Tag: long Covid

A neuroinflammatory paradigm can explain Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract

This thesis illustrates the development of a neuroinflammatory paradigm for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), applicable to Long-COVID related “Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome” (PCFS).

The brain being devoid of nociceptors, in combination with neuroimaging technology lacking sufficient sensitivity, helps to explain why the chronic but low-level neuroinflammation purported to be present in the brains of ME/CFS (and PCFS) sufferers has gone unreported by patients, and has been largely undetected by scientists, until more recently. Over-activation of microglia and astrocytes is increasingly being proposed to be at the heart of ME/CFS (and PCFS) pathophysiology.

A key Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) study (2014) provided evidence of glial-cell over-activity, implicating neuroinflammation within the brain’s limbic system, of ME/CFS patients. Other cerebral spinal fluid and neuroimaging studies, including a more recent Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)/MRI Thermometry study (2019), have added support to this concept.

Resultant dysfunction of the limbic system and its closely-connected hypothalamus, which in turn leads to a disturbed autonomic nervous system (ANS) and dysfunctional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis (HPA-axis) could then account for the diverse range of symptoms reported in ME/CFS (and PCFS). These symptoms include chronic fatigue, flu-like malaise, mood, memory and cognitive problems (limbic system), sleep, taste, visual and thermostatic-control problems (hypothalamus), gastro-intestinal disturbance, cardiovascular problems and hypotension (ANS), as well as increased frequency of urination and lower blood cortisol levels (HPA-axis).

A dysfunctional hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), a potentially vulnerable site, within the brains of genetically susceptible people, which functions normally as a stress-control integrator, is proposed to be at the core of ME/CFS (and PCFS) aetiology and pathophysiology.

It is proposed that all triggers of ME/CFS, be they viral (Epstein-Barr Virus is the most common trigger), or non-viral; including other infectious diseases, multiple vaccinations, emotional trauma or chemical toxin shock, share a common triggering mechanism. They are each proposed to manifest themselves as severe physiological stressors, which by a combination of humoral and neural routes, target, the hypothalamic PVN, of genetically susceptible individuals. By exceeding an intrinsic stress-threshold pertaining to the complex neurological circuitry, within the hypothalamic PVN, the triggering stressor is proposed to overload it into a (permanently) iii dysfunctional state.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in common with the triggering stressors of ME/CFS, also manifests itself as a severe physiological stressor, due to a cytokine surge at the site of the primary infection (the lungs). This particular stressor is, also, proposed to target the hypothalamic PVN, in genetically susceptible people, thus triggering PCFS. Life’s ongoing physiological stressors, such as physical, mental overexercise, chemical toxin exposure, emotional and financial stress, all of which are known to exacerbate and perpetuate ME/CFS (as well as PCFS) could do so by then targeting a now “compromised” (possibly inflamed) stress-sensitive hypothalamic PVN, by similar routes.

Then if an alternative, but variable (according to fluctuating neuroinflammation of the hypothalamic PVN, itself) stress threshold was exceeded, commonly reported post-exertional malaise (PEM) episodes, more problematic flare-ups, and even more severe prolonged and characteristic relapses could ensue.

It is proposed that a dysfunctional hypothalamic PVN, thereby, acts as an epicentre to a radiating neuroinflammatory response within the brains of ME/CFS (and PCFS) sufferers. A neuroinflammatory pathway, as proposed to be shared by the early-onset stages of several progressive neuroinflammatory (neurodegenerative) diseases could also be shared by ME/CFS, and PCFS. Indeed, this pathway could be shared by other potentially nonprogressive neuroinflammatory disorders, such as the closely-related fibromyalgia, mental health disorders, epilepsy, and migraines.

Might then the “drivers” of the inflammatory process, which sustain glial-cell activation (and neuroinflammation), in ME/CFS (and PCFS), be the perpetuating stressors, themselves, acting in combination with a now “compromised” and stress-sensitive hypothalamic PVN? If so, what then might be the mechanistic detail linking a stressor-targeted hypothalamic PVN and microglial activation in ME/CFS (and PCFS)?

One attractive scenario requiring further investigation involves the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH), which is released naturally by the hypothalamic PVN due to stress. The chronic release of CRH from a stress-sensitive, dysfunctional hypothalamic PVN might induce microglia activation, leading to chronic neuroinflammation, via the stimulation of mast-cells.

