Tag: healthcare

Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling yet clinically “contested” condition, previously theorised through a lens of epistemic injustice. Phenomena conceptually close to epistemic injustice, including stigma, are known to have deleterious consequences on a person’s health and life-world. Yet, no known primary studies have explored how people with ME/CFS experience healthcare through a lens of epistemic injustice, whilst a dearth of research explicitly exploring healthcare-related injustice from a patient perspective has been noted. This qualitative study seeks to address this gap.

Semi-structured interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) were used to explore the experiences of five people with ME/CFS in the UK, vis-à-vis healthcare-related epistemic injustice. One superordinate theme is presented, “Being de-centred in patient-centred care,” alongside two sub-themes: “Struggling for epistemic-existential validation” and “Negotiating socio-epistemic hierarchies, politics and ‘power’.”

Findings suggest that healthcare-related epistemic injustice may differentially impact according to the patient’s social positionality (here, notably gender), and that a potential pathway of existential harm operates through threats to identity and personhood. Findings also indicate that cultural and political factors may further epistemic injustice in healthcare. Finally, epistemic injustice impacting as a chronic stressor cannot be ruled out and is worthy of further research.

The experience of healthcare-related epistemic injustice can carry far-reaching yet varied consequences for patients. Future research should consider drawing upon more socio-demographically diverse samples and an intersectional approach is recommended. Further exploration of structural drivers of epistemic injustice may highlight a need for politically and socio-culturally cognisant clinical approaches.

Source: Hunt, J., Runacres, J., Herron, D., & Sheffield, D. (2024). Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 1125-1148. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6519 https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol29/iss4/15/ (Full text available as PDF file)

Burnout, Compassion Fatigue, and the Long Haul of Caring for Long COVID

Abstract:

The current landscape of clinician burnout is prompting the need for our health care system to revise its approach toward complex conditions such as long coronavirus disease (COVID), myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other postinfectious fatiguing illnesses (PIFIs). We discuss our efforts here at Family Health Center of San Diego (FHCSD) to help share insight and glean perspective from clinicians who have participated in our Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded 3-year continuing professional development initiative.

The Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program uses multidisciplinary team-based case consultation and peer-to-peer sharing of emerging best and promising practices (ie, teleECHO [Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes]) to support the management of complex cases associated with long COVID, ME/CFS, and other PIFIs. We believe that this perspective captures a key moment in the trajectory of postpandemic clinician burnout and prompts further reflection and action from the health care system to improve clinician- and patient-level outcomes related to the care of patients with postinfectious fatiguing illnesses.

Source: Ramers CB, Scott JD, Struminger BB. Burnout, Compassion Fatigue, and the Long Haul of Caring for Long COVID. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 7;11(3):ofae080. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae080. PMID: 38449917; PMCID: PMC10917153. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917153/ (Full text)

Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Most patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are dissatisfied with medical care. They complain about e. g. the lack of medical recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological disease and the medical perception of those affected as “difficult patients”.

Method: As part of an exploratory qualitative survey, 544 medically diagnosed ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) were asked about their subjective experiences with regard to the doctor-patient relationships (DP relationship) to their treating physicians. The questionnaire was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The written answers were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results: The participants reported a significant deterioration in their health situation and their quality of life as a result of misdiagnoses and incorrect treatments, the strained DP relationship and the lack of support from the physicians. All of this leads to fear of visiting the doctor, a general loss of trust in physicians, a feeling of helplessness up to bitterness and resignation – with suicide as the last mental option for some patients to escape from this precarious situation. During medical consultations, other participants only addressed health problems that were not related to ME/CFS, or only went to the doctor in an emergency, or refrained from contacting doctors entirely.

Conclusions: The DP relationship described by the participants as problematic in their opinion has significant negative health consequences for them. It is therefore of great urgency to develop a patient-centred treatment concept that focuses on ME/CFS patients as experts on their own illness.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Auswirkungen der Qualität der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung auf die Gesundheit von erwachsenen ME/CFS-Erkrankten : Eine qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patien perspective]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2023 Dec;165(Suppl 5):16-27. German. doi: 10.1007/s15006-023-2894-z. PMID: 38062324.

