mATMT was performed on 19 patients with CCFS and 25 healthy controls of comparable age and sex. The effectiveness of combined treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy and its relationship to cognitive function was investigated by evaluation of Chalder’s fatigue scale and behavior state before and after treatment for 6 consecutive months.

RESULTS: All three tasks (motor skill, selective and alternative attention, and spatial working memory) of the mATMT, especially the difference in reaction time of the alternative attention task, could discriminate CCFS patients from control subjects with 70.5% accuracy (P=0.007). CCFS patients showed significantly lower alternative attention and Chalder’s fatigue score before treatment (P=0.037 and 0.002, respectively). A significant improvement in performance status scores was found during the 6 months follow-up period with combined treatment with CBT and medication (P<0.001). Improvement of their cognitive symptoms was significantly correlated with improvement of alternative attention (r=0.653, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: Higher-order level cognitive dysfunction affects CCFS pathogenesis. Alternative attention performance evaluated by the mATMT may be used to monitor improvement in patients with CCFS. Combined treatment with CBT and medication may be effective to improve poor attention characteristics associated with CCFS.

Copyright © 2011 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Kawatani J, Mizuno K, Shiraishi S, Takao M, Joudoi T, Fukuda S, Watanabe Y, Tomoda A. Cognitive dysfunction and mental fatigue in childhood chronic fatigue syndrome–a 6-month follow-up study. Brain Dev. 2011 Nov;33(10):832-41. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 May 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530119

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy?

Abstract:

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent but poorly understood condition mainly characterized by debilitating, persistent or recurrent fatigue; increased physical and mental fatigability; cognitive impairment and widespread musculoskeletal pain. Despite intensive treatment research, the role of pharmacotherapy in the illness remains uncertain.

: An updated review is given of pharmacotherapy in CFS, with a focus on non-antidepressant, controlled drug trials performed between 1988 and August 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Antiviral, immunological and antibiotic therapies, although sometimes associated with symptom amelioration, can be more harmful than beneficial in CFS. Stimulants seem to benefit some CFS patients but their long-term effects is uncertain. Although antidepressants are not curative for the illness, they might be useful for some symptomatic aspects and co-morbid anxiety and depression. There is little or no evidence that CFS patients benefit from other pharmacological agents (e.g., steroids) or from dietary supplements and complementary medicine products. Future research into treatment should take specific subgroups into account and should target immunological aspects of the illness as well as the complex relationships between CFS, stress and depression.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pharmacotherapy can currently not be considered first-line treatment in CFS and should always be used in a context of self-management and rehabilitation.

 

Source: Van Houdenhove B, Pae CU, Luyten P. Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;11(2):215-23. Doi: 10.1517/14656560903487744. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20088743