Tag: general practice

Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022

Abstract:

Objective To characterise Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected by Omicron.

Design Follow-up survey of persons testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Western Australia, 16 July-3 August 2022.

Setting Community

Participants 22,744 persons with COVID-19 who had agreed to participate in research at the time of diagnosis were texted a survey link 90 days later; non-responders were telephoned. Post stratification weights were applied to responses from 11,697 (51.4%) participants, 94.0% of whom had received >= 3 vaccine doses.

Main outcome measures Prevalence of ‘Long COVID’ – defined as reporting new or ongoing COVID-19 illness-related symptoms or health issues 90 days post diagnosis; associated health care utilisation, reductions in work/study and risk factors were assessed using log-binomial regression.

Results 18.2% (n=2,130) of respondents met case definition for Long COVID. Female sex, being 50-69 years of age, pre-existing health issues, residing in a rural or remote area, and receiving fewer vaccine doses were significant independent predictors of Long COVID (p < 0.05). Persons with Long COVID reported a median of 6 symptoms, most commonly fatigue (70.6%) and difficulty concentrating (59.6%); 38.2% consulted a GP and 1.6% reported hospitalisation in the month prior to the survey due to ongoing symptoms. Of 1,778 respondents with Long COVID who were working/studying before their COVID-19 diagnosis, 17.9% reported reducing/discontinuing work/study.

Conclusion 90 days post Omicron infection, almost 1 in 5 respondents reported Long COVID symptoms; 1 in 15 of all persons with COVID-19 sought healthcare for associated health concerns >=2 months after the acute illness.

The known The prevalence of Long COVID varies widely across studies conducted in diverse settings globally (range: 9%-81%).

The new In a highly vaccinated population (94% with >=3 vaccine doses), almost 20% of persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant reported symptoms consistent with Long COVID 90 days post diagnosis. Long COVID was associated with sustained negative impacts on work/study and a substantial utilisation of GP services 2-3 months after the acute illness; however, ED presentations and hospitalisations for Long COVID were rare.

The implications GP clinics play a significant role in managing the burden of Long COVID in Australia.

Source: Mulu Woldegiorgis, Gemma Cadby, Sera Ngeh, Rosemary Korda, Paul Armstrong, Jelena Maticevic, Paul Knight, Andrew Jardine, Lauren Bloomfield, Paul Effler. Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022. medRxiv 2023.08.06.23293706; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1.full-text (Full text)

Enhancing the management of long COVID in general practice: a scoping review

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID is a multifaceted condition, and it has impacted a considerable proportion of those with acute-COVID-19. Affected patients often have complex care needs requiring holistic and multidisciplinary care, the kind routinely provided in general practice. However, there is limited evidence regarding GP interventions.

Aim: This study aimed to address this issue by conducting a scoping review of literature on GP management of Long COVID.

Design & setting: Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage scoping review framework with recommendations by Levac et al. was used.

Method: PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Google searches were conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed/grey literature, and study selection process was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Braun and Clarke’s ‘Thematic Analysis’ approach was used to interpret data.

Results: Nineteen of 972 identified papers were selected for review. These included peer-reviewed articles and grey literature spanning a wide range of countries. Six themes were identified regarding GP management of Long COVID, these being: (i) GP uncertainty, (ii) Listening and empathy, (iii) Assessment and monitoring of symptoms, (iv) Coordinating access to appropriate services, (v) Facilitating provision of continual and integrated multi-disciplinary care and (vi) Need to facilitate psychological support.

Conclusion: The findings show that GPs can and have played a key role in the management of Long COVID, and that patient care can be improved through better understanding of patient experiences, standardised approaches for symptom identification/treatment, and facilitation of access to multidisciplinary specialist services when needed. Future research evaluating focused GP interventions is needed.

Source: Brennan A, Broughan JM, McCombe G, Brennan J, Collins C, Fawsitt R, Gallagher J, Guérandel A, O’Kelly B, Quinlan D, Lambert JS, Cullen W. Enhancing the management of long COVID in general practice: a scoping review. BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 7:BJGPO.2021.0178. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0178. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35256357.  https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2022/03/06/BJGPO.2021.0178 (Full text available as PDF file)

A Literature Review of GP Knowledge and Understanding of ME/CFS: A Report from the Socioeconomic Working Group of the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE)

Abstract:

Background and Objectives: The socioeconomic working group of the European myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Research Network (EUROMENE) has conducted a review of the literature pertaining to GPs’ knowledge and understanding of ME/CFS;

Materials and Methods: A MEDLINE search was carried out. The papers identified were reviewed following the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) methodology, and were classified according to the focus of the enquiry (patients, GPs, database and medical record studies, evaluation of a training programme, and overview papers), and whether they were quantitative or qualitative in nature;

