Tag: omicron variant

Reduction in Long COVID Symptoms and Symptom Severity in Vaccinated Compared to Unvaccinated Adults

Abstract:

Background: The impact of vaccination prior to infection on postacute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, PASC), also known as long COVID, remains unclear. Here we assess the protective effect of vaccination on long COVID in a community-based setting.

Methods: The Immunity Associated with SARS-CoV-2 (IASO) study is an ongoing prospective cohort of working adults that began in October 2020. Participants are actively followed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. We compared the prevalence of symptoms and symptom severity in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated cases. Our primary definition of long COVID was the presence of symptoms at 90 days postinfection; 30 days postinfection was also examined.

Results: Overall, by 90 days postinfection, 13% of cases had long COVID, with 27% of unvaccinated cases and 8% of vaccinated cases reporting long COVID (relative risk [RR], 0.31 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .22–.42]). Vaccination was also associated with significantly lower average severity scores at all timepoints (eg, relative severity at 90 days postinfection: −2.70 [95% CI, −1.68 to −3.73]). In the pre-Omicron era, 28% of unvaccinated cases and 18% of vaccinated cases reported long COVID (P = .07), and vaccinated cases reported less severe symptoms including less difficulty breathing (P = .01; 90-day RR, 0.07).

Conclusions: Vaccinated cases had lower prevalence of long COVID and reduced symptom severity.

Source: Hannah E Maier, Theresa Kowalski-Dobson, Ashley Eckard, Carmen Gherasim, David Manthei, Alyssa Meyers, Dawson Davis, Kevin Bakker, Kathleen Lindsey, Zijin Chu, Lauren Warsinske, Matthew Arnold, Anna Buswinka, Emily Stoneman, Riccardo Valdez, Aubree Gordon, Reduction in Long COVID Symptoms and Symptom Severity in Vaccinated Compared to Unvaccinated Adults, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 11, Issue 2, February 2024, ofae039, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae039 https://academic.oup.com/ofid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ofid/ofae039/7585852 (Full text)

Clinical characteristics of female long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms: a retrospective study from a Japanese outpatient clinic

Abstract:

Purpose: To elucidate the impact of long COVID on menstruation and mental health, medical records of patients with long COVID were evaluated.

Methods: Symptoms of long COVID, QOL, mental health, and related endocrine data were compared between two groups with and without menstrual disturbances.

Results: Of 349 female patients who visited our clinic between February 2021 and March 2023, 223 patients with long COVID (aged 18-50 years) were included. Forty-four (19.7%) of the patients had menstrual symptoms associated with long COVID. The patients with menstrual symptoms were older than those without menstrual symptoms (42.5 vs. 38 years). The percentage of patients with menstrual symptoms was higher during the Omicron phase (24%) than during the Preceding (13%) and Delta (12%) phases. Cycle irregularity was the most frequent (in 63.6% of the patients), followed by severe pain (25%), heavy bleeding (20.5%), perimenopausal symptoms (18.2%), and premenstrual syndrome (15.9%). Fatigue and depression were the most frequent complications. Scores for fatigue and for QOL were significantly worse in long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms. Results of endocrine examinations showed significantly increased cortisol levels in patients with menstrual complaints.

Conclusion: Long COVID has an impact on menstrual conditions and on QOL related to menstrual conditions.

Source: Sakurada Y, Matsuda Y, Motohashi K, Hasegawa T, Otsuka Y, Nakano Y, Tokumasu K, Yamamoto K, Sunada N, Honda H, Hagiya H, Ueda K, Otsuka F. Clinical characteristics of female long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms: a retrospective study from a Japanese outpatient clinic. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;45(1):2305899. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2024.2305899. Epub 2024 Jan 25. PMID: 38270210. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0167482X.2024.2305899 (Full text)

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Reduces the Occurrence of Post-COVID Conditions in U.S. Children Aged 5-17 Years Following Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Infection, July 2021-September 2022

Abstract:

