Comparison of the muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients post-coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome with pulmonary involvement

Abstract:

Introduction: Pulmonary involvement is prevalent in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Arterial hypoxemia may reduce oxygen transferred to the skeletal muscles, possibly leading to impaired exercise capacity. Oxygen uptake may vary depending on the increased oxygen demand of the muscles during submaximal and maximal exercise.

Objective: This study aimed to compare muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients were included. Pulmonary function (spirometry), peripheral muscle strength (dynamometer), quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle oxygenation (Moxy® device), and submaximal exercise capacity (six-minute walk test (6-MWT)) were tested on the first day, maximal exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)) was tested on the second day. Physical activity level was evaluated using an activity monitor worn for five consecutive days. Cardiopulmonary responses and muscle oxygenation were compared during 6-MWT and CPET.

Results: Patients’ minimum and recovery muscle oxygen saturation were significantly decreased; maximum total hemoglobin increased, heart rate, blood pressure, breathing frequency, dyspnea, fatigue, and leg fatigue at the end-of-test and recovery increased in CPET compared to 6-MWT (p < .050). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was 18.15 ± 4.75 ml/min/kg, VO2peak; percent predicted < 80% was measured in 51.28% patients. Six-MWT distance and QF muscle strength were less than 80% predicted in 58.9% and 76.9% patients, respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement, muscle deoxygenation of QF is greater during maximal exercise than during submaximal exercise. Specifically, patients with lung impairment should be evaluated for deoxygenation and should be taken into consideration during pulmonary rehabilitation.

Source: Kavalcı Kol B, Boşnak Güçlü M, Baytok E, Yılmaz Demirci N. Comparison of the muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients post-coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome with pulmonary involvement. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Mar 12:1-14. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2327534. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38469863. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38469863/

Health outcomes for Long COVID are comparable with ME/CFS

Press Release: Griffith News

People with Long COVID in Australia have poor health outcomes that are comparable with another emerging disease known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), new Griffith University research has discovered.

PhD student Breanna Weigel from Griffith’s National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases (NCNED) will be presenting the findings in Singapore this month at the International Public Health Conference.

Ms Weigel said the study found people with Long COVID have the same health outcomes as ME/CFS over a 12-month period.

“Quality of life and disability scores were significantly poorer for both Long COVID and ME/CFS when compared with healthy people,” she said.

“However, there were no differences between ME/CFS and Long COVID groups which indicates considerable reductions in functional capacity and health and well-being among people living with these illnesses.”

The research found only a few differences in more than 25 different symptoms between Long COVID and ME/CFS participants.

Importantly, both ME/CFS and Long COVID groups had comparable prevalence with the severity of their illness.

Both groups over time had the same symptom presentation of significantly impaired cognition, mobility, bodily pain, and post-exertional malaise (PEM) which means symptoms get worse after physical or mental activity.

PEM is very disabling and causes changes in symptoms and a further reduction in ability to do everyday activities.

Director of the NCNED, Professor Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik, said: “This research highlighted the continued impact of Long COVID on peoples’ lives, which is especially poignant as today we recognise International Long COVID Awareness Day.”

“The research forms one of many Long COVID investigations and clinical trials being undertaken at the national centre where it is hoped these findings will provide pathways for those with Long COVID.

“We are uniquely positioned nationally as we are the only centre to undertake scientific laboratory and MRI research in Long COVID and ME/CFS in tandem, and monitor the health and economic impact of the patients.

“At the national centre we also undertake clinical trials and contribute to best practice guidelines such as the recently published guidelines in the British Medical Journal for ME.”

Dr Natalie Eaton-Fitch, who was an undergraduate student at Griffith University and is now an emerging researcher at the NCNED said: “Researchers are very fortunate to have wonderful opportunities at all stages of their careers and to know research can make a real-world difference for people.”

Ms Weigel’s work builds upon the Issues Brief she did in collaboration with the Deeble Institute that reported how patient experiences can guide the development of Long COVID health policy.

 

Impaired Sleep in Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Compared to Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Trial

Abstract:

Introduction: To objectify self-reported sleep disorders in individuals with post-COVID-syndrome (PCS), we aimed to investigate the prevalence and nature of sleep disturbances by polysomnography (PSG) in PCS compared to healthy individuals.

Methods: People with PCS (n = 21) and healthy controls (CON, n = 10) were included in this prospective trial. At baseline, clinical and social anamnesis, lung function, 1 min sit-to-stand test (STST) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were assessed. For a single-night, sleep health was evaluated by video-PSG. The apnoea/hypopnea index (AHI) was used as the primary outcome.

