Post-COVID-19 patients suffer from chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions

Abstract:

Recent literature indicates that post-COVID-19 patients suffer from a plethora of complications, including chemosensory dysfunction. However, little attention has been given to understand the interactions between chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions in these patients. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the prevalence and combinations of chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions, (2) to identify the odorants/tastants that are compromised, and (3) to explore possible associations between the four dysfunctions in post-COVID-19 patients.

One hundred post-COVID-19 patients and 76 healthy controls (pre-COVID-19) were included in this cross-sectional, case-controlled study. Participants’ smell, taste, trigeminal, and salivary functions were assessed. The patients had a significantly higher prevalence of parosmia (80.0%), hyposmia (42.0%), anosmia (53.0%), dysgeusia (34.0%), complete ageusia (3.0%), specific ageusia (27.0%), dysesthesia (11.0%) and dry mouth (18.0%) compared to controls (0.0% for all parameters, except 27.6% for hyposmia). Complete loss of bitter taste was the most prevalent specific ageusia (66.7%) and coffee was the most common distorted smell (56.4%). Seven different combinations of dysfunction were observed in the patients, the most common being a combination of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (48.0%).

These findings indicate that post-COVID-19 patients experience a range of chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary disturbances, occurring in various combinations.

Source: Rogn Å, Jensen JL, Iversen PO, Singh PB. Post-COVID-19 patients suffer from chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 11;14(1):3455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53919-y. PMID: 38342941; PMCID: PMC10859368. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10859368/ (Full text)

Cardiorespiratory abnormalities in ICU survivors of COVID-19 with Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection are unrelated to invasive mechanical ventilation

Abstract:

Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) often leads to exertional intolerance and reduced exercise capacity, particularly in individuals previously admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, the impact of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) on PASC-associated cardiorespiratory abnormalities during exercise remains poorly understood.

This single-center, cross-sectional study aimed to gather knowledge on this topic. Fifty-two patients with PASC recruited ~6 months after ICU discharge were clustered based on their need for IMV (PASC+IMV, n=27) or non-invasive support therapy (PASC+NIS, n=25). Patients underwent pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), and were compared to a reference group (CONTROL, n=19) comprising individuals of both sexes with similar age, comorbidities, and physical activity levels, but without a history of COVID-19 illness.

Individuals with PASC, irrespective of support therapy, presented with higher rates of cardiorespiratory abnormalities than CONTROL, especially dysfunctional breathing patterns, dynamic hyperinflation, reduced oxygen uptake and oxygen pulse, and blunted heart rate recovery (all P<0.05). Only the rate of abnormal oxygen pulse was greater among PASC+IMV than PASC+NIS (P=0.05). Mean estimates for all CPX variables were comparable between PASC-IMV and PASC-NIS (all P>0.05).

These findings indicate significant involvement of both central and peripheral factors, leading to exertional intolerance in individuals with PASC previously admitted to the ICU, regardless of their need for IMV.

Source: Longobardi I, Prado DMLD, de Andrade DCO, Goessler KF, de Oliveira Júnior GN, Azevedo RA, Leitão AE, Santos JVP, de Sá Pinto AL, Gualano B, Roschel H. Cardiorespiratory abnormalities in ICU survivors of COVID-19 with Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection are unrelated to invasive mechanical ventilation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Feb 9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00073.2024. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38334972. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38334972/ (Full study available as PDF file)

Headache or Disturbed Smell and Taste During Acute COVID-19 as Predictors of Long COVID at One Year

Abstract:

Purpose: Long coronavirus disease (COVID) poses a significant health concern for a substantial proportion of COVID-19 patients. Viral pathogenesis studies suggest the potential of central nervous system (CNS) affection in the acute phase of COVID-19 predicting long COVID.

This study investigates whether acute COVID-19 symptoms, particularly headache and disturbed smell and taste, predict manifestations of long COVID.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 2020, and May 2021. One year after discharge, patients responded to a symptom questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) for these outcomes.

