Clinical characteristics of female long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms: a retrospective study from a Japanese outpatient clinic

Abstract:

Purpose: To elucidate the impact of long COVID on menstruation and mental health, medical records of patients with long COVID were evaluated.

Methods: Symptoms of long COVID, QOL, mental health, and related endocrine data were compared between two groups with and without menstrual disturbances.

Results: Of 349 female patients who visited our clinic between February 2021 and March 2023, 223 patients with long COVID (aged 18-50 years) were included. Forty-four (19.7%) of the patients had menstrual symptoms associated with long COVID. The patients with menstrual symptoms were older than those without menstrual symptoms (42.5 vs. 38 years). The percentage of patients with menstrual symptoms was higher during the Omicron phase (24%) than during the Preceding (13%) and Delta (12%) phases. Cycle irregularity was the most frequent (in 63.6% of the patients), followed by severe pain (25%), heavy bleeding (20.5%), perimenopausal symptoms (18.2%), and premenstrual syndrome (15.9%). Fatigue and depression were the most frequent complications. Scores for fatigue and for QOL were significantly worse in long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms. Results of endocrine examinations showed significantly increased cortisol levels in patients with menstrual complaints.

Conclusion: Long COVID has an impact on menstrual conditions and on QOL related to menstrual conditions.

Source: Sakurada Y, Matsuda Y, Motohashi K, Hasegawa T, Otsuka Y, Nakano Y, Tokumasu K, Yamamoto K, Sunada N, Honda H, Hagiya H, Ueda K, Otsuka F. Clinical characteristics of female long COVID patients with menstrual symptoms: a retrospective study from a Japanese outpatient clinic. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;45(1):2305899. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2024.2305899. Epub 2024 Jan 25. PMID: 38270210. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0167482X.2024.2305899 (Full text)

Glucocorticoid receptor mediated negative feedback in chronic fatigue syndrome using the low dose (0.5 mg) dexamethasone suppression test

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is associated with hypocortisolism, but it is not yet clear the extent to which enhanced negative feedback may underlie this finding.

METHODS: We undertook a low-dose dexamethasone (0.5 mg) suppression test in 18 CFS patients and 20 matched, healthy controls. We measured salivary cortisol levels at 0800 h, 1200 h, 1600 h and 2000 h before and after the administration of 0.5 mg of dexamethasone.

RESULTS: Basal cortisol output was raised in this group of CFS patients compared to controls. Overall, the percentage suppression following dexamethasone administration was no different between CFS (mean+/-sem: 80.4+/-4.4%) and controls (76.2+/-4.9 %). However, the sub-group of patients with CFS and comorbid depression (n=9) showed a significant hypersuppression of salivary cortisol in response to dexamethasone (89.0+/-1.9%; p<0.05 v controls).

LIMITATIONS: The sub-group analysis was on small numbers and should be considered preliminary. Dexamethasone probes only glucocorticoid medicated negative feedback but does not probe mineralocorticoid feedback, the other main physiological feedback mechanism.

CONCLUSION: We found partial support for the hypothesis of enhanced negative feedback in CFS but only in patients with comorbid depression and also in the context of a sample of patients with elevated basal cortisol levels, which is an atypical finding in the literature.

 

Source: Papadopoulos A, Ebrecht M, Roberts AD, Poon L, Rohleder N, Cleare AJ. Glucocorticoid receptor mediated negative feedback in chronic fatigue syndrome using the low dose (0.5 mg) dexamethasone suppression test. J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18573538

 

Corticotropin releasing hormone in the pathophysiology of melancholic and atypical depression and in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs

Abstract:

Hypercortisolism in depression seems to preferentially reflect activation of hypothalamic CRH secretion. Although it has been postulated that this hypercortisolism is an epiphenomenon of the pain and stress of major depression, our data showing preferential participation of AVP in the hypercortisolism of chronic inflammatory disease suggest specificity for the pathophysiology of hypercortisolism in depression.

Our findings that imipramine causes a down-regulation of the HPA axis in experimental animals and healthy controls support an intrinsic role for CRH in the pathophysiology of melancholia and in the mechanism of action of psychotropic agents. Our data suggest that hypercortisolism is not the only form of HPA dysregulation in major depression.

In a series of studies, commencing in patients with Cushing’s disease, and extending to hyperimmune fatigue states such as chronic fatigue syndrome and examples of atypical depression such as seasonal affective disorder, we have advanced data suggesting hypofunction of hypothalamic CRH neurons. These data raise the question that the hyperphagia, hypersomnia, and fatigue associated with syndromes of atypical depression could reflect a central deficiency of a potent arousal-producing anorexogenic neuropeptide.

In the light of data presented elsewhere in this symposium regarding the role of a hypofunctioning hypothalamic CRH neuron in susceptibility to inflammatory disease, these data also raise the question of a common pathophysiological mechanism in syndromes associated both with inflammatory manifestations and atypical depressive symptoms. This concept of hypofunctioning of hypothalamic CRH neurons in these disorders also raises the question of novel forms of neuropharmacological intervention in both inflammatory diseases and atypical depressive syndromes.

 

Source: Gold PW, Licinio J, Wong ML, Chrousos GP. Corticotropin releasing hormone in the pathophysiology of melancholic and atypical depression and in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 29;771:716-29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8597444