Two papers were published in relation to this neuroinflammatory paradigm for ME/CFS (2018, 2019), followed by another paper (2021), in which a paradigm was presented to explain the more recently emergent, but equally perplexing, Long-COVID related “PostCOVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome” (PCFS).

The neuroinflammatory model presented is both iv coherent and unifying for all triggering stressors and perpetuating stressors of ME/CFS (& PCFS), without the need for subtypes (as many other models require), but it does require validation. To this effect, it is hoped that this neuroinflammatory model will be both thought-provoking, as well as providing a framework for scientific researchers to test, critique, modify, and develop, into the future.

More brain-focussed research, using increasingly sophisticated neuroimaging technology (especially enhanced PET/MRI) is recommended. Then, a brain-signature for both ME/CFS (and PCFS) might even become attainable, within the next decade, perhaps.

Long-COVID related PCFS, affecting millions of people worldwide, presents a golden opportunity for in-depth longitudinal neuroimaging studies (following patients through relapse-recovery cycles) to develop a better understanding of PCFS (and ME/CFS) pathophysiology.

Source: Mackay, A. A neuroinflammatory paradigm can explain Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome. PhD Thesis. University of Otago, New Zealand.  https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/15089/MackayAngus2021PhD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (PDF file)

Towards a Better Understanding of the Complexities of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex condition arising in susceptible people, predominantly following viral infection, but also other stressful events. The susceptibility factors discussed here are both genetic and environmental although not well understood.

While the dysfunctional physiology in ME/CFS is becoming clearer, understanding has been hampered by different combinations of symptoms in each affected person.

A common core set of mainly neurological symptoms forms the modern clinical case definition, in the absence of an accessible molecular diagnostic test. This landscape has prompted interest in whether ME/CFS patients can be classified into a particular phenotype/subtype that might assist better management of their illness and suggest preferred therapeutic options.

Currently, the same promising drugs, nutraceuticals, or behavioral therapies available can be beneficial, have no effect, or be detrimental to each individual patient. We have shown that individuals with the same disease profile exhibit unique molecular changes and physiological responses to stress, exercise and even vaccination.

Key features of ME/CFS discussed here are the possible mechanisms determining the shift of an immune/inflammatory response from transient to chronic in ME/CFS, and how the brain and CNS manifests the neurological symptoms, likely with activation of its specific immune system and resulting neuroinflammation.

The many cases of the post viral ME/CFS-like condition, Long COVID, following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the intense research interest and investment in understanding this condition, provide exciting opportunities for the development of new therapeutics that will benefit ME/CFS patients.

Source: Tate WP, Walker MOM, Peppercorn K, Blair ALH, Edgar CD. Towards a Better Understanding of the Complexities of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065124 (Full text)

Monocyte migration profiles define disease severity in acute COVID-19 and unique features of long COVID

Abstract:

Background: COVID-19 is associated with a dysregulated immune response but it is unclear how immune dysfunction contributes to the chronic morbidity persisting in many COVID-19 patients during convalescence (long COVID).

Methods: We assessed phenotypical and functional changes of monocytes in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization and up to 9 months of convalescence following COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or influenza A (flu). Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PFILD) patients were included a positive control for severe, ongoing lung injury.

Results: Monocyte alterations in acute COVID-19 patients included aberrant expression of leucocyte migration molecules, continuing into convalescence (n=142) and corresponding to specific symptoms of long COVID. Long COVID patients with unresolved lung injury, indicated by sustained shortness of breath and abnormal chest radiology, were defined by high monocyte expression of chemokine receptor CXCR6 (p<0.0001) and adhesion molecule PSGL-1 (p<0.01), alongside preferential migration of monocytes towards CXCR6 ligand CXCL16 (p<0.05) which is abundantly expressed in the lung. Monocyte CXCR6 and lung CXCL16 were heightened in PFILD patients (p<0.001) confirming a role for the CXCR6-CXCL16 axis in ongoing lung injury. Conversely, monocytes from long COVID patients with ongoing fatigue exhibited sustained reduction of the prostaglandin-generating enzyme COX-2 (p<0.01) and CXCR2 expression (p<0.05). These monocyte changes were not present in RSV or flu convalescence.

Conclusions: Our data define unique monocyte signatures that define subgroups of long COVID patients, indicating a key role for monocyte migration in COVID-19 pathophysiology. Targeting these pathways may provide novel therapeutic opportunities in COVID-19 patients with persistent morbidity.

