Tag: medical attitudes

COVID-19, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”) and post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS, “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”): Similarities and differences

Abstract:

Worldwide there have been over 760 million confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, and over 13 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered as of April 2023, according to the World Health Organization. An infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can lead to an acute disease, i.e. COVID-19, but also to a post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”). Currently, the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines are increasingly being noted and studied.

Here, we summarise the currently available indications and discuss our conclusions that (i) these side effects have specific similarities and differences to acute COVID-19 and PACS, that (ii) a new term should be used to refer to these side effects (post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome, PCVS, colloquially “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”), and that (iii) there is a need to distinguish between acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (ACVS) and post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PACVS) – in analogy to acute COVID-19 and PACS (“long COVID”). Moreover, we address mixed forms of disease caused by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination.

We explain why it is important for medical diagnosis, care and research to use the new terms (PCVS, ACVS and PACVS) in order to avoid confusion and misinterpretation of the underlying causes of disease and to enable optimal medical therapy. We do not recommend to use the term “Post-Vac-Syndrome” as it is imprecise. The article also serves to address the current problem of “medical gaslighting” in relation to PACS and PCVS by raising awareness among the medical professionals and supplying appropriate terminology for disease.

Source: Scholkmann F, May CA. COVID-19, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS, “long COVID”) and post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS, “post-COVIDvac-syndrome”): Similarities and differences. Pathol Res Pract. 2023 May 3;246:154497. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154497. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37192595; PMCID: PMC10154064. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154064/ (Full text)

Patient and clinician experiences of fibromyalgia, ME/CFS and medically unexplained symptoms: A meta-aggregative systematic review

Abstract:

Objectives: Fibromyalgia (FM), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and other syndromes with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) pose significant healthcare challenges. We aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence regarding the experiences of persons with these conditions (PwC) and their healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Methods & Measures: Databases were searched using terms relating to FM/ME/CFS/MUS, Experience and Qualitative research. Studies published between 2001-2021 concerning adult PwC or HCP perspectives were included and synthesized using Meta-Aggregation, with confidence established following the ConQual approach.

Results: 143 studies were included, with 708 findings aggregated into 82 categories and 13 synthesized findings. PwC narratives reflected a range of themes concerning: The experience of symptoms; The patient journey; Identity loss and change; Managing chronic illness; Understanding and legitimacy; Support needs and experiences; Healthcare needs and experiences; and Managing the healthcare encounters. HCPs perspective themes included: Beliefs and attitudes towards patients; Sensemaking at the limits of medical knowledge; Consultation and management; The patient-clinician relationship; and Barriers and facilitators to care.

Conclusion: Sensemaking challenges are at the core of the patient and clinician experience of MUS, FM and ME/CFS. While gaps in biomedical knowledge are clear, this review highlights the need to address the patient-clinician dynamic in the context of uncertainty.

Source: Duda N, Maguire R, Gitonga I, Corrigan S. Patient and clinician experiences of fibromyalgia, ME/CFS and medically unexplained symptoms: A meta-aggregative systematic review. PsyArXiv [Preprint], 28 Apr 2023  https://psyarxiv.com/5ct4k/ (Full text)

Contesting misrecognition online: Experiences of epistemic in/justice by vloggers with contested illnesses

Abstract:

Contested illnesses, such as fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and chronic Lyme disease (CLD), are surrounded by polemic debates regarding their etiology, symptomology, treatment, and even their existence. People who suffer from these contested illnesses arguably also suffer from “epistemic injustice.” This concept, coined by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, captures how people’s knowledge may be discredited because of identity prejudices. In our paper, this concept is used to understand how seven Dutch women with contested illnesses experience the emancipatory potential of their vlogging practices.

Our findings show how these women understood their vlogging as a means to break with epistemic smothering, understood as the propensity to cater ones testimony to one’s audience (Dotson, 2011), and as a means to attain and enhance epistemic justice. However, our findings also show how vlogging about contested illnesses did not seem to allow these women to fully break with their epistemic smothering practices, and that the ableist design and gendered norms of YouTube were experienced as obstacles to attaining epistemic justice. We conclude that, even though social media do seem to hold emancipatory potential for these women, the experiences of individual users are diverse and ambiguous.

