Inefficient energy consumption is related to post exertional malaise during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in long COVID

Abstract:

Background: Dyspnea, fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) are hallmark features of long Covid and emerging evidence suggests that abnormal energy metabolism may contribute to these symptoms. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) provides a detailed physiologic assessment of ventilatory and cardiovascular function and can offer insights into metabolic substrate utilization energy at rest and during exertion. Our aim was to evaluate patterns of energy metabolism at rest and during exercise during a CPET in patients with long Covid.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive non-selected patients that had been referred for a CPET. We included two groups: a long COVID and a control group. The CPET was performed on a cycle ergometer and we measured standard variables including oxygen uptake (V̇O₂), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), breathing reserve, heart rate, O2 pulse, and anaerobic threshold. We used RER to calculate indirect calorimetry estimating the use of carbohydrates and fat at rest and exertion. We analyzed the association between long COVID symptom severity symptoms including fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) with patterns of energy consumption. We used logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine which CPET variables were most associated with long COVID.

Results: CPET results were analyzed for 50 patients who met the definition of long COVID and 45 patients controls. Long COVID patients and controls had similar peak V̇O₂, heart rate on exertion and V̇O₂ at anaerobic threshold. Seventy-three percent of patients with long COVID had predominant energy use of carbohydrates rather than fat at rest compared to 20% of controls. In multivariable models the odds ratio of using fat as energy source at rest was 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–0.99; p = 0.04. Patients with long COVID and severe fatigue as well as severe PEM had higher usage of carbohydrates (p < 0.01) and similar use of fat.

Conclusion: Patients with long COVID use energy inefficiently and this pattern could serve as a diagnostic feature in certain presentations of long COVID.

Source: Leonardo Tamariz, Brian Garnet, Santiago Avecillas et al. Inefficient energy consumption is related to post exertional malaise during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in long COVID, 15 December 2025, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8072121/v1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-8072121/v1 (Full text)

Precision Medicine Study of Post-Exertional Malaise Epigenetic Changes in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Patients During Exercise

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a defining symptom of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), yet its molecular underpinnings remain elusive. This study investigated the temporal-longitudinal DNA methylation changes associated with PEM using a structured two-day maximum repeated effort cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) protocol involving pre- and two post-exercise blood samplings from five ME/CFS patients.

Cardiopulmonary measurements revealed complex heterogeneous profiles among the patients compared to typical healthy controls, and VO2 peak indicated all patients had poor normative fitness. The switch to anaerobic metabolism occurred at a lower workload in some patients on Day Two of the test. Reduced Representation Bisulphite Sequencing followed by analysis with Differential Methylation Analysis Package-version 2 (DMAP2) identified differentially methylated fragments (DMFs) present in the DNA genomes of all five ME/CFS patients through the exercise test compared with ‘before exercise’.

With further filtering for >10% methylation differences, there were early DMFs (0-24 h after first exercise test) and late DMFs between (24-48 h after the second exercise test), as well as DMFs that changed gradually (between 0 and 48 h). Of these, 98% were ME/CFS-specific, compared with the two healthy controls accompanying the longitudinal study. Principal component analysis illustrated the three distinct clusters at the 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h timepoints, but with heterogeneity among the patients within the clusters, highlighting dynamic methylation responses to exertion in individual patients.

There were 24 ME/CFS-specific DMFs at gene promoter fragments that revealed distinct patterns of temporal methylation across the timepoints. Functional enrichment of ME-specific DMFs revealed pathways involved in endothelial function, morphogenesis, inflammation, and immune regulation. These findings uncovered temporally dynamic epigenetic changes in stress/immune functions in ME/CFS during PEM and suggest molecular signatures with potential for diagnosis and of mechanistic significance.

Source: Sharma S, Hodges LD, Peppercorn K, Davis J, Edgar CD, Rodger EJ, Chatterjee A, Tate WP. Precision Medicine Study of Post-Exertional Malaise Epigenetic Changes in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Patients During Exercise. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 3;26(17):8563. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178563. PMID: 40943482. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/17/8563 (Full text)

Skeletal muscle properties in long COVID and ME/CFS differ from those induced by bed rest

Abstract:

Patients with long COVID and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) suffer from a reduced exercise capacity, skeletal muscle abnormalities and post-exertional malaise (PEM), where symptoms worsen with cognitive or physical exertion. PEM often results in avoidance of physical activity, resulting in a lower aerobic fitness, which may contribute to skeletal muscle abnormalities. Here, we compared whole-body exercise responses and skeletal muscle adaptations after strict 60-day bed rest in healthy people with those in patients with long COVID and ME/CFS, and healthy age- and sex-matched controls.

