Tag: illness beliefs

Indications for management in long-term, physically unexplained fatigue symptoms

Abstract:

In meetings arranged by the minister of Public Health, Welfare and Sports between general practitioners and specialists concerning chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), suggestions for the diagnosis, treatment and assistance and support of patients with protracted physically unexplained fatiguesymptoms, were established in the light of current scientific insight.

The term ‘CFS’ is applicable in cases of fatigue complaints, of at least 6 months’ standing, reported by the patient himself and evaluated medically, for which no physical explanation has been found and which cause considerable disabilities in professional social and/or personal functioning.

The management depends on the duration of the illness. A distinction is made between an acute phase (up to one month after the first consultation; the policy is mostly expectative), a subacute phase (until 6 months after the onset of the complaints and disabilities; the management is aimed at making the patient accept the condition and persuading him or her to make an effort to promote health) and a chronic phase (from 6 months after the onset of the complaints and disabilities; the management is aimed at health-promoting behaviour and cognitions). Further (laboratory) examinations are useful only if the symptoms have not disappeared after one month (this is the case in approximately 20% of the patients); such examinations may be useful in older patients earlier.

It is important that the CFS patient learns to realize that it is useless to continue to spend energy on searching for causes and possible therapies, but that he should try to promote his own health, for instance by means of a quantified programme of activities linked to a time schedule (instead of to a level of fatigue).

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

 

Source: van der Meer JW, Rijken PM, Bleijenberg G, Thomas S, Hinloopen RJ, Bensing JM. Indications for management in long-term, physically unexplained fatigue symptoms.Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1516-9. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543738

Attributions and chronic fatigue

Abstract:

It was recently suggested that chronic fatigue is merely a question of attribution. Attribution clearly contributes to the course of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) but is not its sole determinant. The presence of strong somatic attributions appears to be one of the perpetuating factors in CFS but not the only one.

Many CFS patients present a self-diagnosis, e.g. myalgic encephalomyelitis. Communication problems between patient and doctor easily arise because of different attributions of the complaints. At the start of fatigue somatic attributions are of less importance than later on in the course of the complaints. In this process an iatrogenic factor might be involved. On the other hand doctors are able to influence these attributions actively in a favourable direction.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

 

Source: Bleijenberg G. Attributions and chronic fatigue. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1510-2. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543736

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative investigation of patients’ beliefs about the illness

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a disabling chronic condition of uncertain cause. Previous studies have found that patients seen in hospital clinics with the syndrome often strongly believe that their illness is physical in nature and minimize the role of psychological and social factors. There is also evidence that patients cope by avoiding activity. However, almost all of these studies have assessed illness beliefs only by questionnaire.

The aim of this study was to explore the nature and origin of illness beliefs in more detail using in-depth interviews and a qualitative analysis of patient responses. Sixty-six consecutive referrals meeting Oxford criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome were recruited. Analysis of responses indicated that, whereas the most commonly described explanation for the illness was a physical one, more than half the patients also believed “stress” had played a role. Patients believed that they could partially control the symptoms by reducing activity but felt helpless to influence the physical disease process and hence the course of the illness.

Patients reported that they had arrived at these beliefs about the illness after prolonged reflection on their own experience combined with the reading of media reports, self help books, and patient group literature. The views of health professionals played a relatively small role. There is potentially a considerable opportunity to help patients arrive at a wider and more enabling explanation of their illness when they first present to primary care.

 

Source: Clements A, Sharpe M, Simkin S, Borrill J, Hawton K. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative investigation of patients’ beliefs about the illness. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jun;42(6):615-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9226609

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have become increasingly recognized as a common clinical problem, yet one that physicians often find difficult to manage. In this review we suggest a practical, pragmatic, evidence-based approach to the assessment and initial management of the patient whose presentation suggests this diagnosis. The basic principles are simple and for each aspect of management we point out both potential pitfalls and strategies to overcome them.

The first, and most important task is to develop mutual trust and collaboration. The second is to complete an adequate assessment, the aim of which is either to make a diagnosis of CFS or to identify an alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms. The history is most important and should include a detailed account of the symptoms, the associated disability, the choice of coping strategies, and importantly, the patient’s own understanding of his/her illness. The assessment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety is mandatory.