Source: Scott NA, Pearmain L, Knight SB, Brand O, Morgan DJ, Jagger C, Harbach S, Khan S, Shuwa HA, Franklin M, Kästele V, Williams T, Prise I, McClure FA, Hackney P, Smith L, Menon M, Konkel JE, Lawless C, Wilson J, Mathioudakis AG, Stanel SC, Ustianowski A, Lindergard G, Brij S, Diar Bakerly N, Dark P, Brightling C, Rivera-Ortega P, Lord GM, Horsley A; CIRCO; Piper Hanley K, Felton T, Simpson A, Grainger JR, Hussell T, Mann ER. Monocyte migration profiles define disease severity in acute COVID-19 and unique features of long COVID. Eur Respir J. 2023 Mar 15:2202226. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02226-2022. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36922030. https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/early/2023/02/23/13993003.02226-2022 (Full article available as PDF file)

Demographic And Clinical Factors Associated With Long COVID

Abstract:

Risk factors for postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (“long COVID”) in community-dwelling populations remain poorly understood. Large-scale data, follow-up, comparison groups, and a consensus definition of long COVID are often lacking. Using data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse on a nationwide sample of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees from the period January 2019 through March 2022, we examined demographic and clinical factors associated with long COVID, using two definitions of people who suffer symptoms long after they were first diagnosed with COVID-19 (“long haulers”).

We identified 8,329 long haulers using the narrow definition (diagnosis code), 207,537 long haulers using the broad definition (symptom based), and 600,161 non–long haulers (comparison group).

On average, long haulers were older and more likely female, with more comorbidities. Among narrow-definition long haulers, the leading risk factors for long COVID included hypertension, chronic lung disease, obesity, diabetes, and depression. Their time between initial COVID-19 diagnosis and diagnosis of long COVID averaged 250 days, with racial and ethnic differences. Broad-definition long haulers exhibited similar risk factors. Distinguishing long COVID from the progression of underlying conditions can be challenging, but further study may advance the evidence base related to the identification, causes, and consequences of long COVID.

Source: Song Z, Giuriato M. Demographic And Clinical Factors Associated With Long COVID. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):433-442. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00991. PMID: 36877912. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36877912/

Post-exertional malaise among people with long COVID compared to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID describes a condition with symptoms that linger for months to years following acute COVID-19. Many of these Long COVID symptoms are like those experienced by patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Objective: We wanted to determine if people with Long COVID experienced post-exertional malaise (PEM), the hallmark symptom of ME/CFS, and if so, how it compared to PEM experienced by patients with ME/CFS.

Methods: A questionnaire that asked about the domains of PEM including triggers, experience, recovery, and prevention was administered to 80 people seeking care for Long COVID at Bateman Horne Center. Their responses were compared to responses about PEM given by 151 patients with ME/CFS using chi-square tests of independence.

Results: All but one Long COVID respondent reported having PEM. There were many significant differences in the types of PEM triggers, symptoms experienced during PEM, and ways to recover and prevent PEM between Long COVID and ME/CFS. Similarities between Long COVID and ME/CFS included low and medium physical and cognitive exertion to trigger PEM, symptoms of fatigue, pain, immune reaction, neurologic, orthostatic intolerance, and gastrointestinal symptoms during PEM, rest to recover from PEM, and pacing to prevent PEM.

Conclusion: People with Long COVID experience PEM. There were significant differences in PEM experienced by people with Long COVID compared to patients with ME/CFS. This may be due to the newness of Long COVID, not knowing what exertional intolerance is or how to manage it.

Source: Vernon SD, Hartle M, Sullivan K, Bell J, Abbaszadeh S, Unutmaz D, Bateman L. Post-exertional malaise among people with long COVID compared to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Work. 2023 Mar 7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220581. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911963. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220581 (Full text)

Predictors of impaired functioning among long COVID patients

Abstract:

Background: There is limited information on what acute factors predict more long-term symptoms from COVID-19.

Objective: Our objective was to conduct an exploratory factor analysis of self-reported symptoms at two time points of Long COVID-19.

Methods: Data from patients with Long COVID-19 were collected at the initial two weeks of contracting SARS CoV-2 and the most recent two weeks, with a mean duration of 21.7 weeks between the two-time points. At time point 2, participants also complete the Coronavirus Impact Scale (CIS), measuring how the COVID-19 pandemic affected various dimensions of their lives (e.g., routine, access to medical care, social/family support, etc.).

