Examination of Cloninger’s basic dimensions of personality in fatiguing illness: chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Abstract:

Relatively few studies have examined the personality characteristics of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The personality profiles of 38 CFS subjects were compared with 40 healthy controls and 40 subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic illness that shares many symptoms with CFS (e.g., fatigue), but has a known neurological substrate. Subjects were examined within Cloninger’s biosocial theory of personality, which delineates basic dimensions of temperament. Both illness groups displayed similarly elevated levels of Harm Avoidance, and lower levels of Reward Dependence as compared with healthy controls. The MS group showed a lower level of Persistence than controls and CFS subjects. Implications for the relationship between chronic illness and personality are discussed.

 

Source: Christodoulou C, Deluca J, Johnson SK, Lange G, Gaudino EA, Natelson BH. Examination of Cloninger’s basic dimensions of personality in fatiguing illness: chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis. J Psychosom Res. 1999 Dec;47(6):597-607. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10661606

 

The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: development of a model

Abstract:

The cause of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is unknown. With respect to factors perpetuating fatigue, on the other hand, a model has been postulated in the literature in which behavioral, cognitive, and affective factors play a role in perpetuating fatigue. In the present study, this hypothesized model was tested on patients with CFS and on fatigued patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

The model was formulated in terms of cause-and-effect relationships and an integral test of this model was performed by the statistical technique, “structural equation modeling,” in 51 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and 50 patients with multiple sclerosis matched for age, gender, and education. Attributing complaints to a somatic cause produced low levels of physical activity, which in turn had a causal effect on fatigue severity. Depression had to be deleted from the model.

Sense of control over symptoms and focusing on bodily symptoms each had a direct causal effect on fatigue. The model showed an excellent fit for CFS patients, but was rejected for MS patients. Therefore, a new model for MS patients had to be developed in which sense of control had a causal effect on fatigue. In the MS model, no causal relationship was found between the physical state as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) and fatigue or functional impairment.

The present study shows that cognitive and behavioral factors are involved in the persistence of fatigue. Treatment should be directed at these factors. The processes involved in the subjective experience of fatigue in CFS were different from the processes related to fatigue in MS.

 

Source: Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Galama JM, Fennis JF, Jongen PJ, Hommes OR, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: development of a model. J Psychosom Res. 1998 Dec;45(6):507-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9859853

 

Immunologic parameters in chronic fatigue syndrome, major depression, and multiple sclerosis

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immune dysfunction hypothesis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) by comparing immunologic data from patients with CFS with data from patients with other fatiguing illnesses–major depression and multiple sclerosis (MS)–and with data from healthy sedentary controls.

The subjects were 65 healthy sedentary controls, 71 CFS patients (41 with no axis-I diagnosis), 23 patients with mild MS, and 21 patients with major depression. Blood was sampled and assayed for the following: (1) immunologic serologic variables–circulating immune complexes (i.e., Raji cell and C1q binding), immunoglobulins A, E, G, and M, and IgG subclasses; (2) cell surface activation markers–the proportion of CD4+ cells expressing CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ and the proportion of CD8+ cells expressing CD38+, CD11b-, HLA-DR+ and CD28+; and (3) natural killer (NK) total cell count as well as the proportion of lymphocytes expressing NK cell surface markers (i.e., CD3-/CD16+ and CD56+.

Of the 18 variables studied, differences between CFS patients and controls were found only for IgG1 and IgG3. When CFS patients were stratified by the presence or absence of concurrent axis-I disease, it was the group with axis-I disorder that had the lowest IgG1 values-contrary to expectation.

When data from patients with MS and major depression were also evaluated, the subclass deficiency was no longer significant. The one group to show evidence for immune activation (i.e., an elevated proportion of CD4+ cells expressing the CD45RA+ activation marker) was the group with mild MS.

These data support neither immune dysfunction nor immune activation in CFS or in major depression, for the variables studied. The reductions in IgG subclasses may be an epiphenomenon of patient or control subject composition. In contrast, MS, even in the mild and early stages, as in the patients studied here, is associated with immune activation.

 

Source: Natelson BH, LaManca JJ, Denny TN, Vladutiu A, Oleske J, Hill N, Bergen MT, Korn L, Hay J. Immunologic parameters in chronic fatigue syndrome, major depression, and multiple sclerosis. Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):43S-49S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9790481

 

Increased illness experience preceding chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Almost all published work on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has involved retrospective surveys of cases, which may introduce recall bias. Only medical records collected before diagnosis of CFS can eliminate this.

METHODS: Using data collected several years prior to the development of the illness, we performed a case control study, comparing the reported illness records of all people who subsequently made an insurance claim as a result of CFS, with those of future multiple sclerosis (MS) claimants, and those of non-claimant controls (NC).