Results: Of 288 eligible patients, 111 responded to the follow-up questionnaire. At 1 year follow-up, disturbed smell and taste during acute COVID-19 did not elevate the risk of long COVID. However, patients with acute headache demonstrated a tendency towards an elevated risk of CNS-related long COVID. Notably, this risk significantly increased in patients reporting dizziness (adjusted OR=4.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 – 14.85). Neither disturbed smell and taste nor headache during acute COVID-19 indicated a statistically significant risk of worsening in fatigue, health, or total symptom score at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Headache, and not disturbed smell and taste, predicted CNS-related long COVID. Further research is warranted to clarify pathways connecting CNS-related symptoms during acute COVID-19 with long COVID, aiding the efforts of addressing the range of symptoms observed among long COVID patients and developing effective interventions.

Source: Jane Agergaard. Headache or Disturbed Smell and Taste During Acute COVID-19 as Predictors of Long COVID at One Year, 07 February 2024, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3930891/v1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3930891/v1 (Full text)

Fatigue and symptom-based clusters in post COVID-19 patients: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study

Abstract:

Background: In the Netherlands, the prevalence of post COVID-19 condition is estimated at 12.7% at 90-150 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to determine the occurrence of fatigue and other symptoms, to assess how many patients meet the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) criteria, to identify symptom-based clusters within the P4O2 COVID-19 cohort and to compare these clusters with clusters in a ME/CFS cohort.

Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, observational cohort in the Netherlands, 95 post COVID-19 patients aged 40-65 years were included. Data collection at 3-6 months after infection included demographics, medical history, questionnaires, and a medical examination. Follow-up assessments occurred 9-12 months later, where the same data were collected. Fatigue was determined with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), a score of ≥ 4 means moderate to high fatigue. The frequency and severity of other symptoms and the percentage of patients that meet the ME/CFS criteria were assessed using the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire-2 (DSQ-2). A self-organizing map was used to visualize the clustering of patients based on severity and frequency of 79 symptoms. In a previous study, 337 Dutch ME/CFS patients were clustered based on their symptom scores. The symptom scores of post COVID-19 patients were applied to these clusters to examine whether the same or different clusters were found.

Results: According to the FSS, fatigue was reported by 75.9% of the patients at 3-6 months after infection and by 57.1% of the patients 9-12 months later. Post-exertional malaise, sleep disturbances, pain, and neurocognitive symptoms were also frequently reported, according to the DSQ-2. Over half of the patients (52.7%) met the Fukuda criteria for ME/CFS, while fewer patients met other ME/CFS definitions. Clustering revealed specific symptom patterns and showed that post COVID-19 patients occurred in 11 of the clusters that have been observed in the ME/CFS cohort, where 2 clusters had > 10 patients.

Conclusions: This study shows persistent fatigue and diverse symptomatology in post COVID-19 patients, up to 12-18 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clustering showed that post COVID-19 patients occurred in 11 of the clusters that have been observed in the ME/CFS cohort.

Source: Cornelissen MEB, Bloemsma LD, Vaes AW, Baalbaki N, Deng Q, Beijers RJHCG, Noij LCE, Houweling L, Bazdar S, Spruit MA, Maitland-van der Zee AH; on behalf of the P4O2 Consortium. Fatigue and symptom-based clusters in post COVID-19 patients: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. J Transl Med. 2024 Feb 21;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04979-1. PMID: 38383493. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-024-04979-1 (Full text)

Blood–brain barrier disruption and sustained systemic inflammation in individuals with long COVID-associated cognitive impairment

Abstract:

Vascular disruption has been implicated in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathogenesis and may predispose to the neurological sequelae associated with long COVID, yet it is unclear how blood–brain barrier (BBB) function is affected in these conditions. Here we show that BBB disruption is evident during acute infection and in patients with long COVID with cognitive impairment, commonly referred to as brain fog. Using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, we show BBB disruption in patients with long COVID-associated brain fog.

Transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed dysregulation of the coagulation system and a dampened adaptive immune response in individuals with brain fog. Accordingly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed increased adhesion to human brain endothelial cells in vitro, while exposure of brain endothelial cells to serum from patients with long COVID induced expression of inflammatory markers. Together, our data suggest that sustained systemic inflammation and persistent localized BBB dysfunction is a key feature of long COVID-associated brain fog.

