Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome, understood as per (bio) psychosocial discourse, is a political construction, serving actors and structures associated with welfare reform, to the detriment of patients.

The condition typically known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling condition characterised by post-exertional malaise, often accompanied by cognitive impairment, pain, sleep disturbance, gastro-intestinal and autonomic dysfunction (Goudsmit et al., 2009). ME/CFS is positioned as having multifactorial aetiology, including a genetic predisposition, precipitated by viral, bacterial and parasitic infection, toxins and stress, perpetuated through neuro-immune and metabolic dysfunction (Cortes Rivera et al., 2019). The dominant conceptualisation of ME/CFS in UK healthcare, generated through a biopsychosocial model with a cognitivebehavioural focus, is that of a psychosocial entity which, whilst possibly precipitated by a virus or other stressor, is perpetuated by ‘maladaptive’ illness beliefs, fear-avoidance behaviours, and social reinforcement (Sharpe et al., 1997; Deary et al., 2007; Harvey & Wessely, 2009). This conceptualisation has been critiqued for lacking empirical support.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Hunt, Joanne. Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18-28  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361017759_Towards_a_critical_psychology_of_chronic_fatigue_syndrome_Biopsychosocial_narratives_and_UK_welfare_reform (Full text)

Attributions and chronic fatigue

Abstract:

It was recently suggested that chronic fatigue is merely a question of attribution. Attribution clearly contributes to the course of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) but is not its sole determinant. The presence of strong somatic attributions appears to be one of the perpetuating factors in CFS but not the only one.

Many CFS patients present a self-diagnosis, e.g. myalgic encephalomyelitis. Communication problems between patient and doctor easily arise because of different attributions of the complaints. At the start of fatigue somatic attributions are of less importance than later on in the course of the complaints. In this process an iatrogenic factor might be involved. On the other hand doctors are able to influence these attributions actively in a favourable direction.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

 

Source: Bleijenberg G. Attributions and chronic fatigue. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1510-2. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543736

 

Patterns of utilization of medical care and perceptions of the relationship between doctor and patient with chronic illness including chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

To what extent do personal constructs affect the relationship between doctor and patient when the ill patient does not readily recover with treatment?

Questionnaires were returned anonymously by 609 patients with a self-reported diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome, who were considered chronically ill. Findings were compared with those of an earlier study of a population of 397 general medical patients.

The chronically ill patients lost an average of 65 days of work per year due to illness compared to general medical patients who missed six or fewer days per year because they were ill. The chronically ill patients also reported a 66% higher frequency of iatrogenic illness, spent more money on health care, took more medication, saw more specialists, and were more litigious than the general medical population.

Research suggested several patterns of relationships between doctors and patients, and attitudes to health and illness, which may alert doctors to patients’ perceptions, beliefs, encoded constructs, and patterns of relating that affect responses to treatment. More attention by doctors to patients who are experiencing the stress of chronic illness is indicated.

 

Source: Twemlow SW, Bradshaw SL Jr, Coyne L, Lerma BH. Patterns of utilization of medical care and perceptions of the relationship between doctor and patient with chronic illness including chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol Rep. 1997 Apr;80(2):643-58. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9129381