Results: Twenty patients with PCS (50 ± 11 y, BMI 27.1 m2/kg, SARS-CoV-2 infection 8.5 ± 4.5 months ago) and 10 CON participants (46 ± 10 y, BMI 23.0 m2/kg, no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the history) completed the study. Forced vital capacity (p = 0.018), STST repetitions (p &lt; 0.001), and symptoms of dyspnoea (at rest: p = 0.002, exertion: p &lt; 0.001) were worse in PCS compared to CON. PSQI score (PCS: 7.5 ± 4.7 points) was higher in PCS compared to CON (Δ = 3.7 points, 95% CI [0.4-7.1] p = 0.015), indicating poor sleep in 80% of patients with PCS. Although PSG showed comparable sleep stage distributions in both groups, AHI (Δ = 9.0 n/h, 95% CI [3.3-14.8], p = 0.002), PLM index (Δ = 5.1 n/h, 95% CI [0.4-9.8], p = 0.017), and the prevalence of sleep apnoea (60% vs. 10%, p = 0.028) was significantly higher in PCS compared to CON.

Conclusion: Quantifiable subjective limitations of sleep have been revealed by PSG data in this PCS cohort. More than half of PCS patients had signs of sleep apnoea, highlighting the importance of sleep screening in PCS.

Source: Jarosch I, Schneeberger T, Stegemann A, Gloeckl R, Leitl D, Dennis C, Hitzl W, Schoen C, Koczulla AR. Impaired Sleep in Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Compared to Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Trial. Respiration. 2024 Mar 1:1-5. doi: 10.1159/000536272. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38432219. https://karger.com/res/article/doi/10.1159/000536272/896169/Impaired-Sleep-in-Patients-with-Post-COVID-19 (Full text)

What is the impact of long-term COVID-19 on workers in healthcare settings? A rapid systematic review of current evidence

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID is a devastating, long-term, debilitating illness which disproportionately affects healthcare workers, due to the nature of their work. There is currently limited evidence specific to healthcare workers about the experience of living with Long COVID, or its prevalence, pattern of recovery or impact on healthcare.

Objective: Our objective was to assess the effects of Long COVID among healthcare workers and its impact on health status, working lives, personal circumstances, and use of health service resources.

Methods: We conducted a systematic rapid review according to current methodological standards and reported it in adherence to the PRISMA 2020 and ENTREQ statements.

Results: We searched relevant electronic databases and identified 3770 articles of which two studies providing qualitative evidence and 28 survey studies providing quantitative evidence were eligible. Thematic analysis of the two qualitative studies identified five themes: uncertainty about symptoms, difficulty accessing services, importance of being listened to and supported, patient versus professional identity and suggestions to improve communication and services for people with Long COVID. Common long-term symptoms in the survey studies included fatigue, headache, loss of taste and/or smell, breathlessness, dyspnoea, difficulty concentrating, depression and anxiety.

Conclusion: Healthcare workers struggled with their dual identity (patient/doctor) and felt dismissed or not taken seriously by their doctors. Our findings are in line with those in the literature showing that there are barriers to healthcare professionals accessing healthcare and highlighting the challenges of receiving care due to their professional role. A more representative approach in Long COVID research is needed to reflect the diverse nature of healthcare staff and their occupations. This rapid review was conducted using robust methods with the codicil that the pace of research into Long COVID may mean relevant evidence was not identified.

Source: Cruickshank M, Brazzelli M, Manson P, Torrance N, Grant A. What is the impact of long-term COVID-19 on workers in healthcare settings? A rapid systematic review of current evidence. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 5;19(3):e0299743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299743. PMID: 38442116; PMCID: PMC10914278. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914278/ (Full text)

Ebbing Strength, Fading Power: Unveiling the Impact of Persistent Fatigue on Muscle Performance in COVID-19 Survivors

Abstract:

The total number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus infection is over 621 million. Post-COVID-19 syndrome, also known as long COVID or long-haul COVID, refers to a persistent condition where individuals experience symptoms and health issues after the acute phase of COVID-19.

The aim of this study was to assess the strength and fatigue of skeletal muscles in people recovered from COVID-19. A total of 94 individuals took part in this cross-sectional study, with 45 participants (referred to as the Post-COVID Cohort, PCC) and 49 healthy age-matched volunteers (Healthy Control Cohort, HCC).

This research article uses the direct dynamometry method to provide a detailed analysis of post-COVID survivors’ strength and power characteristics. The Biodex System 4 Pro was utilized to evaluate muscle strength characteristics during the fatigue test. The fatigue work in extensors and flexors was significantly higher in the PCC.  The PCC also showed significantly less power in both extensors and flexors compared to the HCC.