Source: Greene, C., Connolly, R., Brennan, D. et al. Blood–brain barrier disruption and sustained systemic inflammation in individuals with long COVID-associated cognitive impairment. Nat Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01576-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01576-9 (Full text)

Cognitive and Mental Health Trajectories of COVID-19: Role of Hospitalisation and Long-COVID Symptoms

Abstract:

Background: There is considerable evidence of cognitive impairment post COVID-19, especially in individuals with long-COVID symptoms, but limited research objectively evaluating whether such impairment attenuates or resolves over time, especially in young and middle-aged adults.

Methods: Follow-up assessments (T2) of cognitive function (processing speed, attention, working memory, executive function, memory) and mental health were conducted in 138 adults (18-69 years) who had been assessed six months earlier (T1). Of these, 88 had a confirmed history of COVID-19 at T1 assessment (≥20 days post-diagnosis) and were also followed-up on COVID-19 related symptoms (acute and long-COVID); 50 adults had no known COVID-19 history at any point up to their T2 assessment.

Results: From T1 to T2, a trend-level improvement occurred in intra-individual variability in processing speed in the COVID, relative to the non-COVID group. However, longer response/task completion times persisted in participants with COVID-19 related hospitalisation relative to those without COVID-19 related hospitalisation and non-COVID controls. There was a significant reduction in long-COVID symptom load, which correlated with improved executive function in non-hospitalised COVID-19 participants. The COVID group continued to self-report poorer mental health, irrespective of hospitalisation history, relative to non-COVID group.

Conclusions: Although some cognitive improvement has occurred over a six-month period in young and middle-aged COVID-19 survivors, cognitive impairment persists in those with a history of COVID-19 related hospitalisation and/or long-COVID symptoms. Continuous follow-up assessments are required to determine whether cognitive function improves or possibly worsens, over time in hospitalised and long-COVID participants.

Source: Vakani K, Ratto M, Sandford-James A, Antonova E, Kumari V. Cognitive and Mental Health Trajectories of COVID-19: Role of Hospitalisation and Long-COVID Symptoms. Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 5:1-40. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38312039. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377977040_Cognitive_and_Mental_Health_Trajectories_of_COVID-19_Role_of_Hospitalisation_and_Long-COVID_Symptoms (Full text)

Analysis and clinical determinants of post-COVID-19 syndrome in the Lombardy region: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study

Abstract:

Objective: To define macro symptoms of long COVID and to identify predictive factors, with the aim of preventing the development of the long COVID syndrome.

Design: A single-centre longitudinal prospective cohort study conducted from May 2020 to October 2022.

Setting: The study was conducted at Luigi Sacco University Hospital in Milan (Italy). In May 2020, we activated the ARCOVID (Ambulatorio Rivalutazione COVID) outpatient service for the follow-up of long COVID.

Participants: Hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients previously affected by COVID-19 were either referred by specialists or general practitioners or self-referred.

Intervention: During the first visit, a set of questions investigated the presence and the duration of 11 symptoms (palpitations, amnesia, headache, anxiety/panic, insomnia, loss of smell, loss of taste, dyspnoea, asthenia, myalgia and telogen effluvium). The follow-up has continued until the present time, by sending email questionnaires every 3 months to monitor symptoms and health-related quality of life.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Measurement of synthetic scores (aggregation of symptoms based on occurrence and duration) that may reveal the presence of long COVID in different clinical macro symptoms. To this end, a mixed supervised and empirical strategy was adopted. Moreover, we aimed to identify predictive factors for post-COVID-19 macro symptoms.

Results: In the first and second waves of COVID-19, 575 and 793 patients (respectively) were enrolled. Three different post-COVID-19 macro symptoms (neurological, sensorial and physical) were identified. We found significant associations between post-COVID-19 symptoms and (1) the patients’ comorbidities, and (2) the medications used during the COVID-19 acute phase. ACE inhibitors (OR=2.039, 95% CI: 1.095 to 3.892), inhaled steroids (OR=4.08, 95% CI: 1.17 to 19.19) and COVID therapies were associated with increased incidence of the neurological macro symptoms. Age (OR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.04), COVID-19 severity (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.82), number of comorbidities (OR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.5), metabolic (OR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.25 to 5.27), pulmonary (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.32) and autoimmune diseases (OR=4.57, 95% CI: 1.57 to 19.41) increased the risk of the physical macro symptoms.