Results: At time 1, a three-factor model emerged consisting of Cognitive Dysfunction, Autonomic Dysfunction and Gastrointestinal Dysfunction. The analysis of time 2 resulted in a three-factor model consisting of cognitive dysfunction, autonomic dysfunction, and post-exertional malaise. Using factor scores from time 1, the Autonomic Dysfunction and the Gastrointestinal Dysfunction factor scores significantly predicted the CIS summary score at time two. In addition, the same two factor scores at time 1 predicted the occurrence of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome at time 2.

Conclusion: As Cognitive and Autonomic Dysfunction emerged as factors for both time points, suggesting health care workers might want to pay particular attention to these factors that might be related to later symptoms and difficulties with returning to pre-illness family life and work functioning.

Source: Jason LA, Dorri JA. Predictors of impaired functioning among long COVID patients. Work. 2023 Mar 8. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220428. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911958. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220428 (Full text)

My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, debilitating health condition characterized by overwhelming fatigue and post-exertional malaise, or exacerbation of symptoms following physical, mental, or emotional exertion. ME/CFS often impacts every aspect of an individual’s life, and one’s new reality may be much different from the daily life experienced before the onset of the condition. Though the long-term effects of COVID-19 have brought increased attention to chronic fatigue and related disorders, ME/CFS is still vastly understudied and frequently misunderstood.

People with ME/CFS are often passed between various healthcare providers as evidence-based treatments remain scarce. These patients are sometimes sent to rehabilitation professionals, who often lack appropriate education and experience with this patient population. This article describes the experience of a young woman and physical therapist with ME/CFS following COVID-19 infection, as well as potential implications for rehabilitation professionals and those who care for those with this condition.

Source: Sirotiak Z. My experience with ME/CFS and implications: A personal narrative. Work. 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220487. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36911961. https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor220487 (Full text)

Prevalence and risk factor for long COVID in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Abstract:

Background: Millions of COVID-19 pediatric survivors are facing the risk of long COVID after recovery from acute COVID-19. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the available literature and determine the pooled prevalence of, and risk factors for long COVID among the pediatric survivors.

Methods: Studies that assessed the prevalence of, or risk factors associated with long COVID among pediatric COVID-19 survivors were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to December 11th, 2022. Random effects model was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence of long COVID among pediatric COVID-19 patients. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression on the estimated prevalence of long COVID were performed by stratification with follow-up duration, mean age, sex ratio, percentage of multisystem inflammatory syndrome, hospitalization rate at baseline, and percentage of severe illness.

Results: Based on 40 studies with 12,424 individuals, the pooled prevalence of any long COVID was 23.36% ([95% CI 15.27-32.53]). The generalized symptom (19.57%, [95% CI 9.85-31.52]) was reported most commonly, followed by respiratory (14.76%, [95% CI 7.22-24.27]), neurologic (13.51%, [95% CI 6.52-22.40]), and psychiatric (12.30%, [95% CI 5.38-21.37]). Dyspnoea (22.75%, [95% CI 9.38-39.54]), fatigue (20.22%, [95% CI 9.19-34.09]), and headache (15.88%, [95% CI 6.85-27.57]) were most widely reported specific symptoms. The prevalence of any symptom during 3-6, 6-12, and >12 months were 26.41% ([95% CI 14.33-40.59]), 20.64% ([95% CI 17.06-24.46]), and 14.89% ([95% CI 6.09-26.51]), respectively. Individuals with aged over ten years, multisystem inflammatory syndrome, or had severe clinical symptoms exhibited higher prevalence of long COVID in multi-systems. Factors such as older age, female, poor physical or mental health, or had severe infection or more symptoms were more likely to have long COVID in pediatric survivors.

Conclusions: Nearly one quarter of pediatric survivors suffered multisystem long COVID, even at 1 year after infection. Ongoing monitoring, comprehensive prevention and intervention is warranted for pediatric survivors, especially for individuals with high risk factors.