In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence of the impact of post-COVID-19 fatigue on muscle performance, highlighting the importance of considering these effects in the rehabilitation and care of individuals recovering from the virus. PCC achieved lower muscle strength values than HCC.

Source: Kowal M, Morgiel E, Winiarski S, Dymarek R, Bajer W, Madej M, Sebastian A, Madziarski M, Wedel N, Proc K, Madziarska K, Wiland P, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Ebbing Strength, Fading Power: Unveiling the Impact of Persistent Fatigue on Muscle Performance in COVID-19 Survivors. Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 15;24(4):1250. doi: 10.3390/s24041250. PMID: 38400407; PMCID: PMC10892381. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10892381/ (Full text)

Spontaneous, persistent, T cell-dependent IFN-γ release in patients who progress to Long Covid

Abstract:

After acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), a proportion of patients experience persistent symptoms beyond 12 weeks, termed Long Covid. Understanding the mechanisms that cause this debilitating disease and identifying biomarkers for diagnostic, therapeutic, and monitoring purposes are urgently required.

We detected persistently high levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with Long Covid using highly sensitive FluoroSpot assays. This IFN-γ release was seen in the absence of ex vivo peptide stimulation and remains persistently elevated in patients with Long Covid, unlike the resolution seen in patients recovering from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The IFN-γ release was CD8+ T cell-mediated and dependent on antigen presentation by CD14+ cells.

Longitudinal follow-up of our study cohort showed that symptom improvement and resolution correlated with a decrease in IFN-γ production to baseline levels. Our study highlights a potential mechanism underlying Long Covid, enabling the search for biomarkers and therapeutics in patients with Long Covid.

Source: Krishna BA, Lim EY, Metaxaki M, Jackson S, Mactavous L; NIHR BioResource; Lyons PA, Doffinger R, Bradley JR, Smith KGC, Sinclair J, Matheson NJ, Lehner PJ, Sithole N, Wills MR. Spontaneous, persistent, T cell-dependent IFN-γ release in patients who progress to Long Covid. Sci Adv. 2024 Feb 23;10(8):eadi9379. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi9379. Epub 2024 Feb 21. PMID: 38381822; PMCID: PMC10881041. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10881041/ (Full text)

Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic

Abstract:

Introduction: Fatigue, brain fog, and sleep disturbance are among the most common symptoms of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). We sought to determine the impact of sleep disruption on cognition and quality of life in patients with neurologic manifestations of PASC (Neuro-PASC).
Methods: Thirty-nine patients were recruited from Neuro-COVID-19 clinic. Mean age was 48.1 years, 71.8% were female, and 82% were never hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients were evaluated via clinical assessment, quality-of-life measures in domains of cognitive function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, NIH Toolbox cognitive tests, and 7 days of wrist actigraphy.
Results: The median number of neurologic symptoms attributed to PASC was 6, with brain fog being the most common in 89.7%. Regarding non-neurologic symptoms, 94.9% complained of fatigue and 74.4% of insomnia. Patients reported significant impairment in all quality-of-life domains and performed worse in a task of attention compared to a normative US population. Actigraphy showed Neuro-PASC patients had lower sleep efficiency, longer sleep latency (both p < 0.001), and later sleep midpoint (p = 0.039) compared to 71 age-matched healthy controls with no PASC history. Self-reported cognitive symptoms correlated with the severity of fatigue (p < 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.05), and depression (p < 0.01). Objective evidence of sleep disruption measured by wakefulness after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, and latency were associated with decreased performance in attention and processing speed.
Conclusion: Prospective studies including larger populations of patients are needed to fully determine the interplay of sleep disruption on the cognitive function and quality of life of patients with PASC.

Source: Kathryn J Reid, Louis T Ingram, Millenia Jimenez, Zachary S Orban, Sabra M Abbott, Daniela Grimaldi, Kristen L Knutson, Phyllis C Zee, Igor J Koralnik, Mathew B Maas, Impact of sleep disruption on cognitive function in patients with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: initial findings from a Neuro-COVID-19 clinic, SLEEP Advances, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2024, zpae002, https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae002 https://academic.oup.com/sleepadvances/article/5/1/zpae002/7517273 (Full text)

Post-COVID-19 patients suffer from chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions

Abstract:

Recent literature indicates that post-COVID-19 patients suffer from a plethora of complications, including chemosensory dysfunction. However, little attention has been given to understand the interactions between chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions in these patients. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the prevalence and combinations of chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions, (2) to identify the odorants/tastants that are compromised, and (3) to explore possible associations between the four dysfunctions in post-COVID-19 patients.