Focus on Post-Exertional Malaise when approaching ME/CFS in specialist healthcare improves satisfaction and reduces deteriorations

Abstract:

Background: Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) is considered a hallmark characteristic of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). This may also apply to subgroups of patients with long COVID induced ME/CFS. However, it is uncertain to what extent PEM is acknowledged in routine specialist healthcare for ME/CFS patients, and how this affects patient outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate to what extent ME/CFS patients experienced focus on PEM in specialist healthcare practice and its significance for outcome and care quality.

Methods: Data from two online cross-sectional surveys covering specialist healthcare services for ME/CFS patients at rehabilitation institutes in Norway and at two regional hospitals respectively, were analyzed. Evaluations of 788 rehabilitation stays, 86 hospital consultations and 89 hospital interventions were included.

Logistic regression models and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to quantify the impact of addressing PEM on health and functioning, care satisfaction or benefit. Spearman’s rank correlation and Cronbach’s alpha of focus on PEM with the respondents’ perception of healthcare providers’ knowledge, symptom acknowledgement and suitability of intervention were assessed as measures for care quality and their internal consistency, respectively.

Results: PEM was addressed in 48% of the rehabilitation stays, 43% of the consultations and 65% of the hospital interventions. Failure to address PEM roughly doubled the risk of health deterioration following rehabilitation (OR=0.39, 95%CI 0.29-0.52; 40.1% vs 63.2% P= <.001) and hospital intervention (OR=0.34, 95%CI 0.13-0.89; 22.4% vs. 45.2%, P=.026).

PEM-focus during the clinical contact was associated with significantly higher scores on patients’ rated care satisfaction and benefit of both consultation and intervention. Furthermore, addressing PEM was (inter)related to positive views about healthcare providers’ level of knowledge of ME/CFS, their acknowledgment of symptoms, obtained knowledge, and the perceived suitability of intervention (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.80).

Conclusion: PEM is still frequently not acknowledged in specialist healthcare practice for ME/CFS patients in Norway. Not addressing PEM substantially increased the probability of a decline in health and functioning following intervention and was strongly associated with reduced perceived care quality, satisfaction and benefit. These findings may be related to the applied explanatory models for ME/CFS and are most likely of relevance to long COVID.

Source: Marjon E. Wormgoor, Sanne C. Rodenburg. Focus on Post-Exertional Malaise when approaching ME/CFS in specialist healthcare improves satisfaction and reduces deteriorations. Frontiers in Neurology 14- 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1247698/abstract

Healthcare system barriers impacting the care of Canadians with myalgic encephalomyelitis: a scoping review

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome or ME/CFS) is a debilitating, complex, multi-system illness. Developing a comprehensive understanding of the multiple and interconnected barriers to optimal care will help advance strategies and care models to improve quality of life for people living with ME in Canada.

Objectives: To: (1) identify and systematically map the available evidence; (2) investigate the design and conduct of research; (3) identify and categorize key characteristics; and (4) identify and analyze knowledge gaps related to healthcare system barriers for people living with ME in Canada.

Methods: The protocol was preregistered in July 2022. Peer-reviewed and grey literature was searched, and patient partners retrieved additional records. Eligible records were Canadian, included people with ME/CFS and included data or synthesis relevant to healthcare system barriers.

Results: In total, 1821 records were identified, 406 were reviewed in full, and 21 were included. Healthcare system barriers arose from an underlying lack of consensus and research on ME and ME care; the impact of long-standing stigma, disbelief, and sexism; inadequate or inconsistent healthcare provider education and training on ME; and the heterogeneity of care coordinated by family physicians.

Conclusions: People living with ME in Canada face significant barriers to care, though this has received relatively limited attention. This synthesis, which points to several areas for future research, can be used as a starting point for researchers, healthcare providers and decision-makers who are new to the area or encountering ME more frequently due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Source: Said Hussein, Lauren Eiriksson, Maureen MacQuarrie, Scot Merriam, Maria Dalton, Eleanor Stein, Rosie Twomey. Healthcare system barriers impacting the care of Canadians with myalgic encephalomyelitis: a scoping review. medRxiv [Preprint] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.20.23295809v1.full-text (Full text)

A phenomenological study on the lived experience of men with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Whilst chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been widely researched amongst women, studies investigating how men experience a CFS diagnosis is limited.