Background An estimated 1-3% of children with SARS-CoV-2 infection will develop Post-COVID Conditions (PCC). This study evaluates mRNA COVID-19 vaccine impact on likelihood of PCC in children.
Methods A multi-site cohort of children enrolled 7/21/2021-9/1/2022 underwent weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening tests and were surveyed via self- or parental report 12/1/2022-5/31/2023 regarding PCC (defined as ≥1 new or on-going symptoms lasting ≥ 1 month after infection). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the occurrence of PCC by vaccination status among children aged 5–17 years whose first PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in-study with Omicron variant, who completed the survey >60 days from infection, and who were vaccine age-eligible at time of infection per ACIP recommendations. Vaccination status was categorized as vaccinated (at least primary series completed >14 days before infection) and unvaccinated (no vaccine doses before infection). Vaccination status was verified through vaccine registry and/or medical records.
Results Of 622 participants surveyed, 5% (n=28) had PCC (Table 1) and 67% (n=474) were vaccinated (Table 2). Surveys were completed a median (IQR) of 203.7 days (119.0–293.0) after infection. Children with non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity and good/fair/poor self-rated baseline health were more likely to report PCC. Children aged 12-18 years, Non-Hispanic Asian and White children, those reporting symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, and those with excellent/very good self-rated baseline health were more likely to report vaccination When comparing children with and without PCC symptoms, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination was associated with a decreased likelihood of >1 PCC symptom (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43-0.99), >2 PCC symptoms (aOR 0.52, 95% 0.32-0.83), and respiratory PCC symptoms (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.87) (Table 3).
Conclusion In this study, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination appeared to be protective against PCC in children following Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection. The adjusted ORs correspond to an estimated 34%, 48%, and 47% reduced likelihood of >1, >2, and respiratory PCC symptoms among vaccinated children, respectively. These findings support COVID-19 vaccination for children and may encourage increased pediatric vaccine uptake.
Source: Anna R Yousaf, Josephine Mak, Lisa Gwynn, Robin Bloodworth, Ramona Rai, Zuha Jeddy, Lindsay B LeClair, Laura Edwards, Lauren E W Olsho, Gabriella Newes-Adeyi, Alexandra F Dalton, Manjusha Gaglani, Sarang K Yoon, Kurt Hegmann, Katherine Ellingson, Leora R Feldstein, Angela P Campbell, Amadea Britton, Sharon Saydah, 1935. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Reduces the Occurrence of Post-COVID Conditions in U.S. Children Aged 5-17 Years Following Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Infection, July 2021-September 2022, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 10, Issue Supplement_2, December 2023, ofad500.2466, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2466 https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/Supplement_2/ofad500.2466/7448254 (Full text available as PDF file)

Long-term Prognosis at 1.5 years after Infection with Wild-type strain of SARS-CoV-2 and Alpha, Delta, as well as Omicron Variants

Highlights:

  • Trajectory of long COVID in SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron
  • Similar patterns of symptoms and severity of long COVID across all four variants
  • No clinically significant decline in median severity up to 1.5 years after infection
  • More than 50% of long COVID patients failed to improve using any outcome measure
  • Patients infected with Omicron may experience severe non-improving long COVID

Abstract:

Objectives: Knowledge is limited on how changing SARS-CoV-2 variants may translate into different characteristics and affect prognosis of patients with long COVID, especially following Omicron variants. We compared long-term prognosis of patients in a Danish Post COVID Clinic infected with wild-type strain, Alpha, Delta, or Omicron variants as well as the pre-Omicron compared to the Omicron period.

Methods: At enrollment a Post COVID symptom Questionnaire (PCQ), and standard health scores, were registered, and repeated four times until 1.5 years after infection. PCQ was the primary outcome to assess severity of long COVID, and delta PCQ to assess failure to improve.

Results: A total of 806 patients were enrolled. Patients infected with Omicron and Delta variants presented with more severe long COVID (median PCQ 43 in Delta vs 38 in wild-type, P=0.003) and health scores (EQ5D-index was 0.70 in Omicron vs 0.76 in wild-type, P=0.009 and 0.78 pre-Omicron, P=0.006). At 1.5 year after infection patients had no clinically meaningful decline in severity of long COVID, and 57% (245/429) of patients failed to improve 1.5 years after infection, with no differences between variants.

Conclusions: More than half of patients referred to a Post COVID Clinic failed to improve in long COVID severity 1.5 years after infection regardless of variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Source: Jane Agergaard , Jesper Damsgaard Gunst , Berit Schiøttz-Christensen , Lars Østergaard , Christian Wejse , Long-term Prognosis at 1.5 years after Infection with Wild-type strain of SARS-CoV-2 and Alpha, Delta, as well as Omicron Variants, International Journal of Infectious Diseases (2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.10.022 https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(23)00760-9/fulltext (Full text)

Influence of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection on COVID-19 Severity: Evidence from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative

Abstract:

Background As SARS-CoV-2 has transitioned from a pandemic to endemic disease, the majority of new infections have been among previously infected individuals. To manage the risks and benefits of ongoing COVID-19 policies, it is important to understand whether prior infection modifies the severity of subsequent infections.