Results: Thirty-three papers were identified in the MEDLINE search. The quantitative surveys of GPs demonstrated that a third to a half of all GPs did not accept ME/CFS as a genuine clinical entity and, even when they did, they lacked confidence in diagnosing or managing it. It should be noted, though, that these papers were mostly from the United Kingdom. Patient surveys indicated that a similar proportion of patients was dissatisfied with the primary medical care they had received. These findings were consistent with the findings of the qualitative studies that were examined, and have changed little over several decades;

Conclusions: Disbelief and lack of knowledge and understanding of ME/CFS among GPs is widespread, and the resultant diagnostic delays constitute a risk factor for severe and prolonged disease. Failure to diagnose ME/CFS renders problematic attempts to determine its prevalence, and hence its economic impact.

Source: Pheby DFH, Araja D, Berkis U, Brenna E, Cullinan J, de Korwin JD, Gitto L, Hughes DA, Hunter RM, Trepel D, Wang-Steverding X. A Literature Review of GP Knowledge and Understanding of ME/CFS: A Report from the Socioeconomic Working Group of the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE). Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 24;57(1):E7. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010007. PMID: 33374291. https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/57/1/7 (Full text)

Frequency of attendance in general practice and symptoms before development of chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) research has concentrated on infective, immunological, and psychological causes. Illness behaviour has received less attention, with most research studying CFS patients after diagnosis. Our previous study on the records of an insurance company showed a highly significant increase in illness reporting before development of CFS.

AIM: To investigate the number and type of general practitioner (GP) consultations by patients with CFS for 15 years before they develop their condition.

DESIGN OF STUDY: Case-control study in 11 general practices in Devon.

SETTING: Forty-nine patients with CFS (satisfying the Centers for Disease Control criteria), 49 age, sex, and general practice matched controls, and 37 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were identified from the general practices’ computerised databases.

METHOD: The number of general practice consultations and symptoms recorded in three five-year periods (quinquennia) were counted before development of the patients’ condition.

RESULTS: The median number of consultations was significantly higher for CFS patients than that of matched controls in each of the quinquennia: ratios for first quinquennium = 1.88, P = 0.01; second quinquennium = 1.70, P = 0.005; last quinquennium = 2.25, P < 0.001. More CFS patients than controls attended for 13 of the 18 symptoms studied. Significant increases were found for upper respiratory tract infection (P < 0.001), lethargy (P < 0.001), and vertigo (P = 0.02). Similar results were found for CFS patients when compared with MS.

CONCLUSIONS: CFS patients consulted their GP more frequently in the 15 years before development of their condition, for a wide variety of complaints. Several possibilities may explain these findings. The results support the hypothesis that behavioural factors have a role in the aetiology of CFS.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

 

Source: Hamilton WT, Hall GH, Round AP. Frequency of attendance in general practice and symptoms before development of chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jul;51(468):553-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314047/ (Full article)

 

General practitioners’ beliefs, attitudes and reported actions towards chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a survey of Australian general practitioners (GPs) to explore their beliefs, attitudes and reported actions with respect to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHOD: A random sample of 2090 Australian GPs, stratified by state, was surveyed in May-August 1995.

RESULTS: A 77% response rate was obtained. For the majority of practitioners who pursue a diagnosis of CFS, six symptoms were considered to be of significance: chronic unremitting fatigue for over 6 months; failure to recover energy after rest; reduced exercise tolerance; prostration for several days after exercise; generalised myalgia and poor concentration. Individual counselling was the most frequently used treatment. Thirty-one percent of practitioners reported that they did not believe that CFS is a distinct syndrome. Of these, 70% reported that the most likely cause of chronic fatigue was depression.

CONCLUSION: There is considerable diversity of opinion between practitioners about CFS. The diversity extends from questioning whether the syndrome even exists to different strategies for diagnosis and management.

 

Source: Steven ID, McGrath B, Qureshi F, Wong C, Chern I, Pearn-Rowe B. General practitioners’ beliefs, attitudes and reported actions towards chronic fatigue syndrome. Aust Fam Physician. 2000 Jan;29(1):80-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10721550

 

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome as recognized by GPs

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Prevalence studies on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) are rare. Because of the similarity in symptoms, the prevalence of Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome (PFS) was investigated at the same time.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of CFS and PFS as recognized by GPs in The Netherlands and to inform them of the existence of CFS.

METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs.

RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 60% of the GPs. Seventy-three per cent reported one or more CFS patients and 83% one or more PFS patients in their practice.

CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of CFS as recognized by GPs of 112 (PFS 157) patients per 100,000 is a minimum estimate.

 

Source: Bazelmans E, Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van Weel C, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome as recognized by GPs. Fam Pract. 1999 Dec;16(6):602-4. http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/6/602.long (Full article)

 

Patients with fatigue in family practice: prevalence and treatment

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the prevalence and treatment of severe fatigue in general practice.

