Comment in: Self help organization’s advice on myalgic encephalomyelitis. [BMJ. 1992]
Comment on: Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic. [BMJ. 1992]
EDITOR,-Michael Sharpe and colleagues’ paper confirms what many clinicians have long suspected -namely, that the prognosis for those with a chronic fatigue syndrome who reach specialist care is poor.’ The paper also suggests that membership of a self help organisation is associated with a poor outcome. Although the authors emphasise that this association is not necessarily causal, I fear that the self help organisations may interpret this as another attack on their credibility, which will further sour relations between the organisations and the profession.
What are the possible explanations for these disturbing findings? Sharpe and colleagues suggest that patients’ beliefs are an important mediator of disability, a view I share.2 An article written by a sufferer illustrates how this might happen: “These living viruses are erratic and unpredictable. The prickly-edged ones pierce their way into the body cells. If disturbed by the patient’s activity they become as aggressive as a disturbed wasps’ nest, and can be felt giving needle-like jabs (or stimulating the nerves to do so).” It is easy to understand how such beliefs, regardless of their scientific accuracy, amplify disability.
You can read the full comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882994/pdf/bmj00086-0047b.pdf
Source: Wessely S. Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Aug 8;305(6849):365. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882994/