Methods We used data from first and second COVID-19 episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), a collection of health systems who provide de-identified electronic health records for research purposes. Our analysis was a sequential series of nested trial emulations. In the first of two analytic stages, we created a month-specific model of the probability of prior infection for each individual. In the second stage, we used an ordinal logistic regression with inverse probability weights calculated in the first stage to simulate a series of monthly trials comparing severity between the cohorts of first and second infections. In addition to cohort-wide effect estimates, we also conducted analyses among race/ethnicity, sex, and age subgroups.

Results From an initial cohort of 7,446,481 combined first and second infections, we identified a cohort of 2,227,484 infections, among which 7.6% were second infections. Ninety-four percent of patients with two recorded infections experienced mild disease for both. The overall odds ratio (OR) for more severe disease with prior infection was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 – 1.10). Monthly point estimates of the OR ranged from 0.56 (95% CI: 0.37 – 0.84) in October 2020 to 1.64 (95% CI: 1.33 – 2.00) in February 2023. In most subgroups, the effect of prior infection was significant. In 8 out of 10 subgroups, the maximum monthly OR occurred after the minimum monthly OR, suggesting that protection has waned throughout the pandemic.

Conclusion Overall, prior infection was associated with a significant slightly elevated risk of severe disease. This effect varied month to month. As the pandemic proceeded, the effect of prior infection tended to evolve from generally protective during the pre-Omicron era to unprotective during the Omicron era. This points to the need for continued strategies to avert and minimize the harms of COVID-19, rather than relying upon immunity acquired through previous infection.

Question Does prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 affect the severity of subsequent COVID-19 episodes?

Findings We observed a mild protective effect of prior infection during the early and mid-stages of the pandemic that waned after the rise of the Omicron variants, ultimately resulting in loss of protection or a tendency toward more severe second infections.

Meaning Prior infection alone is likely not enough to avert the worst public health harms of endemic SARS-CoV-2. Interventions to avoid infection and reduce the severity of COVID-19 will still be important in the post-pandemic era.

Source: Nathaniel Hendrix, Hythem Sidky, David K. Sahner, The N3C Consortium. Influence of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection on COVID-19 Severity: Evidence from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. medRxiv 2023.08.03.23293612; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.03.23293612 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.03.23293612v1.full-text (Full text)

Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022

Abstract:

Objective To characterise Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected by Omicron.

Design Follow-up survey of persons testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Western Australia, 16 July-3 August 2022.

Setting Community

Participants 22,744 persons with COVID-19 who had agreed to participate in research at the time of diagnosis were texted a survey link 90 days later; non-responders were telephoned. Post stratification weights were applied to responses from 11,697 (51.4%) participants, 94.0% of whom had received >= 3 vaccine doses.

Main outcome measures Prevalence of ‘Long COVID’ – defined as reporting new or ongoing COVID-19 illness-related symptoms or health issues 90 days post diagnosis; associated health care utilisation, reductions in work/study and risk factors were assessed using log-binomial regression.

Results 18.2% (n=2,130) of respondents met case definition for Long COVID. Female sex, being 50-69 years of age, pre-existing health issues, residing in a rural or remote area, and receiving fewer vaccine doses were significant independent predictors of Long COVID (p < 0.05). Persons with Long COVID reported a median of 6 symptoms, most commonly fatigue (70.6%) and difficulty concentrating (59.6%); 38.2% consulted a GP and 1.6% reported hospitalisation in the month prior to the survey due to ongoing symptoms. Of 1,778 respondents with Long COVID who were working/studying before their COVID-19 diagnosis, 17.9% reported reducing/discontinuing work/study.

Conclusion 90 days post Omicron infection, almost 1 in 5 respondents reported Long COVID symptoms; 1 in 15 of all persons with COVID-19 sought healthcare for associated health concerns >=2 months after the acute illness.

The known The prevalence of Long COVID varies widely across studies conducted in diverse settings globally (range: 9%-81%).

The new In a highly vaccinated population (94% with >=3 vaccine doses), almost 20% of persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant reported symptoms consistent with Long COVID 90 days post diagnosis. Long COVID was associated with sustained negative impacts on work/study and a substantial utilisation of GP services 2-3 months after the acute illness; however, ED presentations and hospitalisations for Long COVID were rare.

The implications GP clinics play a significant role in managing the burden of Long COVID in Australia.