Conclusions: Being male was the unique protective factor in both waves. Other factors reflected different medical behaviours and the impact of comorbidities. Evidence of the effect of therapies adds valuable information that may drive future medical choices.

Source: Borgonovo F, Lovaglio PG, Mariani C, Berta P, Cossu MV, Rizzardini G, Vittadini G, Capetti AF. Analysis and clinical determinants of post-COVID-19 syndrome in the Lombardy region: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e075185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075185. PMID: 38320835; PMCID: PMC10860093. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860093/ (Full text)

Gut microbiota composition is altered in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Abstract:

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) reflects an autonomic dysfunction, which can occur as a complication to COVID-19. Our aim was to examine gastrointestinal symptoms and gut microbiota composition in patients with POTS and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS), compared with controls. POTS patients (n = 27), PACS patients (n = 32) and controls (n = 39) delivered fecal samples and completed a 4-day food diary, irritable bowel syndrome-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), and visual analog scale for IBS (VAS-IBS).

A total of 98 DNA aliquots were sequenced to an average depth of 28.3 million (M) read pairs (Illumina 2 × 150 PE) per sample. Diversity and taxonomic levels of the microbiome, as well as functional abundances were calculated for POTS and PACS groups, then compared with controls. There were several differences in taxonomic composition between POTS and controls, whereas only the abundance of Ascomycota and Firmicutes differed between PACS and controls. The clinical variables total IBS-SSS, fatigue, and bloating and flatulence significantly correlated with multiple individual taxa abundances, alpha diversity, and functional abundances.

We conclude that POTS, and to a less extent PACS, are associated with differences in gut microbiota composition in diversity and at several taxonomic levels. Clinical symptoms are correlated with both alpha diversity and taxonomic and functional abundances.

Source: Hamrefors V, Kahn F, Holmqvist M, Carlson K, Varjus R, Gudjonsson A, Fedorowski A, Ohlsson B. Gut microbiota composition is altered in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53784-9. PMID: 38336892; PMCID: PMC10858216. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858216/ (Full text)

Event rates and incidence of post-COVID-19 condition in hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 positive children and young people and controls across different pandemic waves: exposure-stratified prospective cohort study in Moscow (StopCOVID)

Abstract:

Background: Long-term health outcomes in children and young people (CYP) after COVID-19 infection are not well understood and studies with control groups exposed to other infections are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and incomplete recovery in CYP after hospital discharge and compare outcomes between different SARS-CoV-2 variants and non-SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Methods: A prospective exposure-stratified cohort study of individuals under 18 years old in Moscow, Russia. Exposed cohorts were paediatric patients admitted with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection between April 2 and December 11, 2020 (Wuhan variant cohort) and between January 12 and February 19, 2022 (Omicron variant cohort). CYP admitted with respiratory and intestinal infections, but negative lateral flow rapid diagnostic test and PCR-test results for SARS-CoV-2, between January 12 and February 19, 2022, served as unexposed reference cohort. Comparison between the ‘exposed cohorts’ and ‘reference cohort’ was conducted using 1:1 matching by age and sex. Follow-up data were collected via telephone interviews with parents, utilising the long COVID paediatric protocol and survey developed by the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC). The WHO case definition was used to categorise PCC.