RESULTS: The study encompassed 133 CFS, 75 MS and 162 NC cases. CFS cases had recorded significantly more illnesses at time of proposal for insurance than the two control groups, and had significantly more claims between proposal and diagnosis of their disorder. Almost all disease categories were reported higher in future CFS sufferers, lethargy having the highest odds ratio after adjustment in a multivariate model.

INTERPRETATION: The results of this paper on CFS patients who claim permanent health insurance do not support a specific viral or immunological explanation for CFS. We conclude that abnormal illness behaviour is of greater importance than previously recognised.

Comment in:

Increased illness experience preceding chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998]

Increased illness experience preceding chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998]

 

Source: Hall GH, Hamilton WT, Round AP. Increased illness experience preceding chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Jan-Feb;32(1):44-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9507441

Physical activity in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and its role in fatigue

Abstract:

This paper describes the assessment of physical activity in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and investigated the following questions: Do patients with CFS have low levels of physical activity; is there a relationship between actual level of physical activity and fatigue; can self-report measures adequately assess actual level of physical activity; what is the role of cognitions with respect to physical activity; and are results with respect to physical activity specific to CFS?

Three different types of activity measures were used: self-report questionnaires, a 12-day self-observation list, and a motion-sensing device (Actometer) which was used as a reference for actual activity level. Fifty-one patients with CFS, 50 fatigued patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and 53 healthy subjects participated in this study.

Although none of the self-report questionnaires showed high correlations with the Actometer, questionnaires that require simple ratings of specified activities were related to the Actometer and can be used as acceptable substitutes, in contrast to instruments that require general subjective interpretations of activity that had low or non-significant correlations with the Actometer.

Actometer results showed that CFS patients and MS patients had similar activity levels and both groups were significantly less active than healthy subjects. Compared to MS patients, CFS patients were more likely to indicate that they had been less active than other persons they knew. Activities which patients expected to result in higher fatigue levels were less frequently performed. Patients with CFS had significantly higher scores on this measure than MS patients and healthy subjects. Low levels of physical activity were related to severe fatigue in CFS but not in MS.

In conclusion, although CFS patients have similar low activity levels than MS patients, there are also important differences between both groups: in CFS cognitive factors are more prominently involved in producing the low activity levels than in MS and in CFS patients activity level is related to fatigue but not in MS.

 

Source: Vercoulen JH, Bazelmans E, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, Jongen PJ, Hommes O, Van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Physical activity in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and its role in fatigue. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Nov-Dec;31(6):661-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9447571

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome–aetiological aspects

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been intensively studied over the last 40 years, but no conclusions have yet been agreed as to its cause. Most cases nowadays are sporadic. In the established chronic condition there are no consistently abnormal physical signs or abnormalities on laboratory investigation.

Many physicians remain convinced that the symptoms are psychological rather than physical in origin. This view is reinforced by the emotional way in which many patients present themselves. The overlap of symptoms between CFS and depression remains a source of confusion and difficulty. But even if all CFS patients were rediagnosed as depressives, this would not negate the possibility of an underlying organic cause for the condition, in view of the growing evidence that depression itself has a physical cause and responds best to physical treatments.

There is some evidence both for active viral infection and for an immunological disorder in the CFS. Many observations suggest that the syndrome could derive from residual damage to the reticular activating system (RAS) of the upper brain stem and/or to its cortical projections. Such damage could be produced by a previous viral infection, leaving functional defects unaccompanied by any gross histological changes.

In animal experiments activation of the RAS can change sleep state and activate or stimulate cortical functions. RAS lesions can produce somnolence and apathy. Studies by modern imaging techniques have not been entirely consistent, but many magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies already suggest that small discrete patchy brain stem and subcortical lesions can often be seen in CFS.

Regional blood flow studies by single photon-emission computerized tomography (SPECT) have been more consistent. They have revealed blood flow reductions in many regions, especially in the hind brain. Similar lesions have been reported after poliomyelitis and in multiple sclerosis–in both of which conditions chronic fatigue is characteristically present. In the well-known post-polio fatigue syndrome, lesions predominate in the RAS of the brain stem. If similar underlying lesions in the RAS can eventually be identified in CFS, the therapeutic target for CFS would be better defined than it is at present. A number of logical approaches to treatment can already be envisaged.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Eur J Clin Invest. 1997]

Similarity of symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome and Addison’s disease. [Eur J Clin Invest. 1997]

 

Source: Dickinson CJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome–aetiological aspects. Eur J Clin Invest. 1997 Apr;27(4):257-67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9134372

 

The effects of fatigue on neuropsychological performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and depression

Abstract:

The effects of fatigue on neuropsychological performance were examined in patients with fatiguing illnesses. Repeated testing with the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT; Gronwall, 1977) was employed over the course of a demanding neuropsychological testing session. It was hypothesized that if fatigue affects performance, one would expect to observe “blunting” of the PASAT practice effect.