Source: Zheng YB, Zeng N, Yuan K, Tian SS, Yang YB, Gao N, Chen X, Zhang AY, Kondratiuk AL, Shi PP, Zhang F, Sun J, Yue JL, Lin X, Shi L, Lalvani A, Shi J, Bao YP, Lu L. Prevalence and risk factor for long COVID in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Infect Public Health. 2023 Mar 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.03.005. Epub ahead of print. PMCID: PMC9990879. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990879/ (Full text)

Pathogenesis Underlying Neurological Manifestations of Long COVID Syndrome and Potential Therapeutics

Abstract:

The development of long-term symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) more than four weeks after primary infection, termed “long COVID” or post-acute sequela of COVID-19 (PASC), can implicate persistent neurological complications in up to one third of patients and present as fatigue, “brain fog”, headaches, cognitive impairment, dysautonomia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, anosmia, hypogeusia, and peripheral neuropathy. Pathogenic mechanisms of these symptoms of long COVID remain largely unclear; however, several hypotheses implicate both nervous system and systemic pathogenic mechanisms such as SARS-CoV2 viral persistence and neuroinvasion, abnormal immunological response, autoimmunity, coagulopathies, and endotheliopathy.
Outside of the CNS, SARS-CoV-2 can invade the support and stem cells of the olfactory epithelium leading to persistent alterations to olfactory function. SARS-CoV-2 infection may induce abnormalities in innate and adaptive immunity including monocyte expansion, T-cell exhaustion, and prolonged cytokine release, which may cause neuroinflammatory responses and microglia activation, white matter abnormalities, and microvascular changes. Additionally, microvascular clot formation can occlude capillaries and endotheliopathy, due to SARS-CoV-2 protease activity and complement activation, can contribute to hypoxic neuronal injury and blood–brain barrier dysfunction, respectively.
Current therapeutics target pathological mechanisms by employing antivirals, decreasing inflammation, and promoting olfactory epithelium regeneration. Thus, from laboratory evidence and clinical trials in the literature, we sought to synthesize the pathophysiological pathways underlying neurological symptoms of long COVID and potential therapeutics.
Source: Leng A, Shah M, Ahmad SA, Premraj L, Wildi K, Li Bassi G, Pardo CA, Choi A, Cho S-M. Pathogenesis Underlying Neurological Manifestations of Long COVID Syndrome and Potential Therapeutics. Cells. 2023; 12(5):816. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050816 (Full text)

“Long COVID”: the current state of the problem. Review of foreign scientific and medical publications

Abstract:

Not all the patients who are diagnosed with COVID-19 can completely recover; some of them experience miscellaneous persistent symptoms that subsequently wax or wane.  As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, the number of people with long-term symptoms is rapidly increasing, adding to the burden on healthcare and society. The prevalence of the consequences of COVID-19 varies between studies, with some reporting that more than half of hospitalized patients have prolonged symptoms for at least 6 months after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and others for more than 12 months. The overall prevalence of residual symptoms in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is currently estimated to be 10–30%.

This clinical syndrome is commonly referred to as post-acute COVID syndrome (PACS) or long COVID. This multifactorial syndrome is characterised by a variety of debilitating symptoms, including fatigue, brain fog, postural hypotension with tachycardia, and post-exertional malaise. Many of the observations of post COVID-19 condition, including changes in immune, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous and autonomic systems, are shared with the symptoms described in myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients.

Comprehensive longitudinal symptom monitoring is required to confirm of diagnosis, uncover the mechanisms of post-COVID-19-associated ME/CFS, and develop prevention and treatment measures. Current absence of the effective treatment reflects the unclear causes of the post COVID-19 conditions which cannot be targeted properly until the mechanism is established and confirmed.

The multisystem aspects of long COVID remain poorly understood. The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed a significant gap in knowledge about the post-acute consequences of infectious diseases and the need for a unified nomenclature and classification of post-COVID conditions, diagnostic criteria, and reliable assessments of these disorders. Unraveling the complex biology of PACS relies on the identification of biomarkers in plasma and tissue samples taken from individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 that will allow classification of the phenotypes of patients who develop PACS.

For the full treatment of patients with post-COVID syndrome, multidisciplinary therapy and rehabilitation are required. Understanding the physiological mechanisms underlying the long-term clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and the post-COVID-19 state is vital to the development of appropriate effective therapies.

Source: Golota A.S., Vologzhanin D.A., Kamilova T.A., Sсherbak S.G., Makarenko S.V. “Long COVID”: the current state of the problem. Review of foreign scientific and medical publications // Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation. – 2023. – Vol. 5. – N. 1. doi: 10.36425/rehab121733 (Full text available in Russian)