Results: Of 2595 CYP with confirmed COVID-19, 1707 (65.7%) participated in follow-up interviews, with 1183/1707 (69%) included in the final ‘matched’ analysis. The median follow-up time post-discharge was 6.7 months. The incidence of PCC was significantly higher in the Wuhan variant cohort (89.7 cases per 1000 person-months, 95% CI 64.3-120.3) compared to post-infection sequalae in the reference cohort (12.2 cases per 1000 person-months, 95% CI 4.9-21.9), whereas the difference with the Omicron variant cohort and reference cohort was not significant. The Wuhan cohort had higher incidence rates of dermatological, fatigue, gastrointestinal, sensory, and sleep manifestations, as well as behavioural and emotional problems than the reference cohort. The only significant difference between Omicron variant cohort and reference cohort was decreased school attendance. When comparing the Wuhan and Omicron variant cohorts, higher incidence of PCC and event rates of fatigue, decreased physical activity, and deterioration of relationships was observed. The rate of incomplete recovery was also significantly higher in the Wuhan variant cohort than in both the reference and the Omicron variant cohorts.

Conclusions: Wuhan variant exhibited a propensity for inducing a broad spectrum of physical symptoms and emotional behavioural changes, suggesting a pronounced impact on long-term health outcomes. Conversely, the Omicron variant resulted in fewer post-infection effects no different from common seasonal viral illnesses. This may mean that the Omicron variant and subsequent variants might not lead to the same level of long-term health consequences as earlier variants.

Source: Pazukhina E, Rumyantsev M, Baimukhambetova D, Bondarenko E, Markina N, El-Taravi Y, Petrova P, Ezhova A, Andreeva M, Iakovleva E, Bobkova P, Pikuza M, Trefilova A, Abdeeva E, Galiautdinova A, Filippova Y, Bairashevskaia A, Zolotarev A, Bulanov N, DunnGalvin A, Chernyavskaya A, Kondrikova E, Kolotilina A, Gadetskaya S, Ivanova YV, Turina I, Eremeeva A, Fedorova LA, Comberiati P, Peroni DG, Nekliudov N, Genuneit J, Reyes LF, Brackel CLH, Mazankova L, Miroshina A, Samitova E, Borzakova S, Carson G, Sigfrid L, Scott JT, McFarland S, Greenhawt M, Buonsenso D, Semple MG, Warner JO, Olliaro P, Osmanov IM, Korsunskiy AA, Munblit D; Sechenov StopCOVID Research Team. Event rates and incidence of post-COVID-19 condition in hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 positive children and young people and controls across different pandemic waves: exposure-stratified prospective cohort study in Moscow (StopCOVID). BMC Med. 2024 Feb 1;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03221-x. PMID: 38302974; PMCID: PMC10835884. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10835884/ (Full text)

Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Fatigue-dominant Long-COVID subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract:

Background: Long-COVID is defined by persistent symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Approximately 71% of individuals with long-COVID experience ongoing fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and cognitive impairments, which share pathological similarities with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). This similarity has prompted studies to explore the characteristics of long-COVID to gain a better understanding of ME/CFS. To gain insights, we investigated the clinical and laboratory characteristics of individuals with fatigue-dominant long-COVID.

Methods: We enrolled 100 subjects (36 males, 64 females) with long-COVID who had a higher score than 60 in modified Korean version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (mKCFQ11) and higher than 5 in fatigue-focused Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). To investigate fatigue symptoms, the mKCFQ11, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), and VAS for fatigue and brain-fog, along with the Short Form Survey (SF-12) were employed. We also measured three cytokines and cortisol levels for immunological and endocrinological indicators. As a cross-sectional observational study, the data were collected at a single point in time.

Results: The mean scores on the measurements showed severe fatigue, and these scores were significantly correlated, with no differences based on sex, the post-COVID period, or age. Among the laboratory tests, plasma cortisol levels had a significant negative correlation with fatigue scores and a positive correlation with living quality. The negative correlation between cortisol levels and mKCFQ11 scores appeared to be more specific to mental fatigue than physical, which conflicted with other measurements.

Conclusion: Our findings provide the first insights into the characteristics of fatigue in individuals with long-COVID, particularly in terms of fatigue severity and cortisol levels. These results serve as valuable reference data for clinicians dealing with fatigue symptoms in long-COVID patients and for researchers exploring post-viral fatigue symptoms, including ME/CFS, in the future.

Source: Lee JS, Choi Y, Joung JY, Son CG. Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Fatigue-dominant Long-COVID subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study. Am J Med. 2024 Feb 6:S0002-9343(24)00057-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.025. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38331137. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38331137/