This study utilised an interpretative phenomenological approach to interview five men who have a medical diagnosis of CFS.

Six themes emerged to demonstrate the participants’ experiences prior to, during and after obtaining their CFS diagnosis.

Findings revealed that participants were initially reluctant to accept their condition, confounded by their perception that symptoms compromised their sense of masculinity. They also felt that healthcare professionals had limited recognition of CFS leading them to seek social support and legitimisation from other sources.

The struggle to come to terms with a different lifestyle and sense of masculinity prevailed. Such knowledge could be effectively utilised by researchers, practitioners and employers to facilitate an increased understanding of male accounts of the condition and more bespoke interventions where required.

Source: Snell GE, Seage CH, Mercer J. A phenomenological study on the lived experience of men with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. J Health Psychol. 2023 Jul 17:13591053231186385. doi: 10.1177/13591053231186385. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37455618. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37455618/

 

Understanding the experiences of caring for a partner with myalgic encephalopathy: a qualitative study of men in Norway

Abstract:

Background: Informal caring is expanding in many countries as populations age. There is a lot of research on how to care responsibilities are experienced by next of kin, but there is little research on men, which is the focus of this study. This specific focus is Myalgic Encephalopathy (ME), which is a condition that often affects women. This means that it is men who often find themselves in a caring role.

Aim: This project aims to explore what it was like for Norwegian men to have a caring role toward a partner with ME and how it affects everyday life.

Method: A qualitative approach was used. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the participants were recruited from different places in Norway. All were between the ages of 30 to 60 years old and were caring for a partner for several years. To analyze the data, thematic analysis was used, to find different patterns in the data.

Results: A data emerged two main themes and seven under the themes “experiencing the impact of caring for a partner with ME on everyday life “and providing different kinds of support. The experience around the role of caring was influenced by several factors, such as changes in finances and family dynamics as well as accessing formal support. Overall, the mean men felt that being in a caring role meant that life was being put on hold.

Conclusion: Findings from this study help to strengthen previous research. Having a caring role for a sick partner with ME was demanding and greatly affects everyday life. Men found the role of care challenging and it could negatively affect the person psychologically. For most people in a caring role, there was potential for better support both emotionally and financially.

Source: Elise Torp. Understanding the experiences of caring for a partner with myalgic encephalopathy: a qualitative study of men in Norway. M.Sc. Thesis. https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/handle/11250/3019314?locale-attribute=en

Unpaid carers are the missing piece in treatment guidelines and research priorities for ME/CFS

Dear Editor,

The recent publication of a new NICE Guideline1 , an All-Party Parliamentary Group Report (APPG)2, and new Research Priorities3 heralds a dramatic shift in approaches and attitudes to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in the UK. Largely ignored in all three publications, however, are unpaid carers (known outside the UK as family carers or caregivers). The vast majority of people with ME/CFS rely on their families for care and many of those families have been the driving force behind the changes to research and treatment
that are now unfolding.

There has been limited research on unpaid care in the specific context of ME/CFS, but the few existing studies clearly show that the usual toll of caring for a sick or disabled family member is compounded by the historic prejudice surrounding ME/CFS and the absence of evidence-based treatments.g.4-7.

While we applaud the commitment of NICE, the APPG, and the Priority Setting Partnership, it may still be decades before biomedical breakthroughs are made or translated into effective, widely available treatments for ME/CFS8. In the meantime, families will continue to provide the majority of
care for people with ME/CFS and bear the physical, psychological, and economic scars of doing so.

The new NICE guideline does recommend support for carers, but the supports it recommends are generic. They will do little to address the unique needs of ME/CFS carers or their systemic mistreatment by health and social care professionals. A change in the UK’s approach to ME/CFS is long overdue, but without a focus on unpaid carers the puzzle will always be missing a piece. The wellbeing of carers must also be a priority in ME/CFS
research and effective strategies must be developed to address their needs, and recognise and respect their expertise, in clinical practice and social care.