Source: Mulu Woldegiorgis, Gemma Cadby, Sera Ngeh, Rosemary Korda, Paul Armstrong, Jelena Maticevic, Paul Knight, Andrew Jardine, Lauren Bloomfield, Paul Effler. Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022. medRxiv 2023.08.06.23293706; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1.full-text (Full text)

Long COVID in Children and Youth After Infection or Reinfection with the Omicron Variant: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract:

To describe the prevalence of long COVID in children infected for the first time (n=332) or reinfected (n=243) with Omicron variant SARS-CoV-2, compared with test-negative children (n=311). 12-16% infected with Omicron met the research definition of long COVID at 3 and 6 months after infection, with no evidence of difference between cases of first-positive and reinfection (pchi-square=0.17).

Source: Pinto Pereira SM, Mensah A, Nugawela MD, Stephenson T, Ladhani SN, Dalrymple E, Dudley J, McOwat K, Simmons R, Heyman I, Segal T, Semple MG, Xu L, Shafran R; CLoCk Consortium. Long COVID in Children and Youth After Infection or Reinfection with the Omicron Variant: A Prospective Observational Study. J Pediatr. 2023 May 10:113463. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113463. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37172813; PMCID: PMC10171900. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171900/ (Full text)

Post COVID-19 condition of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2

Abstract:

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of post coronavirus disease (COVID-19) condition of the Omicron variant in comparison to other strains.

Study design: A single-center cross-sectional study.

Methods: Patients who recovered from Omicron COVID-19 infection (Omicron group) were interviewed via telephone, and patients infected with other strains (control group) were surveyed via a self-reporting questionnaire. Data on patients’ characteristics, information regarding the acute-phase COVID-19, as well as presence and duration of COVID-19-related symptoms were obtained. Post COVID-19 condition in this study was defined as a symptom that lasted for at least 2 months, within 3 months of COVID-19 onset. We investigated and compared the prevalence of post COVID-19 condition in both groups after performing propensity score matching.

Results: We conducted interviews for 53 out of 128 patients with Omicron and obtained 502 responses in the control group. After matching cases with controls, 18 patients from both groups had improved covariate balance of the factors: older adult, female sex, obesity, and vaccination status. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of each post COVID-19 condition between the two groups. The number of patients with at least one post COVID-19 condition in the Omicron and control groups were 1 (5.6%) and 10 (55.6%) (p = 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions: The prevalence of post Omicron COVID-19 conditions was less than that of the other strains. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to investigate the precise epidemiology of post COVID-19 condition of Omicron, and its impact on health-related quality of life and social productivity.

Source: Morioka S, Tsuzuki S, Suzuki M, Terada M, Akashi M, Osanai Y, Kuge C, Sanada M, Tanaka K, Maruki T, Takahashi K, Saito S, Hayakawa K, Teruya K, Hojo M, Ohmagari N. Post COVID-19 condition of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. J Infect Chemother. 2022 Aug 11:S1341-321X(22)00233-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.08.007. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35963600; PMCID: PMC9365517. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365517/ (Full text)

Omicron BA.2 (B.1.1.529.2): high potential to becoming the next dominating variant

Abstract:

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly replaced the Delta variant as a dominating SARS-CoV-2 variant because of natural selection, which favors the variant with higher infectivity and stronger vaccine breakthrough ability. Omicron has three lineages or subvariants, BA.1 (B.1.1.529.1), BA.2 (B.1.1.529.2), and BA.3 (B.1.1.529.3). Among them, BA.1 is the currently prevailing subvariant. BA.2 shares 32 mutations with BA.1 but has 28 distinct ones. BA.3 shares most of its mutations with BA.1 and BA.2 except for one. BA.2 is found to be able to alarmingly reinfect patients originally infected by Omicron BA.1. An important question is whether BA.2 or BA.3 will become a new dominating “variant of concern”. Currently, no experimental data has been reported about BA.2 and BA.3. We construct a novel algebraic topology-based deep learning model trained with tens of thousands of mutational and deep mutational data to systematically evaluate BA.2’s and BA.3’s infectivity, vaccine breakthrough capability, and antibody resistance.

Our comparative analysis of all main variants namely, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Lambda, Mu, BA.1, BA.2, and BA.3, unveils that BA.2 is about 1.5 and 4.2 times as contagious as BA.1 and Delta, respectively. It is also 30% and 17-fold more capable than BA.1 and Delta, respectively, to escape current vaccines. Therefore, we project that Omicron BA.2 is on its path to becoming the next dominating variant. We forecast that like Omicron BA.1, BA.2 will also seriously compromise most existing mAbs, except for sotrovimab developed by GlaxoSmithKline.

Source: Chen, Jiahui, and Guo-Wei Wei. “Omicron BA.2 (B.1.1.529.2): high potential to becoming the next dominating variant.” Research square rs.3.rs-1362445. 23 Feb. 2022, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1362445/v1. Preprint. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8887081/ (Full text)