Source: Groenevelt IPI, de Boer MLM. Contesting misrecognition online: Experiences of epistemic in/justice by vloggers with contested illnesses. Soc Sci Med. 2023 May 7;327:115951. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115951. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37182295. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623003088?via%3Dihub (Full text)

My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, debilitating health condition characterized by overwhelming fatigue and post-exertional malaise, or exacerbation of symptoms following physical, mental, or emotional exertion. ME/CFS often impacts every aspect of an individual’s life, and one’s new reality may be much different from the daily life experienced before the onset of the condition. Though the long-term effects of COVID-19 have brought increased attention to chronic fatigue and related disorders, ME/CFS is still vastly understudied and frequently misunderstood.

People with ME/CFS are often passed between various healthcare providers as evidence-based treatments remain scarce. These patients are sometimes sent to rehabilitation professionals, who often lack appropriate education and experience with this patient population. This article describes the experience of a young woman and physical therapist with ME/CFS following COVID-19 infection, as well as potential implications for rehabilitation professionals and those who care for those with this condition.

Source: Sirotiak Z. My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative. Work. 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220487. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911961. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220487 (Full text)

Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland

Abstract:

in English, Arabic

Objectives: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex chronic and debilitating multifactorial disease. Adequate patient care is challenged by poor knowledge among health care professionals and the historical misconception that the disease is psychological in nature. This study assessed the health-related challenges faced by patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland and examined whether they receive adequate health care.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire between June and September of 2021, among 169 patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland.

Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 38.8 years. Only one-third of ME/CFS affected children and youth were correctly diagnosed before their 18th birthday. The mean time from disease onset to diagnosis was 6.7 years, and patients had an average of 11.1 different appointments and 2.6 misdiagnoses. A poor diagnosis rate and insufficient disease knowledge among health professionals in Switzerland led 13.5% of the patients to travel abroad to seek a diagnosis. Most patients (90.5%) were told at least once that their symptoms were psychosomatic. Swiss patients expressed high dissatisfaction with the health system and indicated that physicians lacked knowledge regarding ME/CFS. Therapies prescribed by physicians or tried by patients, as well as their perceived efficacy, were described. Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) was perceived as harmful by patients, whereas pacing, complementary/alternative medicine, and dietary supplements and medications to alleviate symptoms were reported to be helpful to varying degrees.

Conclusion: This study highlights that poor disease knowledge among health care providers in Switzerland has led to high patient dissatisfaction, and delays in ME/CFS diagnoses and prescription of inappropriate therapies, thus adding to patient distress and disease burden.

Source: Tschopp R, König RS, Rejmer P, Paris DH. Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jan 4;18(4):876-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019. PMID: 36852237; PMCID: PMC9957780. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957780/ (Full text)

Doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions

Abstract:

This study uses machine learning and natural language processing tools to examine the language used by healthcare professionals on a global online forum. It contributes to an underdeveloped area of knowledge, that of physician attitudes toward their patients. Using comments left by physicians on Reddit’s ”Medicine” subreddit (r/medicine), we test if the language from online discussions can reveal doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions. We focus on a set of chronic conditions that usually are more stigmatized and compare them to ones well accepted by the medical community.

We discovered that when comparing diseases with similar traits, doctors discussed some conditions with more negative attitudes. These results show bias does not occur only along the dimensions traditionally analyzed in the economics literature of gender and race, but also along the dimension of disease type. This is meaningful because the emotions associated with beliefs impact physicians’ decision making, prescribing behavior, and quality of care. First, we run a binomial LASSO-logistic regression to compare a range of 21 diseases against myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), depression, and the autoimmune diseases multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Next, we use dictionary methods to compare five more chronic diseases: Lyme disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Alzheimer’s disease, osteoporosis, and lupus. The results show physicians discuss ME/CFS, depression, and Lyme disease with more negative language than the other diseases in the set. The results for ME/CFS included over four times more negative words than the results for depression.

Source: Brooke Scoles, Catia Nicodemo. Doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 204, December 2022, Pages 182-199. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726812200347X (Full text)

Support amid uncertainty: Long COVID illness experiences and the role of online communities

Abstract:

Long COVID is characterized by persistent and debilitating long-term symptoms from COVID-19. Many persons with Long COVID began gathering in online communities during the early phases of the pandemic to share their illness experiences. This qualitative interview study explored the subjective experiences of 20 persons with Long COVID recruited from five online communities. Their understandings of illness and associated implications for social relationships with family and friends, healthcare professionals, and online community members were explored.

Three themes were identified from our analysis, including (1) complex and unpredictable illness experienced amid an evolving understanding of the pandemic; (2) frustration, dismissal, and gaslighting in healthcare interactions; and (3) validation and support from online communities. These findings highlight the significant uncertainty that persons with Long COVID navigated, the features of their often dismaying healthcare experiences, and the ways in which online communities aided them in understanding their illness.