Kind regards,

Dr Siobhan O’Dwyer, University of Exeter Medical School
Ms Sarah Boothby, Former Carer
Dr Georgia Smith, University of Exeter Medical School
Dr Lucy Biddle, Bristol Medical School
Dr Nina Muirhead, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust
Dr Sharmila Khot, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

Source: O’Dwyer S, Boothby S, Smith G, Biddle L, Muirhead N, Khot S. Unpaid carers are the missing piece in treatment guidelines and research priorities for ME/CFS. BMJ. 2022 Jul 14;378:o1691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1691. PMID: 35835467.  https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/130699/BMJ_Letter_ODwyer.pdf?sequence=3 (Text available as PDF file)

The Advantages of an Integrative Approach in the Primary Healthcare of Post-COVID-19 and ME/CFS Patients

Abstract:

The coronavirus disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed not only global epidemiological and economic developments but also the lives of every individual, with particular severity for patients.

The number of acute illness cases grew rapidly, significantly increasing the workload of hospitals, and simultaneously, new chronic diseases emerged, such as persistent post-COVID-19 syndrome (PPCS), with unclear etiology, symptoms, and complexity—similar to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Accordingly, the burden of chronic diseases poses new long-term challenges for primary healthcare and requires new approaches to patient care.

This chapter provides insight into the integrative approach to healthcare and focuses on potentially new solutions by implementing an integrative attitude to the treatment of post-COVID-19 and ME/CFS patients in primary healthcare.

Integrative health coaching contributes the holistic approach to patients’ overall health and resilience through cognitive practice and patient active engagement. The findings of this chapter can enrich the person-centered approach and healthcare system strengthening through holistic measures and systems thinking.

Source: Diana Araja, Angelika Krumina, Uldis Berkis, Zaiga Nora-Krukle and Modra Murovska. The Advantages of an Integrative Approach in the Primary Healthcare of Post-COVID-19 and ME/CFS Patients. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106013  https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/82708 (Full text)

Long-haul COVID: healthcare utilization and medical expenditures 6 months post-diagnosis

Abstract:

Background: Despite extensive evidence that COVID-19 symptoms may persist for up to a year, their long-term implications for healthcare utilization and costs 6 months post-diagnosis remain relatively unexplored. We examine patient-level association of COVID-19 diagnosis association of COVID-19 diagnosis with average monthly healthcare utilization and medical expenditures for up to 6 months, explore heterogeneity across age groups and determine for how many months post-diagnosis healthcare utilization and costs of COVID-19 patients persist above pre-diagnosis levels.

Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study followed COVID-19 patients’ healthcare utilization and costs from January 2019 through March 2021 using claims data provided by the COVID-19 Research Database. The patient population includes 250,514 individuals infected with COVID-19 during March-September 2020 and whose last recorded claim was not hospitalization with severe symptoms. We measure the monthly number and costs of total visits and by telemedicine, preventive, urgent care, emergency, immunization, cardiology, inpatient or surgical services and established patient or new patient visits.

Results: The mean (SD) total number of monthly visits and costs pre-diagnosis were .4783 (4.0839) and 128.06 (1182.78) dollars compared with 1.2078 (8.4962) visits and 351.67 (2473.63) dollars post-diagnosis. COVID-19 diagnosis associated with .7269 (95% CI, 0.7088 to 0.7449 visits; P < .001) more total healthcare visits and an additional $223.60 (95% CI, 218.34 to 228.85; P < .001) in monthly costs. Excess monthly utilization and costs for individuals 17 years old and under subside after 5 months to .070 visits and $2.77, persist at substantial levels for all other groups and most pronounced among individuals age 45-64 (.207 visits and $73.43) and 65 years or older (.133 visits and $60.49).

Conclusions: This study found that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs over a six-month post-diagnosis period. These findings imply a prolonged burden to the US healthcare system from medical encounters of COVID-19 patients and increased spending.

Source: Koumpias AM, Schwartzman D, Fleming O. Long-haul COVID: healthcare utilization and medical expenditures 6 months post-diagnosis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08387-3. PMID: 35941617; PMCID: PMC9358916. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358916/ (Full text)