Bed rest altered the respiratory and cardiovascular responses to (sub)maximal exercise, while patients exhibited respiratory alterations only at submaximal exercise. Bed rest caused muscle atrophy, and the reduced oxidative phosphorylation related to reductions in maximal oxygen uptake.

Patients with long COVID and ME/CFS did not have muscle atrophy, but had less capillaries and a more glycolytic fibers, none of which were associated with maximal oxygen uptake. While the whole-body aerobic capacity is similar following bed rest compared to patients, the skeletal muscle characteristics differed, suggesting that physical inactivity alone does not explain the lower exercise capacity in long COVID and ME/CFS.

Source: Braeden T. CharltonAnouk SlaghekkeBrent AppelmanMoritz EggelbuschJelle Y. HuijtsWendy NoortPaul W. HendrickseFrank W. BloemersJelle J. PosthumaPaul van AmstelRichie P. GouldingHans DegensRichard T. JaspersMichèle van VugtRob C.I. Wüst. Skeletal muscle properties in long COVID and ME/CFS differ from those induced by bed rest.

Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment

Abstract:

Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a central feature of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and has emerged as a prominent feature of Long COVID. The optimal clinical approach to PEM is inconclusive, and studies of the impact of exercise have yielded contradictory results.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine PEM in Long COVID by assessing the prevalence of self-reported PEM across study cohorts and symptom responses of Long COVID patients to a standardized exercise stressor. Secondarily, Long COVID symptom responses to exercise were compared to those of ME/CFS and healthy volunteers.

Methods: Data from three registered clinical trials comprised four cohorts in this study: Long COVID Questionnaire Cohort (QC; n = 244), Long COVID Exercise Cohort (EC; n = 34), ME/CFS cohort (n = 9), and healthy volunteers (HV; n = 9). All cohorts completed questionnaires related to physical function, fatigue, and/or PEM symptoms. EC also performed a standardized exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET), and the PEM response to CPET was assessed using visual analog scales and qualitative interviews (QIs) administered serially over 72 h. EC PEM measures were compared to ME/CFS and HV cohorts. A secondary analysis of QI explored positive responses to CPET among EC, ME/CFS and HV.

Results: Self-reported PEM was 67% in QC and estimated at 27% in EC. Only 2 of 34 EC patients (5.9%) were observed to develop PEM after a CPET. In addition, PEM responses after CPET in Long COVID were not as severe and prolonged as those assessed in ME/CFS. Twenty-two of 34 EC patients (64.7%) expressed at least one of 7 positive themes after the CPET.

Conclusion: Self-report of PEM is common in Long COVID. However, observable PEM following an exercise stressor was not frequent in this small cohort. When present, PEM descriptions during QI were less severe in Long COVID than in ME/CFS. Positive responses after an exercise stressor were common in Long COVID. Exercise testing to determine the presence of PEM may have utility for guiding clinical management of Long COVID.

Source: Stussman B, Camarillo N, McCrossin G, Stockman M, Norato G, Vetter CS, Ferrufino A, Adedamola A, Grayson N, Nath A, Chan L, Walitt B, Chin LMK. Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1534352. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352. PMID: 40337174; PMCID: PMC12055772. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055772/ (Full text)

Exercise Pathophysiology in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID: Commonalities Detected by Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Rationale: There is substantial overlap of exertional symptoms in Long COVID (LC) and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) including intractable fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and orthostatic intolerance, but very little objective data liking the two. This study compares exercise pathophysiology in the two disorders and normal controls using invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).

Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2024, 1,518 patients underwent a clinical iCPET at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Exclusion criteria included morbid obesity (BMI>40 kg/m2), severe anemia ([Hb]<9.0 g/dL), elite athletes (peak VO(pVO2)>120% predicted), sub-maximum effort (RER<1.05), a primary pulmonary mechanical limit (VE @ AT/MVV>0.7), and comorbidities such as active/treated cancer, interstitial lung disease, or other respiratory related diseases. iCPET results from 438 ME/CFS patients, 73 LC patients, and 43 symptomatic but otherwise normal controls were analyzed. pV02, peak cardiac output (pQc), peak right atrial pressure (pRAP), peak systemic oxygen extraction (pSOE; Ca-vO2/[Hb]), and ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) were compared among groups. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis tests for global comparisons, with post-hoc Dunn tests for pairwise group comparisons. Holm-Bonferroni adjustments were applied to control for multiple comparisons.

