Neuroendocrine correlates of chronic fatigue syndrome: a brief review

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome remains one of the more perplexing syndromes in contemporary clinical medicine. One approach to understanding this condition has been to acknowledge its similarities to other disorders of clearer pathophysiology.

In this review, a rationale for the study of neuroendocrine correlates of chronic fatigue syndrome is presented, based in part on the clinical observation that asthenic or fatigue states share many of the somatic symptom characteristics seen in recognized endocrine disorders. Of additional interest is the observation that psychological symptoms, particularly disturbances in mood and anxiety, are equally prominent in this condition.

At this time, several reports have provided replicated evidence of disruptions in the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. It is notable that the pattern of the alteration in the stress response apparatus is not reminiscent of the well-understood hypercortisolism of melancholic depression but, rather, suggests a sustained inactivation of central nervous system components of this system.

Recent work also implicates alterations in central serotonergic tone in the overall pathophysiology of this finding. The implications of these observations are far from clear, but they highlight the fact that, though chronic fatigue syndrome overlaps with the well-described illness category of major depression, these are not identical clinical conditions.

 

Source: Demitrack MA. Neuroendocrine correlates of chronic fatigue syndrome: a brief review. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):69-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9201649

 

An open study of the efficacy and adverse effects of moclobemide in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

There is a strong association between the chronic fatigue syndrome and both depressive illness and sleep disturbance, but the efficacy of antidepressants is uncertain. We studied the efficacy and adverse effects of moclobemide in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, stratifying the sample both by co-morbid major depressive illness and by sleep disturbance.

Forty-nine patients with chronic fatigue syndrome were recruited. Patients were given moclobemide up to 600 mg a day for 6 weeks. Four (8%) patients dropped out, three because of adverse effects. Adverse effects were otherwise mild and transient. On analysing the whole sample, there were significant but small reductions in fatigue, depression, anxiety and somatic amplification, as well as a modest overall improvement.

The greatest improvement occurred in those individuals who had a co-morbid major depressive illness, with seven out of 14 (50%) of such individuals rating themselves as “much better” by 6 weeks, compared to six out of 31 (19%) of those who were not depressed (31% difference, 95% CI 1-60%, P = 0.04). Sleep disturbance had no effect on outcome.

Moclobemide may be indicated in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and a co-morbid major depressive disorder. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed to confirm this. These results do not support moclobemide as an effective treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome in the absence of a major depressive disorder.

 

Source: White PD, Cleary KJ. An open study of the efficacy and adverse effects of moclobemide in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Jan;12(1):47-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9179634

 

Cognitive performance and complaints of cognitive impairment in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)

Abstract:

Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) complain that they have difficulties with concentration and memory but studies to date have not found consistent objective evidence of performance deficits.

Two groups of CFS patients, depressed and non-depressed, and healthy controls, were asked about concentration problems in general and specifically when reading. CFS subjects were more likely than controls to report that they had concentration problems when reading, that they needed to re-read text and that they failed to take in what they were reading.

Subjects then performed a task in which their reading behaviour and text recall was measured. While all CFS subjects complained of general cognitive failures and of difficulties with reading, only depressed CFS subjects recalled significantly less of the text than controls. Severity of complaints about reading problems was not related to amount of text recalled, but was related to severity of depressed mood. However, subjects were able to evaluate accurately their ability to remember the text immediately after reading it and before being tested for recall.

Additionally, subjects performed a paired-associate learning task on which no significant differences between the subject groups was found. It is concluded that deficits in cognitive functioning in CFS patients are more likely to be found on naturalistic than on laboratory tasks.

 

Source: Wearden A, Appleby L. Cognitive performance and complaints of cognitive impairment in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):81-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9122311

 

Cognitive slowing and working memory difficulties in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) commonly report problems with attention, memory, learning, and speed of cognitive processing. This study attempted to evaluate these complaints using objective test criteria.

METHOD: A test battery composed of six tests assessing these cognitive functions was given on two consecutive days. Twenty CFS patients were compared with 20 healthy control subjects and 14 patients with a history of major depression or dysthymia matched by age, intelligence, education level, and sex.

RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, CFS patients consistently scored lower on tests in which motor and cognitive processing speeds were a critical factor, eg, reaction-time tasks. They also had more difficulty on working-memory tests in which rapid cognitive processing speed is also an important factor. The effort made on the first day of testing did not result in a decline in cognitive function on the following day. CFS patients did not qualify as having affective disorder by several different diagnostic criteria. Nonetheless, CFS patients’ test performances did not differ from patients with a history of major depression or dysthymia.

CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, although CFS and major depression and dysthymia have distinct clinical features, these disorders have slowed motor and cognitive processing speed in common.

Comment in: Cognitive slowing in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) [Psychosom Med. 1997]

 

Source: Marshall PS, Forstot M, Callies A, Peterson PK, Schenck CH. Cognitive slowing and working memory difficulties in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;59(1):58-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9021867

 

Decreased postexercise facilitation of motor evoked potentials in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome or depression

Abstract:

We studied the effects of exercise on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in 18 normal (control) subjects, 12 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, and 10 depressed patients. Subjects performed repeated sets of isometric exercise of the extensor carpi radialis muscle until they were unable to maintain half maximal force.

MEPs were recorded before and after each exercise set and for up to 30 minutes after the last set. The mean amplitude of MEPs recorded from the resting muscle immediately after each exercise set was 218% of the mean pre-exercise MEP amplitude in normal subjects, 126% in chronic fatigue patients, and 155% in depressed patients, indicating postexercise MEP facilitation in all three groups. The increases in the patient groups, however, were significantly lower than normal.

The mean amplitudes of MEPs recorded within the first few minutes after the last exercise sets in all three groups were approximately half their mean pre-exercise MEP amplitudes. This postexercise MEP depression was similar in all groups. We conclude that postexercise cortical excitability is significantly reduced in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in depressed patients compared with that of normal subjects.

 

Source: Samii A, Wassermann EM, Ikoma K, Mercuri B, George MS, O’Fallon A, Dale JK, Straus SE, Hallett M. Decreased postexercise facilitation of motor evoked potentials in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome or depression. Neurology. 1996 Dec;47(6):1410-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8960719

 

Functional status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, other fatiguing illnesses, and healthy individuals

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a condition that may be associated with substantial disability. The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) is an instrument that has been widely used in outpatient populations to determine functional status. Our objectives were to describe the usefulness of the SF-36 in CFS patients and to determine if subscale scores could distinguish patients with CFS from subjects with unexplained chronic fatigue (CF), major depression (MD), or acute infectious mononucleosis (AIM), and from healthy control subjects (HC). An additional goal was to ascertain if subscale scores correlated with the signs and symptoms of CFS or the presence of psychiatric disorders and fibromyalgia.

DESIGN: Prospectively collected case series.

SETTING: Patients with CFS and CF were seen in a university-based referral clinic and had undergone a complete medical and psychiatric evaluation. Other study subjects were recruited from the community to participate in research studies.

PARTICIPANTS: The study included 185 patients with CFS, 246 with CF, 111 with AIM, and 25 with MD. There were 99 HC subjects.

MEASURES: The SF-36 and a structured psychiatric interview were used. The SF-36 contains 8 subscales: physical, emotional, social, and role functioning, body pain, mental health, vitality, and general health- and a structured psychiatric interview.

RESULTS: Performance characteristics (internal reliability coefficients, convergent validity) of the SF-36 were excellent. A strikingly consistent pattern was found for the physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, general health, and body pain subscales, with the lowest scores in CFS patients, intermediate scores in AIM patients, and the highest scores in the HC subjects. The CFS patients had significantly lower scores than patients with CF alone on the physical functioning (P < or = 0.01), role functioning (P < or = 0.01), and body pain (P < or = 0.001) subscales. The emotional functioning and mental health scores were worst among those with MD. The presence of fibromyalgia, being unemployed, and increasing fatigue severity all were associated with additional functional limitations across multiple functional domains, with increasing fatigue appearing to have the greatest effect.

CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 is useful in assessing functional status in patients with fatiguing illnesses. Patients with CFS and CF have marked impairment of their functional status. The severity and pattern of impairment as documented by the SF-36 distinguishes patients with CFS and CF from those with MD and AIM, and from HC, but does not discriminate between CF and CFS.

 

Source: Buchwald D, Pearlman T, Umali J, Schmaling K, Katon W. Functional status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, other fatiguing illnesses, and healthy individuals. Am J Med. 1996 Oct;101(4):364-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873506

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities

Abstract:

This article reviews the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a disorder whose etiology is unknown. The diagnostic criteria proposed in 1994 by the CDC and the International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group are introduced.

In contrast to widespread belief, there are no laboratory tests available to underpin the diagnosis of CFS; the diagnosis is made solely on the basis of clinical criteria. In the differential diagnosis, the exclusion of other conditions that can cause chronic fatigue, such as neuropsychiatric or sleep disorders, is of critical importance.