Source: Russell D, Spence NJ, Chase JD, Schwartz T, Tumminello CM, Bouldin E. Support amid uncertainty: Long COVID illness experiences and the role of online communities. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100177. Epub 2022 Oct 4. PMID: 36212783; PMCID: PMC9531408. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531408/ (Full text)

Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome, understood as per (bio) psychosocial discourse, is a political construction, serving actors and structures associated with welfare reform, to the detriment of patients.

The condition typically known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling condition characterised by post-exertional malaise, often accompanied by cognitive impairment, pain, sleep disturbance, gastro-intestinal and autonomic dysfunction (Goudsmit et al., 2009). ME/CFS is positioned as having multifactorial aetiology, including a genetic predisposition, precipitated by viral, bacterial and parasitic infection, toxins and stress, perpetuated through neuro-immune and metabolic dysfunction (Cortes Rivera et al., 2019). The dominant conceptualisation of ME/CFS in UK healthcare, generated through a biopsychosocial model with a cognitivebehavioural focus, is that of a psychosocial entity which, whilst possibly precipitated by a virus or other stressor, is perpetuated by ‘maladaptive’ illness beliefs, fear-avoidance behaviours, and social reinforcement (Sharpe et al., 1997; Deary et al., 2007; Harvey & Wessely, 2009). This conceptualisation has been critiqued for lacking empirical support.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Hunt, Joanne. Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18-28  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361017759_Towards_a_critical_psychology_of_chronic_fatigue_syndrome_Biopsychosocial_narratives_and_UK_welfare_reform (Full text)

Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment

Abstract:

While we know a lot more about Long Covid today, patients who were infected with Covid-19 early on in the pandemic and developed Long Covid had to contend with medical professionals who lacked awareness of the potential for extended complications from Covid-19. Long Covid patients have responded by labeling their contentious interactions with medical professionals, organizations, and the broader medical system as “gaslighting.” We argue that the charge of medical gaslighting can be understood as a form of ontological politics. Not only do patients demand that their version of reality be recognized, but they also blame the experts who hold gatekeeping power over their medical care for producing a distorted version of said reality.

By analyzing results from an online survey of Long Covid patients active on social media in the United States (n ​= ​334), we find that experiences of contention and their reframing as “gaslighting” were common amongst our respondents. In short answer responses about their experience obtaining medical care for Long Covid, our respondents described encountering medical professionals who dismissed their experience, leading to lengthy diagnostic odysseys and lack of treatment options for Long Covid. Even though we are limited by characteristics of our sample, there is good reason to believe that these experiences and their contentious reframing as medical gaslighting are exacerbated by gender, class, and racial inequalities.

Source: Au L, Capotescu C, Eyal G, Finestone G. Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Sep 7;2:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100167. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36092770; PMCID: PMC9448633.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001299 (Full text)

Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community

Abstract:

Background: In 2020, the long-lasting effects of the Covid-19 virus were not included in public messages of risks to public health. Long Covid emerged as a novel and enigmatic illness with a serious and life-changing impact. Long Covid is poorly explained by objective medical tests, leading to widespread disbelief and stigma associated with the condition. The aim of this organic research is to explore the physical and epistemic challenges of living with Long Covid.

Methods: Unlike any previous pandemic in history, online Covid communities and ‘citizen science’ have played a leading role in advancing our understanding of Long Covid. As patient-led research of this grassroots Covid community, a team approach to thematic analysis was undertaken of 66 patient stories submitted online to covid19-recovery.org at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic between April and September 2020.

Results: The overriding theme of the analysis highlights the complexities and challenges of living with Long Covid. Our distinct themes were identified: the life-changing impact of the condition, the importance of validation and how, for many, seeking alternatives was felt to be their only option.

Conclusions: Long Covid does not easily fit into the dominant evidence-based practice and the biomedical model of health, which rely on objective indicators of the disease process. Patient testimonies are vital to understanding and treating Long Covid, yet patients are frequently disbelieved, and their testimonies are not taken seriously leading to stigma and epistemic injustice, which introduces a lack of trust into the therapeutic relationship.

Patient contribution: The research was undertaken in partnership with our consumer representative(s) and all findings and subsequent recommendations have been coproduced.

Source: Ireson J, Taylor A, Richardson E, Greenfield B, Jones G. Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community. Health Expect. 2022 May 12. doi: 10.1111/hex.13518. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35557480. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.13518 (Full text)