Results: LC and ME/CFS displayed reduced pVO2 % predicted compared to controls (LC: 78.4 ± 18%, ME/CFS: 78.1 ± 17%, Controls: 97.5 ± 10%, P≤0.0001). Reduced pQc % predicted was also observed compared to controls (LC: 91.1 ± 18%, ME/CFS: 96.3%, Controls: 101 ± 11%, P≤0.001). pRAP were significantly less compared to controls (LC: 1.1 ± 3.1 mmHg, ME/CFS: 1.3 ± 2.8 mmHg, Controls: 3.6 ± 3.4 mmHg, P≤0.001). Significant reductions in pSOE were seen for LC and ME/CFS (LC: 0.81 ± 0.1, ME/CFS: 0.81 ± 0.1, Controls, 0.91 ± 0.1, P≤0.0001). The only measure with no significant difference between disease and control was VE/VCO2 slope (LC: 31.4 ± 8.4, ME/CFS: 31.6 ± 6.9, Controls: 32.0 ± 6.7, P≥0.261). Most interestingly, no significant differences were seen between the two diseases for any of the analyzed measures (P≥0.245).

Conclusions: We report the largest cohort of ME/CFS and LC investigated with iCPET to date. ME/CFS and LC share symptomatic, reduced aerobic capacity at peak exercise, which is driven by preload insufficiency and impaired systemic O2 extraction, the latter compatible with peripheral left-to-right shunting and/or limb skeletal muscle dysfunction. These findings should drive future diagnostics and personalized medicine in both diseases. We hope these data inform the pending prospective NIH RECOVER iCPET study of LC.

Source: J. SquiresS. PalwayiP. LiW. XiaoK. LeWineS.W. JohnsonD. FelsensteinA.B. Waxman, and D.M. Systrom. Exercise Pathophysiology in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID: Commonalities Detected by Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A7881. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/​10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A7881

Wearable heart rate variability monitoring identifies autonomic dysfunction and thresholds for post-exertional malaise in Long COVID

Abstract:

Objectives Patients with Long COVID experience disabling fatigue, autonomic dysfunction, reduced exercise capacity, and post-exertional malaise (PEM). Heart rate variability (HRV) can evaluate autonomic function and monitor overexertion, potentially helping to mitigate PEM. This study aimed to use continuous multi-day HRV recordings to monitor overexertion and study autonomic function in Long COVID.

Method Heart rate and HRV were continuously measured in 127 patients with long COVID (43±11 years, 32% male) and 21 healthy controls (42±13 years, 48% male), and daily life activities tracked in a logbook. Participants underwent a (sub)maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test to determine heart rate at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) to study HRV responses to exercise at different intensities.

Results HRV was lower in patients with long COVID compared to healthy controls during various daily activities and sleep (p<0.027). HRV remained lower for 24 hours after exercise below, at or above VT1 in patients, but not in healthy controls (p=0.010). Nighttime HRV decreased with intense exercise and longer durations in patients with long COVID (p=0.018), indicative of exercise-induced diurnal disturbances of the autonomic nervous system in long COVID.

Conclusion Heart rate variability, assessed by wearables, confirms autonomic dysfunction in patients with long COVID. The delayed recovery of the sympathovagal balance after exercise close and above to VT1 suggests that VT1 can be practically interpreted as a PEM threshold.

Application These results confirm the applicability of wearables to assess autonomic function and manage overexertion in long COVID patients.

What is already known on this topic Patients with long COVID often experience fatigue, autonomic dysfunction, and post-exertional malaise (PEM). HRV can be used as a non-invasive tool to measure autonomic function and recovery. Anecdotal evidence suggests lower HRV in patients with long COVID, but measurements are usually very short.

What this study adds This study demonstrates that continuous HRV monitoring through wearables can effectively identify overexertion and autonomic dysfunction during daily activities in patients with long COVID. Patients with long COVID have a lower heart rate variability during sleep and HRV remained significantly lower for a longer period after moderate-to-heavy exercise, that is generally associated with the induction of post-exertional malaise.