Fifteen of the study participants live with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), 15 with multiple sclerosis (MS), 14 with depression (DEP), and 15 are healthy, sedentary controls. Overall PASAT performance was significantly reduced for CFS and DEP participants compared to controls, whereas mean performance did not differ across the three fatiguing illness groups. Degree of improvement across trials (i.e., practice effect) for the groups did not differ from controls’. Neither subjective fatigue or DEP were significantly related to PASAT performance.

These findings suggest that fatigue does not universally impair performance during neuropsychological assessment even in groups in which fatigue is a prominent symptom.

 

Source: Johnson SK, Lange G, DeLuca J, Korn LR, Natelson B. The effects of fatigue on neuropsychological performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and depression. Appl Neuropsychol. 1997;4(3):145-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16318477

 

Health status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in general population and disease comparison groups

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To measure the functional status and well-being of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and compare them with those of a general population group and six disease comparison groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects of the study were patients with CFS (n = 223) from a CFS clinic, a population-based control sample (n = 2,474), and disease comparison groups with hypertension (n = 2,089), congestive heart failure (n = 216), type II diabetes mellitus (n = 163), acute myocardial infarction (n = 107), multiple sclerosis (n = 25), and depression (n = 502). We measured functional status and well-being using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which is a self-administered questionnaire in which lower scores are indicative of greater impairment.

RESULTS: Patients with CFS had far lower mean scores than the general population control subjects on all eight SF-36 scales. They also scored significantly lower than patients in all the disease comparison groups other than depression on virtually all the scales. When compared with patients with depression, they scored significantly lower on all the scales except for scales measuring mental health and role disability due to emotional problems, on which they scored significantly higher. The two SF-36 scales reflecting mental health were not correlated with any of the symptoms of CFS except for irritability and depression.

CONCLUSION: Patients with CFS had marked impairment, in comparison with the general population and disease comparison groups. Moreover, the degree and pattern of impairment was different from that seen in patients with depression.

 

Source: Komaroff AL, Fagioli LR, Doolittle TH, Gandek B, Gleit MA, Guerriero RT, Kornish RJ 2nd, Ware NC, Ware JE Jr, Bates DW. Health status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in general population and disease comparison groups. Am J Med. 1996 Sep;101(3):281-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873490

 

Selective impairment of auditory processing in chronic fatigue syndrome: a comparison with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls

Abstract:

The most consistent deficit observed in individuals with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome has been in efficiency of information processing. To examine the possibility of a modality-specific impairment, the present study examined subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls on an auditory-versus visual-paced serial-addition test. 20 subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 20 subjects with clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis, and 20 sedentary healthy controls were compared.

One-half of the subjects in each group were administered the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and the other half were administered the Paced Visual Serial Addition Test. The group with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was differentially impaired on the auditory relative to the visual processing task. The group with Multiple Sclerosis was equally impaired on both versions of the task. The results are discussed within the framework of Baddeley’s model of working memory.

 

Source: Johnson SK, DeLuca J, Diamond BJ, Natelson BH. Selective impairment of auditory processing in chronic fatigue syndrome: a comparison with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Aug;83(1):51-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873173

 

The measurement of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. A multidimensional comparison with patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy subjects

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To provide a multidimensional characterization of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. Fifty patients with clinically definite MS were compared on the dimensions of fatigue with 51 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and 53 healthy subjects.

RESULTS: Fourty-six percent of the patients with MS reported fatigue to be present at least once a week. Patients with MS and patients with CFS had significantly higher subjective fatigue severity scores than healthy subjects. Patients with MS and patients with CFS had significantly higher scores on measures of psychological well-being than healthy subjects. Patients with MS had scores similar to those of patients with CFS, except that patients with CFS had significantly higher somatization scores. High somatization scores reflect strong focusing on bodily sensations. Both groups of patients were significantly less active than the healthy subjects. The Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Beck Depression Inventory scores were not related to subjective fatigue severity. In patients with MS and in patients with CFS, subjective fatigue severity was related to impairment in daily life, low sense of control over symptoms, and strong focusing on bodily sensations. In CFS, but not in MS, evidence was found for a relationship between low levels of physical activity and attributing symptoms to a physical cause and between subjective fatigue severity and physical activity.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS experienced significant fatigue, which had a significant impact on daily functioning and was not related to depression on Expanded Disability Status Scale score. Psychological factors, such as focusing on bodily sensations and low sense of control play a role in the experience of fatigue in MS and CFS.

 

Source: Vercoulen JH, Hommes OR, Swanink CM, Jongen PJ, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. The measurement of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. A multidimensional comparison with patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy subjects. Arch Neurol. 1996 Jul;53(7):642-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8929171