In this context, the question as to whether CFS is a clinical entity that can be differentiated from psychiatric diagnoses, such as depression, somatoform disorder, or neurasthenia, is discussed. At the moment, there is no specific therapy for CFS. Therefore, therapeutic approaches are limited to symptomatic management of the concomitant sleep disturbances, pain, or psychiatric symptoms, such as depression.

Patients may benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy, as this may help then to identify and exclude factors contributing to and maintaining chronic fatigue. An integrated medical and psychological approach should be adopted, with the aim of preventing significant secondary negative results of the illness, such as interpersonal conflicts or chronic disability.

Comment in: “Chronic fatigue syndrome“. Nervenarzt. 1997

 

Source: Lieb K, Dammann G, Berger M, Bauer J. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities. Nervenarzt. 1996 Sep;67(9):711-20. [Article in German] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8992368

 

Research on cognitive complaints and cognitive functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): What conclusions can we draw?

Abstract:

People with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) complain of difficulties with concentration and memory yet studies suggest that they do not suffer gross deficits in cognitive functioning. Depressed patients make similar cognitive complaints, and there is symptomatic overlap between CFS and depression.

Cognitive complaints and depressed mood are positively correlated in CFS patients but, except on tasks which are particularly sensitive to depression, cognitive performance and depression are not.

The inconsistency between cognitive complaints and results of tests of cognitive functioning resembles that found in other subject groups and may be due in part to the inappropriate use of laboratory memory tests for assessing “everyday” cognitive functioning.

Even when cognitive capacity is intact, cognitive performance may be affected by factors such as arousal, mood, and strategy. In CFS patients, everyday cognitive tasks may require excessive processing resources leaving patients with diminished spare attentional capacity or flexibility.

 

Source: Wearden AJ, Appleby L. Research on cognitive complaints and cognitive functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): What conclusions can we draw? J Psychosom Res. 1996 Sep;41(3):197-211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8910243

 

Health status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in general population and disease comparison groups

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To measure the functional status and well-being of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and compare them with those of a general population group and six disease comparison groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects of the study were patients with CFS (n = 223) from a CFS clinic, a population-based control sample (n = 2,474), and disease comparison groups with hypertension (n = 2,089), congestive heart failure (n = 216), type II diabetes mellitus (n = 163), acute myocardial infarction (n = 107), multiple sclerosis (n = 25), and depression (n = 502). We measured functional status and well-being using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which is a self-administered questionnaire in which lower scores are indicative of greater impairment.

RESULTS: Patients with CFS had far lower mean scores than the general population control subjects on all eight SF-36 scales. They also scored significantly lower than patients in all the disease comparison groups other than depression on virtually all the scales. When compared with patients with depression, they scored significantly lower on all the scales except for scales measuring mental health and role disability due to emotional problems, on which they scored significantly higher. The two SF-36 scales reflecting mental health were not correlated with any of the symptoms of CFS except for irritability and depression.

CONCLUSION: Patients with CFS had marked impairment, in comparison with the general population and disease comparison groups. Moreover, the degree and pattern of impairment was different from that seen in patients with depression.

 

Source: Komaroff AL, Fagioli LR, Doolittle TH, Gandek B, Gleit MA, Guerriero RT, Kornish RJ 2nd, Ware NC, Ware JE Jr, Bates DW. Health status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in general population and disease comparison groups. Am J Med. 1996 Sep;101(3):281-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873490

 

Depression in fatiguing illness: comparing patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis and depression

Abstract:

Because depression is commonly observed in the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), the present study sought to determine whether the symptom pattern is similar to that seen in clinically depressed subjects (DEP). Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) were chosen as an additional comparison group because MS is a fatiguing illness of known organic etiology. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to compare categories of depressive symptomatology.

Absolute scores on the BDI were higher for the depressed group on mood and self-reproach symptoms, but were not higher than the CFS group on somatic and vegetative items. Analysis of symptoms as a percentage of total BDI score revealed no significant differences in mood or vegetative items among the three groups. The CFS and MS groups exhibited a significantly lower percentage of self-reproach symptoms than DEP, whereas the DEP group showed a lower percentage of somatic symptoms than the CFS and MS groups.

 

Source: Johnson SK, DeLuca J, Natelson BH. Depression in fatiguing illness: comparing patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis and depression. J Affect Disord. 1996 Jun 20;39(1):21-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8835650