How this study might affect research, practice, or policy This study supports the use of wearables for assessing autonomic function and overexertion in daily life, helping patients with long COVID in pacing daily activities to mitigate symptoms of post-exertional malaise. HRV tracking after exercise shows that VT1 is a potential threshold for PEM. Sports physicians and physiotherapists can incorporate HRV biofeedback measures into pacing advice to patients. Additional research is needed to further investigate the effect of such an intervention.

Source: Twan RuijgtAnouk SlaghekkeAnneke EllensKasper W. JanssenRob C.I. Wüst.. Wearable heart rate variability monitoring identifies autonomic dysfunction and thresholds for post-exertional malaise in Long COVID.

The metabolic and physiologic impairments underlying long COVID associated exercise intolerance

Abstract:

Data from invasive CPET (iCPET) revealed long COVID patients have impaired systemic oxygen extraction (EO2), suggesting impaired mitochondrial ATP production. However, it remains uncertain whether the initial severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection has implications on EO2 and exercise capacity (VO2) nor has there been assessment of anerobic ATP generation in long COVID patients. iCPET was performed on 47 long COVID patients (i.e., full cohort; n = 8 with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection). ‘

In a subset of patients (i.e., metabolomic cohort; n = 26) metabolomics on venous and arterial blood samples during iCPET was performed. In the full cohort, long COVID patients exhibited reduced peak EO2 with reduced peak VO2 (90 ± 17% predicted) relative to cardiac output (118 ± 23% predicted). Peak VO2 [88% predicted (IQR 81% – 108%) vs. 70% predicted (IQR 64% – 89%); p = 0.02] and EO2 [0.59(IQR 0.53-0.62) vs. 0.53(IQR 0.50-0.48); p = 0.01) were lower in severe versus mild infection.

In the metabolomic cohort, 12 metabolites were significantly consumed, and 41 metabolites were significantly released (p-values < 0.05). Quantitative metabolomics demonstrated significant increases in inosine and succinate arteriovenous gradients during exercise. Peak VO2 was significantly correlated with peak venous succinate (r = 0.68; p = 0.0008) and peak venous lactate (r = 0.49; p = 0.0004). Peak EO2 and consequently peak VO2 impact long COVID patients in a severity dependent manner.

Exercise intolerance associated with long COVID is defined by impaired aerobic and anaerobic energy production. Peak venous succinate may serve as a potential biomarker in long COVID.

Source: Leitner BP, Joseph P, Quast AF, Ramirez MA, Heerdt PM, Villalobos JG, Singh I. The metabolic and physiologic impairments underlying long COVID associated exercise intolerance. Pulm Circ. 2024 Nov 13;14(4):e70009. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70009. PMID: 39544193; PMCID: PMC11560803. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11560803/ (Full text)

Two-Day Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Long COVID Post-Exertional Malaise Diagnosis

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID patients present with a myriad of symptoms that can include fatigue, exercise intolerance and post exertional malaise (PEM). Long COVID has been compared to other post viral syndromes, including myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), where a reduction in day 2 cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performance of a two-day CPET protocol is suggested to be a result of PEM. We investigated cardiopulmonary and perceptual responses to a two-day CPET protocol in Long COVID patients.

Methods: 15 Long COVID patients [n=7 females; mean (SD) age: 53(11) yr; BMI = 32.2(8.5) kg/m2] performed a pulmonary function test and two ramp-incremental CPETs separated by 24hr. CPET variables included gas exchange threshold (GET), V̇O2peak and WRpeak. Ratings of perceived dyspnoea and leg effort were recorded at peak exercise using the modified 0-10 Borg Scale. PEM (past six months) was assessed using the modified DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (mDSQ). One-sample t-tests were used to test significance of mean difference between days (p<0.05).

Results: mDSQ revealed PEM in 80% of patients. Lung function was normal. Responses to day 1 CPET were consistent with the presence of aerobic deconditioning in 40% of patients (V̇O2peak <80% predicted, in the absence of evidence of cardiovascular and pulmonary limitations). There were no differences between day-1 and day-2 CPET responses (all p>0.05).

Conclusion: Post exertional malaise symptoms in Long COVID patients, in the absence of differences in two-day CPET responses separated by 24hours, suggests that post-exertional malaise is not due to impaired recovery of exercise capacity between days.