DESIGN: Secondary data analysis.

METHOD: By means of an episode-oriented morbidity registration by 54 GPs throughout the Netherlands over the period 1985-1994 it was established how often in the course of one year ‘fatigue’ was listed as the reason for consultation, what diagnoses were then made, how long episodes of care because of ‘fatigue’ lasted and what interventions took place (n = 93,297). Of the patients with a care episode because of ‘fatigue’ lasting at least 6 months, age, sex, comorbidity and consumption of care were established; for this purpose use was also made of a file containing data on 4 years in succession (n = 9630).

RESULTS: Per annum, 92 per 1000 listed patients consulted the GP because of fatigue. Somatic or psychic diagnoses were made in 27.7 per 1000 patients listed. The episode of care lasted 4 weeks at most in 86% and at least 6 months in approximately 4%. The GPs’ management of patients with ‘fatigue’ included physical examination in 63% and blood testing in 34%, conversation in 35%, prescription of medication in 24% and referral to a specialist in 3%. Of the 97 patients with fatigue lasting longer than 6 months, 61% had a chronic disease or psychic problems.

CONCLUSION: Fatigue is frequently encountered in general practice, but the estimate that one per 1000 listed patients meets the criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome looks a little high. It appears that GPs, in accordance with recommendations, mostly adopt a policy of wait and see.

 

Source: Kenter EG, Okkes IM. Patients with fatigue in family practice: prevalence and treatment. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Apr 10;143(15):796-801. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10347643

 

Diagnosis in chronic illness: disabling or enabling–the case of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This paper examines doctors’ and patients’ views on the consequences of an increasingly common symptomatic diagnosis, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Two studies were conducted: the first comprised interviews with 20 general practitioners; the second was a longitudinal study, comprising three interviews over a period of 2 years with 50 people diagnosed with CFS. Contrasts were apparent between doctors’ practical and ethical concerns about articulating a diagnosis of CFS and patients’ experiences with and without such a diagnosis.

Seventy per cent of the doctors were reluctant to articulate a diagnosis of CFS. They felt constrained by the scientific uncertainty regarding its aetiology and by a concern that diagnosis might become a disabling self-fulfilling prophecy. Patients, by contrast, highlighted the enabling aspects of a singular coherent diagnosis and emphasized the negative effects of having no explanation for their problems.

Comment in: Diagnosis in chronic illness. [J R Soc Med. 1995]

 

Source: Woodward RV, Broom DH, Legge DG. Diagnosis in chronic illness: disabling or enabling–the case of chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Soc Med. 1995 Jun;88(6):325-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1295234/ (Full article)

GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Sufferers continue to be misrepresented

Comment on: General practitioners’ attitudes to patients with a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. [BMJ. 1995]

 

EDITOR,-Shonagh Scott and colleagues’ paper on general practitioners’ attitudes to self diagnosed myalgic encephalomyelitis illustrates, if nothing else, the continuing misrepresentation of this illness and those who suffer from it.’ Contrary to the authors’ claims, Action for ME has never encouraged self diagnosis, and nor have the other “active support organisations” in Britain. Moreover, we have never advocated that patients should make unreasonable demands on their general practitioners.

Despite what Scott and colleagues imply, it is not just patients who recognise the existence of myalgic encephalomyelitis but also the World Health Organisation (the disease appears in the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision)), several handbooks, and many doctors. Indeed, positive attitudes to fatigue syndromes such as myalgic encephalomyelitis have been noted in several studies in the past few years. For instance, Ho-Yen and McNamara surveyed 178 general practitioners in Scotland and found that 71% accepted the existence of the disorder.2 In New Zealand the figure was 90%.3

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2549698/pdf/bmj00593-0058a.pdf

 

Source: Arber M. GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Sufferers continue to be misrepresented. BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1330. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2549698/

 

General practitioners’ attitudes to patients with a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis

Comment in:

GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Evidence supports presence of encephalitis. [BMJ. 1995]

GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Sufferers continue to be misrepresented. [BMJ. 1995]

 

Interest in the symptom of tiredness has increased with the suggestion of a syndrome of prolonged fatigue caused by infection. The syndrome is referred to as myalgic encephalomyelitis, even though no evidence exists that sufferers have encephalitis or myelitis. Active support organisations encourage self diagnosis 1 and advise how to approach a general practitioner who “doesn’t believe in ME.”2 Problems in doctor-patient relationships may be a factor in persistent disability in fatigue states.3 We therefore used a case vignette method to examine how self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis could influence general practitioners.4

You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2548881/pdf/bmj00581-0036.pdf

 

Source: Scott S, Deary I, Pelosi AJ. General practitioners’ attitudes to patients with a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):508. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2548881/