One hundred post-COVID-19 patients and 76 healthy controls (pre-COVID-19) were included in this cross-sectional, case-controlled study. Participants’ smell, taste, trigeminal, and salivary functions were assessed. The patients had a significantly higher prevalence of parosmia (80.0%), hyposmia (42.0%), anosmia (53.0%), dysgeusia (34.0%), complete ageusia (3.0%), specific ageusia (27.0%), dysesthesia (11.0%) and dry mouth (18.0%) compared to controls (0.0% for all parameters, except 27.6% for hyposmia). Complete loss of bitter taste was the most prevalent specific ageusia (66.7%) and coffee was the most common distorted smell (56.4%). Seven different combinations of dysfunction were observed in the patients, the most common being a combination of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction (48.0%).

These findings indicate that post-COVID-19 patients experience a range of chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary disturbances, occurring in various combinations.

Source: Rogn Å, Jensen JL, Iversen PO, Singh PB. Post-COVID-19 patients suffer from chemosensory, trigeminal, and salivary dysfunctions. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 11;14(1):3455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53919-y. PMID: 38342941; PMCID: PMC10859368. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10859368/ (Full text)

Cardiorespiratory abnormalities in ICU survivors of COVID-19 with Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection are unrelated to invasive mechanical ventilation

Abstract:

Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) often leads to exertional intolerance and reduced exercise capacity, particularly in individuals previously admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, the impact of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) on PASC-associated cardiorespiratory abnormalities during exercise remains poorly understood.

This single-center, cross-sectional study aimed to gather knowledge on this topic. Fifty-two patients with PASC recruited ~6 months after ICU discharge were clustered based on their need for IMV (PASC+IMV, n=27) or non-invasive support therapy (PASC+NIS, n=25). Patients underwent pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), and were compared to a reference group (CONTROL, n=19) comprising individuals of both sexes with similar age, comorbidities, and physical activity levels, but without a history of COVID-19 illness.

Individuals with PASC, irrespective of support therapy, presented with higher rates of cardiorespiratory abnormalities than CONTROL, especially dysfunctional breathing patterns, dynamic hyperinflation, reduced oxygen uptake and oxygen pulse, and blunted heart rate recovery (all P<0.05). Only the rate of abnormal oxygen pulse was greater among PASC+IMV than PASC+NIS (P=0.05). Mean estimates for all CPX variables were comparable between PASC-IMV and PASC-NIS (all P>0.05).

These findings indicate significant involvement of both central and peripheral factors, leading to exertional intolerance in individuals with PASC previously admitted to the ICU, regardless of their need for IMV.

Source: Longobardi I, Prado DMLD, de Andrade DCO, Goessler KF, de Oliveira Júnior GN, Azevedo RA, Leitão AE, Santos JVP, de Sá Pinto AL, Gualano B, Roschel H. Cardiorespiratory abnormalities in ICU survivors of COVID-19 with Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection are unrelated to invasive mechanical ventilation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Feb 9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00073.2024. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38334972. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38334972/ (Full study available as PDF file)

Headache or Disturbed Smell and Taste During Acute COVID-19 as Predictors of Long COVID at One Year

Abstract:

Purpose: Long coronavirus disease (COVID) poses a significant health concern for a substantial proportion of COVID-19 patients. Viral pathogenesis studies suggest the potential of central nervous system (CNS) affection in the acute phase of COVID-19 predicting long COVID.

This study investigates whether acute COVID-19 symptoms, particularly headache and disturbed smell and taste, predict manifestations of long COVID.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 2020, and May 2021. One year after discharge, patients responded to a symptom questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) for these outcomes.

Results: Of 288 eligible patients, 111 responded to the follow-up questionnaire. At 1 year follow-up, disturbed smell and taste during acute COVID-19 did not elevate the risk of long COVID. However, patients with acute headache demonstrated a tendency towards an elevated risk of CNS-related long COVID. Notably, this risk significantly increased in patients reporting dizziness (adjusted OR=4.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 – 14.85). Neither disturbed smell and taste nor headache during acute COVID-19 indicated a statistically significant risk of worsening in fatigue, health, or total symptom score at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Headache, and not disturbed smell and taste, predicted CNS-related long COVID. Further research is warranted to clarify pathways connecting CNS-related symptoms during acute COVID-19 with long COVID, aiding the efforts of addressing the range of symptoms observed among long COVID patients and developing effective interventions.

Source: Jane Agergaard. Headache or Disturbed Smell and Taste During Acute COVID-19 as Predictors of Long COVID at One Year, 07 February 2024, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3930891/v1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3930891/v1 (Full text)