When the physician is satisfied that no alternative physical or psychiatric disorder can be found to explain symptoms, we suggest that a firm and positive diagnosis of CFS be made.

The treatment of CFS requires that the patient is given a positive explanation of the cause of his symptoms, emphasizing the distinction among factors that may have predisposed them to develop the illness (lifestyle, work stress, personality), triggered the illness (viral infection, life events) and perpetuated the illness (cerebral dysfunction, sleep disorder, depression, inconsistent activity, and misunderstanding of the illness and fear of making it worse).

Interventions are then aimed to overcoming these illness-perpetuating factors. The role of antidepressants remains uncertain but may be tried on a pragmatic basis. Other medications should be avoided. The only treatment strategies of proven efficacy are cognitive behavioral ones. The most important starting point is to promote a consistent pattern of activity, rest, and sleep, followed by a gradual return to normal activity; ongoing review of any ‘catastrophic’ misinterpretation of symptoms and the problem solving of current life difficulties.

We regard chronic fatigue syndrome as important not only because it represents potentially treatable disability and suffering but also because it provides an example for the positive management of medically unexplained illness in general.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Chalder T, Palmer I, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):185-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218987

 

Chronic fatigue in the community: ‘a question of attribution’

Abstract:

Thirty-eight subjects identified in a large community survey were found to attribute their fatigue to ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’ (ME). They were matched randomly to two other groups of subjects who attributed their fatigue to either psychological or social factors. All three groups were followed up 18 months later and were asked to complete a series of questionnaires that examined fatigue, psychological distress, number of symptoms, attributional style and levels of disability.

At onset the ‘ME’ group were found to be more fatigued, had been tired for longer but were less psychologically distressed than the other two groups. At follow-up the ‘ME’ group were more handicapped in relation to home, work, social and private leisure activities, even when controlling for both duration of fatigue and fatigue at time 1, but were less psychologically distressed.

The relationships between psychological distress, specific illness attributions, attributional style and their effect on the experience of illness and its prognosis are discussed. Attributing fatigue to social reasons appears to be most protective.

 

Source: Chalder T, Power MJ, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue in the community: ‘a question of attribution’. Psychol Med. 1996 Jul;26(4):791-800. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8817714

 

Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine spontaneous improvement after a follow up interval of 18 months in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and to identify factors that predict improvement.

METHODS: A longitudinal study was used. Of 298 initially assessed self referred patients fulfilling criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome, 246 patients completed self report questionnaires at follow up (response rate 83%). A multidimensional assessment method was used, measuring behavioural, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning. Comparison data from 53 healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and educational level were available.

RESULTS: Three per cent of patients reported complete recovery and 17% reported improvement. At follow up, there were considerable problems at work and consumption of medication was high. Subjective improvement was confirmed by dimensional change: at follow up recovered patients had similar scores to healthy subjects and improved patients showed significant improvement on four out of seven outcome measures and had higher scores than healthy subjects in all dimensions. Sociodemographic variables or treatment by specialists and alternative practitioners did not predict improvement. Predictors of improvement were: subjective sense of control over symptoms, less fatigue, shorter duration of complaints, and a relative absence of physical attributions.

CONCLUSION: The improvement rate in patients with a relatively long duration of complaints is small. Psychological factors are related to improvement, especially cognitive factors.

 

Source: Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):489-94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC486359/ (Full article)

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor

Comment on: Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. [BMJ. 1996]

 

EDITOR,-Michael Sharpe and colleagues’ study confirms that the best medical advice for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome is not “nothing can be done” or that “the disease will burn itself out.”‘ The study produced improvement in 73% of the patients, which is comparable to the 80% improvement produced by my management techniques.2 3 Interestingly, my approach seems to be fundamentally different from that of Sharpe and colleagues.

You can read the full comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2350897/pdf/bmj00539-0053d.pdf

 

Source: Ho-Yen DO. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor. BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1097-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8616430

 

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients presenting with thechronic fatigue syndrome.

DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with final assessment at 12 months.