Source: Gattoni C, Abbasi A, Ferguson C, Lanks CW, Decato TW, Rossiter HB, Casaburi R, Stringer WW. Two-Day Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Long COVID Post-Exertional Malaise Diagnosis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2024 Oct 25:104362. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2024.104362. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39490617. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824001551 (Full text)

Comparison of the muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients post-coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome with pulmonary involvement

Abstract:

Introduction: Pulmonary involvement is prevalent in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Arterial hypoxemia may reduce oxygen transferred to the skeletal muscles, possibly leading to impaired exercise capacity. Oxygen uptake may vary depending on the increased oxygen demand of the muscles during submaximal and maximal exercise.

Objective: This study aimed to compare muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients were included. Pulmonary function (spirometry), peripheral muscle strength (dynamometer), quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle oxygenation (Moxy® device), and submaximal exercise capacity (six-minute walk test (6-MWT)) were tested on the first day, maximal exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)) was tested on the second day. Physical activity level was evaluated using an activity monitor worn for five consecutive days. Cardiopulmonary responses and muscle oxygenation were compared during 6-MWT and CPET.

Results: Patients’ minimum and recovery muscle oxygen saturation were significantly decreased; maximum total hemoglobin increased, heart rate, blood pressure, breathing frequency, dyspnea, fatigue, and leg fatigue at the end-of-test and recovery increased in CPET compared to 6-MWT (p < .050). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was 18.15 ± 4.75 ml/min/kg, VO2peak; percent predicted < 80% was measured in 51.28% patients. Six-MWT distance and QF muscle strength were less than 80% predicted in 58.9% and 76.9% patients, respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement, muscle deoxygenation of QF is greater during maximal exercise than during submaximal exercise. Specifically, patients with lung impairment should be evaluated for deoxygenation and should be taken into consideration during pulmonary rehabilitation.

Source: Kavalcı Kol B, Boşnak Güçlü M, Baytok E, Yılmaz Demirci N. Comparison of the muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients post-coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome with pulmonary involvement. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Mar 12:1-14. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2327534. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38469863. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38469863/

Differential Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamic Phenotypes in PASC Related Exercise Intolerance

Abstract:

Background Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) affects a significant portion of patients who have previously contracted SARS-CoV-2, with exertional intolerance being a prominent symptom.

Study Objective This study aimed to characterize the invasive hemodynamic abnormalities of PASC-related exertional intolerance using a larger data set from invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).

Study Design & Intervention Fifty-five patients were recruited from the Yale Post-COVID-19-Recovery-Program, with most experiencing mild acute illness. Supine right heart catheterization (RHC) and iCPET were performed on all participants.

Main results The majority (75%) of PASC patients exhibited impaired peak systemic oxygen extraction (pEO2) during iCPET in conjunction with supranormal cardiac output (CO) (i.e., PASC alone group), On average, the PASC alone group exhibited a “normal” peak exercise capacity, VO2 (89±18% predicted). Approximately 25% of patients had evidence of central cardiopulmonary pathology (i.e., 12 with resting and exercise HFpEF and 2 with exercise PH). PASC patient with HFpEF (i.e., PASC HFpEF group) exhibited similarly impaired pEO2 with well compensated PH (i.e., peak VO2 and cardiac output >80% respectively) despite aberrant central cardiopulmonary exercise hemodynamics. PASC patients with HFpEF also exhibited increased body mass index of 39±7 kg·m−2. To examine the relative contribution of obesity to exertional impairment in PASC HFpEF, a control group compromising of obese non-PASC group (n=61) derived from historical iCPET cohort was used. The non-PASC obese patients with preserved peak VO2 (>80% predicted) exhibited a normal peak pulmonary artery wedge pressure (17±14 versus 25±6 mmHg; p=0.03) with similar maximal voluntary ventilation (90±12 versus 86±10%predicted; p=0.53) compared to PASC HFpEF patients. Impaired pEO2 was not significantly different between PASC patients who underwent supervised rehabilitation and those who did not (p=0.19).

Conclusions This study highlights the importance of considering impaired pEO2 in PASC patients with persistent exertional intolerance unexplained by conventional investigative testing. Results of current study also highlights the prevalence of a distinct high output failure HFpEF phenotype in PASC with a primary peripheral limitation to exercise.

Source: Peter A. Kahn, Phillip Joseph, Paul M. Heerdt, Inderjit Singh. Differential Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamic Phenotypes in PASC Related Exercise Intolerance. ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00714-2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00714-2023 https://openres.ersjournals.com/content/early/2023/12/07/23120541.00714-2023 (Full text available as PDF file)