SETTING: An infectious diseases outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS: 60 consecutively referred patients meeting consensus criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS: Medical care comprised assessment, advice, and follow up in general practice. Patients who received cognitive behaviour therapy were offered 16 individual weekly sessions in addition to their medical care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportions of patients (a) who achieved normal daily functioning (Karnofsky score 80 or more) and (b) who achieved a clinically significant improvement in functioning (change in Karnofsky score 10 points or more) by 12 months after randomisation.

RESULTS: Only two eligible patients refused to participate. All randomised patients completed treatment. An intention to treat analysis showed that 73% (22/30) of recipients of cognitive behaviour therapy achieved a satisfactory outcome as compared with 27% (8/30) of patients who were given only medical care (difference 47 percentage points; 95% confidence interval 24 to 69). Similar differences were observed in subsidiary outcome measures. The improvement in disability among patients given cognitive behaviour therapy continued after completion of therapy. Illness beliefs and coping behaviour previously associated with a poor outcome changed more with cognitive behaviour therapy than with medical care alone.

CONCLUSION: Adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome is acceptable to patients and leads to a sustained reduction in functional impairment.

Comment in:

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Good general care may offer as much benefit as cognitive behaviour therapy. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients were not representative of all patients with the syndrome. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Cognitive behavior therapy should be compared with placebo treatments. [BMJ. 1996]

ACP J Club. 1996 May-Jun;124(3):71.

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Use an interdisciplinary approach. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Evening primrose oil and magnesium have been shown to be effective. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Essential elements of the treatment must be identified. [BMJ. 1996]

 

Source: Sharpe M, Hawton K, Simkin S, Surawy C, Hackmann A, Klimes I, Peto T, Warrell D, Seagroatt V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):22-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/pdf/bmj00523-0026.pdf

 

 

Somatization, illness attribution and the sociocultural psychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In addition to epidemiological and neurobiological perspectives on the relationship between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and psychiatric disorders there has been increasing interest in the role of cognitive-behavioural, psychological, psychodynamic and social factors in the psychiatric aspects of this syndrome. These factors may be important in the initiation and/or maintenance of CFS and play important roles in the misdiagnosis of primary psychopathology as CFS. They may be important targets for intervention and treatment.

This paper examines the relevance of the following issues for better understanding the relationship between CFS and the results of psychiatric studies: (1) the concepts of somatization and abnormal illness behaviour; (2) the role of patients’ illness attributions; (3) psychological and psychodynamic constructs such as depressive vulnerability occurring in individuals dependent upon achievement for the maintenance of self-esteem and euthymic mood, perfectionism, and helplessness; (4) the role of personality characteristics and styles; (5) the potential iatrogenic role of the health care system in producing disability in individuals with a diagnosis of CFS; (6) the role of the media and other sociocultural forces in the patient’s choice of the CFS label; and (7) the impact of the CFS label on the patient. The importance of differentiating between initiating and maintaining or perpetuating factors is emphasized.

 

Source: Abbey SE. Somatization, illness attribution and the sociocultural psychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:238-52; discussion 252-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491101

 

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Self help organization’s advice on myalgic encephalomyelitis. [BMJ. 1992]

Comment on: Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-Michael Sharpe and colleagues’ paper confirms what many clinicians have long suspected -namely, that the prognosis for those with a chronic fatigue syndrome who reach specialist care is poor.’ The paper also suggests that membership of a self help organisation is associated with a poor outcome. Although the authors emphasise that this association is not necessarily causal, I fear that the self help organisations may interpret this as another attack on their credibility, which will further sour relations between the organisations and the profession.

What are the possible explanations for these disturbing findings? Sharpe and colleagues suggest that patients’ beliefs are an important mediator of disability, a view I share.2 An article written by a sufferer illustrates how this might happen: “These living viruses are erratic and unpredictable. The prickly-edged ones pierce their way into the body cells. If disturbed by the patient’s activity they become as aggressive as a disturbed wasps’ nest, and can be felt giving needle-like jabs (or stimulating the nerves to do so).” It is easy to understand how such beliefs, regardless of their scientific accuracy, amplify disability.

You can read the full comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882994/pdf/bmj00086-0047b.pdf

 

Source: Wessely S. Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Aug 8;305(6849):365. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882994/